Effective use of sequence correlation and conservation in fold recognition

Journal of Molecular Biology

Volumn 293, Issue 5, 1999, Pages 1221-1239

  Olmea, Osvaldo ^a   Rost, Burkhard ^b   Valencia, Alfonso ^a  

^a CENTRO NACIONAL DE BIOTECNOLOGÍA   (Spain)

^b Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

Author keywords

Conservation; Contact prediction; Correlation; Incorrectly folded models; Threading

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CORRELATION FUNCTION; GENETIC CONSERVATION; GENETIC PROCEDURES; MOLECULAR RECOGNITION; MUTATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FAMILY; PROTEIN FOLDING; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY;

EID: 0033550256     PISSN: 00222836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1999.3208     Document Type: Article

References (89)

1. Abagyan R., Totrov M., Kuznetsov D. ICM-a new method for protein modeling and design: applications to docking and structure prediction from the distorted native conformation. J. Comput. Chem. 15:1994;488-506.
2. Altschuh D., Lesk A. M., Bloomer A. C., Klug A. Correlation of co-ordinated amino acid substitutions with function in viruses related to tobacco mosaic virus. J. Mol. Biol. 193:1987;693-707.
3. Altschuh D., Vernet T., Moras D., Nagai K. Coordinated amino acid changes in homologous protein families. Protein Eng. 2:1988;193-199.
4. Andrade M. A., Casari G., Sander C., Valencia A. Classification of protein families and detection of the determinant residues with an improved self-organizing map. Biol. Cybern. 76:1997;441-450.
5. Artymiuk P. J., Grindley H. M., Kumar K., Rice D. W., Willett D. W. Three-dimensional structural resemblance between the ribonuclease H and connection domain of HIV reverse transcriptase and the ATPase fold revealed using graph theoretical techniques. FEBS Letters. 324:1993;15-21.
6. Bairoch A. PROSITE: a dictionary of sites and patterns in proteins. Nucl. Acids Res. 20:1992;2013-2018.
7. Benner S. A. Patterns of divergence in homologous proteins as indicators of tertiary and quaternary structure. Advan. Enzyme Regul. 28:1989;219-236.
8. Benner S. A., Gerloff D. Patterns of divergence in homologous proteins as indicators of secondary and tertiary structure: a prediction of the structure of the catalytic domain of protein kinases. Advan. Enzyme Regul. 31:1991;121-181.
9. Bork P. Recognition of functional regions in primary structures using a set of property patterns. FEBS Letters. 257:1989;191-195.
10. Bork P., Gellerich J., Groth H., Hooft R., Martin F. Divergent evolution of a b/a barrel subclass: detection of numerous phosphate-binding sites by motif search. Protein Sci. 4:1995;268-274.
11. Bowie D., Clarke N. D., Pabo C. O., Sauer R. T. Identification of protein folds: matching hydrophobicity patterns of sequence sets with solvent accessibility patterns of known structures. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 7:1990;257-264.
12. Bryant S. H., Amzel L. M. Correctly folded proteins make twice as many hydrophobic contacts. J. Int. Pept. Protein Res. 29:1987;46-52.
13. Casari G., Sander C., Valencia A. A method to predict functional residues in proteins. Nature Struct. Biol. 2:1995;171-178.
14. Chelvanayagam G., Eggenschwiler A., Knecht L., Gonnet G. H., Benner S. A. An analysis of simultaneous variation in protein structures. Protein Eng. 10:1997;307-316.
15. Clark D. A., Shirazi J., Rawlings C. J. Protein topology prediction through constraint-based search and the evaluation of topological folding rules. Protein Eng. 4:1991;751-760.
16. Cooperman B. S., Baykov A. A., Lahti R. Evolutionary conservation of the active site of soluble inorganic pyrophosphatase. Trends Biochem. Sci. 17:1992;262-266.
17. Defay T. R., Cohen F. E. Multiple sequence information for threading algorithms. J . Mol. Biol. 262:1996;314-323.
18. Fariselli P., Casadio R. A neural network based predictor of residue contacts in proteins. Protein Eng. 12:1999;15-21.
19. Fisher D., Eisenberg D. Protein fold recognition using sequence-derived predictions. Protein Sci. 5:1996;947-955.
