Fluency Has a Role in the Simple View of Reading

Scientific Studies of Reading

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 108-133

  Silverman, Rebecca D ^a   Speece, Deborah L ^a   Harring, Jeffrey R ^a   Ritchey, Kristen D ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84873973517     PISSN: 10888438     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10888438.2011.618153     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Adams, M. 1990. Beginning to read, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Adlof, S. M., Catts, H. W. and Little, T. D. 2006. Should the simple view of reading include a fluency component?. Reading and Writing, 19: 933-958. doi:10.1007/s11145-006-9024-z
3. Baron, R. M. and Kenny, D. A. 1986. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51: 1173-1182. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.51.6.1173
4. Bentler, P. M. 1990. Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107: 238-246. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.107.2.238
5. Chen, R. S. and Vellutino, F. R. 1997. Prediction of reading ability: A cross-validation study of the Simple View Model of reading. Journal of Literacy Research, 29(1): 1-24. doi:10.1080/10862969709547947
6. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G. and Aiken, L. S. 2003. Applied multiple regression/correlational analysis for the behavioral sciences, 3rd, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. Conners, F. A. 2009. Attentional control and the simple view of reading. Reading & Writing, 22: 591-613. doi:10.1007/s11145-008-9126-x
8. Cromley, J. G. and Azevedo, R. 2007. Testing and refining the direct and inferential mediation model of reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99: 311-325. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.99.2.311
9. Cronbach, L. J. 1987. Statistical tests for moderator variables: Flaws in analyses recently proposed. Psychological Bulletin, 102: 414-417. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.102.3.414
10. Cutting, L. E. and Scarborough, H. S. 2006. Prediction of reading comprehension: Relative contributions of word recognition, language proficiency, and other cognitive skills can depend on how comprehension is measured. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10: 277-299. doi:10.1207/s1532799xssr1003_5
11. Deno, S. L. (1985). Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative. Exceptional Children, 52, 219-232. http://journals.cec.sped.org/ec/ (http://journals.cec.sped.org/ec/)
12. Dreyer, L. and Katz, L. 1992. An examination of the simple view of reading. National Reading Conference Yearbook, 41: 169-175.
13. Fuchs, L. S. n.d. Project PROACT Maze Reading Passages, Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University.
14. Fuchs, L. S. and Fuchs, D. 1992. Identifying a measure for monitoring student reading progress. School Psychology Review, 21(1): 45-58.
15. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L. and Allinder, R. M. 1991. Effects of expert system advice within curriculum-based measurement on teacher planning and student achievement in spelling. School Psychology Review, 20(1): 49-66.
16. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hosp, M. K. and Jenkins, J. R. 2001. Oral reading fluency as an indicator of reading competence: A theoretical, empirical, and historical analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5: 239-256. doi:10.1207/S1532799XSSR0503_3
17. Fuchs, L. S., Hamlett, C. L. and Fuchs, D. 1990. Monitoring basic skills progress: Basic reading, Austin, TX: ProEd.
18. Georgiou, G. K., Das, J. P. and Hayward, D. 2009. Revisiting the "simple view of reading" in a group of children with poor reading comprehension. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42(1): 76-84. doi:10.1177/0022219408326210
19. Gough, P. B. 2002. "Word recognition". In Handbook of reading research, Edited by: Pearson, P. D., Barr, R., Kamil, M. L. and Mosenthal, P. 225-254. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
20. Gough, P. B. and Tunmer, W. 1986. Decoding, reading and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7(1): 6-10. doi:10.1177/074193258600700104
21. Hoover, W. A. and Gough, P. B. 1990. The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2: 127-160. doi:10.1007/BF00401799
22. Hudson, R. F., Pullen, P. C., Lane, H. B. and Torgesen, J. K. 2009. The complex nature of reading fluency: A multidimensional view. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 25(1): 4-32. doi:10.1080/10573560802491208
23. Jaccard, J., Turrisi, R. and Wan, C. K. 1990. Interaction effects in multiple regression, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
24. Johnston, T. C. and Kirby, J. R. 2006. The contribution of naming speed to the simple view of reading. Reading and Writing, 19: 339-361. doi:10.1007/s11145-005-4644-2
25. Joshi, R. M. and Aaron, P. G. 2000. The component model of reading: Simple View of Reading made a little more complex. Reading Psychology, 21: 85-97. doi:10.1080/10573560802491208
26. Keenan, J. M., Betjemann, R. S. and Olson, R. K. 2008. Reading comprehension tests vary in the skills they assess: Differential dependence on decoding and oral comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 12: 281-300. doi:10.1080/10888430802132279
27. Kendeou, P., Savage, R. and van den Broek, P. 2009. Revisiting the simple view of reading. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79: 353-370. doi:10.1348/978185408X369020
28. Kirby, J. R. and Savage, R. S. 2008. Can the simple view deal with the complexities of reading?. Literacy, 42: 75-82. doi:10.1111/j.1741-4369.2008.00487.x
