Macromolecule-assisted de novo protein folding

International Journal of Molecular Sciences

Volumn 13, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 10368-10386

  Choi, Seong Il ^a   Son, Ahyun ^a   Lim, Keo Heun ^a   Jeong, Hotcherl ^b   Seong, Baik L ^a  

^a Yonsei University   (South Korea)

^b Department of Biotechnology College of Bioscience and Biotechnology Yonsei University ^*  (South Korea)

Author keywords

Aggregation; Excluded volume; Folding; Hydrophobic interaction; Macromolecules; Molecular chaperone; Surface charges

Indexed keywords

CHAPERONE; HYBRID PROTEIN; POLYPEPTIDE; MACROMOLECULE; PROTEIN; PROTEIN BINDING;

CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; HYDROPHOBICITY; IN VITRO STUDY; IN VIVO STUDY; LIPID BILAYER; MACROMOLECULE; PROTEIN AGGREGATION; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; PROTEIN SYNTHESIS; REVIEW; RIBOSOME; THERMODYNAMICS; ANIMAL; CHEMISTRY; HUMAN; PROTEIN CONFORMATION;

ANIMALS; HUMANS; MACROMOLECULAR SUBSTANCES; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEINS;

EID: 84878638259     PISSN: 16616596     EISSN: 14220067     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/ijms130810368     Document Type: Review

References (109)

