Prediction of contacts from correlated sequence substitutions

Current Opinion in Structural Biology

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 473-479

  Taylor, William R ^a   Hamilton, Russell S ^b   Sadowski, Michael I ^a,c  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^c SYNTHACE LTD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BACTERIAL PROTEIN; MEMBRANE PROTEIN;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; AMINO ACID SUBSTITUTION; ENTROPY; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN RNA BINDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; REVIEW; RNA STRUCTURE; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; STRUCTURAL GENOMICS; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS;

ALGORITHMS; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; AMINO ACID SUBSTITUTION; AMINO ACIDS; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; HUMANS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEINS; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT;

EID: 84879158202     PISSN: 0959440X     EISSN: 1879033X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbi.2013.04.001     Document Type: Review

References (52)

1. Kendrew J.C., Watson H.C. Stabilizing interactions in globular proteins. Principles of Biomolecular Organization, Ciba Foundation Symposium 1966, J. and A. Churchill, London. G.E.W. Wolstenholme, M. O'Connor (Eds.).
2. Lesk A.M., Chothia C. How different amino acid sequences determine similar protein structures: the structure and evolutionary dynamics of the globins. J Molec Biol 1980, 136:225-270.
3. Altschuh D., Lesk A.M., Bloomer A.C., Klug A. Correlation of coordinated amino-acid substitutions with function in tobamoviruses. Protein Eng 1987, 1:228.
4. Altschuh D., Lesk A.M., Bloomer A.C., Klug A. Correlation of coordinated amino-acid substitutions with function in viruses related to tobacco mosaic-virus. J Molec Biol 1987, 193:693-707.
5. Vernet T., Tessier D.C., Khouri H.E., Altschuh D. Correlation of co-ordinated amino acid changes at the two-domain interface of cysteine proteases with protein stability. J Molec Biol 1992, 224:461-471.
6. Neher E. How frequent are correlated changes in families of protein sequences?. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994, 91:98-102.
7. Taylor W.R., Hatrick K. Compensating changes in protein multiple sequence alignments. Prot Engng 1994, 7:341-348.
8. Gobel U., Sander C., Schneider R., Valencia A. Correlated mutations and residue contacts in proteins. Prot Struct Funct Genet 1994, 18:309-317.
9. Pazos F., Helmer-Citterich M., Ausiello G., Valencia A. Correlated mutations contain information about protein-protein interaction. J Molec Biol 1997, 271:511-523.
10. Lockless S.W., Ranganathan R. Evolutionarily conserved pathways of energetic connectivity in protein families. Science 1999, 286:295-299.
11. Olmea O., Rost B., Valencia A. Effective use of sequence correlation and conservation in fold recognition. J Mol Biol 1999, 293:1221-1239.
12. Bartlett G.J., Taylor W.R. Using scores derived from statistical coupling analysis to distinguish correct and incorrect folds in de-novo protein structure prediction. Proteins: Struct Funct Bioinfo 2008, 71:950-959.
13. Suel G.M., Lockless S.W., Wall M.A., Ranganathan R. Evolutionarily conserved networks of residues mediate allosteric communication in proteins. Nat Struct Biol 2003, 10:59-69.
14. Dima R.I., Thirumalai D. Determination of network of residues that regulate allostery in protein families using sequence analysis. Protein Sci 2006, 15:258-268.
15. Socolich M., Lockless Steve W., Russ William P., Lee H., Gardner Kevin H., Ranganathan R. Evolutionary information for specifying a protein fold. Nature 2005, 437:512-518.
16. McLaughlin R.N., Poelwijk F.J., Raman A., Gosal W.S., Ranganthan R. The spatial architecture of protein function and adaptation. Nature 2012, 491:138-142.
17. Lapedes Alan S., Giraud B., Liu L.C., Stormo Gary D. Correlated mutations in models of protein sequences: phylogenetic and structural effects. Statistics in Molecular Biology and Genetics: Selected Proceedings of the Joint AMS-IMS-SIAM Summer Conference on Statistics in Molecular Biology 1996, vol. 33:236-256. Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Hayward, CA USA.
18. Henikoff S., Henikoff J.G. Performance evaluation of amino acid substitution matrices. Prot Struct Funct Genet 1993, 17:49-61.
19. Pollock D.D., Taylor W.R. Effectiveness of correlation analysis in identifying protein residues undergoing correlated evolution. Prot Engng 1997, 10:647-657.
20. Pollock D.D., Taylor W.R., Goldman N. Coevolving protein residues: maximum likelihood identification and relationship to structure. J Molec Biol 1999, 287:187-198.
21. Weigt M., White R.A., Szurmantc H., Hochc J.A., Hwa T. Identification of direct residue contacts in protein-protein interaction by message passing. PNAS 2009, 106:67-72.
22. Dunn S.D., Wahl L.M.G., Gloor B. Mutual information without the influence of phylogeny or entropy dramatically improves residue contact prediction. Bioinformatics 2008, 24:333-340.
