Visualizing cellulase activity

Biotechnology and Bioengineering

Volumn 110, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 1529-1549

  Bubner, Patricia ^a   Plank, Harald ^a   Nidetzky, Bernd ^a  

^a GRAZ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Austria)

Author keywords

(E)TEM; AFM; Cellulase; Cellulose degradation; Renewable energy; SEM

Indexed keywords

ADVANCED VISUALIZATIONS; AFM; BIOTECHNOLOGICAL PRODUCTION; CELLULASE; CELLULOSE DEGRADATION; COMMERCIAL EXPLOITATION; RENEWABLE ENERGIES; SUBSTRATE MORPHOLOGIES;

CELLULOSE; ENZYMES; SACCHARIFICATION; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY;

SUBSTRATES;

CELLULASE; CELLULOSE; LIGNOCELLULOSE;

ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; BACTERIAL STRAIN; BIOTECHNOLOGICAL PRODUCTION; ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; ENZYMATIC DEGRADATION; ENZYME ACTIVITY; ENZYME SUBSTRATE COMPLEX; FLUORESCENCE MICROSCOPY; FUNGAL STRAIN; HYDROLYSIS; NONHUMAN; REVIEW; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY;

BACTERIAL PROTEINS; CELLULASE; CELLULOSE; FUNGAL PROTEINS; MICROSCOPY, ATOMIC FORCE; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PLANTS; RENEWABLE ENERGY;

EID: 84876774277     PISSN: 00063592     EISSN: 10970290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bit.24884     Document Type: Review

References (143)

