Introgression of wing pattern alleles and speciation via homoploid hybridization in Heliconius butterflies: A review of evidence from the genome

Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 280, Issue 1752, 2013, Pages

  Brower, Andrew V Z ^a  

^a MIDDLE TENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Ecological speciation; Gene flow; Homoploid hybrid speciation; Magic traits; M llerian mimicry; Population genomics

Indexed keywords

ALLELE; APOSEMATISM; ASSORTATIVE MATING; BUTTERFLY; GENE FLOW; GENOME; GENOMICS; HYBRIDIZATION; INTROGRESSION; MIMICRY; NEOTROPICAL REGION; SPECIATION (BIOLOGY); WING MORPHOLOGY;

HELICONIUS; HELICONIUS MELPOMENE; NYMPHALIDAE; PAPILIONOIDEA;

EID: 84879045359     PISSN: 09628452     EISSN: 14712954     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2012.2302     Document Type: Article

References (115)

1. Eltringham H. 1916 On specific and mimetic relationships in the genus Heliconius L. Trans. Entomol. Soc. Lond. 1916, 101-148.
2. Emsley MG. 1964 The geographical distribution of the color-pattern componenents of Heliconius erato and Heliconius melpomene with genetical evidence for the systematic relationship between the two species. Zool. NY 49, 245-286.
3. Brown Jr KS. 1979 Ecologia geográfica e evolução nas florestas neotropicais. Campinas, Brazil: Universidade Estadual de Campinas.
4. Sheppard PM, Turner JRG, Brown KS, Benson WW, Singer MC. 1985 Genetics and the evolution of Muellerian mimicry in Heliconius butterflies. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 308, 433-613. (doi:10.1098/ rstb.1985.0066)
5. Brower AVZ. 1996 Parallel race formation and the evolution of mimicry in Heliconius butterflies: a phylogenetic hypothesis from mitochondrial DNA sequences. Evolution 50, 195-221. (doi:10.2307/2410794)
6. Darwin C. 1859 On the origin of species. London, UK: John Murray.
7. Mallet J, Beltrán M, Neukirchen W, Linares M. 2007 Natural hybridization in heliconiine butterflies: the species boundary as a continuum. BMC Evol. Biol. 7, 28. (doi:10.1186/1471-2148-7-28)
8. Salazar CA, Baxter SW, Pardo-Diaz C, Wu G, Surridge A, Linares M, Bermingham E, Jiggins CD. 2010 Genetic evidence for hybrid trait speciation in Heliconius butterflies. PLoS Genet. 6, e1000930. (doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000930)
9. Quek S-P, Counterman BA, Albequerque de Moura P, Cardoso MZ, Marshall CR, McMillan WO, Kronforst MR. 2010 Dissecting comimetic radiations in Heliconius reveals divergent histories of convergent butterflies. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 7365-7370. (doi:10.1073/pnas.0911572107)
10. Hines HM et al. 2011 Wing patterning gene redefines the mimetic history of Heliconius butterflies. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 19666-19671. (doi:10.1073/pnas.1110096108)
11. Dasmahapatra KK et al. 2012 Butterfly genome reveals promiscuous exchange of mimicry adaptations among species. Nature 487, 94-98. (doi:10.1038/nature11041)
12. Nadeau NJ et al. 2012 Genomic islands of divergence in hybridizing butterflies identified by large-scale targeted sequencing. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 367, 343-353. (doi:10.1098/rstb.2011.0198)
13. Nadeau NJ et al. In press. Genome-wide patterns of divergence and gene flow across a butterfly radiation. Mol. Ecol. (doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X. 2012.05730.x)
14. Pardo-Diaz C, Salazar C, Baxter SW, Merot C, Figueiredo-Ready W, Joron M, McMillan WO, Jiggins CD. 2012 Adaptive introgression across species boundaries in Heliconius butterflies. PLoS Genet. 8, e1002752. (doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002752)
15. Brower AVZ. 1994 Phylogeny of Heliconius butterflies inferred from mitochondrial DNA sequences (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 3, 159-174. (doi:10.1006/mpev. 1994.1018)
16. Brower AVZ, Egan MG. 1997 Cladistics of Heliconius butterflies and relatives (Nymphalidae: Heliconiiti): the phylogenetic position of Eueides based on sequences from mtDNA and a nuclear gene. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 264, 969-977. (doi:10.1098/ rspb.1997.0134)
17. Beltrán M, Jiggins CD, Brower AVZ, Bermingham E, Mallet J. 2007 Do pollen feeding, pupal-mating and larval gregariousness have a single origin in Heliconius butterflies? Inferences from multilocus DNA sequence data. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 92, 221-239. (doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.2007.00830.x)
18. Coyne JA, Orr HA. 2004 Speciation. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
19. Butlin RK et al. 2012 What do we need to know about speciation? Trends Ecol. Evol. 27, 27-38. (doi:10.1016/j.tree.2011.09.002)
20. Brower AVZ. 2011 Hybrid speciation in Heliconius butterflies? A review and critique of the evidence. Genetica 139, 589-609. (doi:10.1007/s10709-010-9530-4)
