The whole is greater than the sum of its parts

Cell Cycle

Volumn 12, Issue 8, 2013, Pages 1180-1188

  Matthews, Lindsay A ^a   Guarné, Alba ^a  

^a MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Dbf4; DDK; DNA replication; Mitotic exit; Replication checkpoint

Indexed keywords

DUMBBELL FORMER 4 PROTEIN; REGULATOR PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; CDC7 PROTEIN, S CEREVISIAE; CELL CYCLE PROTEIN; DBF4 PROTEIN, HUMAN; PROTEIN SERINE THREONINE KINASE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN;

BIOCHEMISTRY; CELL CYCLE REGULATION; HUMAN; NONHUMAN; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; REVIEW; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINT; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; DBF4; DDK; DNA REPLICATION; GENETICS; METABOLISM; MITOTIC EXIT; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MOLECULAR GENETICS; PHYSIOLOGY; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; REPLICATION CHECKPOINT; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

DBF4; DDK; DNA REPLICATION; MITOTIC EXIT; REPLICATION CHECKPOINT;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINTS; CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; HUMANS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN-SERINE-THREONINE KINASES; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84876212038     PISSN: 15384101     EISSN: 15514005     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4161/cc.24416     Document Type: Review

References (89)

1. Bousset K, Diffley JF. The Cdc7 protein kinase is required for origin firing during S phase. Genes Dev 1998; 12:480-90; PMID:9472017; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.12.4.480
2. Ogi H, Wang CZ, Nakai W, Kawasaki Y, Masumoto H. The role of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Cdc7-Dbf4 complex in the replication checkpoint. Gene 2008; 414:32-40; PMID:18372119; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2008.02.010
3. Marston AL. Meiosis: DDK is not just for replication. Curr Biol 2009; 19:R74-6; PMID:19174144; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2008.12.003
4. Pessoa-Brandão L, Sclafani RA. CDC7/DBF4 functions in the translesion synthesis branch of the RAD6 epistasis group in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 2004; 167:1597-610; PMID:15342501; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1534/genetics.103.021675
5. Takayama Y, Mamnun YM, Trickey M, Dhut S, Masuda F, Yamano H, et al. Hsk1-and SCF(Pof3)-dependent proteolysis of S. pombe Ams2 ensures histone homeostasis and centromere function. Dev Cell 2010; 18:385-96; PMID:20230746; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2009.12.024
6. Miller CT, Gabrielse C, Chen YC, Weinreich M. Cdc7p-Dbf4p regulates mitotic exit by inhibiting Polo kinase. PLoS Genet 2009; 5:e1000498; PMID:19478884; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal. pgen.1000498
7. Jackson AL, Pahl PM, Harrison K, Rosamond J, Sclafani RA. Cell cycle regulation of the yeast Cdc7 protein kinase by association with the Dbf4 protein. Mol Cell Biol 1993; 13:2899-908; PMID:8474449
8. Yoon HJ, Loo S, Campbell JL. Regulation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae CDC7 function during the cell cycle. Mol Biol Cell 1993; 4:195-208; PMID:8382976
9. Chapman JW, Johnston LH. The yeast gene, DBF4, essential for entry into S phase is cell cycle regulated. Exp Cell Res 1989; 180:419-28; PMID:2644125; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0014-4827(89)90068-2
10. Cheng L, Collyer T, Hardy CF. Cell cycle regulation of DNA replication initiator factor Dbf4p. Mol Cell Biol 1999; 19:4270-8; PMID:10330168
11. Ferreira MF, Santocanale C, Drury LS, Diffley JF. Dbf4p, an essential S phase-promoting factor, is targeted for degradation by the anaphase-promoting complex. Mol Cell Biol 2000; 20:242-8; PMID:10594027; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/ MCB.20.1.242-248.2000