1. Abbe E. 1873. Beiträge zur Theorie des Mikroskops und der mikroskopischen Wahrnehmung. Arch Mikrosk Anat 9: 413-420.
2. Abuja PM, Pilz I, Claeyssens M, Tomme P. 1988a. Domain structure of cellobiohydrolase II as studied by small angle X-ray scattering: Close resemblance to cellobiohydrolase I. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 156: 180-185.
3. Abuja PM, Schmuck M, Pilz I, Tomme P, Claeyssens M, Esterbauer H. 1988b. Structural and functional domains of cellobiohydrolase I from Trichoderma reesei . Eur Biophys J 15: 339-342.
4. Adams JJ, Currie MA, Ali S, Bayer EA, Jia Z, Smith SP. 2010. Insights into higher-order organization of the cellulosome revealed by a dissect-and-build approach: Crystal structure of interacting Clostridium thermocellum multimodular components. J Mol Biol 396: 833-839.
5. Ahola S, Turon X, Osterberg M, Laine J, Rojas OJ. 2008. Enzymatic hydrolysis of native cellulose nanofibrils and other cellulose model films: Effect of surface structure. Langmuir 24: 11592-11599.
6. Allison DP, Mortensen NP, Sullivan CJ, Doktycz MJ. 2010. Atomic force microscopy of biological samples. Nanomed Nanobiotechnol 2: 618-634.
7. Arantes V, Saddler JN. 2010. Access to cellulose limits the efficiency of enzymatic hydrolysis: The role of amorphogenesis. Biotechnol Biofuels 3: 4.
8. Astley OM, Chanliaud E, Donald AM, Gidley MJ. 2001. Structure of Acetobacter cellulose composites in the hydrated state. Int J Biol Macromol 29: 193-202.
9. Bansal P, Hall M, Realff MJ, Lee JH, Bommarius AS. 2009. Modeling cellulase kinetics on lignocellulosic substrates. Biotechnol Adv 27: 833-848.
10. Barr BK, Hsieh YL, Ganem B, Wilson DB. 1996. Identification of two functionally different classes of exocellulases. Biochemistry 35: 586-592.
11. Bayer EA, Lamed R. 1986. Ultrastructure of the cell surface cellulosome of Clostridium thermocellum and its interaction with cellulose. J Bacteriol 167: 828-836.
12. Beckham GT, Matthews JF, Peters B, Bomble YJ, Himmel ME, Crowley MF. 2011. Molecular-level origins of biomass recalcitrance: Decrystallization free energies for four common cellulose polymorphs. J Phys Chem B 115: 4118-4127.
13. Berg RH, Erdos GW, Gritzali M, Brown RDJ. 1988. Enzyme-gold affinity labelling of cellulose. J Electron Microsc Tech 8: 371-379.
14. Blanchette RA, Abad AR. 1988. Ultrastructural localization of hemicellulose in birch wood (Betula papyrifera) decayed by brown and white rot fungi. Holzforschung 42: 393-398.
15. Blanchette RA, Abad AR, Cease KR, Lovrien RE, Leathers TD. 1989. Colloidal gold cytochemistry of endo-1, 4-beta-glucanase, 1, 4-beta-D-glucan cellobiohydrolase, and endo-1, 4-beta-xylanase: Ultrastructure of sound and decayed birch wood. Appl Environ Microbiol 55: 2293-2301.
16. Boisset C, Chanzy H, Schülein M, Henrissat B. 1997. An ultrastructural study of the interaction of a fungal endoglucanase from Humicola insolens with cotton fibers. Cellulose 4: 7-20.
17. Boisset C, Chanzy H, Henrissat B, Lamed R, Shoham Y, Bayer EA. 1999. Digestion of crystalline cellulose substrates by the Clostridium thermocellum cellulosome: Structural and morphological aspects. Biochem J 340: 829-835.
18. Boisset C, Fraschini C, Schülein M, Henrissat B, Chanzy H. 2000. Imaging the enzymatic digestion of bacterial cellulose ribbons reveals the endo character of the cellobiohydrolase Cel6A from Humicola insolens and its mode of synergy with cellobiohydrolase Cel7A. Appl Environ Microbiol 66: 1444-1452.
19. Bowling AJ, Amano Y, Lindstrom R, Brown RMJ. 2001. Rotation of cellulose ribbons during degradation with fungal cellulase. Cellulose 8: 91-97.
20. Bradbury S, Evennett P. 1996. Fluorescence microscopy. Contrast techniques in light microscopy. Oxford: BIOS Scientific Publishers, Ltd. p 91-100.
21. Bu L, Nimlos MR, Shirts MR, Stahlberg J, Himmel ME, Crowley MF, Beckham GT. 2012. Product binding varies dramatically between processive and nonprocessive cellulase enzymes. J Biol Chem 287: 24807-24813.
