Guided and Team-Based Learning for Chemical Information Literacy

Journal of Academic Librarianship

Volumn 39, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 252-259

  Loo, Jeffery L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Active learning; Chemical information literacy; Guided learning; Information literacy instruction; POGIL; Team based learning

Indexed keywords

EID: 84878932990     PISSN: 00991333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2013.01.007     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. ACRL Information literacy competency standards for higher education retrieved January 6, 2012 from. http://www.ala.org/acrl/standards/informationliteracycompetency.
2. ACRL Board Guidelines for instruction programs in academic libraries retrieved October 18, 2012 from. http://www.ala.org/ala/mgrps/divs/acrl/standards/guidelinesinstruction.cfm.
3. Bean T.M., Thomas S.N. Being like both: Library instruction methods that outshine the one-shot. Public Services Quarterly 2010, 6(2-3):237-249. 10.1080/15228959.2010.497746.
4. Brown A., Campione J. Guided discovery in a community of learners. Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice 1994, 229-270. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. K. McGilly (Ed.).
5. Clark R.C., Nguyen F., Sweller J. Efficiency in learning: Evidence-based guidelines to manage cognitive load 2006, Pfeiffer, San Francisco.
6. Collins J.W., O'Brien N.P. The Greenwood dictionary of education 2003, Greenwood Press, Westport, CT.
7. Cooper J.E. Using CAI to teach library skills. [Feature]. College & Research Libraries News 1993, 2(1993, February):75-78.
8. Cooper G., Sweller J. Effects of schema acquisition and rule automation on mathematical problem-solving transfer. Journal of Educational Psychology 1987, 79(4):347-362. 10.1037/0022-0663.79.4.347.
9. Dougherty R.C., Bowen C.W., Berger T., Rees W., Mellon E.K., Pulliam E. Cooperative learning and enhanced communication-Effects on student performance, retention, and attitudes in general chemistry. [Article]. Journal of Chemical Education 1995, 72(9):793-797.
10. Elmore R. Foreward. Education for judgment: The artistry of discussion leadership 1991, Harvard Business School Press, Boston. C.R. Christensen, D.A. Garvin, A. Sweet (Eds.).
11. Farrell J.J., Moog R.S., Spencer J.N. A guided-inquiry general chemistry course. Journal of Chemical Education 1999, 76(4):570. 10.1021/ed076p570.
12. Ferrer-Vinent I.J., Carello C.A. Embedded library instruction in a first-year biology laboratory course. Science & Technology Libraries 2008, 28(4):325-351. 10.1080/01942620802202352.
13. Gandhi S. Faculty-librarian collaboration to assess the effectiveness of a five-session library instruction model. Community & Junior College Libraries 2005, 12(4):15-48. 10.1300/J107v12n04_05.
14. Gedeon R. Enhancing a large lecture with active learning. Research Strategies 1997, 15(4):301-309. 10.1016/s0734-3310(97)90018-5.
15. Hale D., Mullen L.G. Designing process-oriented guided-inquiry activities: A new innovation for marketing classes. [Article]. Marketing Education Review 2009, 19(1):73-80.
16. Hanson D.M. Instructor's guide to process-oriented guided-inquiry learning 2006, Pacific Crest, Lisle, IL.
17. Hanson D., Wolfskill T. Process workshops-A new model for instruction. Journal of Chemical Education 2000, 77(1):120. 10.1021/ed077p120.
18. Jackson S., Stratford S., Krajcik J., Soloway E. A learner-centered tool for students building models. Communications of the ACM 1996, 39(4):48-49.
19. Jacobs H., Jacobs D. Transforming the one-shot library session into pedagogical collaboration. Reference & User Services Quarterly 2009, 49(1):72-82.
20. Johnson D., Johnson R., Stanne M. Cooperative learning methods: A meta-analysis retrieved January 8, 2012 from. http://www.tablelearning.com/uploads/File/EXHIBIT-B.pdf.
21. Kenney B.F. Revitalizing the one-shot instruction session using problem-based learning. Reference & User Services Quarterly 2008, 47(4):386-391.