12. Weinreich M, Stillman B. Cdc7p-Dbf4p kinase binds to chromatin during S phase and is regulated by both the APC and the RAD53 checkpoint pathway. EMBO J 1999; 18:5334-46; PMID:10508166; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/emboj/18.19.5334
13. Duncker BP, Shimada K, Tsai-Pflugfelder M, Pasero P, Gasser SM. An N-terminal domain of Dbf4p mediates interaction with both origin recognition complex (ORC) and Rad53p and can deregulate late origin firing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002; 99:16087-92; PMID:12441400; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas. 252093999
14. Gabrielse C, Miller CT, McConnell KH, DeWard A, Fox CA, Weinreich MA. A Dbf4p BRCA1 C-terminallike domain required for the response to replication fork arrest in budding yeast. Genetics 2006; 173:541-55; PMID:16547092; http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/genetics.106.057521
15. Varrin AE, Prasad AA, Scholz RP, Ramer MD, Duncker BP. A mutation in Dbf4 motif M impairs interactions with DNA replication factors and confers increased resistance to genotoxic agents. Mol Cell Biol 2005; 25:7494-504; PMID:16107698; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.25.17.7494-7504.2005
16. Matthews LA, Jones DR, Prasad AA, Duncker BP, Guarné A. Saccharomyces cerevisiae Dbf4 has unique fold necessary for interaction with Rad53 kinase. J Biol Chem 2012; 287:2378-87; PMID:22130670; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1074/jbc.M111.233973
17. Chen YC, Weinreich M. Dbf4 regulates the Cdc5 Polo-like kinase through a distinct non-canonical binding interaction. J Biol Chem 2010; 285:41244-54; PMID:21036905; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc. M110.155242
18. Johnston LH, Thomas AP. The isolation of new DNA synthesis mutants in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Gen Genet 1982; 186:439-44; PMID:6750322; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00729466
19. Johnston LH, Thomas AP. A further two mutants defective in initiation of the S phase in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Gen Genet 1982; 186:445-8; PMID:6750323; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00729467
20. El-Sayed NM, Myler PJ, Bartholomeu DC, Nilsson D, Aggarwal G, Tran AN, et al. The genome sequence of Trypanosoma cruzi, etiologic agent of Chagas disease. Science 2005; 309:409-15; PMID:16020725; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/ science.1112631
21. Lalle M, Camerini S, Cecchetti S, Sayadi A, Crescenzi M, Pozio E. Interaction network of the 14-3-3 protein in the ancient protozoan parasite Giardia duodenalis. J Proteome Res 2012; 11:2666-83; PMID:22452640; http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/pr3000199
22. Masai H, Arai K. Dbf4 motifs: Conserved motifs in activation subunits for Cdc7 kinases essential for S-phase. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2000; 275:228-32; PMID:10944469; http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/bbrc.2000.3281
23. Matthews LA, Duong A, Prasad AA, Duncker BP, Guarné A. Crystallization and preliminary X-ray diffraction analysis of motif N from Saccharomyces cerevisiae Dbf4. Acta Crystallogr Sect F Struct Biol Cryst Commun 2009; 65:890-4; PMID:19724125; http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S1744309109029376
24. Yamashita N, Kim JM, Koiwai O, Arai K, Masai H. Functional analyses of mouse ASK, an activation subunit for Cdc7 kinase, using conditional ASK knockout ES cells. Genes Cells 2005; 10:551-63; PMID:15938714; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1111/j.1365-2443.2005.00857.x
25. Fung AD, Ou J, Bueler S, Brown GW. A conserved domain of Schizosaccharomyces pombe dfp1(+) is uniquely required for chromosome stability following alkylation damage during S phase. Mol Cell Biol 2002; 22:4477-90; PMID:12052858; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.22.13.4477-4490.2002
