Thermobifida fusca cellulases exhibit limited surface diffusion on bacterial micro-crystalline cellulose

Biotechnology and Bioengineering

Volumn 110, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 47-56

  Moran Mirabal, Jose M ^a,b   Bolewski, Jacob C ^a,b   Walker, Larry P ^a,b  

^a Department of Biological and Environmental Engineering   (United States)

^b MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Cellulase; Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching; Microscopy; Single molecule; Surface diffusion; Thermobifida fusca

Indexed keywords

CELLULOSE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CRYSTALLINE MATERIALS; ENZYMES; FLUORESCENCE; MICROSCOPIC EXAMINATION; MOLECULES; MONTE CARLO METHODS; PHOTOBLEACHING; SURFACE DIFFUSION; SURFACE MOUNT TECHNOLOGY;

BOND CLEAVAGES; CELLULASE; CELLULOSE SURFACES; CRYSTALLINE CELLULOSE; DIFFUSIVE MOTIONS; FLUORESCENCE RECOVERY AFTER PHOTOBLEACHING; MOLECULAR STATE; MONTE CARLO SIMULATIONS; SINGLE MOLECULE; SINGLE-MOLECULE TRACKING; SURFACE MOTIONS; THERMOBIFIDA FUSCA;

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY;

CELLULASE; CRYSTALLIN; MICROCRYSTALLINE CELLULOSE;

ARTICLE; CATALYSIS; CELL TRACKING; DIFFUSION; DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT; FLUORESCENCE RECOVERY AFTER PHOTOBLEACHING; MONTE CARLO METHOD; NONHUMAN; SINGLE MOLECULE TRACKING; THERMOBIFIDA FUSCA;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); THERMOBIFIDA FUSCA;