23. Burger L., van E., Nimwegen Disentangling direct from indirect co-evolution of residues in protein alignments. PLoS Comp Biol 2010, 6:1-17.
24. Lauritzen S.L. Graphical Models 1996, Oxford Statistical Science Series, OUP.
25. Sadowski M.I., Maksimiak K., Taylor W.R. Direct correlation analysis improves fold recognition. Comp Biol Chem 2011, 35:323-332.
26. Friedman J., Hastie T., Tibshirani R. Sparse inverse covarience estimation with the graphical lasso. Biostatistics 2008, 9:432-441.
27. Weigt M., White R.A., Szurmantc H., Hochc J.A., Hwa T. Identification of direct residue contacts in protein-protein interaction by message passing. PNAS 2009, 106:67-72.
28. Taylor W.R., Sadowski M.I. Structural constraints on the covariance matrix derived from multiple aligned protein sequences. PLoS One 2011, 6:e28265.
29. Jones David T., Buchan Daniel W.A., Cozzetto D., Pontil M. PSICOV: precise structural contact prediction using sparse inverse covariance estimation on large multiple sequence alignments. Bioinformatics 2012, 28:184-190.
30. Taylor W.R., Jones D.T., Sadowski M.I. Protein topology from predicted residue contacts. Prot Sci 2012, 21:299-305.
31. Marks Debora S., Colwell Lucy J., Sheridan R., Hopf Thomas A., Pagnani A., Zecchina R., Sander C. Protein 3D structure computed from evolutionary sequence variation. PLoS One 2011, 6:e28766.
32. Morcos F., Pagnani A., Lunt B., Bertolino A., Marks Debora S., Sander C., Zecchina R., Onuchic José N., Hwa T., Weigt M. Direct-coupling analysis of residue coevolution captures native contacts across many protein families. PNAS 2012, 108:E1293-E1301.
33. Sulkowska Joanna I., Morcos F., Weigt M., Hwa T., Onuchic J.N. Genomics-aided structure prediction. PNAS 2012, 109:10340-10345.
34. Hopf Thomas A., Colwell Lucy J., Sheridan R., Rost B., Sander C., Marks Debora S. Three-dimensional structures of membrane proteins from genomic sequencing. Cell 2012, 149:1607-1621.
35. Nugent T., Jones D.T. Accurate de novo structure prediction of large transmembrane protein domains using fragment-assembly and correlated mutation analysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012, 109:1540-1547.
36. Flock T., Venkatakrishnan A.J., Vinothkumar K.R., Madan Babu M. Deciphering membrane protein structures from protein sequences. Genome Biol 2012, 13:160.
37. Marks Debora S., Hopf Thomas A., Sander C. Protein structure prediction from sequence variation. Nature Biotech 2012, 11:1072-1080. Perspective.
38. Sadowski M.I. Prediction of protein domain boundaries from inverse covariences. Proteins 2012, 10.1002/prot.24181.
39. Russell S., Hamilton G., Ball I.Davis A multidisciplinary approach to RNA localisation. Biophysical Approaches to Translational Control of Gene Expression 2013, 213-233. Springer.
40. Zuker M. Calculating nucleic acid secondary structure. Curr Opin Struct Biol June 2000, 10:303-310.
41. Lorenz R., Bernhart Stephan H., Hoener zu Siederdissen C., Tafer H., Flamm C., Stadler Peter F., Hofacker Ivo L. ViennaRNA Package 2.0. Algorithms Mol Biol 2011, 6:26.
42. Hamilton Russell S., Davis I. Identifying and searching for conserved RNA localisation signals. Methods Mol Biol (Clifton, NJ) 2011, 714:447-466.
43. Gardner Paul P., Giegerich R. A comprehensive comparison of comparative RNA structure prediction approaches. BMC Bioinformatics 2004, 5.
44. Nawrocki Eric P., Kolbe Diana L., Eddy Sean R. Infernal 1.0: inference of RNA alignments. Bioinformatics 2009, 25:1335-1337.
45. Knudsen B., Hein J. RNA secondary structure prediction using stochastic context-free grammars and evolutionary history. Bioinformatics 1999, 15:446-454.
46. Abu Almakarem A.S., Petrov A.I., Stombaugh J., Zirbel C.L., Leontis N.B. Comprehensive survey and geometric classification of base triples in RNA structures. Nucleic Acids Res 2012, 40:1407-1423.
47. Ren J.H., Rastegari B., Condon A., Hoos Holger H. HotKnots: heuristic prediction of RNA secondary structures including pseudoknots. RNA (New York, NY) 2005, 11:1494-1504.
48. Lyngsø Rune B., Pedersen Christian N.S. RNA pseudoknot prediction in energy-based models. J Comput Biol 2000, 7:409-427.
49. Cruz J.A., Westhof E. Sequence-based identification of 3D structural modules in RNA with RMDetect. Nat Methods 2011, 8:513-519.
50. Shang L., Xu W., Ozer S., Gutell Robin R. Structural constraints identified with covariation analysis in ribosomal RNA. PLoS One 2012, 7:e39383.
51. Parisien M., Marc F. The MC-fold and MC-Sym pipeline infers RNA structure from sequence data. Nature 2008, 452:51-55.
52. Cruz J.A., Blanchet M.F., Boniecki M., Bujnicki Janusz M., Chen S-J., Cao S., Das R., Ding F., Dokholyan Nikolay V., Flores S.C., Huang L., Lavender Christopher A., Lisi V., Major F., Mikolajczak K., Patel Dinshaw J., Philips A., Puton T., Santalucia J., Sijenyi F., Hermann T., Rother K., Rother M., Serganov A., Skorupski M., Soltysinski T., Sripakdeevong P., Tuszynska I., Weeks Kevin M., Waldsich C., Wildauer M., Leontis Neocles B., Westhof E. RNA-puzzles: a CASP-like evaluation of RNA three-dimensional structure prediction. RNA (New York, NY) 2012, 18:610-625.