DiffCorr: An R package to analyze and visualize differential correlations in biological networks

Gene

Volumn 518, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 209-214

  Fukushima, Atsushi ^a  

^a RIKEN   (Japan)

Author keywords

Correlation network; Differential correlation; Network modules; R program

Indexed keywords

TRANSCRIPTOME;

ARTICLE; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DIFFCORR; GENETIC DATABASE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ARABIDOPSIS; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; FLAVONOIDS; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; LEUKEMIA, MYELOID, ACUTE; METABOLOMICS; PRECURSOR CELL LYMPHOBLASTIC LEUKEMIA-LYMPHOMA; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84875380606     PISSN: 03781119     EISSN: 18790038     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2012.11.028     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Altay G., Asim M., Markowetz F., Neal D.E. Differential C3NET reveals disease networks of direct physical interactions. BMC Bioinforma. 2011, 12:296.
2. Benjamini Y., Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. B. 1995, 57:289-300.
3. Cho S.B., Kim J., Kim J.H. Identifying set-wise differential co-expression in gene expression microarray data. BMC Bioinforma. 2009, 10:109.
4. Choi J.K., Yu U., Yoo O.J., Kim S. Differential coexpression analysis using microarray data and its application to human cancer. Bioinformatics 2005, 21:4348-4355.
5. Chu J.H., Lazarus R., Carey V.J., Raby B.A. Quantifying differential gene connectivity between disease states for objective identification of disease-relevant genes. BMC Syst. Biol. 2011, 5:89.
6. Csardi G., Nepusz T. The igraph software package for complex network research. Int. J. Complex Syst. 2006, (p. http://necsi.org/events/iccs6/viewabstract.php?id=88).
7. Dawson J.A., Kendziorski C. An empirical Bayesian approach for identifying differential coexpression in high-throughput experiments. Biometrics 2012, 68:455-465.
8. Dawson J.A., Ye S., Kendziorski C. R/EBcoexpress: an empirical Bayesian framework for discovering differential co-expression. Bioinformatics 2012, 28:1939-1940.
9. de la Fuente A. From 'differential expression' to 'differential networking' - identification of dysfunctional regulatory networks in diseases. Trends Genet. 2010, 26:326-333.
10. Eisen M.B., Spellman P.T., Brown P.O., Botstein D. Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1998, 95:14863-14868.
11. Falcon S., Gentleman R. Using GOstats to test gene lists for GO term association. Bioinformatics 2007, 23:257-258.
12. Fukushima A., Kusano M., Redestig H., Arita M., Saito K. Integrated omics approaches in plant systems biology. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2009, 13:532-538.
13. Fukushima A., Kusano M., Redestig H., Arita M., Saito K. Metabolomic correlation-network modules in Arabidopsis based on a graph-clustering approach. BMC Syst. Biol. 2011, 5:1.
14. Fukushima A., et al. Exploring tomato gene functions based on coexpression modules using graph clustering and differential coexpression approaches. Plant Physiol. 2012, 158:1487-1502.
15. Gillis J., Pavlidis P. A methodology for the analysis of differential coexpression across the human lifespan. BMC Bioinforma. 2009, 10:306.
16. Golub T.R., et al. Molecular classification of cancer: class discovery and class prediction by gene expression monitoring. Science 1999, 286:531-537.
17. Ideker T., Krogan N.J. Differential network biology. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2012, 8:565.
18. Kayano M., Takigawa I., Shiga M., Tsuda K., Mamitsuka H. ROS-DET: robust detector of switching mechanisms in gene expression. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 39:e74.
19. Kim T.Y., Kim H.U., Lee S.Y. Data integration and analysis of biological networks. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2010, 21:78-84.
