The relationship between research and teaching: A meta-analysis

Review of Educational Research

Volumn 66, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 507-542

  Hattie, John ^a   Marsh, H W ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030353892     PISSN: 00346543     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3102/00346543066004507     Document Type: Review

References (179)

1. Abelson, P. H. (1967). Justifying academic research. Science, 157, 754.
2. Ahern, J. (1970). Characteristics of teachers who have received an "outstanding teacher" award from New England institutions of higher education in the five year period beginning with the academic year 1963-1964 (Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, 1969). Dissertation Abstracts International, 30, 2717A.
3. * Aiken, L. R. (1975). Procedures and problems in designing a college course evaluation questionnaire. College and University, 50, 247-253.
4. * Aleamoni, L., & Yimer, M. (1973). An investigation of the relationship between colleague rating, student rating, research productivity, and academic rank in rating instructional effectiveness. Journal of Educational Psychology, 64, 274-277.
5. Andrews, F. M. (1964). Scientific performance as related to time spent on technical work, teaching or administration. Administrative Science Quarterly, 9, 182-193.
6. Astin, A. W., & Lee, C. B. T. (1966). Current practices in the evaluation and training of college teachers. Educational Record, 47, 361-375.
7. * Baird, L. L. (1980). The relationship between ratings of graduate departments and faculty publication rates (Research Rep. No. 80-27). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
8. Baker, P. J. (1986). The helter-skelter relationship between teaching and research: A cluster of problems and small wins. Teaching Sociology, 14, 50-66.
9. Barnett, B. (1992, June 3). Teaching and research are inescapably incompatible. Chronicle of Higher Education, p. A40.
10. Barnett, R. (1991). Linking teaching and research: A critical inquiry. Journal of Higher Education, 63, 619-636.
11. * Bausell, R. B., & Magoon, J. (1972). The validation of student ratings of instruction: An institutional research model. Newark: University of Delaware, College of Education.
12. Ben-David, J. (1977). Centers of learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.
13. Biglan, A. (1973). Relationship between subject matter characteristics and the structure and output of university departments. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57, 204-213.
14. Black, S. (1972). Interactions between teaching and research. Universities Quarterly, 26, 348-352.
15. Blackburn, R. T. (1974) The meaning of work in academia. In J. I. Doi (Ed.), Assessing faculty effort: New directions for institutional research (Vol. 2, pp. 75-99). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
16. Blackburn, R. T., Behymer, C. E., & Hall, D. E. (1978). Research note: Correlates of faculty publications. Sociology of Education, 51, 132-141.
17. Blackburn, R. T., & Clark, M. J. (1975). An assessment of faculty performance: Some correlates between administrator, colleague, student, and self ratings. Sociology of Education, 48, 242-256.
18. Blasi, A. J. (1992, June 17). The tensions between teaching and scholarship. Chronicle of Higher Education, p. B4.
19. Borgatta, E. F. (1970). Student ratings of faculty. American Association of University Professors Bulletin, 56, 6-7.
20. Bowen, H. R., & Schuster, J. H. (1986). American professors: A national resource imperiled. New York: Oxford University Press.
21. Boyer, E. (1987). The undergraduate experience in America. New York: Harper & Row.
22. Boyer, E. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
23. * Braunstein, D. N., & Benston, G. J. (1973). Student and department chairman views of the performance of university professors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 58, 244-249.
24. * Braxton, J. M. (1983). Teaching as performance of scholarly based course activities: A perspective on the relationship between teaching and research. The Review of Higher Education, 7, 21-33.
25. * Bresler, J. B. (1968). Teaching effectiveness and government awards. Science, 160, 164-167.
26. Bretton, H. L. (1979). On the necessity of research in teaching. Science Teaching, 9, 96.
27. * Centra, J. (1983). Research productivity and teaching effectiveness. Research in Higher Education, 18, 379-389.
28. * Clark, M. J. (1974). Organizational stress and professional performance among faculty members at a small college (Doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, 1973). Dissertation Abstracts International, 35, 209A.
29. Clark, S. (1986). The academic profession and career: Perspectives and problems. Teaching Sociology, 14, 24-34.
30. Committee on Higher Education. (1963). Higher education: Report of the committee appointed by the prime minister under the chairmanship of Lord Robbins, 1961-1963. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.
