Direct comparison of rest and adenosine stress myocardial perfusion CT with rest and stress SPECT

Journal of Nuclear Cardiology

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 27-37

  Okada, David R ^a   Ghoshhajra, Brian B ^a   Blankstein, Ron ^a,b   Rocha Filho, Jose A ^a   Shturman, Leonid D ^a   Rogers, Ian S ^a   Bezerra, Hiram G ^c   Sarwar, Ammar ^a,e   Gewirtz, Henry ^a   Hoffmann, Udo ^a   Mamuya, Wilfred S ^a,d   Brady, Thomas J ^a   Cury, Ricardo C ^a,f  

^a MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS OF CLEVELAND   (United States)

^d Lown Cardiovascular Group   (United States)

^e HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^f BAPTIST CARDIAC AND VASCULAR INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Adenosine; Computed tomography (CT); Ischemia; Myocardial; Sestamibi; SPECT

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE; IOPAMIDOL; METHOXY ISOBUTYL ISONITRILE TECHNETIUM TC 99M;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEART MUSCLE ISCHEMIA; HEART MUSCLE PERFUSION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; NON INVASIVE PROCEDURE; PHARMACOLOGIC STRESS TESTING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION DOSE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SINGLE PHOTON EMISSION COMPUTER TOMOGRAPHY;

ADENOSINE; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; EXERCISE TEST; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION IMAGING; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; REST; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, EMISSION-COMPUTED, SINGLE-PHOTON; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; VASODILATOR AGENTS;

