Attitudes of business faculty towards two methods of collecting teaching evaluations: Paper vs. online

Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education

Volumn 27, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 455-462

  Dommeyer, Curt J ^a   Baum, Paul ^a   Chapman, Kenneth S ^a   Hanna, Robert W ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0442313483     PISSN: 02602938     EISSN: 1469297X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0260293022000009320     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. ALEAMONI, L. M. (1981) Student ratings of instruction, in: J. MILLMAN (Ed) Handbook of Teacher Evaluation, pp. 110-145 (Newbury Park, CA, Sage).
2. BAUM, P., CHAPMAN, K., DOMMEYER, C. & HANNA, R. (2001) Online versus inclass student evaluation s of faculty, Paper presented at the Hawaii Conference on Business, June 14-17, Honolulu.
3. BENSON, D. E. & LEWIS, J. M. (1994) Students' evaluation of teaching and accountability: implications from the Boyer and ASA reports, Teaching Sociology, 22 (2), pp. 195-199.
4. BRASKAMP, L. A., BRANDENBURG, D. C. & ORY, J. (1984) Evaluating Teaching Effectiveness: A Practical Guide (Beverly Hills, CA, Sage Publications).
5. CENTRA, J. A. (1979) Determining Faculty Effectivenes s (San Francisco, CA, Jossey-Bass Publishers).
6. CENTRA, J. A. (1993) Re ective Faculty Evaluation: Enhancing Teaching and Determining Faculty Effectiveness (San Francisco, CA, Jossey-Bass Publishers).
7. FRANKLIN, J. & THEALL, M. (1989) Who reads ratings: Knowledge, attitudes, and practice of users of student ratings of instruction, Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, April, San Francisco.
8. GILMORE, G. M., KANE, M. T. & NACCARATO, R. W. (1978) The generalizabilit y of student ratings of instruction: Estimation of teacher and course components, Journal of Educational Measurement, 15 (1), pp. 1-13.
9. LAYNE, B. H., DECRISTOFORO, J. R. & MCGINTY, D. (1999) Electronic versus traditional student ratings of instruction, Research in Higher Education, 40 (2), pp. 221-232.
10. MARSH, H. W. (1987) Student evaluation s of university teaching: Research. ndings, methodological issues, and directions for future research, International Journal of Educational Research, 11, pp. 253-388.
11. MILLER, R. I. (1987) Evaluating Faculty for Promotion and Tenure (San Francisco, CA, Jossey-Bas s Publishers).
12. NUNNALLY, J. C. (1978) Psychometric Theory, 2nd edition (New York, McGraw-Hill).
13. ORY, J. C. & PARKER, S. A. (1989) Student ratings of instruction: Ethics and practice, in: M. THEALL & J. FRANKLIN (Eds) Student Ratings of Instruction: Issues for Improving Practice, pp. 63-74 (San Francisco, CA, Jossey-Bass Publishers).
14. ROSENFELD, P., BOOTH-KEWLEY, S. & EDWARDS J. E. (1993) Computer-administere d surveys in organizational settings: Alternatives, advantages, and applications, American Behavioral Scientis t, 36 (4), pp. 485-511.
15. SELDIN, P. (1984) Changing Practices in Faculty Evaluation: A Critical Assessment and Recommendations for Improvement (San Francisco, CA, Jossey-Bas s Publishers).