22. Bubner P, Dohr J, Plank H, Mayrhofer C, Nidetzky B. 2012. Cellulases dig deep: In situ observation of the mesoscopic structural dynamics of enzymatic cellulose degradation. J Biol Chem 287: 2759-2765.
23. Casuso I, Kodera N, Le Grimellec C, Ando T, Scheuring S. 2009. Contact-mode high-resolution high-speed atomic force microscopy movies of the purple membrane. Biophys J 97: 1354-1361.
24. Chanzy H, Henrissat B. 1983. Electron microscopy study of the enzymic hydrolysis of Valonia cellulose. Carbohydr Polym 3: 161-173.
25. Chanzy H, Henrissat B. 1985. Undirectional degradation of Valonia cellulose microcrystals subjected to cellulase action. FEBS Lett 184: 285-288.
26. Chanzy H, Henrissat B, Vuong H, Schülein M. 1983. The action of 1, 4-β-D-glucan cellobiohydrolase on Valonia cellulose microcrystals. An electron microscopy study. FEBS Lett 153: 113-118.
27. Chanzy H, Henrissat B, Vuong H. 1984. Colloidal gold labelling of 1, 4-ß-D-glucan cellobiohydrolase adsorbed on cellulose substrates. FEBS Lett 172: 193-197.
28. Chundawat SP, Bellesia G, Uppugundla N, Sousa LD, Gao D, Cheh A, Agarwal UP, Bianchetti CM, Phillips GN, Langan P, Balan V, Gnanakaran S, Dale BE. 2011. Restructuring crystalline cellulose hydrogen bond network enhances its depolymerization rate. J Am Chem Soc 133: 11163-11174.
29. Clegg DW, Collyer AA, editors. 1991. Irradiation effects on polymers. New York: Elsevier Science.
30. Collins SP, Pope RK, Scheetz RW, Ray RI, Wagner PA, Little BJ. 1993. Advantages of environmental scanning electron microscopy in studies of microorganisms. Microsc Res Tech 25: 398-405.
31. Crampton N, Yokokawa M, Dryden DT, Edwardson JM, Rao DN, Takeyasu K, Yoshimura SH, Henderson RM. 2007. Fast-scan atomic force microscopy reveals that the type III restriction enzyme EcoP15I is capable of DNA translocation and looping. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104: 12755-12760.
32. Cuissinat C, Navard P. 2006. Swelling and dissolution of cellulose part 1: Free floating cotton and wood fibres in N-methylmorpholine-N-oxide-water mixtures. Macromol Symp 244: 1-18.
33. Dagel DJ, Liu YS, Zhong L, Luo Y, Himmel ME, Xu Q, Zeng Y, Ding SY, Smith S. 2011. In situ imaging of single carbohydrate-binding modules on cellulose microfibrils. J Phys Chem B 115: 635-641.
34. de Jonge N, Peckys DB, Kremers GJ, Piston DW. 2009. Electron microscopy of whole cells in liquid with nanometer resolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106: 2159-2164.
35. Debzi EM, Chanzy H, Sugiyama J, Tekely P, Excoffier G. 1991. The Iα→Iβ transformation of highly crystalline cellulose by annealing in various mediums. Macromolecules 24: 6816-6822.
36. Denk W, Horstmann H. 2004. Serial block-face scanning electron microscopy to reconstruct three-dimensional tissue nanostructure. PLoS Biol 2: e329.
37. Ding SY, Himmel ME. 2006. The maize primary cell wall microfibril: A new model derived from direct visualization. J Agric Food Chem 54: 597-606.
38. Ding SY, Xu Q, Ali MK, Baker JO, Bayer EA, Barak Y, Lamed R, Sugiyama J, Rumbles G, Himmel ME. 2006. Versatile derivatives of carbohydrate-binding modules for imaging of complex carbohydrates approaching the molecular level of resolution. Biotechniques 41(435-436): 438-440.
39. Ding SY, Xu Q, Crowley M, Zeng Y, Nimlos M, Lamed R, Bayer EA, Himmel ME. 2008. A biophysical perspective on the cellulosome: New opportunities for biomass conversion. Curr Opin Biotechnol 19: 218-227.
40. Ding SY, Liu YS, Zeng Y, Himmel ME, Baker JO, Bayer EA. 2012. How does plant cell wall nanoscale architecture correlate with enzymatic digestibility? Science 338: 1055-1060.
41. Donohoe BS, Selig MJ, Viamajala S, Vinzant TB, Adney WS, Himmel ME. 2009. Detecting cellulase penetration into corn stover cell walls by immuno-electron microscopy. Biotechnol Bioeng 103: 480-489.
