Impact of product information and repeated exposure on consumer liking, sensory perception and concept associations of local apple juice

Food Research International

Volumn 52, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 91-98

  Stolzenbach, Sandra ^a   Bredie, Wender L P ^a   Christensen, Rune H B ^b   Byrne, Derek V ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^b TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Assimilation; Danish apple juice; Expectations; Local foods; Repeated exposure

Indexed keywords

APPLE JUICE; ASSIMILATION; EXPECTATIONS; LOCAL FOODS; REPEATED EXPOSURE;

SENSORY PERCEPTION;

FRUIT JUICES;

MALUS X DOMESTICA;

EID: 84875782285     PISSN: 09639969     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2013.02.018     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Aaron J.I., Mela D.J., Evans R.E. The influences of attitudes, beliefs and label information on perception of reduced-fat spread. Appetite 1994, 22:25-37.
2. Anderson R.E. Consumer dissatisfaction: the effect of disconfirmed expectancy on percieved product performance. Journal of Marketing Research 1973, 10:38-44.
3. Bárcenas P., Pérez de San Román R., Pérez Elortondo F.J., Albisu M. Consumer preference structures for traditional Spanish cheeses and their relationship with sensory properties. Food Quality and Preference 2001, 12:269-279.
4. Berlyne D.E. Arousal and reinforcement. Nebraska symposium on motivation 1967, 1-110. University of Nebraska Press.
5. Caporale G., Monteleone E. Influence of information about manufacturing process on beer acceptability. Food Quality and Preference 2004, 15:271-278.
6. Cardello A.V., Sawyer F.M. Effects of disconfirmed expectations on food acceptability. Journal of Sensory Studies 1992, 7:253-277.
7. Deliza R., MacFie H.J.H. The generation of sensory expectation by external cues and its effect on sensory perception and hedonic ratings: A review. Journal of Sensory Studies 1996, 11:103-128.
8. Di Monaco R., Cavella S., Di Marzo S., Masi P. The effect of expectations generated by brand name on the acceptability of dried semolina pasta. Food Quality and Preference 2004, 15:429-437.
9. Essed N.H., van Staveren W.A., Kok F.J., Ormel W., Zeinstra G., de Graaf C. The effect of repeated exposure to fruit drinks on intake, pleasantness and boredom in young and elderly adults. Physiology & Behavior 2006, 89:335-341.
10. Guinard J.-X., Uotani B., Schlich P. Internal and external preference mapping of preferences for commercial lager beers: Comparison of hedonic ratings by consumers blind versus with knowledge of brand and price. Food Quality and Preference 2001, 12:243-255.
11. Hersleth M., Lengard V., Verbeke W., Guerrero L., Næs T. Consumers' acceptance of innovations in dry-cured ham: Impact of reduced salt content, prolonged aging time and new origin. Food Quality and Preference 2011, 22:31-41.
12. Hetherington M.M., Bell A., Rolls B.J. Effects on repeat consumption on pleasantness, preference and intake. British Food Journal 2000, 102:507-521.
13. Iaccarino T., Di Monaco R., Mincione A., Cavella S., Masi P. Influence of information on origin and technology on the consumer response: The case of soppressata salami. Food Quality and Preference 2006, 17:76-84.
14. Jacoby J., Olson J.C., Haddock R.A. Price, brand name, and product composition characteristics as determinants of percieved quality. Journal of Applied Psychology 1971, 55:570-579.
15. Köster E.P., Beckers A.W.J.M., Houben J.H. The influence of health information on the acceptance of a snack in a canteen test. Flavour science in technology 1987, 391-398. J. Wiley, Chichester. M. Martens, G.A. Dalen, H. Russwurm (Eds.).
16. Köster E.P., Rummel C., Kornelson C., Benz K.H. Stability and changes in food liking: Food preferences in two Germany's after the reunification. Flavour 2000: Perception, release, evaluation, formation, acceptance, nutrition and health 2001, 237-253. Bergholz-Rehbrücke, Rhothe. M. Rothe (Ed.).
17. Kuznesof S., Tregear A., Moxey A. Regional foods: A consumer perspective. British Food Journal 1997, 99:199-206.
