Expectations influence sensory experience in a wine tasting

Appetite

Volumn 52, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 762-765

  Siegrist, Michael ^a   Cousin, Marie Eve ^a  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Consumer experience; Perception; Sensory evaluation; Taste

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONSUMER HEALTH INFORMATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXPECTATION; FEMALE; FOOD ANALYSIS; FOOD QUALITY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PERSONAL EXPERIENCE; SENSORY EVALUATION; SENSORY STIMULATION; TASTE; WINE; WINE INDUSTRY;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ASSOCIATION; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; COGNITION; FEMALE; FOOD PREFERENCES; HUMANS; MALE; SENSATION; SET (PSYCHOLOGY); TASTE; WINE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 67349123729     PISSN: 01956663     EISSN: 10958304     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2009.02.002     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Aaron J.I., Mela D.J., and Evans R.E. The influences of attitudes, beliefs and label information on perceptions of reduced-fat spread. Appetite 22 1 (1994) 25-37
2. Allison R.I., and Uhl K.P. Influence of beer brand identification on taste perception. Journal of Marketing Research 1 (1964) 36-39
3. Caporale G., and Monteleone E. Influence of information about manufacturing process on beer acceptability. Food Quality and Preference 15 3 (2004) 271-278
4. Deliza R., and MacFie H.J.H. The generation of sensory expectation by external cues and its effect on sensory perception and hedonic ratings: a review. Journal of Sensory Studies 11 (1996) 103-128
5. Festinger L. A theory of cognitive dissonance (1957), Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA
6. Grunert K.G. What's in a steak? A cross-cultural study on the quality perception of beef. Food Quality and Preference 8 (1997) 157-174
7. Hirokawa K., and Yamazawa K. Gendered information on sensory, hedonic and familiarity ratings of green tea by female Japanese students. Appetite 51 (2008) 343-346
8. Johansson L., Haglund A., Berglund L., Lea P., and Risvik E. Preference for tomatoes, affected by sensory attributes and information about growth conditions. Food Quality and Preference 10 4-5 (1999) 289-298
9. Kihlberg I., Johansson L., Langsrud O., and Risvik E. Effects of information on liking of bread. Food Quality and Preference 16 1 (2005) 25-35
10. Lee L., Frederick S., and Ariely D. Try it, you'll like it. Psychological Science 17 (2006) 1054-1058
11. Levin I.P., and Gaeth G.J. How consumers are affected by the framing of attribute information before and after consuming the product. Journal of Consumer Research 15 (1988) 374-378
12. Petty R.E., Wegener D.T., and Fabrigar L.R. Attitudes and attitude change. Annual Review of Psychology 48 (1997) 609-647
13. Poulsen C.S., Juhl H.J., Kristensen K., Bech A.C., and Engelund E. Quality guidance and quality formation. Food Quality and Preference 7 (1996) 127-135
14. Steenkamp J.-B.E.M. Conceptual model of the quality perception process. Journal of Business Research 21 (1990) 309-333
15. Wansink B., and Park S.B. Sensory suggestiveness and labeling: do soy labels bias taste?. Journal of Sensory Studies 17 5 (2002) 483-491
16. Wansink B., Payne C.R., and North J. Fine as North Dakota wine: sensory expectations and the intake of companion food. Physiology & Behavior 90 (2007) 712-716