42. Druzhinina IS, Komon-Zelazowska M, Ismaiel A, Jaklitsch W, Mullaw T, Samuels GJ, Kubicek CP. 2012. Molecular phylogeny and species delimitation in the section Longibrachiatum of Trichoderma . Fungal Genet Biol 49: 358-368.
43. Eriksson J, Malmsten M, Tiberg F, Callisen TH, Damhus T, Johansen KS. 2005a. Enzymatic degradation of model cellulose films. J Colloid Interface Sci 284: 99-106.
44. Eriksson J, Malmsten M, Tiberg F, Callisen TH, Damhus T, Johansen KS. 2005b. Model cellulose films exposed to H. insolens glucoside hydrolase family 45 endo-cellulase-The effect of the carbohydrate-binding module. J Colloid Interface Sci 285: 94-99.
45. Evans CS, Gallagher IM, Atkey PT, Wood DA. 1991. Localisation of degradative enzymes in white-rot decay of lignocellulose. Biodegradation 2: 93-106.
46. Fontes CM, Gilbert HJ. 2010. Cellulosomes: Highly efficient nanomachines designed to deconstruct plant cell wall complex carbohydrates. Annu Rev Biochem 79: 655-681.
47. Fox JM, Levine SE, Clark DS, Blanch HW. 2012. Initial- and processive-cut products reveal cellobiohydrolase rate limitations and the role of companion enzymes. Biochemistry 51: 442-452.
48. Gagner JE, Lopez MD, Dordick JS, Siegel RW. 2011. Effect of gold nanoparticle morphology on adsorbed protein structure and function. Biomaterials 32: 7241-7252.
49. Ganner T, Bubner P, Eibinger M, Mayrhofer C, Plank H, Nidetzky B. 2012. Dissecting and reconstructing synergism: In situ visualization of cooperativity among cellulases. J Biol Chem 287: 43215-43222.
50. García R. 2010. Amplitude modulation atomic force spectroscopy. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA.
51. Geoghegan WD, Ackerman GA. 1977. Adsorption of horseradish peroxidase, ovomucoid and anti-immunoglobulin to colloidal gold for the indirect detection of concanavalin A, wheat germ agglutinin and goat anti-human immunoglobulin G on cell surfaces at the electron microscopic level: A new method, theory and application. J Histochem Cytochem 25: 1187-1200.
52. Gilkes NR, Warren RA, Miller RC Jr, Kilburn DG. 1988. Precise excision of the cellulose binding domains from two Cellulomonas fimi cellulases by a homologous protease and the effect on catalysis. J Biol Chem 263: 10401-10407.
53. Gilkes NR, Kilburn DG, Miller RC Jr, Warren RA, Sugiyama J, Chanzy H, Henrissat B. 1993. Visualization of the adsorption of a bacterial endo-beta-1, 4-glucanase and its isolated cellulose-binding domain to crystalline cellulose. Int J Biol Macromol 15: 347-351.
54. Goyal A, Ghosh B, Eveleigh D. 1991. Characteristics of fungal cellulases. Biores Technol 36: 37-50.
55. Graham-Rowe D. 2011. Agriculture: Beyond food versus fuel. Nature 474(7352): S6-S8.
56. Habibi Y, Lucia LA, Rojas OJ. 2010. Cellulose nanocrystals: Chemistry, self-assembly, and applications. Chem Rev 110: 3479-3500.
57. Hall M, Bansal P, Lee JH, Realff MJ, Bommarius AS. 2010. Cellulose crystallinity-A key predictor of the enzymatic hydrolysis rate. FEBS J 277: 1571-1582.
58. Himmel ME, Ding SY, Johnson DK, Adney WS, Nimlos MR, Brady JW, Foust TD. 2007. Biomass recalcitrance: Engineering plants and enzymes for biofuels production. Science 315: 804-807.
59. Horn SJ, Vaaje-Kolstad G, Westereng B, Eijsink VG. 2012. Novel enzymes for the degradation of cellulose. Biotechnol Biofuels 5: 45.
60. 13C-NMR study of cellulose structure in spruce wood and kraft pulp. Cellulose 7: 35-55.
61. Hult EL, Iversen T, Sugiyama J. 2003. Characterization of the supermolecular structure of cellulose in wood pulp fibres. Cellulose 10: 103-110.
62. Humbel BM, Sibon OC, Stierhof YD, Schwarz H. 1995. Ultra-small gold particles and silver enhancement as a detection system in immunolabeling and in situ hybridization experiments. J Histochem Cytochem 43: 735-737.
63. Igarashi K, Wada M, Hori R, Samejima M. 2006. Surface density of cellobiohydrolase on crystalline celluloses. A critical parameter to evaluate enzymatic kinetics at a solid-liquid interface. FEBS J 273: 2869-2878.