21. Abbott RJ, Hegarty MJ, Hiscock SJ, Brennan AC. 2010 Homoploid hybrid speciation in action. Taxon 59, 1375-1386.
22. Mavárez J, Salazar CA, Bermingham E, Salcedo C, Jiggins CD, Linares M. 2006 Speciation by hybridization in Heliconius butterflies. Nature 441, 868-871. (doi:10.1038/nature04738)
23. Mallet J. 2007 Hybrid speciation. Nature 446, 279-283. (doi:10.1038/nature05706)
24. Mallet J. 2008 Hybridization, ecological races and the nature of species: empirical evidence for the ease of speciation. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 363, 2971-2986. (doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0081)
25. Mallet J. 2009 Rapid speciation, hybridization and adaptive radiation in the Heliconius melpomene group. In Speciation and patterns of diversity (eds RK Butlin, JR Bridle, D Schluter), pp. 177-194. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
26. Jiggins CD, Salazar CA, Linares M, Mavárez J. 2008 Hybrid trait speciation and Heliconius butterflies. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 1506, 3047-3054. (doi:10. 1098/rstb.2008.0065)
27. Melo MC, Salazar C, Jiggins CD, Linares M. 2009 Assortative mating preferences among hybrids offers a route to hybrid speciation. Evolution 63, 1660-1665. (doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00633.x)
28. Kronforst MR. 2012 Mimetic butterflies introgress to impress. PLoS Genet. 8, e1002802. (doi:10.1371/ journal.pgen.1002802)
29. Buerkle CA, Morris RJ, Asmussen MA, Rieseberg LH. 2000 The likelihood of homoploid hybrid speciation. Heredity 84, 441-451. (doi:10.1046/j.1365-2540.2000.00680.x)
30. Dueñéz-Guzmán EA, Mavárez J, Vose MD, Gavrilets S. 2009 Case studies and mathematical models of ecological speciation. IV. Hybrid speciation in butterflies in a jungle. Evolution 63, 2611-2626. (doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00756.x)
31. Lamas G. (ed.) 2004 Atlas of neotropical Lepidoptera. Checklist part 4a: Hesperioidea-Papiionoidea. Gainesville, FL: Scientific Publishers/ Association of Tropical Lepidoptera.
32. Rosser N, Phillimore AB, Huertas B, Willmott KR, Mallet J. 2012 Testing historical explanations for gradients in species richness in heliconiine butterflies of tropical America. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 105, 479-497. (doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.2011. 01814.x)
33. Giraldo N, Salazar CA, Jiggins CD, Bermingham E, Linares M. 2008 Two sisters in the same dress: Heliconius cryptic species. BMC Evol. Biol. 8, 324. (doi:10.1186/1471-2148-8-324)
34. Jiggins CD. 2008 Ecological speciation in mimetic butterflies. BioScience 58, 541-548. (doi:10.1641/B580610)
35. Mallet J. 1995 A species definition for the modern synthesis. Trends Ecol. Evol. 10, 294-298. (doi:10.1016/0169-5347(95)90031-4)
36. Brower AVZ. 1996b A new mimetic species of Heliconius (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae), from southeastern Colombia, as revealed by cladistic analysis of mitochondrial DNA sequences. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 116, 317-332. (doi:10.1080/ 106351599260535)
37. Brower AVZ. 2000 On the validity of Heliconius tristero and Heliconius melpomene mocoa Brower, with notes on species concepts in Heliconius Kluk (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Proc. Entomol. Soc. Wash. 102, 678-687.