22. King A. From sage on the stage to guide on the side. College Teaching 1993, 41(1):30-35.
23. Kirschner P.A., Sweller J., Clark R.E. Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist 2006, 41(2):75-86. 10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1.
24. Krathwohl D.R. A revision of Bloom's taxonomy: An overview. Theory Into Practice 2002, 41(4):212-218. 10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2.
25. Lawson A.E. Science teaching and the development of thinking 1995, Wadsworth Pub., Belmont, CA.
26. Lewis S.E., Lewis J.E. Departing from lectures: An evaluation of a peer-led guided inquiry alternative. Journal of Chemical Education 2005, 82(1):135. 10.1021/ed082p135.
27. Luo L. Web 2.0 integration in information literacy instruction: An overview. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 2010, 36(1):32-40. 10.1016/j.acalib.2009.11.004.
28. Mayer R.E. Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning?. American Psychologist 2004, 59(1):14-19. 10.1037/0003-066x.59.1.14.
29. Michael J. Where's the evidence that active learning works?. Advances in Physiology Education 2006, 30(4):159-167. 10.1152/advan.00053.2006.
30. Michaelsen L.K., Sweet M. Team-based learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning 2011, 2011(128):41-51. 10.1002/tl.467.
31. Mitchell E., Hiatt D. Using POGIL techniques in an information literacy curriculum. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 2010, 36(6):539-542. 10.1016/j.acalib.2010.08.010.
32. Moog R.S., Spencer J.N. POGIL: An overview. Process-oriented guided inquiry learning 2008, 1-13. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC. R.S. Moog, J.N. Spencer (Eds.).
33. Moreno R. Decreasing cognitive load for novice students: Effects of explanatory versus corrective feedback in discovery-based multimedia. Instructional Science 2004, 32(1):99-113. 10.1023/B:TRUC.0000021811.66966.1d.
34. Nadolski R.J., Kirschner P.A., Van Merriënboer J.J.G. Optimizing the number of steps in learning tasks for complex skills. British Journal of Educational Psychology 2005, 75(2):223-237. 10.1348/000709904x22403.
35. Neville A.J. Problem-based learning and medical education forty years on. Medical Principles and Practice 2009, 18(1):1-9.
36. Parang E., Raine M., Stevenson T. Redesigning freshman seminar library instruction based on information competencies. Research Strategies 2000, 17(4):269-280. 10.1016/s0734-3310(01)00057-x.
37. Pienta N.J., Cooper M.M., Greenbowe T.J. Chemists' guide to effective teaching 2005, Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
38. Prince M. Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education 2004, 93(3):223-231.
39. Rabine J., Cardwell C. Start making sense: Practical approaches to outcomes assessment for libraries. Research Strategies 2000, 17(4):319-335. 10.1016/s0734-3310(01)00051-9.
40. Sweller J., Cooper G.A. The use of worked examples as a substitute for problem solving in learning algebra. Cognition and Instruction 1985, 2(1):59-89. 10.1207/s1532690xci0201_3.
41. Tuovinen J.E., Sweller J. A comparison of cognitive load associated with discovery learning and worked examples. Journal of Educational Psychology 1999, 91(2):334-341. 10.1037/0022-0663.91.2.334.
42. van Merrienboer J.J.G. Training complex cognitive skills: A four-component instructional design model for technical training 1997, Educational Technology Publications, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
43. Williams S. New tools for online information literacy instruction. The Reference Librarian 2010, 51(2):148-162. 10.1080/02763870903579802.
44. York A.C., Vance J.M. Taking library instruction into the online classroom: Best practices for embedded librarians. Journal of Library Administration 2009, 49(1-2):197-209. 10.1080/01930820802312995.
45. Zhang L., Watson E.M., Banfield L. The efficacy of computer-assisted instruction versus face-to-face instruction in academic libraries: A systematic review. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 2007, 33(4):478-484. 10.1016/j.acalib.2007.03.006.