20. Gabrielian A. E., Ivanov V. S., Kozhich A. T. On searching for the active sites in proteins and peptide hormones. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 6:1990;1-2.
21. Galaktionov S. G., Marshall G. R. Properties of intraglobular contacts in proteins: An approach to prediction of tertiary structure. Waileas H. L. 27th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. 1994;326-335 IEEE Society Press.
22. Galaktionov S. G., Rodionov M. A. Calculation of the tertiary structure of proteins on the basis of analysis of the matrices of contacts between amino acid residues. Biophysics. 25:1981;395-403.
23. Göbel U., Sander C., Schneider R., Valencia A. Correlated mutations and residue contacts in proteins. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 18:1994;309-317.
24. Godzik A., Sander C. Conservation of residue interactions in a family of Ca-binding proteins. Protein Eng. 2:1989;589-596.
25. Gregoret L. M., Cohen F. E. Novel method for the rapid evaluation of packing in protein structures. J. Mol. Biol. 211:1990;959-974.
26. Gribskov M., McLachlan M., Eisenberg D. Profile analysis: detection of distantly related proteins. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 84:1987;4355-4358.
27. Hendlich M., Lackner P., Weitckus S., Floeckner H., Froschauer R., Gottsbacher K., Casari G., Sippl M. J. Identification of native protein folds amongst a large number of incorrect models. The calculation of low energy conformations from potentials of mean force. J. Mol. Biol. 216:1990;167-180.
28. Hobohm U., Scharf M., Schneider R., Sander C. Selection of representative protein data sets. Protein Sci. 1:1992;409-417.
29. Holm L., Sander C. Evaluation of protein models by atomic solvation preference. J. Mol. Biol. 225:1992;93-105.
30. Holm L., Sander C. Protein structure comparison by alignment of distance matrices. J. Mol. Biol. 233:1993;123-138.
31. Holm L., Sander C. Searching protein structure databases has come of age. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 19:1994;165-173.
32. Holm L., Sander C. DNA polymerase beta belongs to an ancient nucleotidyltransferase superfamily. Trends Biochem. Sci. 20:1995;45-347.
33. Holm L., Sander C. The FSSP database: fold classification based on structure-structure alignment of proteins. Nucl. Acids Res. 24:1996;206-210.
34. Holm L., Sander C., Murzin A. Three sisters, different names. Nature Struct. Biol. 1:1994;146-147.
35. Howell N. Evolutionary conservation of protein regions in the protonmotive cytochrome b and their possible roles in redox catalysis. J. Mol. Evol. 29:1989;157-169.
36. Huang E. S., Subbiah S., Levitt M. Recognizing native folds by the arrangament of hydrophobic and polar residues. J. Mol. Biol. 252:1995;709-720.
37. Huang E. S., Subbiah S., Tsai J., Levitt M. Using a hydrophobic contact potential to evaluate native and near-native folds generated by molecular simulations. J. Mol. Biol. 257:1996;716-725.
38. Hubbard T. J. L., Blundell T. L. Comparison of solvent-inaccessible cores of homologous proteins: definitions useful for protein modelling. Protein Eng. 1:1987;159-171.
39. Hubbard T. J., Park J. Fold recognition and ab initio structure predictions using hidden Markov models and β-strand pair potentials. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 23:1995;398-402.
40. Hwang P. K., Fletterick R. J. Convergent and divergent evolution of regulatory sites in eukaryotic phosphorylases. Nature. 234:1986;80-83.
41. Jones D. T., Taylor W. R., Thornton J. M. A new approach to protein fold recognition. Nature. 358:1992;86-89.
42. Juffer A. H., Eisenhaber F., Hubbard S. J., Walther D., Argos P. Comparison of atomic solvation parametric sets: applicability and limitations in protein folding and binding. Protein Sci. 4:1995;2499-2509.
43. Koonin E. V., Tatusov R. L., Rudd K. E. Protein sequence comparison at genome scale. Methods Enzymol. 266:1996;295-322.
44. Lapedes A. S., Giraud B. G., Liu L. C., Stormo G. D. Correlated mutations in protein sequences: phylogenetic and structural effects. AMS/SIAM Conference on Statistics and Molecular Biology. 1997.