31. * Cornwell, C. D. (1974). Statistical treatment of data from student teaching evaluation questionnaires. Journal of Chemical Education, 51, 155-160.
32. Crimmel, H. (1984). The myth of the teacher-scholar. Liberal Education, 70, 184-198.
33. Crocker-Kakness, J. (1984). Community college faculty should engage in research for publication. Association for Communication Administration Bulletin, 47, 78-80.
34. Delaney, E. L. (1976, April). The relationships of student ratings of instruction to student, instructor and course characteristics. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 126 140)
35. Deming, W. E. (1972). Memorandum on teaching. The American Statistician, 26, 47.
36. * Dent, P., & Lewis, D. (1976). The relationship between teaching effectiveness and measures of research quality. Educational Research Quarterly, 1, 3-16.
37. Eble, K. (1976). The craft of teaching. New York: Jossey-Bass.
38. Elliott, D. H. (1950). Characteristics and relationships of various criteria of colleges and university teaching. Purdue University Studies in Higher Education, 70, 5-61.
39. Elton, L. R. B. (1986). Research and teaching: Symbiosis or conflict? Higher Education, 15, 299-304.
40. * Faia, M. (1976). Teaching and research: Rapport of misalliance. Research in Higher Education, 4, 235-246.
41. Feist, G. J. (1994). Personality and working style predictors of integrative complexity: A study of scientists' thinking about research and teaching. Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, 67, 474-484.
42. Feldman, K. (1987a). Research productivity and scholarly accomplishment of college teachers as related to their instructional effectiveness: A review and exploration. Research in Higher Education, 26, 227-298.
43. Feldman, K. (1987b, April). Exploring the relationship between research productivity and college students' ratings of teachers: Quantitative reviews and the logic of analysis. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC.
44. Ferber, M. (1974). Professors, performance and rewards. Industrial Relations, 13, 69-77.
45. Finkelstein, M. (1984). The American academic profession: A synthesis of social inquiry since World War 11. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
46. Flexner, A. (1930). Universities, German, English, American. New York: Oxford University Press.
47. Fox, M. F. (1979, August).Sex, income and achievement: Reward-dualism in academia. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, Boston, MA.
48. Fox, M. F. (1992). Research, teaching, and publication productivity: Mutuality versus competition in academia. Sociology of Education, 65, 293-305.
49. * Freedman, R. D., Stumpf, S. A., & Aguanno, J. C. (1979). Validity of the course faculty instrument (CFI): Intrinsic and extrinsic variables. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 39, 153-159.
50. * Frey, P. W. (1978). A two dimensional analysis of student ratings of instruction. Research in Higher Education, 9, 69-91.
51. * Friedrich, R., & Michalak, S. (1983). Why doesn't research improve teaching? Some answers from a small liberal arts college. Journal of Higher Education, 54, 145-163.
52. Frumkin, R. M., & Howell, W. H. (1954). Effective college teaching: A preliminary causal analysis. Journal of Educational Research, 47, 683-693.
53. Fulton, O., & Trow, M. (1974). Research activity in American higher education. Sociology of Education, 47, 29-73.
54. Gamble, J. K. (1985). The relationships between teaching and research: Clear answers to the wrong questions. Journal of Educational Thought, 19, 95-103.
55. Cell, C. (1992). Faculty research. In B. L. Clark & G. R. Neave (Eds.), Encyclopedia of higher education (Vol. 3, pp. 1634-1641). Oxford, England: Pergamon.
56. * Genn, J. M. (1980, May). Australian university teachers' perceptions of the ideal and actual reward structure in the academic profession. Paper presented to the 6th Annual Conference of the Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australia, Canberra, Australia.
57. Glass, G. V., McGaw, B., & Smith, M. L. (1981). Meta-analysis in social research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
58. * Goldsmid, C. A., Gruber, J. E., & Wilson, E. K. (1977). Perceived attributes of superior teachers (PAST): An inquiry into the giving of teacher awards. American Educational Research Journal, 14, 423-440.