EID: 75949083693     PISSN: 10713581     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12350-009-9156-z     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. IK Bailey LS Griffith J Rouleau W Strauss B Pitt 1977 Thallium-201 myocardial perfusion imaging at rest and during exercise. Comparative sensitivity to electrocardiography in coronary artery disease Circulation 55 79 87 1:STN:280:DyaE2s%2FkslKjug%3D%3D 830222
2. MS Verani ML Marcus MA Razzak JC Ehrhardt 1978 Sensitivity and specificity of thallium-201 perfusion scintigrams under exercise in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease J Nucl Med 19 773 782 1:STN:280: DyaE1c7ps1ahtA%3D%3D 660279
3. RD Okada CA Boucher GM Pohost 1985 Quantitative split dose thallium-201 imaging with exercise: A technique for obtaining rest and exercise perfusion images in one setting and markedly reducing the study time J Am Coll Cardiol 5 70 77 1:STN:280:DyaL2M%2FlsFyqsQ%3D%3D 3880568
4. FJ Wackers DS Berman J Maddahi DD Watson GA Beller HW Strauss, et al. 1989 Technetium-99m hexakis 2-methoxyisobutyl isonitrile: Human biodistribution, dosimetry, safety, and preliminary comparison to thallium-201 for myocardial perfusion imaging J Nucl Med 30 301 311 1:STN:280:DyaL1M3ptlaltw%3D%3D 2525610
5. JK Kahn I McGhie MS Akers MN Sills TL Faber PV Kulkarni, et al. 1989 Quantitative rotational tomography with 201Tl and 99mTc 2-methoxy-isobutyl- isonitrile. A direct comparison in normal individuals and patients with coronary artery disease Circulation 79 1282 1293 1:STN:280:DyaL1M3kvFOitg%3D%3D 2785873
6. T Nguyen J Heo JD Ogilby AS Iskandrian 1990 Single photon emission computed tomography with thallium-201 during adenosine-induced coronary hyperemia: Correlation with coronary arteriography, exercise thallium imaging and two-dimensional echocardiography J Am Coll Cardiol 16 1375 1383 1:STN:280:DyaK3M%2Fjs1Ghtg%3D%3D 2229789
7. TP Rocco V Dilsizian HW Strauss CA Boucher 1989 Technetium-99m isonitrile myocardial uptake at rest. II. Relation to clinical markers of potential viability J Am Coll Cardiol 14 1678 1684 1:STN:280:DyaK3c%2Fmt1Ortg%3D%3D 2584556 (Pubitemid 20011858)
8. JA Leppo J O'Brien JA Rothendler JD Getchell VW Lee 1984 Dipyridamole-thallium-201 scintigraphy in the prediction of future cardiac events after acute myocardial infarction N Engl J Med 310 1014 1018 1:STN:280:DyaL2c7mvVSjsA%3D%3D 6708976
9. DS Berman R Hachamovitch H Kiat I Cohen JA Cabico FP Wang, et al. 1995 Incremental value of prognostic testing in patients with known or suspected ischemic heart disease: A basis for optimal utilization of exercise technetium-99m sestamibi myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography J Am Coll Cardiol 26 639 647 10.1016/0735-1097(95)00218-S 1:STN:280:DyaK2MzntVGhug%3D%3D 7642853
10. R Hachamovitch DS Berman H Kiat I Cohen JA Cabico J Friedman, et al. 1996 Exercise myocardial perfusion SPECT in patients without known coronary artery disease: Incremental prognostic value and use in risk stratification Circulation 93 905 914 1:STN:280:DyaK287nvFShsg%3D%3D 8598081
11. R Hachamovitch DS Berman LJ Shaw H Kiat I Cohen JA Cabico, et al. 1998 Incremental prognostic value of myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography for the prediction of cardiac death: Differential stratification for risk of cardiac death and myocardial infarction Circulation 97 535 543 1:STN:280:DyaK1c7ltlSnsA%3D%3D 9494023
12. RC Cury K Nieman MD Shapiro J Butler CH Nomura M Ferencik, et al. 2008 Comprehensive assessment of myocardial perfusion defects, regional wall motion, and left ventricular function by using 64-section multidetector CT Radiology 248 466 475 10.1148/radiol.2482071478 18641250
13. U Hoffmann R Millea C Enzweiler M Ferencik S Gulick J Titus, et al. 2004 Acute myocardial infarction: Contrast-enhanced multi-detector row CT in a porcine model Radiology 231 697 701 10.1148/radiol.2313030132 15118118 (Pubitemid 38668085)
14. AH Mahnken P Bruners M Katoh JE Wildberger RW Gunther A Buecker 2006 Dynamic multi-section CT imaging in acute myocardial infarction: Preliminary animal experience Eur Radiol 16 746 752 10.1007/s00330-005-0057-5 16283323 (Pubitemid 44149389)
15. K Nieman MD Shapiro M Ferencik CH Nomura S Abbara U Hoffmann, et al. 2008 Reperfused myocardial infarction: Contrast-enhanced 64-Section CT in comparison to MR imaging Radiology 247 49 56 10.1148/radiol.2471070332 18372464
16. B Ruzsics H Lee PL Zwerner M Gebregziabher P Costello UJ Schoepf 2008 Dual-energy CT of the heart for diagnosing coronary artery stenosis and myocardial ischemia-initial experience Eur Radiol 18 2414 2424 10.1007/s00330-008-1022-x 18523782
17. BL Gerber B Belge GJ Legros P Lim A Poncelet A Pasquet, et al. 2006 Characterization of acute and chronic myocardial infarcts by multidetector computed tomography: Comparison with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance Circulation 113 823 833 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.529511 16461822 (Pubitemid 43754303)