64. Igarashi K, Wada M, Samejima M. 2007. Activation of crystalline cellulose to cellulose III(I) results in efficient hydrolysis by cellobiohydrolase. FEBS J 274: 1785-1792.
65. Igarashi K, Koivula A, Wada M, Kimura S, Penttilä M, Samejima M. 2009. High speed atomic force microscopy visualizes processive movement of Trichoderma reesei cellobiohydrolase I on crystalline cellulose. J Biol Chem 284: 36186-36190.
66. Igarashi K, Uchihashi T, Koivula A, Wada M, Kimura S, Okamoto T, Penttilä M, Ando T, Samejima M. 2011. Traffic jams reduce hydrolytic efficiency of cellulase on cellulose surface. Science 333: 1279-1282.
67. Imai T, Boisset C, Samejima M, Igarashi K, Sugiyama J. 1998. Unidirectional processive action of cellobiohydrolase Cel7A on Valonia cellulose microcrystals. FEBS Lett 432: 113-116.
68. Imai T, Putaux J-L, Sugiyama J. 2003. Geometric phase analysis of lattice images from algal cellulose microfibrils. Polymer 44: 1871-1879.
69. Jäger G, Girfoglio M, Dollo F, Rinaldi R, Bongard H, Commandeur U, Fischer R, Spiess AC, Büchs J. 2011. How recombinant swollen in from Kluyveromyces lactis affects cellulosic substrates and accelerates their hydrolysis. Biotechnol Biofuels 4: 33.
70. Jalak J, Väljamäe P. 2010. Mechanism of initial rapid rate retardation in cellobiohydrolase catalyzed cellulose hydrolysis. Biotechnol Bioeng 106: 871-883.
71. Jalak J, Kurashin M, Teugjas H, Väljamäe P. 2012. Endo-exo synergism in cellulose hydrolysis revisited. J Biol Chem 287: 28802-28815.
72. Jarvis M. 2003. Chemistry: Cellulose stacks up. Nature 426: 611-612.
73. Jervis EJ, Haynes CA, Kilburn DG. 1997. Surface diffusion of cellulases and their isolated binding domains on cellulose. J Biol Chem 272: 24016-24023.
74. Josefsson P, Henriksson G, Wågberg L. 2008. The physical action of cellulases revealed by a quartz crystal microbalance study using ultra thin cellulose films and pure cellulases. Biomacromolecules 9: 249-254.
75. Klemm D, Heublein B, Fink HP, Bohn A. 2005. Cellulose: Fascinating biopolymer and sustainable raw material. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 44: 3358-3393.
76. Klemm D, Kramer F, Moritz S, Lindstrom T, Ankerfors M, Gray D, Dorris A. 2011. Nanocelluloses: A new family of nature-based materials. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 50: 5438-5466.
77. Kleywegt GJ, Zou JY, Divne C, Davies GJ, Sinning I, Stahlberg J, Reinikainen T, Srisodsuk M, Teeri TT, Jones TA. 1997. The crystal structure of the catalytic core domain of endoglucanase I from Trichoderma reesei at 3.6 Å resolution, and a comparison with related enzymes. J Mol Biol 272: 383-397.
78. Kodera N, Yamamoto D, Ishikawa R, Ando T. 2010. Video imaging of walking myosin V by high-speed atomic force microscopy. Nature 468: 72-76.
79. Kontturi E, Thüne PC, Niemantsverdriet JWH. 2003. Cellulose model surfaces-simplified preparation by spin coating and characterization by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, infrared spectroscopy, and atomic force microscopy. Langmuir 19: 5735-5741.
80. Kontturi E, Suchy M, Penttilä P, Jean B, Pirkkalainen K, Torkkeli M, Serimaa R. 2011. Amorphous characteristics of an ultrathin cellulose film. Biomacromolecules 12: 770-777.
81. Krishnamachari P, Hashaikeh R, Tiner M. 2011. Modified cellulose morphologies and its composites; SEM and TEM analysis. Micron 42: 751-761.
82. Kubicek CP, Bolzlbauer UM, Kovacs W, Mach RL, Kuhls K, Lieckfeldt E, Borner T, Samuels GJ. 1996. Cellulase formation by species of Trichoderma sect. Longibrachiatum and of Hypocrea spp. with anamorphs referable to Trichoderma sect. Longibrachiatum . Fungal Genet Biol 20: 105-114.
83. Kurasin M, Väljamäe P. 2011. Processivity of cellobiohydrolases is limited by the substrate. J Biol Chem 286: 169-177.
84. Lee HJ, Brown MJ. 1997. A comparative structural characterization of two cellobiohydrolases from Trichoderma reesei: A high resolution electron microscopy study. J Biotechnol 57: 127-136.
