Using Drawings of the Brain Cell to Exhibit Expertise in Neuroscience: Exploring the Boundaries of Experimental Culture

Science Education

Volumn 97, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 468-491

  Hay, David B ^a   Williams, Darren ^a   Stahl, Daniel ^a   Wingate, Richard J ^a  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84876388287     PISSN: 00368326     EISSN: 1098237X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/sce.21055     Document Type: Article

References (84)

1. Ainsworth, S., Prain, V., & Tyler, R. (2011). Drawing to learn in science. Science, 333, 1096-1097.
2. Amann, K., & Knorr Cetina, K. (1988). The fixation of evidence. Human Studies, 11, 133-169.
3. Barker, L. F. (1899). The nervous system and its constituent neurons. New York: Appleton.
4. Barnett, R. (2010). Knowing and becoming in the higher education curriculum. Studies in Higher Education, 34(4), 429-440.
5. Blackmore, P. (2009). Conceptions of academic development in higher education institutions. Studies in Higher Education, 34(6), 663-679.
6. Bruner, J. S. (1957). Going beyond the information given. In J. S. Bruner, E. Brunswik, L. Festinger, F. Heider, K. F. Muenzinger, C. E. Osgood, & D. Rapaport (Eds.), Contemporary approaches to cognition (pp. 41-69). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7. Bruner, J. S. (1960). The process of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8. Bruner, J. S. (2002). Making stories: Law, literature, life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
9. Cajal, S. R. y. (1894). Les nouvelles idées sur la structure du système nerveux chez l'homme et chez les vertébrés. Paris: Reinwald.
10. Chadarevian de, S., & Hopwood, N. (Eds.) (2004). Models: The third dimension of science. Stanford, CA: Stanford University press.
11. Chick, N. L., Hayne, A., & Gurung, R. A. R. (2009). From generic to signature pedagogies: Teaching disciplinary understandings. In R. A. R. Gurung, N. L. Chick, & A. Hayne (Eds.), Exploring signature pedagogies: Approaches to teaching disciplinary habits of mind (pp. 1-16). Sterling, VA: Stylus.
12. Chiu, T., Fang, D. P., Chen, J., Wang, Y, & Jeris, C. (2001). A robust and scalable clustering algorithm for mixed type attributes in large scale database. Paper presented at Proceedings of the Seventh ACM SIGKDD International Conference of Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. ACM Digital Library. Retrieved August 2, 2012, from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=502549.
13. Coffey, X. J. E., Elby, V., & Levin, D. M. (2010). The scientific method and scientific inquiry: Tensions in teaching and learning. Science Education, 94(1), 29-47.
14. Collins, H. (2010). Tacit and explicit knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
15. Daston, L. (2003). The coming into being of scientific objects. In L. Daston (Ed.), Biographies of scientific objects (pp. 1-14). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16. Daston, L., & Galison, P. (2007). Objectivity. New York: Zone.
17. DiCarlo, S. E. (2005). Cell biology should be taught as science is practised. Nature Reviews of Molecular and Cell Biology, 7(4), 290-296.
18. DiCarlo, S. E. (2010). Teacher quality matters. Physiologist, 53(4), 89, 92-94.
19. Driver, R. (1985). Children's ideas in science. Milton Keynes, England: Open University Press.
20. Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 5-12.
21. Driver, R., & Easley, J. (1978). Pupils and paradigms: A review of literature related to concept development in adolescent science students. Studies in Science Education, 5, 61-84.
22. Elkins, J. (2007). Introduction. In J. Elkins (Ed.), Visual practices across the university (pp. 9-57). Munich, Germany: Wilhelm Fink Verlag.
23. Elton, L. (1986). Research and teaching: Symbiosis or conflict. Higher Education, 15, 299-304.
24. Entwistle, N. J., & Smith, C. A. (2002). Personal understanding and target understanding: mapping influences of the outcomes of learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 321-342.
25. Everitt, B. S., Landau, S., Lesse, M., & Stahl, D. (2011). Cluster analysis (5th ed.). New York: Wiley.
26. Feldman, A., Divoll, K., & Rogan-Kyle, A. (2009). Research education of new scientists: implications for science teacher education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 442-459.
27. Florence, M. K., & Yore, L. D. (2004). Learning to write like a scientist: Co-authoring as an enculturation task. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 637-668.
