Embedded library instruction in a first-year biology laboratory course

Science and Technology Libraries

Volumn 28, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 325-351

  Ferrer Vinent, Ignacio J ^a,b   Carello, Christy A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^b METROPOLITAN STATE UNIVERSITY OF DENVER   (United States)

Author keywords

Assessment; Bibliographic instruction; Biology; Collaboration; Embedded; First year experience; Information literacy; Library instruction; Surveys

Indexed keywords

ASSESSMENT; BIBLIOGRAPHIC INSTRUCTION; EMBEDDED; FIRST-YEAR EXPERIENCE; INFORMATION LITERACY; LIBRARY INSTRUCTION;

INFORMATION SCIENCE; SURVEYS; TEACHING;

BIOLOGY;

EID: 70349805895     PISSN: 0194262X     EISSN: 15411109     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01942620802202352     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Carello, C. 2006. Biology 1091 laboratory manual. Denver: MSCD Press.
2. Ferrer-Vinent, I. J. 2006. Lab 2: Library scavenger hunt and PowerPoint tutorial. In Biology 1091 laboratory manual, by C. A. Carello, 7-19. Denver: MSCD Press.
3. Bowden, T., and A. DiBenedetto. 2001. Information literacy in a biology laboratory session: An example of librarian-faculty collaboration. Research Strategies 18 (2): 143-49.
4. Choinski, E., and M. Emanuel. 2006. The one-minute paper and the one-hour class: Outcomes assessment for one-shot library instruction. Reference Services Review 34 (1):148-55.
5. Curzon, S. C. 2004. Developing faculty-librarian partnerships in information literacy. In Integrating Information Literacy into the Higher Education Curriculum: Practical Models for Transformation, ed. I. F. Rockman and Associates, 29-45. San Francisco: Josey-Bass.
6. Dewald, N. H. 1999. Transporting good library instruction practices into the Web environment: An analysis of online tutorials. Journal of Academic Librarianship 25 (1): 26-32.
7. Huerta, D., and V. McMillan. 2004. Reflections on collaborative teaching of science information literacy and science writing: Plans, processes and pratfalls. Science and Technology Libraries 17 (1/2): 19-28.
8. Kaplowitz, J., and J. Contini. 1998. Computer-assisted instruction: Is it an option for bibliographic instruction in large undergraduate survey classes? College and Research Libraries 59 (1): 19-27.
9. Kearns, K., and T. T. Hybl. 2005. A collaboration between faculty and librarians to develop and assess a science literacy laboratory module. Science and Technology Libraries 25 (4): 39-56.
10. Lee, J., and D. MacMillan. 2004. Evolving instruction in biology: Using the Web to improve in-class instruction. Reference Services Review 32 (4): 374-82.
11. Nicholas, M., C. Rudowsky., and J. Valencia. 2007. Who's afraid of the big bad library? Paper presented at the 13th national conference of the Association of College and Research Libraries, Baltimore.
12. Orians, Colin, and Laurie Sabol. 1999. Using the Web to teach library research skills in introductory biology: A collaboration between faculty and librarians. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship 23 (Summer), http://www.istl.org/ 99-summer/article2.html.
13. Reichardt, R., and S. Campbell 2001. Mass instruction that works: Teaching 900 first-year biology students in five days. In Library User Education: Powerful Learning, Powerful Partnerships, ed. B. I. Dewey, 144-49. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.
14. Samson, S. 2000. What and when do they know? Web-based assessment. Reference Service Review 28 (4): 335-42.
15. Sinn, R. N. 1998. Library instruction for biology courses: A literature review and survey. Research Strategies 16 (2): 103-15.
16. Spackman, E. 2007. Utilizing focus groups to evaluate an information literacy program in a general biology course. Science and Technology Libraries 27 (3): 3-28.
17. Zhang, L., E. M. Watson., and L. Banfield. 2007. The efficacy of computer-assisted instruction versus face-to-face instruction in academic libraries: A systematic review. Journal of Academic Librarianship 33 (4): 478-84.