26. Saunders DG, Aves SJ, Talbot NJ. Cell cycle-mediated regulation of plant infection by the rice blast fungus. Plant Cell 2010; 22:497-507; PMID:20190078; http://dx.doi.org/10.1105/tpc.109.072447
27. James SW, Bullock KA, Gygax SE, Kraynack BA, Matura RA, MacLeod JA, et al. nimO, an Aspergillus gene related to budding yeast Dbf4, is required for DNA synthesis and mitotic checkpoint control. J Cell Sci 1999; 112:1313-24; PMID:10194410
28. Jones DR, Prasad AA, Chan PK, Duncker BP. The Dbf4 motif C zinc finger promotes DNA replication and mediates resistance to genotoxic stress. Cell Cycle 2010; 9:2018-26; PMID:20436286; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.9.10.11752
29. Hughes S, Elustondo F, Di Fonzo A, Leroux FG, Wong AC, Snijders AP, et al. Crystal structure of human CDC7 kinase in complex with its activator DBF4. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2012; 19:1101-7; PMID:23064647; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ nsmb.2404
30. Harkins V, Gabrielse C, Haste L, Weinreich M. Budding yeast Dbf4 sequences required for Cdc7 kinase activation and identification of a functional relationship between the Dbf4 and Rev1 BRCT domains. Genetics 2009; 183:1269-82; PMID:19822727; http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/genetics.109.110155
31. Davey MJ, Andrighetti HJ, Ma X, Brandl CJ. A synthetic human kinase can control cell cycle progression in budding yeast. G3 (Bethesda) 2011; 1:317-25; PMID:22384342; http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/g3.111.000430
32. Ogino K, Takeda T, Matsui E, Iiyama H, Taniyama C, Arai K, et al. Bipartite binding of a kinase activator activates Cdc7-related kinase essential for S phase. J Biol Chem 2001; 276:31376-87; PMID:11402029; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1074/jbc.M102197200
33. Sato N, Sato M, Nakayama M, Saitoh R, Arai K, Masai H. Cell cycle regulation of chromatin binding and nuclear localization of human Cdc7-ASK kinase complex. Genes Cells 2003; 8:451-63; PMID:12694534; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1046/j.1365-2443.2003.00647.x
34. Hughes S, Jenkins V, Dar MJ, Engelman A, Cherepanov P. Transcriptional co-activator LEDGF interacts with Cdc7-activator of S-phase kinase (ASK) and stimulates its enzymatic activity. J Biol Chem 2010; 285:541-54; PMID:19864417; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc. M109.036491
35. Tower J. Developmental gene amplification and origin regulation. Annu Rev Genet 2004; 38:273-304; PMID:15568978; http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev. genet.37.110801.143851
36. Mantiero D, Mackenzie A, Donaldson A, Zegerman P. Limiting replication initiation factors execute the temporal programme of origin firing in budding yeast. EMBO J 2011; 30:4805-14; PMID:22081107; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/emboj. 2011.404
37. Patel PK, Kommajosyula N, Rosebrock A, Bensimon A, Leatherwood J, Bechhoefer J, et al. The Hsk1(Cdc7) replication kinase regulates origin efficiency. Mol Biol Cell 2008; 19:5550-8; PMID:18799612; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1091/mbc.E08-06-0645
38. Zegerman P, Diffley JF. Checkpoint-dependent inhibition of DNA replication initiation by Sld3 and Dbf4 phosphorylation. Nature 2010; 467:474-8; PMID:20835227; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature09373
39. Duch A, Palou G, Jonsson ZO, Palou R, Calvo E, Wohlschlegel J, et al. A Dbf4 mutant contributes to bypassing the Rad53-mediated block of origins of replication in response to genotoxic stress. J Biol Chem 2011; 286:2486-91; PMID:21098477; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M110.190843
40. Lopez-Mosqueda J, Maas NL, Jonsson ZO, Defazio-Eli LG, Wohlschlegel J, Toczyski DP. Damage-induced phosphorylation of Sld3 is important to block late origin firing. Nature 2010; 467:479-83; PMID:20865002; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1038/nature09377
