A Conjoint-based approach to student evaluations of teaching performance

Expert Systems with Applications

Volumn 40, Issue 10, 2013, Pages 4083-4089

  Kuzmanovic, Marija ^a   Savic, Gordana ^a   Andric Gusavac, Bisera ^a   Makajic Nikolic, Dragana ^a   Panic, Biljana ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BELGRADE   (Serbia)

Author keywords

Conjoint analysis; Criteria importance; Evaluation measures; Student satisfaction; Teaching performance

Indexed keywords

CAREER ADVANCEMENT; CONJOINT ANALYSIS; CRITERIA IMPORTANCE; EVALUATION MEASURES; OBJECTIVE EVALUATION; STUDENT EVALUATION; STUDENT SATISFACTION; UNIVERSITY TEACHERS;

STATISTICAL METHODS; STUDENTS;

QUALITY CONTROL;

EID: 84875371174     PISSN: 09574174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2013.01.039     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. R.G. Biesma, M. Pavlova, G.G. van Merode, and W. Groo Using conjoint analysis to estimate employers preferences for key competencies of master level Dutch graduates entering the public health field Economics of Education Review 26 2007 375 386
2. Y.R. Choi, and D.A. Shepherd Entrepreneurs' decision to exploit opportunities Journal of Management 30 3 2004 377 395
3. J. Cornelius-White Learner-centered teacher-student relationships are effective: A meta-analysis Review of Educational Research 77 2007 113 143
4. O.W. DeShields, A. Kara, and E. Kaynak Determinants of business student satisfaction and retention in higher education: Applying Herzberg's two-factor theory International Journal of Educational Management 19 2 2005 128 139
5. C.J. Dommeyer, P. Baum, K.S. Chapman, and R.W. Hanna Attitudes of business faculty towards two methods of collecting teaching evaluations: Paper vs. online Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 27 2002 455 462
6. K.M. Elliott, and M.A. Healy Key factors influencing student satisfaction related to recruitment retention Journal of Marketing for Higher Education 10 4 2001 1 11
7. M. Gray, and B.R. Bergmann Student teaching evaluations: Inaccurate, demeaning, misused Academe 89 5 2003 44 46
8. P.E. Green, and V.R. Rao Conjoint measurement for quantifying judgmental data Journal of Marketing Research 8 1971 355 363
9. J.E. Gustafsson What do we know about effects of school resources on educational results? Swedish Economic Policy Review 10 2003 77 110
10. Ø. Helgesen, and E. Nesset What accounts for students' loyalty? Some field study evidence International Journal of Educational Management 21 2 2007 126 143
11. D. Hensher The valuation of commuter travel time savings for car drivers: Evaluating alternative model specifications Transportation 28 2001 101 118
12. J.S. Hur, and R.J. Pak Conjoint analysis for the preferred subjects of elementary school computer education Journal of the Korean Data and Information Science Society 18 2 2007 357 364
13. M.H. Immordino-Yang, and A. Damasio We feel therefore we learn: The relevance of affective and social neuroscience to education Mind, Brain and Education 1 2007 3 10
14. Y. Kim Estimation of consumer preferences on new telecommunications services: IMT-2000 service in Korea Information Economics and Policy 17 1 2004 73 84
15. C. Kim, S. Choe, C. Choi, and Y. Park A systematic approach to new mobile service creation Expert Systems with Applications 35 2008 762 771
16. J.A. Kulik Student ratings: Validity, utility, and controversy New Directions for Institutional Research 109 2001 9 25
17. Kuzmanović, M.; Popović, M.; & Savić, G. (2012a). Using conjoint analysis to elicit students' preferences towards various aspects of university teaching. In Proceedings of international conference on information technology and development of education-ITRO 2012 (pp. 21-26). Zrenjanin, Serbia.
18. M. Kuzmanovic, and M. Martic An approach to competitive product line design using conjoint data Expert Systems with Application 39 8 2012 7262 7269 10.1016/j.eswa.2012.01.097
19. M. Kuzmanovic, B. Panic, and M. Martic Identification of key positioning factors in the retail sector: A conjoint analysis approach African Journal of Business Management 5 26 2011 10376 10386
20. M. Kuzmanovic, G. Savic, M. Popovic, and M. Martic A new approach to evaluation of university teaching considering heterogeneity of students' preferences Higher Education 2012 10.1007/s10734-012-9596-2