85. Lee I, Evans BR, Lane LM, Woodward J. 1996. Substrate-enzyme interactions in cellulase systems. Biores Technol 58: 163-169.
86. Lee I, Evans BR, Woodward J. 2000. The mechanism of cellulase action on cotton fibers: Evidence from atomic force microscopy. Ultramicroscopy 82: 213-221.
87. Lee SH, Doherty TV, Linhardt RJ, Dordick JS. 2009. Ionic liquid-mediated selective extraction of lignin from wood leading to enhanced enzymatic cellulose hydrolysis. Biotechnol Bioeng 102: 1368-1376.
88. Lee HJ, Lee S, Ko HJ, Kim KH, Choi IG. 2010. An expansin-like protein from Hahella chejuensis binds cellulose and enhances cellulase activity. Mol Cells 29: 379-385.
89. Lehtiö J, Sugiyama J, Gustavsson M, Fransson L, Linder M, Teeri TT. 2003. The binding specificity and affinity determinants of family 1 and family 3 cellulose binding modules. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 484-489.
90. Leung BO, Chou KC. 2011. Review of super-resolution fluorescence microscopy for biology. Appl Spectrosc 65(250A-272A): 967-1086.
91. Levine SE, Fox JM, Blanch HW, Clark DS. 2010. A mechanistic model of the enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose. Biotechnol Bioeng 107: 37-51.
92. Linder M, Mattinen ML, Kontteli M, Lindeberg G, Stahlberg J, Drakenberg T, Reinikainen T, Pettersson G, Annila A. 1995. Identification of functionally important amino acids in the cellulose-binding domain of Trichoderma reesei cellobiohydrolase I. Protein Sci 4: 1056-1064.
93. Liu H, Fu S, Zhu JY, Li H, Zhan H. 2009a. Visualization of enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose using AFM phase imaging. Enzyme Microb Tech 45: 274-281.
94. Liu Y, Zeng Y, Luo Y, Xu Q, Himmel ME, Smith SJ, Ding SY. 2009b. Does the cellulose-binding module move on the cellulose surface? Cellulose 16: 587-597.
95. Liu YS, Luo Y, Baker JO, Zeng Y, Himmel ME, Ding S-Y. 2010. Single molecule study of cellulase hydrolysis of crystalline cellulose. Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Photonics West 2010. San Francisco, CA, USA.
96. Liu YS, Baker JO, Zeng Y, Himmel ME, Haas T, Ding SY. 2011. Cellobiohydrolase hydrolyzes crystalline cellulose on hydrophobic faces. J Biol Chem 286: 11195-11201.
97. Luterbacher JS, Walker LP, Moran-Mirabal JM. 2013. Observing and modeling BMCC degradation by commercial cellulase cocktails with fluorescently labeled Trichoderma reseii Cel7A through confocal microscopy. Biotechnol Bioeng 110: 108-117.
98. Lynd LR, Weimer PJ, van Zyl WH, Pretorius IS. 2002. Microbial cellulose utilization: Fundamentals and biotechnology. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 66: 506-577.
99. Lynd LR, Laser MS, Bransby D, Dale BE, Davison B, Hamilton R, Himmel M, Keller M, McMillan JD, Sheehan J, Wyman CE. 2008. How biotech can transform biofuels. Nat Biotechnol 26: 169-172.
100. Mansfield SD, Mooney C, Saddler JN. 1999. Substrate and enzyme characteristics that limit cellulose hydrolysis. Biotechnol Prog 15: 804-816.
101. Moran-Mirabal JM, Santhanam N, Corgie SC, Craighead HG, Walker LP. 2008. Immobilization of cellulose fibrils on solid substrates for cellulase-binding studies through quantitative fluorescence microscopy. Biotechnol Bioeng 101: 1129-1141.
102. Moran-Mirabal JM, Bolewski JC, Walker LP. 2011. Reversibility and binding kinetics of Thermobifida fusca cellulases studied through fluorescence recovery after photobleaching microscopy. Biophys Chem 155: 20-28.
103. Moran-Mirabal JM, Bolewski JC, Walker LP. 2013. Thermobifida fusca cellulases exhibit limited surface diffusion on bacterial micro-crystalline cellulose. Biotechnol Bioeng 110: 47-56.
104. Nidetzky B, Steiner W, Hayn M, Claeyssens M. 1994. Cellulose hydrolysis by the cellulases from Trichoderma reesei: A new model for synergistic interaction. Biochem J 298: 705-710.
