Using scores derived from statistical coupling analysis to distinguish correct and incorrect folds in de-novo protein structure prediction

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 71, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 950-959

  Bartlett, Gail J ^a   Taylor, William R ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Alpha beta alpha proteins; Bioinformatics; De novo protein structure prediction; Fold discrimination; Statistical coupling analysis

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS;

MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; PROTEINS; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; THIOREDOXINS;

EID: 41149161782     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.21779     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Bradley P, Misura KM, Baker D. Toward high-resolution de novo structure prediction for small proteins. Science 2005;309:1868-1871. (doi:10.1126/science. 1113801.)
2. Neher E. How frequent are correlated changes in families of protein sequences? Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994;91:98-102.
3. Gobel U, Sander C, Schneider R, Valencia A. Correlated mutations and residue contacts in proteins. Proteins 1994;18:309-317. (doi:10.1002/prot. 340180402.)
4. Hatrick K, Taylor W. Sequence conservation and correlation measures in protein structure prediction. Comput Chem 1994;18:245-250.
5. Pollock D, Taylor W. Effectiveness of correlation analysis in identifying protein residues undergoing correlated mutation. Prot Eng 1997;10:647-657.
6. Shindyalov IN, Kolchanov NA, Sander C. Can three-dimensional contacts in protein structures be predicted by analysis of correlated mutations? Prot Eng 1994;7:349-358.
7. Thomas DJ, Casari G, Sander C. The prediction of protein contacts from multiple sequence alignments. Prot Eng 1996;9:941-948.
8. Pollock D, Taylor W, Goldman N. Coevolving protein residues: maximum likelihood identification and relationship to structure. J Mol Biol 1999;287:187-198.
9. Singer MS, vriend G, Bywater RP. Prediction of protein residue contacts with a PDB-derived likelihood matrix. Prot Eng 2002;15:721-725.
10. Ortiz AR, Kolinski A, Rotkiewicz P, Ilkowski B, Skolnick J. Ab initio folding of proteins using restraints derived from evolutionary information. Proteins 1999;3:177-185.
11. Aszdi A, Gradwell MJ, Taylor WR. Global fold determination from a small number of distance restraints. J Mol Biol 1995;251:308-326 (doi:10.1006/jmbi. 1995.0436).
12. Olmea O, Rost B, Valencia A. Effective use of sequence correlation and conservation in fold recognition. J Mol Biol 1999;293:1221-1239. (doi:10.1006/jmbi.1999.3208).
13. Pazos F, Valencia A. In silico two-hybrid system for the selection of physically interacting protein pairs. Prot Struct Funct Genet 2002;47:219-227.
14. Halperin I, Wolfson H, Nussinov R. Correlated mutations: advances and limitations, a study on fusion proteins and on the cohesin-dockerin families. Prot Struct Funct Bioinf 2006;63:832-845.
15. Fleishman SJ, Yifrach O, Ben-Tal N. An evolutionary conserved network of amino acids mediates gating in voltage-dependent potassium channels. J Mol Biol 2004;340:307-318.
16. Fodor AA, Aldrich RA. On evolutionary conservation of thermodnamic coupling in proteins. J BiolChem 2004;279:19046-19050.
17. Noivirt O, Eisenstein M, Horovitz A. Detection and reduction of evolutionary noise in correlated mutation analysis. Prot Eng Des Sel 2005;18:247-253.
18. Wang B, Chen P, Huang D, Li J, Lok T, Lyu MR. Predicting protein interaction sites from residue spatial sequence profile and evolution rate. FEBS Lett 2006;580:380-384.
19. Lockless SW, Ranganathan R. Evolutionarily conserved pathways of energetic connectivity in protein families. Science 1999;286:295-299.
20. Suel GM, Lockless SW, Wall MA, Ranganathan R. Evolutionarily conserved networks of residues mediate allosteric communication in proteins. Nat Struct Biol 2003;10:59-69 (doi:10.1038/nsb881).
21. Dima RI, Thirumalai D. Determination of network of residues that regulate allostery in protein families using sequence analysis. Prot Sci 2006;15:258-268. (doi:10.1110/ps.051767306).
22. Socolich M, Lockless SW, Russ WP, Lee H, Gardner KH, Ranganathan R. Evolutionary information for specifying a protein fold. Nature 2005; 437:512-518. (doi:10.1038/nature03991).
23. Finn RD, Mistry J, Schuster-Bckler B, Griffiths-Jones S, Hollich V, Lassman T, Moxon S, Marshall M, Khanna A, Durbin R, Eddy SR, Sonnhammer EL, Bateman A. Pfam: clans, web tools and services. Nucleic Acids Res 2006;34:D247-D251.
24. Edgar RC. Muscle: a multiple sequence alignment method with reduced time and space complexity. BMC Bioinformatics 2004;5:113-132(doi:10.1186/1471-2105-5- 113).
25. Taylor WR, Bartlett GJ, Chelliah V, Klose D, Lin K, Sheldon T, Jonassen I, Prediction of protein structure from ideal forms. Proteins, in press.
26. Taylor WR. Protein structure comparison using bipartite graph matching and its application to protein structure classification. Mol Cell Proteomics 2002;1:334-339.
27. Taylor WR. Protein fold refinement: building models from idealized folds using motif constraints and multiple sequence data. Protein Eng 1993;6:593-604.
28. Jonassen I, Klose D, Taylor WR. Protein model refinement using structural fragment tessellation. Comput Biol Chem 2006;30:360-366. (doi:10.1016/j. compbiolchem.2006.08.002).
29. Taylor WR, Lin K, Klose D, Fraternali F, Jonassen I. Dynamic domain threading. Proteins 2006;64:601-614. (doi:10.1002/prot.20915).
30. Taylor WR, Jonassen I. A structural pattern-based method for protein fold recognition. Proteins 2004;56:222-234 (doi:10.1002/prot.20073).
31. Lin K, May AC, Taylor WR. Threading using neural networks (TUNE): the measure of protein sequence-structure compatibility. Bioinformatics 2002;18:1350-1357.
32. Lin K, Taylor WR, Klienjung J, Heringa J. CAO matrices from an artificial neural network model. J Comput Biol Chem 2003;27:93-102.
33. Sayle RA, White MEJ. RASMOL: biomolecular graphics for all. Trends Biochem Sci 1995;20:374-376.