21. M. Kuzmanovic, M. Vujosevic, and M. Martic Using conjoint analysis to elicit patients' preferences for public primary care service in Serbia HealthMED 6 2 2012 496 504
22. D.W. Letcher, and J.S. Neves Determinants of undergraduate business student satisfaction Research in Higher Education Journal 6 2010 http://www.aabri.com/manuscripts/09391.pdf. Accessed 1 February 2012
23. J. Looney Developing high-quality teachers: Teacher evaluation for improvement European Journal of Education 46 4 2011 440 455
24. Louis, K.S, Leithwood, K.; Wahlstrom, K.L.; & Anderson, S.E. (2010). Investigating the links to improved student learning: Final report of research findings. St. Paul, University of Minnesota. < http://www.cehd.umn.edu/carei/ Leadership/Learning-from-Leadership-Executive-Summary-July-2010.pdf >. Accessed 24 December 2011.
25. R.D. Luce, and J.W. Tukey Simultaneous conjoint measurement: A new type of fundamental measurement Journal of Mathematical Psychology 1 1964 1 27
26. D. Malesevic, Z. Adamovic, and Z. Djuric The influence of competences of a teacher on the quality of professional education Technics Technologies Education Management-TTEM 6 4 2011 1100 1109
27. H.W. Marsh, and L.A. Roche The use of students' evaluations and an individually structured intervention to enhance university teaching effectiveness American Educational Research Journal 30 1993 217 251
28. D.H. Monk Subject area preparation of secondary mathematics and science teachers and student achievement Economics of Education Review 13 1994 125 145
29. J. O'Day Complexity, accountability, and school improvement Harvard Educational Review 72 3 2002 293 329
30. OECD (2005). Teachers matter: Attracting, developing and retaining effective teachers. Paris: OECD.
31. A.J. Onwuegbuzie, L.G. Daniel, and K.M.T. Collins A meta-validation model for assessing the score validity of student teacher evaluations Quality and Quantity 43 2009 197 209
32. A.J. Onwuegbuzie, A.E. Witcher, K.M.T. Collins, J.D. Filer, C.D. Wiedmaier, and C.W. Moore Students' perceptions of characteristics of effective college teachers: A validity study of a teaching evaluation form using a mixed-methods analysis American Educational Research Journal 44 1 2007 113 160
33. J.C. Ory Teaching evaluation: Past, present, and future New Directions for Teaching and Learning 83 2000 13 18
34. J.W. Pellegrino, G.P. Baxter, and R. Glaser Addressing the 'two disciplines' problem: Linking theories of cognition and learning with assessment and instructional practice Review of Research in Education 24 1999 307 353
35. M. Popović, M. Kuzmanović, and M. Martić Using conjoint analysis to elicit employers' preferences toward key competencies for a business manager position Management-Journal for Theory and Practice Management 17 63 2012 17 26 10.7595/management.fon.2012.0011
36. J. Rice Teacher quality: Understanding the effectiveness of teacher attributes 2003 Economic Policy Institute Washington, DC
37. C.M. Rubie-Davis Classroom interactions: Exploring the practices of high- and low-expectation teachers British Journal of Educational Psychology 77 2007 289 306
38. C.M. Rubie-Davis, J.A.C. Hattie, and R. Hamilton Expecting the best for students: Teacher expectations and academic outcomes British Journal of Educational Psychology 76 2006 429 444
39. P. Seldin The use and abuse of student ratings of professors Chronicle of Higher Education 39 46 1993 A40
40. S.Y. Sohn, and Y.H. Ju Conjoint analysis for recruiting high quality students for college education Expert Systems with Applications 37 2010 3777 3783
41. G.N. Soutar, and J.P. Turner Students' preferences for college: A conjoint analysis International Journal of Educational Management 16 1 2002 40 45
42. K.J. Spencer, and L.P. Schmelkin Students' perspectives on teaching and its evaluation Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 27 2002 397 408
43. R. Sproule Student evaluation of teaching: A methodological critique of conventional practices Education Policy Analysis Archives 8 50 2000 125 142
44. P. Toth Learning strategies and styles in vocational education Acta Polytechnica Hungarica 9 2012 195 216
45. U. Venesaar, H. Ling, and K. Voolaid Evaluation of the entrepreneurship education programme in university: A new approach Amfiteatru Economic 30 2011 377 391