59. Grant, C. W. (1971). Faculty allocation of effort and student course evaluations. Journal of Educational Research, 64, 405-410.
60. Grob, G. N. (1992, June 24). Research and teaching: Are they incompatible? Chronicle of Higher Education, p. B6.
61. * Guthrie, E. R. (1949). Evaluation of teaching. Education Record, 30, 109-115.
62. Halsey, A. H. (1992). Decline of donnish dominion: The British academic profession in the twentieth century. Oxford, England: Clarendon.
63. Hammond, P. E., Meyer, J. W., & Miller, D. (1969). Teaching versus research: Sources of misperceptions. Journal of Higher Education, 40, 682-692.
64. * Harry, J., & Goldner, N. S. (1972). The null relationship between teaching and research. Sociology of Education, 45, 47-60.
65. Hattie, J. A., Print, M., & Krakowski, K. (1994). Productivity of academics. Australian Journal of Education, 38, 201-218.
66. * Hayes, J. R. (1971). Research, teaching, and faculty fate. Science, 172, 227-230.
67. Hedges, L. V. (1986). Issues in meta-analysis. Review of Research in Education, 13, 353-398.
68. Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Orlando, FL: Academic.
69. Heller, S., & Morgan, K. S. (1987, January 28). Many professors reject the shibboleth that research is the enemy of teaching. Chronicle of Higher Education, 33, pp. 11-14.
70. * Hicks, R. (1974). The relationship between publishing and teaching effectiveness. California Journal of Educational Research, 25, 140-146.
71. * Hoffman, R. A. (1984a). An assessment of the teaching, research and service function of a college faculty. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 17, 51-54.
72. * Hoffman, R. A. (1984b). Correlates of faculty performance. College Student Journal, 18, 164-168.
73. Honigman, R. D. (1992, September 16). Research and teaching: A historical view. Chronicle of Higher Education, pp. B3, B6.
74. * Hoyt, D. P. (1974). Interrelationships among instructional effectiveness, publication record, and monetary reward. Research in Higher Education, 2, 81-88.
75. * Hoyt, D. P., & Spangler, R. (1976). Faculty research involvement and instructional outcomes. Research in Higher Education, 4, 113-122.
76. Humbolt, W. (1970). On the spirit and the organizational framework of intellectual institutions in Berlin. Minerva, 8, 242-267. (Original work published 1809)
77. Jauch, L. R. (1976). Relationships of research and teaching: Implications for faculty evaluation. Research in Higher Education, 5, 1-13.
78. Jencks, C., & Riesman, D. (1968). The academic revolution. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
79. Jensen, J. (1988). Research and teaching in the universities of Denmark: Does such an interplay really exist? Higher Education, 17, 17-26.
80. Kingman, J. (1993, June 18). The pursuit of truth. The Times Higher.
81. * Kremer, J. (1990). Construct validity of multiple measures in teaching, research and services and reliability of peer ratings. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 213-218.
82. * Kremer, J. (1991). Identifying faculty types using peer ratings of teaching, research and service. Research in Higher Education, 32, 351-361.
83. Kyvik, S., & Smeby, J. (1994). Teaching and research: The relationship between the supervision of graduate students and faculty research performance. Higher Education, 28, 227-239.
84. Ladd, E. C. (1979). The work experiences of American college professors. Current Issues in Higher Education, 22, 135-154.
85. Larsson, S. (1983). Paradoxes in teaching. Instructional Science, 12, 355-365.
86. Larsson, S. (1987). Learning from experience: Teachers' conceptions of changes in their professional practice. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19, 35-43..
87. * Lasher, H., & Vogt, K. (1974). Student evaluation: Myths and realities. Improving College and University Teaching, 22, 267-269.
88. Leary, L. (1959). The scholar as teacher. School and Society, 87, 362-363.
89. Leinster-Mackay, D. P. (1978). The idea of a university: A historical perspective on some precepts and practices. Vestes, 20(4), 28-33.
90. Leonard, W. P. (1992, June 17). The tensions between teaching and scholarship. Chronicle of Higher Education, p. B4.
91. * Lewis, L. S., & Gregorio, D. L. (1984). University teaching and the assessment of merit. Teaching Sociology, 12, 32-46.