20. Kostka D., Spang R. Finding disease specific alterations in the co-expression of genes. Bioinformatics 2004, 20(Suppl. 1):i194-i199.
21. Kusano M., et al. Unbiased characterization of genotype-dependent metabolic regulations by metabolomic approach in Arabidopsis thaliana. BMC Syst. Biol. 2007, 1:53.
22. Kusano M., et al. Metabolomics reveals comprehensive reprogramming involving two independent metabolic responses of Arabidopsis to UV-B light. Plant J. 2011, 67:354-369.
23. Lai Y., Wu B., Chen L., Zhao H. A statistical method for identifying differential gene-gene co-expression patterns. Bioinformatics 2004, 20:3146-3155.
24. Langfelder P., Horvath S. Eigengene networks for studying the relationships between co-expression modules. BMC Syst. Biol. 2007, 1:54.
25. Li K.C. Genome-wide coexpression dynamics: theory and application. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2002, 99:16875-16880.
26. Liu B.H., Yu H., Tu K., Li C., Li Y.X., Li Y.Y. DCGL: an R package for identifying differentially coexpressed genes and links from gene expression microarray data. Bioinformatics 2010, 26:2637-2638.
27. Markowetz F., Spang R. Inferring cellular networks-a review. BMC Bioinforma. 2007, 8(Suppl. 6):S5.
28. Morgenthal K., Weckwerth W., Steuer R. Metabolomic networks in plants: transitions from pattern recognition to biological interpretation. Biosystems 2006, 83:108-117.
29. Odibat O., Reddy C. Ranking differential hubs in gene co-expression networks. J. Bioinformatics Comput. Biol. 2012, 10:1240002.
30. Pan W. A comparative review of statistical methods for discovering differentially expressed genes in replicated microarray experiments. Bioinformatics 2002, 18:546-554.
31. Ray M., Zhang W. Analysis of Alzheimer's disease severity across brain regions by topological analysis of gene co-expression networks. BMC Syst. Biol. 2010, 4:136.
32. Reiner A., Yekutieli D., Benjamini Y. Identifying differentially expressed genes using false discovery rate controlling procedures. Bioinformatics 2003, 19:368-375.
33. Saito K., Hirai M.Y., Yonekura-Sakakibara K. Decoding genes with coexpression networks and metabolomics - 'majority report by precogs'. Trends Plant Sci. 2008, 13:36-43.
34. Stacklies W., Redestig H., Scholz M., Walther D., Selbig J. pcaMethods-a bioconductor package providing PCA methods for incomplete data. Bioinformatics 2007, 23:1164-1167.
35. Steuer R. Review: on the analysis and interpretation of correlations in metabolomic data. Brief. Bioinform. 2006, 7:151-158.
36. Strimmer K. fdrtool: a versatile R package for estimating local and tail area-based false discovery rates. Bioinformatics 2008, 24:1461-1462.
37. Tesson B.M., Breitling R., Jansen R.C. DiffCoEx: a simple and sensitive method to find differentially coexpressed gene modules. BMC Bioinforma. 2010, 11:497.
38. Usadel B., et al. Co-expression tools for plant biology: opportunities for hypothesis generation and caveats. Plant Cell Environ. 2009, 32:1633-1651.
39. Valcarcel B., et al. A differential network approach to exploring differences between biological states: an application to prediabetes. PLoS One 2011, 6:e24702.
40. van den Berg R.A., Hoefsloot H.C., Westerhuis J.A., Smilde A.K., van der Werf M.J. Centering, scaling, and transformations: improving the biological information content of metabolomics data. BMC Genomics 2006, 7:142.
41. Wang J., Li M., Deng Y., Pan Y. Recent advances in clustering methods for protein interaction networks. BMC Genomics 2010, 11(Suppl. 3):S10.
42. Watson M. CoXpress: differential co-expression in gene expression data. BMC Bioinforma. 2006, 7:509.
43. White C.D., Brown M.D., Sacks D.B. IQGAPs in cancer: a family of scaffold proteins underlying tumorigenesis. FEBS Lett. 2009, 583:1817-1824.
44. Yu H., Liu B.H., Ye Z.Q., Li C., Li Y.X., Li Y.Y. Link-based quantitative methods to identify differentially coexpressed genes and gene pairs. BMC Bioinforma. 2011, 12:315.