18. Lange C., Martin C., Chabanet C., Combris P., Issanchou S. Impact of the information provided to consumers on their willingness to pay for Champagne: Comparison with hedonic scores. Food Quality and Preference 2002, 13:597-608.
19. Levy C.M., MacRae A., Köster E.P. Perceived stimulus complexity and food preference development. Acta Psychologica 2006, 123:394-413.
20. Monteleone E., Bertuccioli M. The first European conference on sensory science of food and beverages "a sense of identity". Food Quality and Preference 2006, 17:1-2.
21. Murray J.M., Delahunty C.M. Mapping consumer preference for the sensory and packaging attributes of Cheddar cheese. Food Quality and Preference 2000, 11:419-435.
22. Pelchat M.L., Schaefer S. Dietary monotony and food cravings in young and elderly adults. Physiology and Behavior 2000, 68:353-359.
23. Porcherot C., Issanchou S. Dynamics of liking for flavoured crackers: Test of predictive value of a boredom test. Food Quality and Preference 1998, 9:21-28.
24. Schutz H.G., Pilgrim F.J. A field study of food monotony. Psychological Reports 1958, 4:559-565.
25. Shepherd R., Sparks P., Bellier S., Raats M.M. The effect of information on sensory ratings and preferences: The importance of attitude. Food Quality and Preference 1991/92, 3:147-155.
26. Siegrist M., Cousin M.E. Expectations influence sensory experience in a wine tasting. Appetite 2009, 52:762-765.
27. Siret F., Issanchou S. Traditional process: influence on sensory properties and on consumers' expectations and liking - Application to D́pâté de campagneD́. Food Quality and Preference 2000, 11:217-228.
28. Stefani G., Romano D., Cavicchi A. Consumer expectations, liking and willingness to pay for speciality foods: Do sensory characteristics tell the whole story?. Food Quality and Preference 2006, 17:53-62.
29. Stein L.J., Nagai H., Nakagawa M., Beauchamp G.K. Effect of repeated exposure and health- related information on hedonic evaluation and acceptance of a bitter beverage. Appetite 2003, 40:119-129.
30. Stolzenbach, S., Bredie. W. L. P., Christensen, R. H. B., & Byrne, D. V. (in press-a). Understanding liking of local apple juices in relation to sensory characteristics, consumer concept associations, arousal potential and appropriateness for use.
31. Stolzenbach, S., Bredie, W. L. P., & Byrne, D. V. (in press-b). Consumer concepts in new product development of local foods: traditional versus novel honeys. Food Research International.
32. Stubenitsky K., Aaron J.I., Catt S.L., Mela D.J. Effect of information and extended use on acceptance of reduced-fat products. Food Quality and Preference 1999, 10:367-376.
33. Sulmont-Rossé C., Chabanet C., Issanchou S., Köster E.P. Impact of the arousal potential of uncommon drinks on the repeated exposure effect. Food Quality and Preference 2008, 19:412-420.
34. van Ittersum K., Candel M., Meulemberg M. The influence of the image of a product's region of origin on product evaluation. Journal of Business Research 2003, 56:215-226.
35. Vanhonacker F., Verbeke W., Guerrero L., Clarat A., Contel M., Scalvedi L. How European consumers define the concept of traditional food: Evidence from a survey in six countries. Agribusiness 2010, 26:453-476.
36. Varela P., Ares G., Giménez A., Gámbaro A. Influence of brand information on consumers' expectations and liking of powdered drinks in central location tests. Food Quality and Preference 2010, 21:873-880.
37. Verlegh P.W.J., Steenkamp J.B. Areview and meta-analysis of country of origin research. Journal of Economic Psychology 1999, 20:521-546.
38. Vickers Z., Holton E. A comparison of taste test ratings, repeated consumption and postconsumption ratings of strengths of iced tea. Journal of Sensory Studies 1998, 13:199-212.
39. Zajonc R.B. Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Monograph Supplement 1968, 9:1-27.
40. Zandstra E.H., de Graaf C., van Trijp H.C.M. Effects of variety and repeated in-home consumption on product acceptance. Appetite 2000, 35:113-119.