45. Lichtarge O., Bourne H. R., Cohen F. E. An evolutionary trace method defines binding surfaces common to protein families. J. Mol. Biol. 257:1996;342-358.
46. Livingstone C. D., Barton G. J. Protein sequence alignments: a strategy for the hierarchical analysis of residue conservation. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 6:1993;645-756.
47. Lund O., Frimand K., Gorodkin J., Bohr H., Bohr J., Hansen J., Brunak S. Protein distance constraints predicted by neural networks and probability density functions. Protein Eng. 10:1997;1241-1248.
48. Lüthy R., Bowie J. U., Eisenberg D. Assessment of protein models with three-dimensional profiles. Nature. 356:1992;83-85.
49. Maiorov V. N., Crippen G. M. Contact potential that recognizes the correct folding of globular proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 227:1992;876-888.
50. Mauzy C. A., Hermodson M. A. Structural homology between rbs repressor and ribose binding protein implies functional similarity. Protein Sci. 1:1992;843-849.
51. Mclachlan A. D. Test for comparing related amino acid sequences. J. Mol. Biol. 61:1971;409-424.
52. Murzin A. G. Structural classification of proteins: new superfamilies. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 6:1996;386-394.
53. Neher E. How frequent are correlated changes in families of protein sequences? Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 91:1994;98-102.
54. Novotny J., Bruccoleri R. E., Karplus M. An analysis of incorrectly folded models. Implications for structure prediction. J. Mol. Biol. 177:1984;787-818.
55. Novotny J., Rashin A. A., Bruccoleri R. E. Criteria that discriminate between native proteins and incorrectly folded models. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 4:1988;19-30.
56. Olmea O., Valencia A. Improving contact predictions by the combination of correlated mutations and other sources of sequence information. Fold. Des. 2:1997;S25-S32.
57. Ortiz A. R., Kolinski A., Skolnick J. Fold assembly of small proteins using monte carlo simulations driven by restraints derived from multiple sequence alignments. J. Mol. Biol. 277:1998a;419-448.
58. Ortiz A. R., Kolinski A., Skolnick J. Nativelike topology assembly of small proteins using predicted restraints in Monte Carlo folding simulations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 95:1998b;1020-1025.
59. Ouzounis C., Sander C., Scharf M., Schneider R. Prediction of protein structure by evaluation of sequence-structure fitness: aligning sequences to contact profiles derived from three-dimensional structures. J. Mol. Biol. 232:1993;805-825.
60. Ouzounis C., Perez-Irratxeta C., Sander C., Valencia A. Are binding residues conserved? Hunter L. Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. 1998;399-410 World Scientist, Hawaii.
61. Pastore A., Lesk A. M. Comparison of the structures of globins and phycocyanins: evidence for evolutionary relationship. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 8:1990;133-155.
62. Pazos F., Helmer-Citterich M., Ausiello G., Valencia A. Correlated mutations contain information about protein-protein interaction. J. Mol. Biol. 272:1997a;1-13.
63. Pazos F., Olmea O., Valencia A. A graphical interface for correlated mutations and other structure prediction methods. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 13:1997b;319-321.
64. Pazos F., Sanchez-Pulido L., García-Ranea J. A., Andrade M. A., Atrian S., Valencia A. Comparative analysis of different methods for the detection of specificity regions in protein families. Lund D. et al. Biocomputing and Emergent Computation. 1997c;132-145 World Scientific, Singapore, New Jersey, London.
65. Pollock D. D., Taylor W. R. Effectiveness of correlation analysis in identifying protein residues undergoing correlated evolution. Protein Eng. 10:1997;647-657.
66. Pollock D. D., Taylor W. R., Goldman N. Coevolving protein residues: maximum likelihood identification and relationship to structure. J. Mol. Biol. 287:1999;187-198.