EID: 84869880474     PISSN: 00063592     EISSN: 10970290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bit.24604     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Axelrod D, Koppel D, Schlessinger J, Elson E, Webb W. 1976. Mobility measurement by analysis of fluorescence photobleaching recovery kinetics. Biophys J 16: 1055-1069.
2. Ha T. 2001. Single-molecule fluorescence resonance energy transfer. Methods 25: 78-86.
3. Helbert W, Chanzy H, Husum TL, Schülein M, Ernst S. 2003. Fluorescent cellulose microfibrils as substrate for the detection of cellulase activity. Biomacromolecules 4: 481-487.
4. Henrissat B, Davies GJ. 2000. Glycoside hydrolases and glycosyltransferases. Families, modules, and implications for genomics. Plant Physiol 124: 1515.
5. Himmel ME, Ding S-Y, Johnson DK, Adney WS, Nimlos MR, Brady JW, Foust TD. 2007. Biomass recalcitrance: Engineering plants and enzymes for biofuels production. Science 315: 804-8807.
6. Igarashi K, Koivula A, Wada M, Kimura S, Penttila M, Samejima M. 2009. High speed atomic force microscopy visualizes processive movement of Trichoderma reesei cellobiohydrolase I on crystalline cellulose. J Biol Chem 284: 36186-36190.
7. Igarashi K, Uchihashi T, Koivula A, Wada M, Kimura S, Okamoto T, Penttila M, Ando T, Samejima M. 2011. Traffic jams reduce hydrolytic efficiency of cellulase on cellulose surface. Science 333: 1279-1282.
8. Jeoh T, Wilson DB, Walker LP. 2002. Cooperative and competitive binding in synergistic mixtures of Thermobifida fusca cellulases Cel5A, Cel6B, and Cel9A. Biotechnol Prog 18: 760-769.
9. Jervis EJ, Haynes CA, Kilburn DG. 1997. Surface diffusion of cellulases and their isolated binding domains on cellulose. J Biol Chem 272: 24016.
10. Jung ED, Lao G, Irwin D, Barr BK, Benjamin A, Wilson DB. 1993. DNA sequences and expression in streptomyces lividans of an exoglucanase gene and an endoglucanase gene from Thermomonospora fusca Appl Environ Microbiol 59: 3032-33043.
11. Jung H, Wilson DB, Walker LP. 2003. Binding and reversibility of Thermobifida fusca Cel5A, Cel6B, and Cel48A and their respective catalytic domains to bacterial microcrystalline cellulose. Biotechnol Bioeng 84: 151-159.
12. Kostylev M, Moran-Mirabal JM, Walker LP, Wilson DW. 2012. Determination of the molecular states of the processive endocellulase Thermobifida fusca Cel9A during crystalline cellulose depolymerization. Biotechnol Bioeng 109: 295-299.
13. Kurasin M, Valjamae P. 2010. Processivity of cellobiohydrolases is limited by the substrate. J Biol Chem 286: 169-177.
14. Kusumi A, Sako Y, Yamamoto M. 1993. Confined lateral diffusion of membrane receptors as studied by single particle tracking (nanovid microscopy). Effects of calcium-induced differentiation in cultured epithelial cells. Biophys J 65: 2021-2040.
15. Liu Y-S, Zeng Y, Luo Y, Xu Q, Himmel ME, Smith SJ, Ding S-Y. 2009. Does the cellulose-binding module move on the cellulose surface? Cellulose 16: 587-597.
16. Moran-Mirabal JM, Corgie SC, Bolewski JC, Smith HM, Cipriany BR, Craighead HG, Walker LP. 2009. Labeling and purification of cellulose-binding proteins for high resolution fluorescence applications. Anal Chem 81: 7981-7987.
17. Moran-Mirabal JM, Bolewski JC, Walker LP. 2011. Reversibility and binding kinetics of Thermobifida fusca cellulases studied through fluorescence recovery after photobleaching microscopy. Biophys Chem 155: 20-28.
18. Nugent-Glandorf L, Perkins TT. 2004. Measuring 0.1-nm motion in 1ms in an optical microscope with differential back-focal-plane detection. Opt Lett 29: 2611-2613.
19. Praestgaard E, Elmerdahl J, Murphy L, Nymand S, McFarland KC, Borch K, Westh P. 2011. A kinetic model for the burst phase of processive cellulases. FEBS J 278: 1547-1560.
20. Rubin EM. 2008. Genomics of cellulosic biofuels. Nature 454: 841-845.
21. Santhanam N, Walker LP. 2008. A high-throughput assay to measure cellulase binding and synergism in ternary mixtures. Biol Eng 1: 1-19.
22. Saxton MJ, Jacobson K. 1997. Single-particle tracking: Applications to membrane dynamics. Ann Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 26: 373-399.
23. Sbalzarini IF, Koumoutsakos P. 2005. Feature point tracking and trajectory analysis for video imaging in cell biology. J Struct Biol 151: 182-195.
24. Smal I, Loog M, Niessen W, Meijering E. 2010. Quantitative comparison of spot detection methods in fluorescence microscopy. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 29: 282-301.
25. Sprague B, McNally J. 2005. FRAP analysis of binding: Proper and fitting. Trends Cell Biol 15: 84-91.
26. Ståhlberg J, Johansson G, Pettersson G. 1991. A new model for enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose based on the two-domain structure of cellobiohydrolase I. Nat Biotechnol 9: 286-290.
27. Thevenaz P, Ruttimann UE, Unser M. 1998. A pyramid approach to subpixel registration based on intensity. IEEE Trans Image Process 7: 27-41.
28. Väljamäe P, Pettersson G, Johansson G. 2001. Mechanism of substrate inhibition in cellulose synergistic degradation. Eur J Biochem 268: 4520-4526.
29. Vogelsang J, Kasper R, Steinhauer C, Person B, Heilemann M, Sauer M, Tinnefeld P. 2008. A reducing and oxidizing system minimizes photobleaching and blinking of fluorescent dyes. Angew Chem Int Ed 47: 5465-5469.
30. Wilson DB. 2007. Three microbial strategies for plant cell wall degradation. Ann New York Acad Sci 1125: 289-297.