18. RT George M Jerosch-Herold C Silva K Kitagawa DA Bluemke JA Lima, et al. 2007 Quantification of myocardial perfusion using dynamic 64-detector computed tomography Invest Radiol 42 815 822 10.1097/RLI.0b013e318124a884 18007153 (Pubitemid 350126563)
19. RT George C Silva MA Cordeiro A DiPaula DR Thompson WF McCarthy, et al. 2006 Multidetector computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging during adenosine stress J Am Coll Cardiol 48 153 160 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.04.014 16814661 (Pubitemid 43929222)
20. A Kurata T Mochizuki Y Koyama T Haraikawa J Suzuki Y Shigematsu, et al. 2005 Myocardial perfusion imaging using adenosine triphosphate stress multi-slice spiral computed tomography: Alternative to stress myocardial perfusion scintigraphy Circ J 69 550 557 10.1253/circj.69.550 15849441 (Pubitemid 40745727)
21. RT George A Arbab-Zadeh JM Miller K Kitagawa H-J Chang DA Bluemke L Becker O Yousuf J Texter AC Lardo JA Lima 2009 Adenosine stress 64- and 256-row detector computed tomography angiography and perfusion imaging: A pilot study evaluating the transmural extent of perfusion abnormalities to predict atherosclerosis causing myocardial ischemia Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2 174 182 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.108.813766 19808590
22. R Blankstein LD Shturman IS Rogers JA Rocha-Filho DR Okada A Sarwar AV Soni H Bezerra BB Ghoshhajra M Petranovic R Loureiro G Feuchtner H Gewirtz U Hoffmann WS Mamuya TJ Brady RC Cury 2009 Adenosine induced stress myocardial perfusion imaging using dual source cardiac computed tomography J Am Coll Cardiol 54 1072 84 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.06.014 19744616
23. R Blankstein DR Okada JA Rocha-Filhoa F Rybicki TJ Brady RC Cury 2009 Cardiac myocardial perfusion imaging using dual source computed tomography Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 25 209 216 10.1007/s10554-009-9438-1
24. MD Cerqueira NJ Weissman V Dilsizian AK Jacobs S Kaul WK Laskey, et al. 2002 Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart: A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association Circulation 105 539 542 10.1161/hc0402.102975 11815441 (Pubitemid 34262671)
25. AE Iskandrian TM Bateman L Belardinelli B Blackburn MD Cerqueira RC Hendel, et al. 2007 Adenosine versus regadenoson comparative evaluation in myocardial perfusion imaging: Results of the ADVANCE phase 3 multicenter international trial J Nucl Cardiol 14 645 658 10.1016/j.nuclcard.2007.06.114 17826318 (Pubitemid 47355078)
26. EG DePuey EV Garcia 1989 Optimal specificity of thallium-201 SPECT through recognition of imaging artifacts J Nucl Med 30 441 449 1:STN:280:DyaL1M3ptlarug%3D%3D 2661749
27. I Klem S Greulich JF Heitner H Kim H Vogelsberg EM Kispert, et al. 2008 Value of cardiovascular magnetic resonance stress perfusion testing for the detection of coronary artery disease in women JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 1 436 445 10.1016/j.jcmg.2008.03.010 19356464 (Pubitemid 351998675)
28. J Rieber A Huber I Erhard S Mueller M Schweyer A Koenig, et al. 2006 Cardiac magnetic resonance perfusion imaging for the functional assessment of coronary artery disease: A comparison with coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve Eur Heart J 27 1465 1471 10.1093/eurheartj/ehl039 16720685 (Pubitemid 43998081)
29. F Prigent J Maddahi E Garcia K Van Train J Friedman D Berman 1986 Noninvasive quantification of the extent of jeopardized myocardium in patients with single-vessel coronary disease by stress thallium-201 single-photon emission computerized rotational tomography Am Heart J 111 578 586 10.1016/0002-8703(86)90067-0 1:STN:280:DyaL287lsFCjsg%3D%3D 3485369 (Pubitemid 16130138)
30. G Fragasso E Rossetti F Dosio L Gianolli G Pizzetti N Cattaneo, et al. 1996 High prevalence of the thallium-201 reverse redistribution phenomenon in patients with syndrome X Eur Heart J 17 1482 1487 1:STN:280: DyaK2s%2Fms1ChsA%3D%3D 8909903
31. H Kiat J Maddahi LT Roy K Van Train J Friedman K Resser, et al. 1989 Comparison of technetium 99m methoxy isobutyl isonitrile and thallium 201 for evaluation of coronary artery disease by planar and tomographic methods Am Heart J 117 1 11 10.1016/0002-8703(89)90649-2 1:STN:280:DyaL1M7gtlSqsg%3D%3D 2643279 (Pubitemid 19043745)
32. I Matsunari S Fujino J Taki J Senma T Aoyama T Wakasugi, et al. 1996 Comparison of defect size between thallium-201 and technetium-99m tetrofosmin myocardial single-photon emission computed tomography in patients with single-vessel coronary artery disease Am J Cardiol 77 350 354 10.1016/S0002-9149(97)89362-9 1:STN:280:DyaK287nvF2ruw%3D%3D 8602561 (Pubitemid 26061164)
33. RC Hendel TM Bateman MD Cerqueira AE Iskandrian JA Leppo B Blackburn, et al. 2005 Initial clinical experience with regadenoson, a novel selective A2A agonist for pharmacologic stress single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging J Am Coll Cardiol 46 2069 2075 10.1016/j.jacc.2005. 05.097 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXht1Onur7P 16325044 (Pubitemid 41713594)