38. Mayr E. 1940 Speciation phenomena in birds. Am. Nat. 74, 249-278. (doi:10.1086/280892)
39. M̈ller F. 1879 Ituna and Thyridia; a remarkable case of mimicry in butterflies. Proc. Entomol. Soc. Lond. 1879, 20-29.
40. Fisher RA. 1958 The genetical theory of natural selection, 2nd edn. New York, NY: Dover Publications.
41. Benson WW. 1972 Natural selection for Müllerian mimicry in Heliconius erato in Costa Rica. Science 176, 936-939. (doi:10.1126/science.176.4037.936)
42. Mallet J. 1993 Speciation, raciation and color pattern evolution in Heliconius butterflies: evidence from hybrid zones. In Hybrid zones and the evolutionary process (ed. RG Harrison), pp. 226-260. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
43. Mallet J, Barton NH. 1989 Strong natural selection in a warning-color hybrid zone. Evolution 43, 421-431. (doi:10.2307/2409217)
44. Bates HW. 1879 Comments on Müllerian mimicry. Proc. Entomol. Soc. Lond. 1879, 28-29.
45. Turner JRG. 1977 Butterfly mimicry: the genetical evolution of an adaptation. In Evolutionary biology, vol. 10 (eds MK Hecht, WC Steere, B Wallace), pp. 163-206. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
46. Nijhout HF. 1991 The development and evolution of butterfly wing patterns. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
47. Turner JRG, Johnson MS, Eanes WF. 1979 Contrasted modes of evolution in the same genome: allozymes and adaptive change in Heliconius. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 76, 1924-1928. (doi:10.1073/pnas.76.4.1924)
48. Mallet J, Barton N, Lamas MG, Santisteban CJ, Muedas MM, Eeley H. 1990 Estimates of selection and gene flow from measures of cline width and linkage disequilibrium in Heliconius hybrid zones. Genetics 124, 921-936.
49. Mallet J. 2010 Shift happens! Shifting balance and the evolution of diversity in warning colour and mimicry. Ecol. Entomol. 35, 90-104. (doi:10.1111/j. 1365-2311.2009.01137.x)
50. Turner JRG. 1982 How do refuges produce biological diversity? Allopatry and parapatry, extinction and gene flow in mimetic butterflies. In Biological diversification in the tropics: proceedings, Fifth international symposium of the association for tropical biology (ed. GT Prance), pp. 309-335. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
51. Turelli M, Barton NH, Coyne JA. 2001 Theory and speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16, 330-343. (doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02177-2)
52. Whinnett A, Zimmermann M, Willmott KR, Herrera N, Mallarino R, Simpson F, Joron M, Lamas G, Mallet J. 2005 Strikingly variable divergence times inferred across an Amazonian butterfly 'suture zone'. Proc. R. Soc. B 272, 2525-2533. (doi:10. 1098/rspb.2005.3247)
53. Rull V. 2008 Speciation timing and neotropical biodiversity: the Tertiary-Quaternary debate in the light of molecular phylogenetic evidence. Mol. Ecol. 17, 2722-2729. (doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008. 03789.x)
54. Antonelli A, Quijada-Mascareñas A, Crawford AJ, Bates JM, Velazco PM, Wüster W. 2010 Molecular studies and phylogeography of Amazonian tetrapods and their relation to geological and climate models. In Amazonia, landscape and species evolution: a look into the past (eds C Hoorn, FP Wesselingh), pp. 386-404. London, UK: Wiley Blackwell.