1. Hemmingsen, S.M.; Woolford, C.; van der Vies, S.M.; Tilly, K.; Dennis, D.T.; Georgopoulos, C.P.; Hendrix, R.W.; Ellis, R.J. Homologous plant and bacterial proteins chaperone oligomeric protein assembly. Nature 1988, 333, 330-334.
2. Bukau, B.; Horwich, A.L. The Hsp70 and Hsp60 chaperone machines. Cell 1998, 92, 351-366.
3. Hartl, F.U.; Hayer-Hartl, M. Molecular chaperones in the cytosol: From nascent chain to folded protein. Science 2002, 295, 1852-1858.
4. Hartl, F.U.; Bracher, A.; Hayer-Hartl, M. Molecular chaperones in protein folding and proteostasis. Nature 2011, 475, 324-332.
5. Anfinsen, C.B. Principles that govern the folding of protein chains. Science 1973, 181, 223-230.
6. Choi, S.I.; Ryu, K.; Seong, B.L. RNA-mediated chaperone type for de novo protein folding. RNA Biol. 2009, 6, 21-24.
7. Creighton, T.E. Protein Folding; W.H. Freeman and Company: New York, NY, USA, 1992; pp. 405-454.
8. Kolb, V.A.; Makeyev, E.V.; Spirin, A.S. Folding of firefly luciferase during translation in a cell-free system. EMBO J. 1994, 13, 3631-3637.
9. Fedorov, A.N.; Baldwin, T.O. Cotranslational protein folding. J. Biol. Chem. 1997, 272, 32715-32718.
10. Kramer, G.; Ramachandiran, V.; Hardesty, B. Cotranslational folding-omnia mea mecum porto? Int. J. Biochem. Cell. Biol. 2001, 33, 541-553.
11. Cabrita, L.D.; Dobson, C.M.; Christodoulou, J. Protein folding on the ribosome. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2010, 20, 33-45.
12. Zhang, G.; Hubalewska, M.; Ignatova, Z. Transient ribosomal attenuation coordinates protein synthesis and co-translational folding. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2009, 16, 274-280.
13. Kimchi-Sarfaty, C.; Oh, J.M.; Kim, I.W.; Sauna, Z.E.; Calcagno, A.M.; Ambudkar, S.V.; Gottesman, M.M. A "silent" polymorphism in the MDR1 gene changes substrate specificity. Science 2007, 315, 525-528.
14. Lilie, H.; Lang, K.; Rudolph, R.; Buchner, J. Prolyl isomerases catalyze antibody folding in vitro. Protein Sci. 1993, 2, 1490-1496.
15. Gruber, C.W.; Cemazar, M.; Heras, B.; Martin, J.L.; Craik, D.J. Protein disulfide isomerase: The structure of oxidative folding. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2006, 31, 455-464.
16. Dunker, A.K.; Silman, I.; Uversky, V.N.; Sussman, J.L. Function and structure of inherently disordered proteins. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2008, 18, 756-764.
17. Xue, B.; Williams, R.W.; Oldfield, C.J.; Dunker, A.K.; Uversky, V.N. Archaic chaos: Intrinsically disordered proteins in Archaea. BMC Syst. Biol. 2010, 4, S1.
18. Uversky, V.N.; Gillespie, J.R.; Fink, A.L. Why are "natively unfolded" proteins unstructured under physiologic conditions? Proteins 2000, 41, 415-427.
19. Boehr, D.D.; Nussinov, R.; Wright, P.E. The role of dynamic conformational ensembles in biomolecular recognition. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2009, 5, 789-796.
20. Chakraborty, K.; Chatila, M.; Sinha, J.; Shi, Q.; Poschner, B.C.; Sikor, M.; Jiang, G.; Lamb, D.C.; Hartl, F.U.; Hayer-Hartl, M. Chaperonin-catalyzed rescue of kinetically trapped states in protein folding. Cell 2010, 142, 112-122.
21. Ellis, R.J. Macromolecular crowding: An important but neglected aspect of the intracellular environment. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2001, 11, 114-119.
22. Szabo, A.; Langer, T.; Schröder, H.; Flanagan, J.; Bukau, B.; Hartl, F.U. The ATP hydrolysis-dependent reaction cycle of the Escherichia coli Hsp70 system DnaK, DnaJ, and GrpE. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1994, 91, 10345-10349.
23. Buchberger, A.; Schröder, H.; Hesterkamp, T.; Schönfeld, H.J.; Bukau, B. Substrate shuttling between the DnaK and GroEL systems indicates a chaperone network promoting protein folding. J. Mol. Biol. 1996, 261, 328-333.
24. Hesterkamp, T.; Bukau, B. Role of the DnaK and HscA homologs of Hsp70 chaperones in protein folding in E. coli. EMBO J. 1998, 17, 4818-4828.