105. Nieves RA, Ellis RP, Todd RJ, Johnson TJ, Grohmann K, Himmel ME. 1991. Visualization of Trichoderma reesei cellobiohydrolase I and endoglucanase I on aspen cellulose by using monoclonal antibody-colloidal gold conjugates. Appl Environ Microbiol 57: 3163-3170.
106. Nigmatullin R, Lovitt R, Wright C, Linder M, Nakari-Setala T, Gama M. 2004. Atomic force microscopy study of cellulose surface interaction controlled by cellulose binding domains. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 35: 125-135.
107. Nimlos MR, Matthews JF, Crowley MF, Walker RC, Chukkapalli G, Brady JW, Adney WS, Cleary JM, Zhong L, Himmel ME. 2007. Molecular modeling suggests induced fit of family I carbohydrate-binding modules with a broken-chain cellulose surface. Protein Eng Des Sel 20: 179-187.
108. Nimlos MR, Beckham GT, Matthews JF, Bu L, Himmel ME, Crowley MF. 2012. Binding preferences, surface attachment, diffusivity, and orientation of a family 1 carbohydrate-binding module on cellulose. J Biol Chem 287: 20603-20612.
109. Noy A, editor. 2008. Handbook of molecular force spectroscopy. New York: Springer.
110. Park S, Baker JO, Himmel ME, Parilla PA, Johnson DK. 2010. Cellulose crystallinity index: Measurement techniques and their impact on interpreting cellulase performance. Biotechnol Biofuels 3: 10.
111. Payne CM, Baban J, Horn SJ, Backe PH, Arvai AS, Dalhus B, Bjoras M, Eijsink VG, Sorlie M, Beckham GT, Vaaje-Kolstad G. 2012. Hallmarks of processivity in glycoside hydrolases from crystallographic and computational studies of the Serratia marcescens chitinases. J Biol Chem 287: 36322-36330.
112. Peckys DB, Mazur P, Gould KL, de Jonge N. 2011. Fully hydrated yeast cells imaged with electron microscopy. Biophys J 100: 2522-2529.
113. Penttilä PA, Várnai A, Leppänen K, Peura M, Kallonen A, Jääskeläinen P, Lucenius J, Ruokolainen J, Siika-aho M, Viikari L, Serimaa R. 2010. Changes in submicrometer structure of enzymatically hydrolyzed microcrystalline cellulose. Biomacromolecules 11: 1111-1117.
114. Pinto R, Carvalho J, Mota M, Gama M. 2006. Large-scale production of cellulose-binding domains. Adsorption studies using CBD-FITC conjugates. Cellulose 13: 557-569.
115. Pinto R, Amaral AL, Ferreira EC, Mota M, Vilanova M, Ruel K, Gama M. 2008. Quantification of the CBD-FITC conjugates surface coating on cellulose fibres. BMC Biotechnol 8: 1.
116. Quirk A, Lipkowski J, Vandenende C, Cockburn D, Clarke AJ, Dutcher JR, Roscoe SG. 2010. Direct visualization of the enzymatic digestion of a single fiber of native cellulose in an aqueous environment by atomic force microscopy. Langmuir 26: 5007-5013.
117. Quiroz-Castaneda RE, Martinez-Anaya C, Cuervo-Soto LI, Segovia L, Folch-Mallol JL. 2011. Loosenin, a novel protein with cellulose-disrupting activity from Bjerkandera adusta . Microb Cell Fact 10: 8.
118. Reymann J, Baddeley D, Gunkel M, Lemmer P, Stadter W, Jegou T, Rippe K, Cremer C, Birk U. 2008. High-precision structural analysis of subnuclear complexes in fixed and live cells via spatially modulated illumination (SMI) microscopy. Chromosome Res 16: 367-382.
119. Rust MJ, Bates M, Zhuang X. 2006. Sub-diffraction-limit imaging by stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (STORM). Nat Methods 3: 793-795.
120. Saloheimo M, Paloheimo M, Hakola S, Pere J, Swanson B, Nyyssonen E, Bhatia A, Ward M, Penttila M. 2002. Swollenin, a Trichoderma reesei protein with sequence similarity to the plant expansins, exhibits disruption activity on cellulosic materials. Eur J Biochem 269: 4202-4211.
121. Sander B, Golas MM. 2011. Visualization of bionanostructures using transmission electron microscopical techniques. Microsc Res Tech 74: 642-663.
122. Santa-Maria M, Jeoh T. 2010. Molecular-scale investigations of cellulose microstructure during enzymatic hydrolysis. Biomacromolecules 11: 2000-2007.
123. Sezen M, Plank H, Nellen PM, Meier S, Chernev B, Grogger W, Fisslthaler E, List EJW, Scherf U, Poelt P. 2009. Ion beam degradation analysis of poly(3-hexylthiophene) (P3HT): Can cryo-FIB minimize irradiation damage? Phys Chem Chem Phys 11: 5130-5133.