92. Light, D. (1974). Introduction: The structure of the academic professions. Sociology of Education, 47, 2-28.
93. * Linsky, S., & Straus, M. (1975). Student evaluations, research productivity, and eminence of college faculty. Journal of Higher Education, 46, 89-102.
94. Lotka, A. J. (1926). Productivity and academic position in the scientific career. American Sociological Review, 43, 889-908.
95. Manis, J. G. (1951). Some academic influences upon publication productivity. Social Forces, 29, 267-272
96. Marks, S. R. (1977). Multiple roles and role strain: Some notes on human energy, time and commitment. American Sociological Review, 42, 921-936.
97. * Marquardt, R. A., McGann, A. F., & Jakubauskas, E. B. (1975). Academic clients, scholarly contributions, faculty compensation and performance criteria of "Shouldn't we take one more look before we leap ... ?" AACSB Bulletin, 12, 13-17.
98. Marsh, H. W. (1979). Annotated bibliography of research on the relationship between quality of teaching and quality of research in higher education. Los Angeles: University of Southern California, Office of Institutional Studies.
99. Marsh, H. W. (1984). Students' evaluations of teaching: Dimensionality, reliability, validity, potential biases and utility. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 707-754.
100. Marsh, H. W. (1987). Students' evaluations of university teaching: Research findings, methodological issues, and directions for further research. International Journal of Educational Research, 11, 253-388.
101. Marsh, H. W. (1991a). A multidimensional perspective on students' evaluations of teaching effectiveness: A reply to Abrami and d'Apollonia (1991). Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 416-421.
102. Marsh, H. W. (1991b). Multidimensional students' evaluations of teaching effectiveness: A test of alternative higher-order structure. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 285-296.
103. Marsh, H. W., & Dunkin, M. J. (1992). Students' evaluations of university teaching: A multidimensional perspective. In J. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 8, pp. 143-233). New York: Agathon.
104. * Marsh, H. W., & Overall, J. W. (1979, April). Validity of students' evaluations of teaching: A comparison with instructor self evaluations by teaching assistants, undergraduate faculty, and graduate faculty. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 177 205)
105. Marsh, H. W., & Roche, L. (1992). The use of students' evaluations and an individually structured intervention to enhance university teaching effectiveness. American Educational Research Journal, 30, 217-251.
106. Martin, M. W., & Berry, K. J. (1969). The teaching-research dilemma: Its source in the university setting. Journal of Higher Education, 40, 691-703.
107. Marton, F. (1981). Phenomonography: Describing conceptions of the world around us. Instructional Science, 10, 177-200.
108. Marton, F., & Ramsden, P. (1988). What does it take to improve learning? In P. Ramsden (Ed.), Improving learning: New perspectives (pp. 268-286). London: Kogan Page.
109. Marton, F., & Saljo, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning: I. Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 4-11.
110. * Maslow, A. H., & Zimmerman, W. (1956). College teaching ability, scholarly activity, and personality. Journal of Educational Psychology, 47, 185-189.
111. McCaughey, R. A. (1992, August 5). Why research and teaching can coexist. Chronicle of Higher Education, p. A36.
112. McCaughey, R. A. (1994). Scholars and teachers: The faculties of select liberal arts colleges and their place in American higher learning. New York: Conceptual Litho Reproductions.
113. * McCullagh, R. D., & Roy, M. R. (1975). The contribution of noninstructional activities to college classroom teacher effectiveness. Journal of Experimental Education, 44, 61-70.
114. * McDaniel, E. D., & Feldhusen, J. F. (1970). Relationships between faculty ratings and indices of service and scholarship. Proceedings of the 78th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, 1970, 5, 619-620.
115. * McGrath, E. J. (1962). Characteristics of outstanding college teachers. Journal of Higher Education, 33, 148-152.
116. * Michalak, S. J., & Friedrich, R. J. (1981). Research productivity and teaching effectiveness at a small liberal arts college. Journal of Higher Education, 52, 578-597.
117. Minner, S. (1992, June 24). Research and teaching: Are they incompatible? Chronicle of Higher Education, p. B6.
118. Mooney, C. J. (1991, May 8). Professors feel conflict between roles in teaching and research, say students are badly prepared. Chronicle of Higher Education, pp. 15-17.