55. Ribas CC, Aleixo A, Nogueira ACR, Miyaki CY, Cracraft J. 2011 A palaeobiogeographic model for biotic diversification within Amazonia over the past three million years. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 279, 681-689. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2011.1120)
56. Brower AVZ. 1994 Rapid morphological radiation and convergence among races of the butterfly Heliconius erato inferred from patterns of mitochondrial DNA evolution. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 91, 6491-6495. (doi:10.1073/pnas.91.14.6491)
57. Flanagan NS, Tobler A, Davison A, Pybus OG, Kapan DD, Planas S, Linares M, Heckel DG, McMillan WO. 2004 Historical demography of Müllerian mimicry in the neotropical Heliconius butterflies. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 9704-9709. (doi:10.1073/pnas. 0306243101)
58. Cuthill JH, Charleston MA. 2012 Phylogenetic codivergence supports coevolution of mimetic Heliconius butterflies. PLoS ONE 7, e36464. (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0036464)
59. Knapp S, Mallet J. 2003 Refuting refugia? Science 300, 71-72. (doi:10.1126/science.1083007)
60. Reed RD et al. 2011 Optix drives the repeated convergent evolution of butterfly mimicry. Science 333, 1137-1141. (doi:10.1126/ science.1208227)
61. Baxter SW et al. 2010 Genetic hotspots for adaptation: the population genetics of Müllerian mimicry in the Heliconius melpomene clade. PLoS Genet. 6, e1000794. (doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000794)
62. Counterman BA et al. 2010 Genetic hotspots for adaptation: the population genetics of Müllerian mimicry in Heliconius erato. PLoS Genet. 6, e1000796. (doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000796)
63. Jiggins CD, Naisbit RE, Coe RL, Mallet J. 2001 Reproductive isolation caused by colour pattern mimicry. Nature 411, 302-305. (doi:10. 81038/35077075)
64. Naisbit RE, Jiggins CD, Mallet J. 2001 Disruptive sexual selection against hybrids contributes to speciation between Heliconius cydno and H. melpomene. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268, 1849-1854. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2001.1753)
65. Salazar CA, Jiggins CD, Arias CF, Tobler A, Bermingham E, Linares M. 2005 Hybrid incompatibility is consistent with a hybrid origin of Heliconius heurippa Hewitson from its close relatives, Heliconius cydno Doubleday and Heliconius melpomene Linnaeus. J. Evol. Biol. 18, 247-256. (doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00839.x)
66. Merrill RM, Gompert Z, Dembeck LM, Kronforst MR, McMillan WO, Jiggins CD. 2011 Mate preference across the speciation continuum in a clade of mimetic butterflies. Evolution 65, 1489-1500. (doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01216.x)
67. Kronforst MR, Young LG, Kapan DD, McNeely C, ONeill RJ, Gilbert LE. 2006 Linkage of butterfly mate preference and wing color preference cue at the genomic location of wingless. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 6575-6580. (doi:10.1073/pnas.0509685103)
68. Chamberlain NL, Hill RI, Kapan DD, Gilbert LE, Kronforst MR. 2009 Polymorphic butterfly reveals the missing link in ecological speciation. Science 326, 847-850. (doi:10.1126/science.1179141)
69. Gilbert LE. 2003 Adaptive novelty through introgression in Heliconius wing patterns: evidence for a shared genetic 'tool box' from synthetic hybrid zones and a theory of diversification. In Butterflies: ecology and evolution taking flight (eds CL Boggs, WB Watt, PR Ehrlich), pp. 281-318. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
70. Nijhout HF, Wray GA, Gilbert LE. 1990 An analysis of the phenotypic effects of certain color pattern genes in Heliconius (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 40, 357-372. (doi:10.1111/j. 1095-8312.1990.tb00545.x)
71. Joron M et al. 2006 A conserved supergene locus controls colour pattern diversity in Heliconius butterflies. PLoS Biol. 4, e303. (doi:10.1371/journal. pbio.0040303)
72. Papa R et al. 2008 Highly conserved gene order and numerous novel repetitive elements in genomic regions linked to wing pattern variation in Heliconius butterflies. BMC Genomics 9, 345. (doi:10.1186/1471-2164-9-345)
73. Chamberlain NL, Hill RI, Baxter SW, Jiggins CD, Kronforst MR. 2011 Comparative population genetics of a mimicry locus among hybridizing Heliconius butterfly species. Heredity 107, 200-204. (doi:10.1038/hdy.2011.3)
74. Martin A et al. 2012 Diversification of complex butterfly wing patterns by repeated regulatory evolution of a Wnt ligand. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 12632-12637. (doi:10.1073/pnas.1204800109)
75. Mallet J, McMillan WO, Jiggins CD. 1998 Mimicry and warning color at the boundary between races and subspecies. In Endless forms (eds DJ Howard, SH Berlocher), pp. 390-403. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
76. Descimon H, Mast de Maeght J. 1983 Semispecies relationships between Heliconius erato cyrbia Godt. and H. himera Hew. in southwestern Ecuador. J. Res. Lep. 22, 229-237.