25. Deuerling, E.; Schulze-Specking, A.; Tomoyasu, T.; Mogk, A.; Bukau, B. Trigger factor and DnaK cooperate in folding of newly synthesized proteins. Nature 1999, 400, 693-696.
26. Houry, W.A.; Frishman, D.; Eckerskorn, C.; Lottspeich, F.; Hartl, F.U. Identification of in vivo substrates of the chaperonin GroEL. Nature 1999, 402, 147-154.
27. Koll, H.; Guiard, B.; Rassow, J.; Ostermann, J.; Horwich, A.L.; Neupert, W.; Hartl, F.U. Antifolding activity of hsp60 couples protein import into the mitochondrial matrix with export to the intermembrane space. Cell 1992, 68, 1163-1175.
28. Kandror, O.; Busconi, L.; Sherman, M.; Goldberg, A.L. Rapid degradation of an abnormal protein in Escherichia coli involves the chaperones GroEL and GroES. J. Biol. Chem. 1994, 269, 23575-23582.
29. De Los Rios, P.; Ben-Zvi, A.; Slutsky, O.; Azem, A.; Goloubinoff, P. Hsp70 chaperones accelerate protein translocation and the unfolding of stable protein aggregates by entropic pulling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 6166-6171.
30. Taipale, M.; Jarosz, D.F.; Lindquist, S. HSP90 at the hub of protein homeostasis: Emerging mechanistic insights. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2010, 11, 515-528.
31. Frydman, J. Folding of newly translated proteins in vivo: The role of molecular chaperones. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2001, 70, 603-647.
32. Vorderwülbecke, S.; Kramer, G.; Merz, F.; Kurz, T.A.; Rauch, T.; Zachmann-Brand, B.; Bukau, B.; Deuerling, E. Low temperature or GroEL/ES overproduction permits growth of Escherichia coli cells lacking trigger factor and DnaK. FEBS Lett. 2004, 559, 181-187.
33. Ullers, R.S.; Luirink, J.; Harms, N.; Schwager, F.; Georgopoulos, C.; Genevaux, P. SecB is a bona fide generalized chaperone in Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 7583-7588.
34. Masters, M.; Blakely, G.; Coulson, A.; McLennan, N.; Yerko, V.; Acord, J. Protein folding in Escherichia coli: The chaperonin GroE and its substrates. Res. Microbiol. 2009, 160, 267-277.
35. Wong, P.; Houry, W.A. Chaperone networks in bacteria: Analysis of protein homeostasis in minimal cells. J. Struct. Biol. 2004, 146, 79-89.
36. Horwich, A.L.; Low, K.B.; Fenton, W.A.; Hirshfield, I.N.; Furtak, K. Folding in vivo of bacterial cytoplasmic proteins: Role of GroEL. Cell 1993, 74, 909-917.
37. Chapman, E.; Farr, G.W.; Usaite, R.; Furtak, K.; Fenton, W.A.; Chaudhuri, T.K.; Hondorp, E.R.; Matthews, R.G.; Wolf, S.G.; Yates, J.R.; et al. Global aggregation of newly translated proteins in an Escherichia coli strain deficient of the chaperonin GroEL. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 15800-15805.
38. Sewell, B.T.; Best, R.B.; Chen, S.; Roseman, A.M.; Farr, G.W.; Horwich, A.L.; Saibil, H.R. A mutant chaperonin with rearranged inter-ring electrostatic contacts and temperature-sensitive dissociation. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2004, 11, 1128-1133.
39. Sot, B.; von Germar, F.; Mäntele, W.; Valpuesta, J.M.; Taneva, S.G.; Muga, A. Ionic interactions at both inter-ring contact sites of GroEL are involved in transmission of the allosteric signal: A time-resolved infrared difference study. Protein Sci. 2005, 14, 2267-2274.
40. Cheng, M.Y.; Hartl, F.U.; Martin, J.; Pollock, R.A.; Kalousek, F.; Neupert, W.; Hallberg, E.M.; Hallberg, R.L.; Horwich, A.L. Mitochondrial heat-shock protein hsp60 is essential for assembly of proteins imported into yeast mitochondria. Nature 1989, 337, 620-625.
41. Ellis, R.J.; Hartl, F.U. Principles of protein folding in the cellular environment. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 1999, 9, 102-110.
42. Feldman, D.E.; Frydman, J. Protein folding in vivo: The importance of molecular chaperones. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2000, 10, 26-33.
43. Sørensen, H.P.; Kristensen, J.E.; Sperling-Petersen, H.U.; Mortensen, K.K. Soluble expression of aggregating proteins by covalent coupling to the ribosome. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2004, 319, 715-719.