41. Chen S, de Vries MA, Bell SP. Orc6 is required for dynamic recruitment of Cdt1 during repeated Mcm2-7 loading. Genes Dev 2007; 21:2897-907; PMID:18006685; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1596807
42. Ilves I, Petojevic T, Pesavento JJ, Botchan MR. Activation of the MCM2-7 helicase by association with Cdc45 and GINS proteins. Mol Cell 2010; 37:247-58; PMID:20122406; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2009.12.030
43. Costa A, Ilves I, Tamberg N, Petojevic T, Nogales E, Botchan MR, et al. The structural basis for MCM2-7 helicase activation by GINS and Cdc45. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2011; 18:471-7; PMID:21378962; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nsmb. 2004
44. Sheu YJ, Stillman B. The Dbf4-Cdc7 kinase promotes S phase by alleviating an inhibitory activity in Mcm4. Nature 2010; 463:113-7; PMID:20054399; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature08647
45. Randell JC, Fan A, Chan C, Francis LI, Heller RC, Galani K, et al. Mec1 is one of multiple kinases that prime the Mcm2-7 helicase for phosphorylation by Cdc7. Mol Cell 2010; 40:353-63; PMID:21070963; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. molcel.2010.10.017
46. Hoang ML, Leon RP, Pessoa-Brandao L, Hunt S, Raghuraman MK, Fangman WL, et al. Structural changes in Mcm5 protein bypass Cdc7-Dbf4 function and reduce replication origin efficiency in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 2007; 27:7594-602; PMID:17724082; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.00997-07
47. Vijayraghavan S, Schwacha A. The Eukaryotic Mcm2-7 Replicative Helicase. In: MacNeill S, ed. The Eukaryotic Replisome: A Guide to Protein Structure and Function. Dordrecht: Springer, 2012:113-34
48. Muramatsu S, Hirai K, Tak YS, Kamimura Y, Araki H. CDK-dependent complex formation between replication proteins Dpb11, Sld2, Pol epsilon, and GINS in budding yeast. Genes Dev 2010; 24:602-12; PMID:20231317; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1101/gad.1883410
49. Zegerman P, Diffley JF. Phosphorylation of Sld2 and Sld3 by cyclin-dependent kinases promotes DNA replication in budding yeast. Nature 2007; 445:281-5; PMID:17167417; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature05432
50. Tanaka S, Umemori T, Hirai K, Muramatsu S, Kamimura Y, Araki H. CDK-dependent phosphorylation of Sld2 and Sld3 initiates DNA replication in budding yeast. Nature 2007; 445:328-32; PMID:17167415; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1038/nature05465
51. Kundu LR, Kumata Y, Kakusho N, Watanabe S, Furukohri A, Waga S, et al. Deregulated Cdc6 inhibits DNA replication and suppresses Cdc7-mediated phosphorylation of Mcm2-7 complex. Nucleic Acids Res 2010; 38:5409-18; PMID:20421204; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkq262
52. Montagnoli A, Bosotti R, Villa F, Rialland M, Brotherton D, Mercurio C, et al. Drf1, a novel regulatory subunit for human Cdc7 kinase. EMBO J 2002; 21:3171-81; PMID:12065429; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/emboj/cdf290
53. Yanow SK, Gold DA, Yoo HY, Dunphy WG. Xenopus Drf1, a regulator of Cdc7, displays checkpointdependent accumulation on chromatin during an S-phase arrest. J Biol Chem 2003; 278:41083-92; PMID:12897072; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc. M307144200
54. Yoshizawa-Sugata N, Ishii A, Taniyama C, Matsui E, Arai K, Masai H. A second human Dbf4/ASK-related protein, Drf1/ASKL1, is required for efficient progression of S and M phases. J Biol Chem 2005; 280:13062-70; PMID:15668232; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc. M411653200
55. Takahashi TS, Walter JC. Cdc7-Drf1 is a developmentally regulated protein kinase required for the initiation of vertebrate DNA replication. Genes Dev 2005; 19:2295-300; PMID:16204181; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1339805