77. Holzinger H, Holzinger R. 1994 Heliconius and related genera. Venette, France: Sciences Nat.
78. Merrill RM, Van Schooten B, Scott JA, Jiggins CD. 2011 Pervasive genetic associations between traits causing reproductive isolation in Heliconius butterflies. Proc. R. Soc. B 278, 511-518. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2010.1493)
79. Smadja CM, Butlin RK. 2011 A framework for comparing processes of speciation in the presence of gene flow. Mol. Ecol. 20, 5123-5140. (doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05350.x)
80. Nosil P. 2012 Ecological speciation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
81. Insect Designs. 2012 New Heliconius hybrids from Costa Rica. See http://insectdesignsnews.blogspot.com/2012_06_01_archive.html (accessed 24 June 2012).
82. Anonymous. 1906 Has mania for butterflies. L'abeille de la Nouvelle Orleans 146, 6 (English edition, 29 November 1906; http://nobee.jefferson.lib.la.us./vol-146/11_1906/1906_11_0206.pdf)
83. Bull V, Beltrán M, Jiggins CD, McMillan WO, Bermingham E, Mallet J. 2006 Polyphyly and gene flow between non-sibling Heliconius species. BMC Biol. 4, 11. (doi:10.1186/1741-7007-4-11)
84. Kronforst MR, Young LG, Blume LM, Gilbert LE. 2006 Multilocus analyses of admixture and introgression among hybridizing Heliconius butterflies. Evolution 60, 1254-1268. (doi:10. 1554/06-005.1)
85. Salazar CA, Jiggins CD, Taylor JE, Kronforst MR, Linares M. 2008 Gene flow and genealogical history of Heliconius heurippa. BMC Evol. Biol. 8, 132. (doi:10.1186/1471-2148-8-132)
86. Harrison RG. 1990 Hybrid zones: windows on evolutionary process. In Oxford surveys in evolutionary biology, vol. 7 (eds D Futuyma, J Antonovics), pp. 69-128. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
87. Twyford AD, Ennos RA. 2012 Next-generation hybridization and introgression. Heredity 108, 179-189. (doi:10.1038/hdy.2011.68)
88. Beltrán M, Jiggins CD, Bull V, Linares M, Mallet J, McMillan WO, Bermingham E. 2002 Phylogenetic discordance at the species boundary: comparative gene genealogies among rapidly radiating Heliconius butterflies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19, 2176-2190. (doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a004042)
89. Kronforst MR, Salazar CA, Linares M, Gilbert LE. 2007 No genomic mosaicism in a putative hybrid butterfly species. Proc R. Soc. B 274, 1255-1264. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2006.0207)
90. Grant V. 1981 Plant speciation. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
91. Ungerer MC, Baird SJE, Pan J, Rieseberg LH. 1998 Rapid hybrid speciation in wild sunflowers. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 11757-11762. (doi:10. 1073/pnas.95.20.11757)
92. Gavrilets S. 2004 Fitness landscapes and the origin of species. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
93. Servedio MR, Van Doorn GS, Kopp M, Frame AM, Nosil P. 2011 Magic traits in speciation: 'magic' but not rare? Trends Ecol. Evol. 28, 389-397. (doi:10. 1016/j.tree.2011.04.005)
94. Schluter D. 2001 Ecology and the origin of species. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16, 372-380. (doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02198-X)
95. Mallet J. 2005 Hybridization as invasion of the genome. Trends Ecol. Evol. 20, 229-237. (doi:10.1016/j.tree.2005.02.010)
96. Nosil P, Funk DJ, Ortiz-Barrientos D. 2009 Divergent selection and heterogeneous genomic divergence. Mol. Ecol. 18, 375-402. (doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X. 2008.03946.x)
97. Nosil P, Feder JL. 2012 Genomic divergence during speciation: causes and consequences. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 367, 332-342. (doi:10.1098/rstb.2011.0263)
98. Feder JL, Egan SP, Nosil P. 2012 The genomics of speciation-with-gene-flow. Trends Genet. 28, 342-350. (doi:10.1016/j.tig.2012.03.009)
99. Bates HW. 1862 Contributions to an insect fauna of the Amazon Valley. Lepidoptera: Heliconidae. Trans. Linn. Soc. 23, 495-566. (doi:10.1111/j.1096-3642. 1860.tb00146.x)
100. Plate L. 1928 Ueber Vervollkommnung Anpassung und Unterscheidung von niederen und höheren Tieren. Zool. Jahrb. 45, 745-798.