44. Schimmele, B.; Gräfe, N.; Plückthun, A. Ribosome display of mammalian receptor domains. Protein Eng. Des. Sel. 2005, 18, 285-294.
45. Wittrup, K.D. Protein engineering by cell-surface display. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2001, 12, 395-399.
46. Ngo, K.X.; Umakoshi, H.; Shimanouchi, T.; Sugaya, H.; Kuboi, R. Chitosanase displayed on liposome can increase its activity and stability. J. Bacteriol. 2010, 146, 105-113.
47. Kim, C.W.; Han, K.S.; Ryu, K.S.; Kim, B.H.; Kim, K.H.; Choi, S.I.; Seong, B.L. N-terminal domains of native multidomain proteins have the potential to assist de novo folding of their downstream domains in vivo by acting as solubility enhancers. Protein Sci. 2007, 16, 635-643.
48. Pelham, H.R. Speculations on the functions of the major heat shock and glucose-regulated proteins. Cell 1986, 46, 959-961.
49. Wegrzyn, R.D.; Deuerling, E. Molecular guardians for newborn proteins: Ribosome-associated chaperones and their role in protein folding. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2005, 62, 2727-2738.
50. Craig, E.A.; Eisenman, H.C.; Hundley, H.A. Ribosome-tethered molecular chaperones: The first line of defense against protein misfolding? Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2003, 6, 157-162.
51. Peisker, K.; Chiabudini, M.; Rospert, S. The ribosome-bound Hsp70 homolog Ssb of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2010, 1803, 662-672.
52. Choi, S.I.; Lim, K.H.; Seong, B.L. Chaperoning roles of macromolecules interacting with proteins in vivo. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2011, 12, 1979-1990.
53. Svetlov, M.S.; Kolb, V.A.; Spirin, A.S. Folding of the firefly luciferase polypeptide chain with immobilized C-terminus. Mol. Biol. (Mosk) 2007, 41, 96-102.
54. Choi, S.I.; Han, K.S.; Kim, C.W.; Ryu, K.S.; Kim, B.H.; Kim, K.H.; Kim, S.I.; Kang, T.H.; Shin, H.C.; Lim, K.H.; et al. Protein solubility and folding enhancement by interaction with RNA. PLoS One 2008, 3, e2677.
55. Kaiser, C.M.; Goldman, D.H.; Chodera, J.D.; Tinoco, I., Jr.; Bustamante, C. The ribosome modulates nascent protein folding. Science 2011, 334, 1723-1727.
56. Das, B.; Chattopadhyay, S.; Bera, A.K.; DasGupta, C. In vitro protein folding by ribosomes from Escherichia coli, wheat germ and rat liver: The role of the 50S particle and its 23S rRNA. Eur. J. Biochem. 1996, 235, 613-621.
57. Chattopadhyay, S.; Das, B.; DasGupta, C. Reactivation of denatured proteins by 23S ribosomal RNA: Role of domain V. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1996, 93, 8284-8287.
58. Samanta, D.; Mukhopadhyay, D.; Chowdhury, S.; Ghosh, J.; Pal, S.; Basu, A.; Bhattacharya, A.; Das, A.; Das, D.; DasGupta, C. Protein folding by domain V of Escherichia coli 23S rRNA: Specificity of RNA-protein interactions. J. Bacteriol. 2008, 190, 3344-3352.
59. Chen, W.; Georgiou, G. Cell-Surface display of heterologous proteins: From high-throughput screening to environmental applications. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2002, 79, 496-503.
60. Cornelis, P. Expressing genes in different Escherichia coli compartments. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2000, 11, 450-454.
61. Jose, J. Autodisplay: Efficient bacterial surface display of recombinant proteins. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2006, 69, 607-614.
62. Chen, Y.P.; Hwang, I.E.; Lin, C.J.; Wang, H.J.; Tseng C.P. Enhancing the stability of xylanase from Cellulomonas fimi by cell-surface display on Escherichia coli. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2012, 112, 455-463.
63. Polizzi, K.M.; Bommarius, A.S.; Broering, J.M.; Chaparro-Riggers, J.F. Stability of biocatalysts. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2007, 11, 220-225.
64. O'Fágáin, C. Engineering protein stability. Methods Mol. Biol. 2011, 681,103-136.
65. Hebert, D.N.; Zhang, J.X.; Chen, W.; Foellmer, B.; Helenius, A. The number and location of glycans on influenza hemagglutinin determine folding and association with calnexin and calreticulin. J. Cell. Biol. 1997, 139, 613-623.
