Conjoint analysis for recruiting high quality students for college education

Expert Systems with Applications

Volumn 37, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 3777-3783

  Sohn, So Young ^a   Ju, Yong Han ^a  

^a Yonsei University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Choice simulation; College Entrance Examination; Conjoint analysis

Indexed keywords

COLLEGE EDUCATION; CONJOINT ANALYSIS; ENTRANCE EXAMINATION; HIGH QUALITY; HIGH SCHOOL; HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS;

QUALITY CONTROL; TEACHING; VEHICULAR TUNNELS;

STUDENTS;

EID: 73249114923     PISSN: 09574174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2009.11.043     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Armitage A.M.D. The application of conjoint analysis to evaluate service quality. Total Quality Management 8 2/3 (1997) 79-82
2. Baek Y.S. An issue and improvement strategy of college entrance policy: High school academic record: The present condition and problem diagnosis. Journal of Korean Engineering Education 11 4 (2004) 6-11
3. Biesma R.G., Pavlova M., van Merode G.G., and Groot W. Using conjoint analysis to estimate employers preferences for key competencies of master level Dutch graduates entering the public health field. Economics of Education Review 26 3 (2007) 375-386
4. Cho S., Baek S., and Kim J.S. Exploring artificial intelligence-based data fusion for conjoint analysis. Expert Systems with Application 24 3 (2003) 287-294
5. Choi J.H. An issue and improvement strategy of college entrance policy: Essay and interview: The present condition and problem diagnosis. Journal of Korean Engineering Education 11 4 (2004) 12-15
6. Croot D., and Chalkley. Student recruitment and the geography of undergraduate geographers in England and Wales. Journal of Geography in Higher Education 23 1 (1999) 21-47
7. Enders J. A chair system in transition: Appointments, promotions, and gate keeping in German higher education. Higher Education 41 1/2 (2001) 3-25
8. Hertling, E. (1999). Conducting a principal search (Report No. EDO-EA-99-9). Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED436815).
9. Horn C. Standardized assessments and the flow of students into the college admission pool. Educational Policy 19 2 (2005) 331-348
10. Hur J.S., and Pak R.J. Conjoint analysis for the preferred subjects of elementary school computer education. Journal of the Korean Data and Information Science Society 18 2 (2007) 357-364
11. Islam R. Exploring the global trend in recruitment for engineering and technology freshmen: Current challenges and suggested solutions. American Society for Engineering Education: Staying in Tune with Engineering Education (2003) 1206
12. Kang, K. G. N., & Lee, Y. W. (1994). National College Entrance Examination and Measurement Issues in Korea. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the national council on measurement in education. New Orleans, LA.
13. Kim C.W., and Dembo M.H. Social-cognitive factors influencing success on college entrance exams in South Korea. Social Psychology of Education 4 2 (2000) 95-115
14. Kim G., Kim A., and Sohn S.Y. Conjoint analysis for luxury brand outlet malls in Korea with consideration of customer lifetime value. Expert Systems with Applications 36 1 (2009) 922-932
15. Lemann N. The big test: The secret history of the American meritocracy (1999), Farrar, Strauss, and Giroux, New York
16. Maringe F. University and course choice: Implications for positioning, recruitment and marketing. International Journal of Education Management 20 6 (2006) 466-479
17. Mori R. Entrance examinations and remedial education in Japanese higher education. Higher Education 43 1 (2002) 27-42
18. Murrell L.E., and Hughey A.W. The effects of job attributes, institutional mission emphasis, and institution type on perceptions of the provost position. Educational Administration Quarterly 39 4 (2003) 533-565
19. Pounder, D. G., & Young, I. P. (1996). Recruitment and selection of educational administrators: Priorities for today's schools. In K. Leithwood (Ed.) & A.W. Hart (Section Ed.), The international handbook of educational leadership (pp. 279-308). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
20. Rhie J.H. Evaluating university entrance examination policy: The effectiveness of Korean-type early decision programs. Korea Journal of Administration Research with Korea Society 14 1 (2003) 345-368
21. Ross M., Heaney J.-G., and Cooper M. Institutional and managerial factors affecting international student recruitment management. International Journal of Educational Management 21 7 (2007) 593-605
22. Seong T.J., and Hong H.J. Curriculum and education evaluation and change of college entrance examination. Korea Educational Review 6 2 (2000) 59-75
23. Smith P. Japan: A reinterpretation (1997), Vintage Books, Random House, Inc., New York
24. Soutar G.N., and Turner J.P. Students' preferences for college: A conjoint analysis. International Journal of Educational Management 16 1 (2002) 40-45
25. Sternberg R.J. Increasing academic excellence and enhancing diversity are compatible goals. Education Policy 22 4 (2008) 487-514
26. Syverson S. The role of standardized tests in college admissions: Test-optional admissions. New Directions for Student Services 2007 118 (2007) 55-70
27. Wainer H., Saka H., and Donoghe J.R. The validity of the SAT at the University of Hawaii: A riddle wrapped in an enigma. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 15 1 (1993) 91-98
28. Wiklund S.P., and Wiklund H. Student focused design and improvement of college courses. Managing Service Quality 9 6 (1999) 434-443
29. Winter P.A., and Melloy S.H. Teacher recruitment in a school reform. Educational Administration Quarterly 41 2 (2005) 349-372
30. Woldrige A. A ture test. New Republic 18 (1998) 21
31. Zwick R. Fair Game: The Use of Standardized Admission Test in Higher Education (2002), Routledge Falmer, New York