56. Nakamura T, Nakamura-Kubo M, Nakamura T, Shimoda C. Novel fission yeast Cdc7-Dbf4-like kinase complex required for the initiation and progression of meiotic second division. Mol Cell Biol 2002; 22:309-20; PMID:11739743; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.22.1.309-320.2002
57. Koltun ES, Tsuhako AL, Brown DS, Aay N, Arcalas A, Chan V, et al. Discovery of XL413, a potent and selective CDC7 inhibitor. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 2012; 22:3727-31; PMID:22560567; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2012.04.024
58. Nolen B, Taylor S, Ghosh G. Regulation of protein kinases; controlling activity through activation segment conformation. Mol Cell 2004; 15:661-75; PMID:15350212; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2004.08.024
59. Pinna LA. Protein kinase CK2: A challenge to canons. J Cell Sci 2002; 115:3873-8; PMID:12244125; http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.00074
60. Kitamura R, Fukatsu R, Kakusho N, Cho YS, Taniyama C, Yamazaki S, et al. Molecular mechanism of activation of human Cdc7 kinase: Bipartite interaction with Dbf4/activator of S phase kinase (ASK) activation subunit stimulates ATP binding and substrate recognition. J Biol Chem 2011; 286:23031-43; PMID:21536671; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M111.243311
61. Wolf I, Rubinfeld H, Yoon S, Marmor G, Hanoch T, Seger R. Involvement of the activation loop of ERK in the detachment from cytosolic anchoring. J Biol Chem 2001; 276:24490-7; PMID:11328824; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M103352200
62. Kim BJ, Lee H. Importin-beta mediates Cdc7 nuclear import by binding to the kinase insert II domain, which can be antagonized by importin-alpha. J Biol Chem 2006; 281:12041-9; PMID:16492669; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M512630200
63. Segurado M, Tercero JA. The S-phase checkpoint: Targeting the replication fork. Biol Cell 2009; 101:617-27; PMID:19686094; http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/ BC20090053
64. Byun TS, Pacek M, Yee MC, Walter JC, Cimprich KA. Functional uncoupling of MCM helicase and DNA polymerase activities activates the ATRdependent checkpoint. Genes Dev 2005; 19:1040 PMID:15833913; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/ gad.1301205
65. Sogo JM, Lopes M, Foiani M. Fork reversal and ssDNA accumulation at stalled replication forks owing to checkpoint defects. Science 2002; 297:599-602; PMID:12142537; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science. 1074023
66. Sweeney FD, Yang F, Chi A, Shabanowitz J, Hunt DF, Durocher D. Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad9 acts as a Mec1 adaptor to allow Rad53 activation. Curr Biol 2005; 15:1364-75; PMID:16085488; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2005. 06.063
67. Osborn AJ, Elledge SJ. Mrc1 is a replication fork component whose phosphorylation in response to DNA replication stress activates Rad53. Genes Dev 2003; 17:1755-67; PMID:12865299; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1098303
68. Sanchez Y, Desany BA, Jones WJ, Liu Q, Wang B, Elledge SJ. Regulation of RAD53 by the ATM-like kinases MEC1 and TEL1 in yeast cell cycle checkpoint pathways. Science 1996; 271:357-60; PMID:8553072; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/ science.271.5247.357
69. Pellicioli A, Lucca C, Liberi G, Marini F, Lopes M, Plevani P, et al. Activation of Rad53 kinase in response to DNA damage and its effect in modulating phosphorylation of the lagging strand DNA polymerase. EMBO J 1999; 18:6561-72; PMID:10562568; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/emboj/18.22.6561
70. Lopez-Mosqueda J, Vidanes GM, Toczyski DP. Cdc5 blocks in vivo Rad53 activity, but not in situ activity (ISA). Cell Cycle 2010; 9:4266-8; PMID:20962588; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/cc.9.21.13637.