119. Moore W. E. (1963). Man, time and society. New York: Wiley.
120. Neumann, R. (1992). Perceptions of the teaching-research nexus: A framework for analysis. Higher Education, 23, 159-171.
121. Newman, J. H. (1853). The idea of a university. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
122. Ortega y Gasset, J. (1944). Mission of the university. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
123. Ozman, H. (1967). Publications and teaching. Improving College and University Teaching, 15, 106-107.
124. Page, C. F. (1972). Teaching and research: Happy symbiosis or hidden warfare? Universities Quarterly, 27, 102-118.
125. Parsons, T., & Platt, G. M. (1968). Age, social structure, and the socialization in higher education. Sociology of Education, 43, 1-37.
126. Paul, C. W., & Rubin, P. C. (1984). Teaching and research: The human capital paradigm. Journal of Economic Education, 15, 142-147.
127. Pelz, D., & Andrews, F. (1964). Diversity in R&D tasks. International School Technology, 31, 28-36.
128. Pezzullo, T. R., & Brittingham, B. E. (1979). Salary equity: Detecting sex bias in salaries among college and university professors. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
129. * Plant, W. T., & Sawrey, J. M. (1970). Student ratings of psychology professors as teachers and the research involvement of the professors rated. The Clinical Psychologist, 23, 15-16.
130. Ramsden, P. (1991) Teaching and research in Australian higher education: The fallacy of complementarity. Unpublished manuscript.
131. Ramsden, P. (1992a). Learning to teach in higher education. New York: Routledge.
132. Ramsden, P. (1992b, July 17). Lost in the crowd. The Times Higher, p. 15.
133. Ramsden, P. (1994). Describing and explaining research productivity. Higher Education, 28, 207-226.
134. * Ramsden, P., & Moses, I. (1992). Association between research and teaching in Australian higher education. Higher Education, 23, 273-295.
135. * Ratz, H. C. (1975). Factors in the evaluation of instructors by students. IEEE Transactions on Education, E-18(3), 122-127.
136. Rau, W., & Baker, P. J. (1989). The organized contradictions of academia: Barriers facing the next academic revolution. Teaching Sociology, 17, 161-175.
137. Reich, J. N., Rosch J. A., & Catania, F. J. (1988, November). The scholar: Integrating teaching and research in higher education. Paper presented at the meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, St. Louis, MO. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 303 095)
138. * Riley, J. W., Ryan, B. F., & Lifshitz, M. (1950). The student looks at his teacher: An inquiry into the implications of student ratings at the college level. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
139. Rosenthal, R. (1984). Meta-analysis procedures for social research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
140. * Rossman, J. (1976). Teaching, publication, and rewards at a liberal arts college. Improving College and University Teaching, 24, 238-240.
141. Rossum, E. J. van. (1984, March). Students' conceptions of learning and good teaching. Paper presented at the 10th International Conference on Improving University Teaching, MD.
142. Rossum, E. J. van, Deijkers, R., & Hamer, R. (1985). Students' learning conceptions and their interpretations of significant educational concepts. Higher Education, 14, 617-641.
143. * Rothman, L., & Preshaw, R. (1975). Is scientific achievement a correlate of effective teaching performance? Research in Higher Education, 3, 29-34.
144. Rowe, M. (1992, June 24). Research and teaching: Are they incompatible? Chronicle of Higher Education, p. B6.
145. Rugarcia, A. (1991). The link between teaching and research: Myth or possibility? Engineering Education, 81, 20-22.
146. * Rushton, J. P., Murray, H. G., & Paunonen, S. V. (1983). Personality, research creativity, and teaching effectiveness in university professors. Scientometrics, 5, 93-116.
147. Saljo, R. (1982). Learning and understanding: A study of differences in constructing meaning from a text. Goteborg, Sweden: Allfoto i Goteburg, AB.
148. Sample, S. B. (1972). Inherent conflict between research and education. Educational Record, 53, 17-22.
149. Samuelowicz, K., & Bain, J. D. (1992). Conceptions of teaching held by academic teachers. Higher Education, 24, 93-111.