101. Ferguson LC, Maroja LS, Jiggins CD. 2011 Convergent, modular expression of ebony and tan in the mimetic wing patterns of Heliconius butterflies. Dev. Genes Evol. 221, 297-308. (doi:10.1007/ s00427-011-0380-6)
102. Butlin RK. 2010 Population genomics and speciation. Genetica 138, 409-418. (doi:10.1007/s10709-008-9321-3)
103. MacArthur D. 2012 Face up to false positives. Nature 487, 427-428. (doi:10.1038/487427a)
104. Davis JI, Nixon KC. 1992 Populations, genetic 9 variation, and the delimitation of phylogenetic species. Syst. Biol. 41, 421-435. (doi:10.2307/ 2992584)
105. Brower AVZ. 1999 Delimitation of phylogenetic species with DNA sequences: a critique of Davis and Nixon's population aggregation analysis. Syst. Biol. 48, 199-213. (doi:10.1080/106351599260535)
106. Durand EY, Patterson N, Reich D, Slatkin M. 2011 Testing for ancient admixture between closely related populations. Mol. Biol. Evol. 28, 2239-2252. (doi:10.1093/molbev/msr048)
107. Hey J, Nielsen R. 2004 Multilocus methods for estimating population sizes, migration rates and divergence time, with applications to the divergence of Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis. Genetics 167, 747-760. (doi:10.1534/ genetics.103.024182)
108. Machado CA, Kliman RM, Markert JA, Hey J. 2002 Inferring the history of speciation from multilocus DNAsequence data: the case of Drosophila pseudoobscura and its close relatives. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19, 472-488. (doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev. a004103)
109. Becquet C, Przeworski M. 2009 Learning about modes of speciation by computational approaches. Evolution 63, 2547-2562. (doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00662.x)
110. Strasburg JL, Rieseberg LH. 2010 How robust are 'isolation with migration' analyses to violations of the IM model? A simulation study. Mol. Biol. Evol. 27, 297-310. (doi:10.1093/molbev/msp233)
111. Peters JL, Roberts TE, Winker K, McCracken KG. 2012 Heterogeneity in genetic diversity among non-coding loci fails to fit neutral coalescent models of population history. PLoS ONE 7, e31972. (doi:10. 1371/journal.pone.0031972)
112. Barton NH. 1979 Gene flow past a cline. Heredity 43, 333-339. (doi:10.1038/hdy.1979.86)
113. Barton NH. 2001 The role of hybridization in evolution. Mol. Ecol. 10, 551-568. (doi:10.1046/j.1365-294x.2001.01216.x)
114. Barton NH, Turelli M. 2011 Spatial waves of advance with bistable dynamics: cytoplasmic and genetic analogues of Allee effects. Am. Nat. 178, E48-E75. (doi:10.1086/661246)
115. Currat M, Ruedi M, Petit RJ, Excoffier L. 2008 The hidden side of invasions: massive introgression by local genes. Evolution 62, 1908-1920. (doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00413.x)