67. Rooman M. J., Wodak S. J. Extracting information on folding from the amino acid sequence: consensus regions with preferred conformation in homologous proteins. Biochemistry. 31:1992;10239-10249.
68. Rooman M. J., Kocher J.-P. A., Wodak S. J. Extracting information on folding from the amino acid sequence: accurate predictions for protein regions with preferred conformation in the absence of tertiary interactons. Biochemistry. 31:1992;10226-10238.
69. Rost B. TOPITS: threading one-dimensional predictions into three-dimensional structures. Rawlings C., Clark D., Altman R., Hunter L., Lengauer T., Wodak S. Third International Conference on Intelligent Systems for Molecular Biology. 1995;314-321 AAAI PressMenlo Park, CA, Cambridge.
70. Rost B., Sander C. Conservation and prediction of solvent accessibility in protein families. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 20:1994;216-226.
71. Rost B., Schneider R., Sander C. Protein fold recognition by prediction-based threading. J. Mol. Biol. 270:1997;471-480.
72. Sander C., Schneider R. The HSSP data base of protein structure-sequence alignments. Nucl. Acids Res. 21:1993;3105-3109.
73. Shindyalov I. N., Kolchanov N. A., Sander C. Can three-dimensional contacts in protein structures be predicted by analysis of correlated mutations. Protein Eng. 7:1994;349-358.
74. Singer M. S., Oliveira L., Vriend G., Shepherd G. M. Potential ligand-binding residues in rat olfactory receptors identified by correlated mutation analysis. Recept. Chann. 3:1995;89-95.
75. Sippl M. J. Knowledge-based potentials for proteins. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 5:1995;229-235.
76. Sippl M. J., Weitckus S. Detection of native-like models for amino acid sequences of unknown three-dimensional structure in a data base of known protein conformations. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 13:1992;258-271.
77. Smith R. F., Smith T. F. Pattern-induced multi-sequence alignment (PIMA) algorithm employing secondary structure-dependent gap penalties for use in comparative protein modelling. Protein Eng. 5:1992;35-41.
78. Sticht H., Willbold D., Ejchart A., Rosin-Arbesfeld R., Yaniv A., Gazit A., Rösch P. Trifluoroethanol stabilizes a helix-turn-helix motif in equine infectious-anemina-virus trans-activator protein. Eur. J. Biochem. 225:1994;855-861.
79. Taylor W. R. Towards protein tertiary fold prediction using distance and motif constraints. Protein Eng. 4:1991;853-870.
80. Taylor W. R., Harrick K. Compensating changes in protein multiple sequence alignments. Protein Eng. 7:1994;342-348.
81. Thanki N., Umrania Y., Thornton J. M., Goodfellow J. M. Analysis of protein main-chain solvation as a function of secondary structure. J. Mol. Biol. 221:1991;669-691.
82. Thomas D., Casari G., Sander G. The prediction of protein contacts from multiple sequence alignments. Protein Eng. 9:1996;941-948.
83. Thompson J. D., Higgins D. G., Gibson T. J. Improved sensitivity of profile searches through the use of sequence weights and gap excision. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 10:1994;19-29.
84. Valencia A., Hubbard T. J., Muga A., Bañuelos S., Llorca O., Carrascosa J. L., Valpuesta J. M. Prediction of the structure of GroES and its interaction with GroEL. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 22:1995;199-209.
85. Vriend G. WHAT IF: a molecular modelling and drug design program. J. Mol. Graph. 8:1990;52-56.
86. Willbold D., Rosin-Arbesfeld R., Sticht H., Frank R., Rösch P. Structure of the equine infectious anemia virus Tat protein. Science. 264:1994;1584-1587.
87. Wodak S. J., Rooman M. J. Generating and testing protein folds. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 3:1993;247-259.
88. Zuckerkandl E., Pauling L. Evolutionary divergence and convergence in proteins. Bryson V., Vogel H. J. Evolving Genes And Proteins. 1965;97-166 Academic Press, New York.
89. Zvelebil M. J., Barton G. J., Taylor W. R., Sternberg M. J. E. Prediction of protein secondary structure and active sites using alignment of homologous sequences. J. Mol. Biol. 195:1987;957-961.