150. Schmitt, H. A. (1965). Teaching and research: Companions or adversaries? Journal of Higher Education, 36, 419-421.
151. Scott, P. (1991). Beyond the dual-support system: Scholarship, research and teaching in the context of academic autonomy. Studies in Higher Education, 16, 5-13.
152. Scriven, M. (1981). Summative teacher evaluation. In J. Millman (Ed.), Handbook of teacher evaluation (pp. 244-271). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
153. Seldin, P. (1985). Changing practices in faculty evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
154. Serafin, A. G. (1992, January). Interrelations for teaching, research and service: The faculty satisfaction dilemma. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Michigan Educational Research Association, Novi, MI. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 439 660)
155. * Siegfried, J. J., & White, K. J. (1973). Teaching and publishing as determinants of academic salaries. Journal of Economic Education, 4, 90-99.
156. * Stallings, W., & Singhal, S. (1970). Some observations on the relationships between research productivity and student evaluations of courses and teaching. American Sociologist, 5, 141-143.
157. * Stavridis, P. G. (1972). Relationships between student ratings of teacher effectiveness and certain criteria used in promotion of college faculty. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University.
158. Stokes, T. (1992, June 10). Balancing act between training and research. The Australian, p. 20.
159. Sykes, C. (1988). Prof scam: Professors and the demise of higher education. New York: Regney Gateway.
160. * Tanner, J. H., Manakyan, H., & Hotard, D. G. (1992). Management-faculty research productivity and perceived teaching effectiveness. Journal of Education for Business, 68, 261-265.
161. * Teague, G. V. (1981). Compatibility of teaching and research at a large land-grant university. Improving College and University Teaching, 29, 33-35.
162. Trice, A. J. (1992, June 17). The tensions between teaching and scholarship. Chronicle of Higher Education, p. B4.
163. Trigwell, K., Prosser, M., & Taylor, P. (1994). Qualitative differences in approaches to teaching first year university science. Higher Education, 27, 75-84.
164. Tuckman, H. P., & Hagemann, R. P. (1976). An analysis of the reward structure in two disciplines. Journal of Higher Education, 47, 447-463.
165. * Usher, R. H. (1967). The relationship of perceptions of self, others and the helping task to certain measures of college faculty effectiveness (Doctoral dissertation,s University of Florida, 1966). Dissertation Abstracts International, 30, 1713A.
166. * Voeks, V. W. (1962). Publications and teaching effectiveness. Journal of Higher Education, 33, 212-218.
167. * Volkwein, J., & Carbone, D. (1991, November). A study of research and teaching orientations in twenty-seven academic departments: The impact on undergraduates. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Boston, MA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 339 332)
168. Webster, D. (1985). Does research productivity enhance teaching? Educational Record, 66, 60-62.
169. Webster, D. (1986). Research productivity and classroom teaching effectiveness. Instructional Evaluation, 9, 14-20.
170. Weisner, S. G. (1992, June 24). Research and teaching: Are they incompatible? Chronicle of Higher Education, p. B6.
171. Westergard, J. (1991). Scholarship, research and teaching: A view from the social sciences. Studies in Higher Education, 16, 23-28.
172. White, A. (1986). Teaching and research: Independent, parallel, unequal. Unpublished manuscript, University of Wyoming, Laramie. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 28 150)
173. Whitely, R. (1984). The intellectual and social organization of the sciences. Oxford, England: Clarendon.
174. Wilensky, H. (1961). The uneven distribution of leisure. Social Problems, 9, 32-56.
175. Williams, R. J. P. (1991). Science in universities: Teaching, research and autonomy. Studies in Higher Education, 16, 15-22.
176. Wilson, J. H., & Wilson, R. S. (1972). The teaching-research controversy. Educational Record, 53, 321-326.
177. * Wood, N. J., & DeLorme, C. D. (1976). An investigation of the relationship among teaching evaluation, research and ability. Journal of Economic Education, 7, 77-80.
178. * Wood, P. (1978, March). Student and peer ratings of college teaching and peer ratings of research and service: Four years of departmental evaluation. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 007 347)
179. Woodburne, L. S. (1952). The qualifications of superior faculty members. Journal of Higher Education, 23, 377-382.