66. Garvey, M.; Griesser, S.S.; Griesser, H.J.; Thierry, B.; Nussio, M.R.; Shapter, J.G.; Ecroyd, H.; Giorgetti, S.; Bellotti, V.; Gerrard, J.A.; et al. Enhanced molecular chaperone activity of the small heat-shock protein αB-cystallin following covalent immobilization onto a solid-phase support. Biopolymers 2011, 95, 376-389.
67. Netzer, W.J.; Hartl, F.U. Recombination of protein domains facilitated by co-translational folding in eukaryotes. Nature 1997, 388, 343-349.
68. Braun, P.; LaBaer, J. High throughput protein production for functional proteomics. Trends Biotechnol. 2003, 21, 383-388.
69. Esposito, D.; Chatterjee, D.K. Enhancement of soluble protein expression through the use of fusion tags. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2006, 17, 353-358.
70. Van den Berg, B.; Ellis, R.J.; Dobson, C.M. Effects of macromolecular crowding on protein folding and aggregation. EMBO J. 1999, 18, 6927-6933.
71. Kramer, G.; Boehringer, D.; Ban, N.; Bukau, B. The ribosome as a platform for co-translational processing, folding and targeting of newly synthesized proteins. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2009, 16, 589-597.
72. Meinnel, T.; Giglione C. Tools for analyzing and predicting N-terminal protein modifications. Proteomics 2008, 8, 626-649.
73. Kauzmann, W. Factors in interpretation of protein denaturation. Adv. Protein Chem. 1959, 14, 1-63.
74. Baldwin, R.L. Energetics of protein folding. J. Mol. Biol. 2007, 10, 283-301.
75. Bolen, D.W.; Rose, G.D. Structure and energetics of the hydrogen-bonded backbone in protein folding. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2008, 77, 339-362.
76. Kolinski, A. Protein modeling and structure prediction with a reduced representation. Acta. Biochim. Pol. 2004, 51, 349-371.
77. Knowles, T.P.; Fitzpatrick, A.W.; Meehan, S.; Mott, H.R.; Vendruscolo, M.; Dobson, C.M.; Welland, M.E. Role of intermolecular forces in defining material properties of protein nanofibrils. Science 2007, 318, 1900-1903.
78. Fernández, A.; Crespo, A. Protein wrapping: A molecular marker for association, aggregation and drug design. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008, 37, 2373-2382.
79. Misselwitz, B.; Staeck, O.; Rapoport, T.A. J proteins catalytically activate Hsp70 molecules to trap a wide range of peptide sequences. Mol. Cell 1998, 2, 593-603.
80. Aoki, K.; Taguchi, H.; Shindo, Y.; Yoshida, M.; Ogasahara, K.; Yutani, K.; Tanaka, N. Calorimetric observation of a GroEL-protein binding reaction with little contribution of hydrophobic interaction. J. Biol. Chem. 1997, 272, 32158-32162.
81. Martinez-Hackert, E.; Hendrickson, W.A. Promiscuous substrate recognition in folding and assembly activities of the trigger factor chaperone. Cell 2009, 138, 923-934.
82. Trombetta, E.S.; Helenius, A. Lectins as chaperones in glycoprotein folding. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 1998, 8, 587-592.
83. Ellis, R.J. Protein folding: Importance of the Anfinsen cage. Curr. Biol. 2003, 13, R881-R883.
84. Apetri, A.C.; Horwich, A.L. Chaperonin chamber accelerates protein folding through passive action of preventing aggregation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 17351-17355.
85. Tang, Y.C.; Chang, H.C.; Roeben, A.; Wischnewski, D.; Wischnewski, N.; Kerner, M.J.; Hartl, F.U.; Hayer-Hartl, M. Structural features of the GroEL-GroES nano-cage required for rapid folding of encapsulated protein. Cell 2006, 125, 903-914.
86. Lin, Z.; Rye, HS. GroEL-mediated protein folding: Making the impossible, possible. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2006, 41, 211-239.
87. Todd, M.J.; Lorimer, G.H.; Thirumalai, D. Chaperonin-facilitated protein folding: Optimization of rate and yield by an iterative annealing mechanism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1996, 93, 4030-4035.
88. Kmiecik, S.; Kolinski, A. Simulation of chaperonin effect on protein folding: A shift from nucleation-condensation to framework mechanism. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 10283-10289.