28. Foreman, P. (1997). Recent science: Late-modern and post-modern. In T. Söderqvist (Ed), The historiography of contemporary science and technology (pp. 179-213). Amsterdam: Harwood.
29. Francoeur, E. (2002). Cyrus Levinthal, the Kluge and the origins of interactive molecular graphics. Endeavour, 26(4), 127-131.
30. Gamble, J. (2001). Modelling the invisible: The pedagogy of craft apprenticeship. Studies in Continuing Education, 23(2), 185-200.
31. Garfinkel, H., Lynch, M., & Livingston, E. (1981). The work of a discovering science construed with materials from the optically discovered pulsar. Philosophy of the Social Sciences [Philosophie des Sciences Sociales], 11, 131-158.
32. Greenleaf, C. L., Litman, C., Hanson, T. L., & Rosen, R. (2011). Integrating literacy and scientific in biology: Teaching and learning impacts of reading apprenticeship professional development. American Educational Research Journal, 28(3), 647-717.
33. Haggis, T. (2009). What have we been thinking of? A critical review of 40 years of student learning research in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 34(4), 377-390.
34. Hall, J. C. (1977). Portions of the central nervous system controlling reproductive behaviour in Drosophila melanogaster. Behavioural Genetics, 7, 291-312.
35. Hattie, J., & Marsh, H. W. (1996). The relationship between research and teaching: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 507-542.
36. Hay, D. B. (2010). The function of imagination in university student learning: Theory and case study data from third year neuroscience. Psychology: The Journal of the Hellenic Psychology Society, 17(3), 288-306.
37. Holland, D., Lachicotte, W. Jr., Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
38. Jenkins, A., & Healey, M. (2009). Developing the student as a researcher through the curriculum. In C. Rust (Ed.), Improving student learning through the curriculum (pp. 117-132). Oxford, England: Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development, Oxford Brookes University.
39. Jones, S. C., & Kinchin, I. M. (2009). Integration or coordination? A consideration of two curriculum models in the context of a masters of pharmacy (MPharm) module. In S. LygoBaker (Ed.), Proceedings of the Excellence in Teaching Conference (pp. 5-12). London: King's College London.
40. Kawatoko, Y., & Ueno, N. (2003). Talking about skill: Making objects, technologies and communities visible. Visual Studies, 18(1), 47-57.
41. Keller, E. F. (2002). Making sense of life: Explaining biological development models, metaphors, and machines. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
42. Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: an analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75-86.
43. Knorr Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic cultures: How the science make knowledge. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
44. Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. London: Routledge.
45. Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A semiotic approach to contemporary communication. London: Routledge.
46. Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
47. Kukla, R. (2008). Naturalising objectivity. Perspectives in Science, 16(3), 285-302.
48. Latour, B. (1986). Visualisation and cognition: Thinking with the eyes and hands. In H. Kuklick & E. Long (Eds.), Knowledge and society: Studies in the sociology of culture past and present (Vol. 6, pp. 1-40). Greenwich, CT: Jai Press.
49. Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
50. Latour, B. (1999). Pandora's hope: Essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
51. Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
52. Latour, B., & Wolgar, S. (1985). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
53. Lea, M., & Street, B. V. (1998). Student writing and staff feedback in higher education: An academic literacies approach. Studies in Higher Education 23(2):157-172.
54. Lillis, T. (2003). Student writing as "academic literacies": Drawing on Bakhtin to move from critique to design. Language Education, 17(3), 192-207.
55. Macfarlane, B. (2011a). Prizes, pedagogic research and teaching professors: Lowering the status of teaching and learning through bifurcation. Teaching in Higher Education, 16(1), 127-130.
56. Macfarlane, B. (2011b). The morphing of academic practice: unbundling and the para-academic. Higher Education Quarterly, 65(1), 59-73.
57. Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning I: Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 4-11.
58. Myers, N. (2008). Molecular embodiments and the body-work of modelling in protein crystallography. Social Studies of Science, 38(2), 163-199.
59. Perkins, D. (2007). Theories of difficulty. In N. Entwistle & P. Tomlinson (Eds.), Student learning and university teaching (pp. 31-48). Leicester, England: The British Psychological Society.
60. Perutz, M. F., Rossmann, M. G., Cullis, A. F., Muirhead, H., Will, G., & North, A. C. T. (1960). Structure of myoglobin: A three dimensional Fourier stynthesis at 5.5. Angstrom resolution, obtained by X-ray analysis. Nature, 185, 416-422.
61. Price, D., Jarman, A., Mason, J., & Kind, P. (2011). Building brains. Chichester, England: Wiley.
62. Purves, D., & Lichtman, J. W. (1985). Principles of neural development. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.
63. Phillipsborne, A. C. V., Lui, T., Yu, J. Y., Masser, C., Bidaye, S. S., & Dickson, B. J. (2011). Neuronal control of Drosophila courtship song. Neuron, 69(3), 509-522.
64. Polanyi, M. (1962). Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
65. Ranaweera, S. P. N., & Montplaisir, L. M. (2010). Students' illustrations of the human nervous system as a formative assessment tool. Anatomical Sciences Education, 3, 227-233.
66. Rheinberger, H, -J. (1997). Towards a history of epistemic things: Synthesizing proteins in the test tube. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
67. Rheinberger, H.-J. (2009). Recent science and its exploration: The case of molecular biology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 40, 6-12.
68. Radder, H. (2012). The material realization of science: From Habermas to experimental and referential realism. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 294. Boston: Springer.
69. Sadler, T. D., Burgin, S., McKinney, L., & Ponjuan, L. (2010). Learning through research apprenticeships: A critical review of the literature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(3), 235-256.
70. Schulman, L. S. (2005). Signature pedagogies in the professions. Dædalus, 143(3), 52-59.
71. Shepherd, G. (1991). Foundations of the neuron doctrine. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
72. Southern, E. M. (1975). Detection of specific sequences among DNA fragments separated by gel electrophoresis. Journal of Molecular Biology, 98, 503-517.
73. Stoeckli, E. T., & Landmesser, L. T. (1998). Axon guidance at choice points. Current Opinions in Neurobiology, 8, 73-79.
74. Valter, K., & Akërlind, G. (2010). Introducing students to ways of thinking and acting like a researcher: A case study of researcher-led education in the sciences. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 22(1) 89-97.
75. Vermunt, J. D. (2011). Patterns in student learning and teacher learning: Similarities and differences. In S. Rayner & E. Cools (Eds.), Style differences in cognition, learning and management: Theory, research and practice (pp. 173-187). New York: Routledge.
76. Warwick, R., & Williams, P. L. (Eds, ) (1973). Anatomia del Gray (Vol. 2). Bologna, Italy: Zanichelli.
77. Wegerif, R. (2007). Dialogic, education and technology: Expanding the space of learning. New York: Springer.
78. Wingate, R. J. (2010). What does research-led teaching mean? In S. Lygo-Baker (Ed.), Proceedings of the excellence in teaching conference, King's College London (pp. 89-96). London: King's College London.
79. Wingate, R. J. (2011). Thinking about evolution: Combinatorial play as a strategy for exercising scientific creativity. Journal of Biological Education, 45, 50-53.
80. Wingate, R. J., & Kwint, M. (2006). Imagining the brain cell: The neuron in visual culture. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 7(9), 745-752.
81. Wittmann, B. (2009). Symptomatology of drawing and writing: Process of self-recording. In B. Wittmann (Ed.), Produce tracks: Drawing and writing as a process of self-recording. Berlin, Germany: Diaphanes.
82. Wolgar, S. (1988). Time and documents in researcher interaction: Some ways of making out what is happening in experimental science. Human Studies, 11, 171-200.
83. Wolpert, L., Beddington, R., Brockes, J., Jessell, T. M., Lawrence, P. A., & Meyerowitz, E. (1998). Principles of development. London: Current Biology Ltd.
84. Zamorski, B. (2002). Research-led teaching and learning in higher education: A case. Teaching in Higher Education, 7, 411-422.