124. Sezen M, Plank H, Fisslthaler E, Chernev B, Zankel A, Tchernychova E, Blümel A, List EJW, Grogger W, Pölt P. 2011. An investigation on focused electron/ion beam induced degradation mechanisms of conjugated polymers. Phys Chem Chem Phys 13: 20235-20240.
125. Singh S, Simmons BA, Vogel C. 2009. Visualization of biomass solubilization and cellulose regeneration during ionic liquid pretreatment of switchgrass. Biotech Bioeng 104: 68-75.
126. Solomon BD, Barnes JR, Halvorsen KE. 2007. Grain and cellulosic ethanol: History, economics, and energy policy. Biomass Bioenergy 31: 416-425.
127. Šturcová A, His I, Apperley DC, Sugiyama J, Jarvis MC. 2004. Structural details of crystalline cellulose from higher plants. Biomacromolecules 5: 1333-1339.
128. Suchy M, Kontturi E, Vuorinen T. 2010. Impact of drying on wood ultrastructure: Similarities in cell wall alteration between native wood and isolated wood-based fibers. Biomacromolecules 11: 2161-2168.
129. Tébéka IR, Silva AG, Petri DF. 2009. Hydrolytic activity of free and immobilized cellulase. Langmuir 25: 1582-1587.
130. Tomme P, Van Tilbeurgh H, Pettersson G, Van Damme J, Vandekerckhove J, Knowles J, Teeri T, Claeyssens M. 1988. Studies of the cellulolytic system of Trichoderma reesei QM 9414. Analysis of domain function in two cellobiohydrolases by limited proteolysis. Eur J Biochem 170: 575-581.
131. Uchihashi T, Kodera N, Ando T. 2012. Guide to video recording of structure dynamics and dynamic processes of proteins by high-speed atomic force microscopy. Nat Protoc 7: 1193-1206.
132. Väljamäe P, Sild V, Pettersson G, Johansson G. 1998. The initial kinetics of hydrolysis by cellobiohydrolases I and II is consistent with a cellulose surface-erosion model. Eur J Biochem 253: 469-475.
133. I. Biomacromolecules 5: 1385-1391.
134. Wang J, Quirk A, Lipkowski J, Dutcher JR, Hill C, Mark A, Clarke AJ. 2012a. Real-time observation of the swelling and hydrolysis of a single crystalline cellulose fiber catalyzed by cellulase 7B from Trichoderma reesei . Langmuir 28: 9664-9672.
135. Wang L, Wang Y, Ragauskas AJ. 2012b. Determination of cellulase colocalization on cellulose fiber with quantitative FRET measured by acceptor photobleaching and spectrally unmixing fluorescence microscopy. Analyst 137: 1319-1324.
136. Westphal V, Rizzoli SO, Lauterbach MA, Kamin D, Jahn R, Hell SW. 2008. Video-rate far-field optical nanoscopy dissects synaptic vesicle movement. Science 320: 246-249.
137. White AR, Brown RM. 1981. Enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose: Visual characterization of the process. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 78: 1047-1051.
138. Wildanger D, Patton BR, Schill H, Marseglia L, Hadden JP, Knauer S, Schonle A, Rarity JG, O'Brien JL, Hell SW, Smith JM, 2012. Solid immersion facilitates fluorescence microscopy with nanometer resolution and sub-angstrom emitter localization. Adv Mater 24: 309-313.
139. Wilson DB. 2012. Processive and nonprocessive cellulases for biofuel production-Lessons from bacterial genomes and structural analysis. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 93: 497-502.
140. Xu Q, Tucker MP, Arenkiel P, Ai X, Rumbles G, Sugiyama J, Himmel ME, Ding S. 2009. Labeling the planar face of crystalline cellulose using quantum dots directed by type-I carbohydrate-binding modules. Cellulose 16: 19-26.
141. Zhang YH, Lynd LR. 2004. Toward an aggregated understanding of enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose: Noncomplexed cellulase systems. Biotechnol Bioeng 88: 797-824.
142. Zhang Z, Wang Y, Ruan J. 1998. Reclassification of Thermomonospora and Microtetraspora . Int J Syst Bacteriol 48: 411-422.
143. Zhou W, Xu Y, Schüttler H-B. 2010. Cellulose hydrolysis in evolving substrate morphologies III: Time-scale analysis. Biotech Bioeng 107: 224-234.