89. Shaw, B.F.; Moustakas, D.T.; Whitelegge, J.P.; Faull, K.F. Taking charge of proteins from neurodegeneration to industrial biotechnology. Adv. Protein Chem. Struct. Biol. 2010, 79, 127-164.
90. Schmittschmitt, J.P.; Scholtz, J.M. The role of protein stability, solubility, and net charge in amyloid fibril formation. Protein Sci. 2003, 12, 2374-2378.
91. Shaw, K.L.; Grimsley, G.R.; Yakovlev, G.I.; Makarov, A.A.; Pace, C.N. The effect of net charge on the solubility, activity, and stability of ribonuclease Sa. Protein Sci. 2001, 10, 1206-1215.
92. Tompa, P.; Csermely, P. The role of structural disorder in the function of RNA and protein chaperones. FASEB J. 2004, 18, 1169-1175.
93. Chiti, F.; Calamai, M.; Taddei, N.; Stefani, M.; Ramponi, G.; Dobson, C.M. Studies of the aggregation of mutant proteins in vitro provide insights into the genetics of amyloid diseases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 16419-16426.
94. Lawrence, M.S.; Phillips, K.J.; Liu, D.R. Supercharging proteins can impart unusual resilience. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 10110-10112.
95. Chiti, F.; Stefani, M.; Taddei, N.; Ramponi, G.; Dobson, C.M. Rationalization of the effects of mutations on peptide and protein aggregation rates. Nature 2003, 424, 805-808.
96. Marqusee, S.; Robbins, V.H.; Baldwin, R.L. Unusually stable helix formation in short alanine-based peptides. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1989, 86, 5286-5290.
97. Chen, J.; Skehel, J.J.; Wiley, D.C. A polar octapeptide fused to the N-terminal fusion peptide solubilizes the influenza virus HA2 subunit ectodomain. Biochemistry 1998, 37, 13643-13649.
98. Zhang, Y.B.; Howitt, J.; McCorkle, S.; Lawrence, P.; Springer, K.; Freimuth, P. Protein aggregation during overexpression limited by peptide extensions with large net negative charge. Protein Expr. Purif. 2004, 36, 207-216.
99. Kapust, R.B.; Waugh, D.S. Escherichia coli maltose-binding protein is uncommonly effective at promoting the solubility of polypeptides to which it is fused. Protein Sci. 1999, 8, 1668-1674.
100. Speed, M.A.; Wang, D.I.; King, J. Specific aggregation of partially folded polypeptide chains: The molecular basis of inclusion body composition. Nat. Biotechnol. 1996, 14, 1283-1287.
101. Rajan, R.S.; Illing, M.E.; Bence, N.F.; Kopito, R.R. Specificity in intracellular protein aggregation and inclusion body formation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 13060-13065.
102. Wright, C.F.; Teichmann, S.A.; Clarke, J.; Dobson, C.M. The importance of sequence diversity in the aggregation and evolution of proteins. Nature 2005, 438, 878-881.
103. Fink, A.L. Protein aggregation: Folding aggregates, inclusion bodies and amyloid. Fold. Des. 1998, 3, R9-R23.
104. Høiberg-Nielsen, R.; Fuglsang, C.C.; Arleth, L.; Westh, P. Interrelationships of glycosylation and aggregation kinetics for Peniophora lycii phytase. Biochemistry 2006, 45, 5057-5066.
105. Rajan, R.S.; Li, T.; Aras, M.; Sloey, C.; Sutherland, W.; Arai, H.; Briddell, R.; Kinstler, O.; Lueras, A.M.; Zhang, Y.; et al. Modulation of protein aggregation by polyethylene glycol conjugation: GCSF as a case study. Protein Sci. 2006, 15, 1063-1075.
106. Rüdiger, S.; Germeroth, L.; Schneider-Mergener, J.; Bukau, B. Substrate specificity of the DnaK chaperone determined by screening cellulose-bound peptide libraries. EMBO J. 1997, 16, 1501-1507.
107. Ryu, K.; Kim, C.W.; Kim, B.H.; Han, K.S.; Kim, K.H.; Choi, S.I.; Seong, B.L. Assessment of substrate-stabilizing factors for DnaK on the folding of aggregation-prone proteins. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2008, 373, 74-79.
108. Hiemenz, P.C.; Rajagopalan, R. In Principles of Colloid and Surface Chemistry, 3rd ed.; CRC Press: London, UK, 1997; pp. 575-621.
109. Wayne, N.; Bolon, D.N. Charge-rich regions modulate the anti-aggregation activity of Hsp90. J. Mol. Biol. 2010, 401, 931-939.