71. Pellicioli A, Foiani M. Signal transduction: How rad53 kinase is activated. Curr Biol 2005; 15:R769-71; PMID:16169479; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.cub.2005.08.057
72. Durocher D, Taylor IA, Sarbassova D, Haire LF, Westcott SL, Jackson SP, et al. The molecular basis of FHA domain:phosphopeptide binding specificity and implications for phospho-dependent signaling mechanisms. Mol Cell 2000; 6:1169-82; PMID:11106755; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1097-2765(00)00114-3
73. Li H, Byeon IJ, Ju Y, Tsai MD. Structure of human Ki67 FHA domain and its binding to a phosphoprotein fragment from hNIFK reveal unique recognition sites and new views to the structural basis of FHA domain functions. J Mol Biol 2004; 335:371-81; PMID:14659764; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2003.10.032
74. Tong Y, Tempel W, Wang H, Yamada K, Shen L, Senisterra GA, et al. Phosphorylation-independent dual-site binding of the FHA domain of KIF13 mediates phosphoinositide transport via centaurin alpha1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010; 107:20346-51; PMID:21057110; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1009008107
75. Li J, Williams BL, Haire LF, Goldberg M, Wilker E, Durocher D, et al. Structural and functional versatility of the FHA domain in DNA-damage signaling by the tumor suppressor kinase Chk2. Mol Cell 2002; 9:1045-54; PMID:12049740; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00527-0
76. Nott TJ, Kelly G, Stach L, Li J, Westcott S, Patel D, et al. An intramolecular switch regulates phosphoindependent FHA domain interactions in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Sci Signal 2009; 2:ra12; PMID:19318624; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/scisignal.2000212
77. Matthews LA, Guarne A. Extending the interaction repertoire of FHA and BRCT domains. In: Stuart D, ed. The mechanisms of DNA replication: In Tech, February 2013; http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/51670
78. Vidanes GM, Sweeney FD, Galicia S, Cheung S, Doyle JP, Durocher D, et al. CDC5 inhibits the hyperphosphorylation of the checkpoint kinase Rad53, leading to checkpoint adaptation. PLoS Biol 2010; 8:e1000286; PMID:20126259; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal. pbio.1000286
79. Branzei D, Foiani M. The Rad53 signal transduction pathway: Replication fork stabilization, DNA repair, and adaptation. Exp Cell Res 2006; 312:2654-9; PMID:16859682; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yexcr.2006.06.012
80. Schleker T, Shimada K, Sack R, Pike BL, Gasser SM. Cell cycle-dependent phosphorylation of Rad53 kinase by Cdc5 and Cdc28 modulates checkpoint adaptation. Cell Cycle 2010; 9:350-63; PMID:20046099; http://dx.doi.org/10.4161/ cc.9.2.10448
81. Lee KS, Park JE, Asano S, Park CJ. Yeast polo-like kinases: Functionally conserved multitask mitotic regulators. Oncogene 2005; 24:217-29; PMID:15640837; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1208271
82. Charles JF, Jaspersen SL, Tinker-Kulberg RL, Hwang L, Szidon A, Morgan DO. The Polo-related kinase Cdc5 activates and is destroyed by the mitotic cyclin destruction machinery in S. cerevisiae. Curr Biol 1998; 8:497-507; PMID:9560342; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9822(98)70201-5
83. Mortensen EM, Haas W, Gygi M, Gygi SP, Kellogg DR. Cdc28-dependent regulation of the Cdc5/Polo kinase. Curr Biol 2005; 15:2033-7; PMID:16303563; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2005.10.046
84. Cheng KY, Lowe ED, Sinclair J, Nigg EA, Johnson LN. The crystal structure of the human polo-like kinase-1 polo box domain and its phospho-peptide complex. EMBO J 2003; 22:5757-68; PMID:14592974; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ emboj/cdg558
85. Yun SM, Moulaei T, Lim D, Bang JK, Park JE, Shenoy SR, et al. Structural and functional analyses of minimal phosphopeptides targeting the polo-box domain of polo-like kinase 1. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2009; 16:876-82; PMID:19597481; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.1628
86. Elia AE, Rellos P, Haire LF, Chao JW, Ivins FJ, Hoepker K, et al. The molecular basis for phosphodependent substrate targeting and regulation of Plks by the Polobox domain. Cell 2003; 115:83-95; PMID:14532005; http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00725-6
87. Liu F, Park JE, Qian WJ, Lim D, Gräber M, Berg T, et al. Serendipitous alkylation of a Plk1 ligand uncovers a new binding channel. Nat Chem Biol 2011; 7:595-601; PMID:21765407; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nchembio.614
88. Śledź P, Stubbs CJ, Lang S, Yang YQ, McKenzie GJ, Venkitaraman AR, et al. From crystal packing to molecular recognition: Prediction and discovery of a binding site on the surface of polo-like kinase 1. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2011; 50:4003-6; PMID:21472932; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1002/anie.201008019
89. Heltzel JM, Maul RW, Scouten Ponticelli SK, Sutton MD. A model for DNA polymerase switching involving a single cleft and the rim of the sliding clamp. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009; 106:12664-9; PMID:19617571; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1073/pnas.0903460106