29. Kline, R. B. 2005. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, 2nd, New York, NY: Guilford.
30. Kuhn, M. R., Schwanenflugel, P. J. and Meisinger, E. B. 2010. Review of Research: Aligning theory and assessment of reading fluency: Automaticity, prosody, and definitions of fluency. Reading Research Quarterly, 45: 230-251. doi:10.1598/RRQ.45.2.4
31. LaBerge, D. and Samuels, J. 1974. Towards a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6: 293-323. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(74)90015-2
32. MacGinitie, W. H., MacGinitie, R. K., Maria, K. and Dreyer, L. G. 2000. Gates-MacGinitie Reading Tests Forms S and T, Fourth, Itasca, IL: Riverside.
33. Maller, S. J. 2004. "Review of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Fourth Edition". In The sixteenth mental measurements yearbook, Edited by: Spies, R. A. and Plake, B. S. 1092-1096. Lincoln, NE: The Buros Institute of Mental Measurements. Retrieved from Mental Measurements Yearbook with Tests in Print database through EBSCO Host.
34. Marston, D. B. 1989. "A curriculum-based measurement approach to assessing academic performance: What it is and why do it". In Curriculum-based measurement, Edited by: Shinn, M. R. 18-78. New York, NY: Guilford.
35. Mather, N., Hammill, D. D., Allen, E. A. and Roberts, R. 2004. Test of Silent Word Reading Fluency: Examiner's manual, Austin, TX: Pro-Ed
36. Muthén L., & Muthén, B. O. (2010). Mplus (Version 6.0) [Structural equation modeling software]. http://www.statmodel.com (http://www.statmodel.com)
37. National Center on Response to Intervention. (2009). Screening tools chart. http://www.rti4success.org/tools_charts/screening.php (http://www.rti4success.org/tools_charts/screening.php)
38. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. http://www.nationalreadingpanel.org/publications/summary.htm (http://www.nationalreadingpanel.org/publications/summary.htm)
39. Neuhaus, G. F., Roldan, L. W., Boulware-Gooden, R. and Swank, P. R. 2006. Parsimonious reading models: Identifying teachable subskills. Reading Psychology, 27(1): 37-58. doi:10.1080/02702710500468724
40. Olson, R. K., Forsberg, H., Wise, B. and Rack, J. 1994. "Measurement of word recognition, orthographic, and phonological skills". In Frames of reference for the assessment of learning disabilities: New views on measurement issues, Edited by: Lyon, G. R. 243-277. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
41. Perfetti, C. A. 1985. Reading ability, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
42. Pierce, M., Katzir, T., Wolf, M. and Noam, G. 2010. Examining the construct of reading among dysfluent urban children: A factor analysis approach. Journal of Literacy Research, 42: 124-158. doi:10.1080/10862961003796140
43. Pikulski, J. J. and Chard, D. J. 2005. Fluency: Bridge between decoding and reading comprehension. The Reading Teacher, 58: 510-519. doi:10.1598/RT.58.6.2
44. Samuels, S. J. 2007. The DIBELS tests: Is speed of barking at print what we mean by reading fluency?. Reading Research Quarterly, 42: 563-566.
45. Savage, R. 2006. Reading comprehension is not always the product of nonsense word decoding and linguistic comprehension: Evidence from teenagers who are extremely poor readers. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10: 143-164. doi:10.1207/s1532799xssr1002_2
46. Scarborough, H. S., Cutting, L. E., Speece, D. L., Sabatini, J. P., Olson, R. K. and Denckla, M. B. April 2008. Can taking a cheap and easy route get the job done? Using quick group tasks to screen for reading disability, April, Philadelphia, PA: Paper presented at the Institute for Educational Sciences/Educational Testing Service conference on Assessing Reading in the 21st Century.
47. Schwanenflugel, P. J., Meisinger, E., Wisenbaker, J. M., Kuhn, M. R., Strauss, G. P. and Morris, R. D. 2006. Becoming a fluent and automatic reader in the early elementary school years. Reading Research Quarterly, 41: 496-522. doi:10.1598/RRQ.41.4.4
48. Semel, E., Wiig, E. and Secord, W. 2003. Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals, (CLEF-4), Fourth, San Antonio, TX: PsychCorp.
49. Sober, E. 2000. Instrumentalism, parsimony, and the Akaike framework. Philosophy of Science, 69: 112-123.
50. Speece, D., Ritchey, K., Silverman, R., Schatschneider, C., Walker, C. and Andrusik, K. 2010. Identifying children in middle childhood who are at risk for reading problems. School Psychology Review, 39: 258-276.
51. Tilstra, J., McMaster, K., Van den Broek, P., Kendeou, P. and Rapp, D. 2009. Simple but complex: Components of the simple view of reading across grade levels. Journal of Research in Reading, 32: 383-401. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9817.2009.01401.x
52. Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K. and Rashotte, C. A. 1999. Test of Word Reading Efficiency: Examiner's manual, Austin, TX: Pro-.
53. Vellutino, F. R., Tunmer, W. E., Jaccard, J. J. and Chen, R. 2007. Components of reading ability: Multivariate evidence for a convergent skills model of reading development. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11: 3-32. doi:10.1207/s1532799xssr1101_2
54. Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K. and Rashotte, C. A. 1999. Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing: Examiner manual, Austin, TX: Pro-.
55. Wechsler, D. 2003. Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children, Fourth, San Antonio, TX: Pearson.
56. Wiley, H. I., & Deno, S. L. (2005). Oral reading and maze measures as predictors of success for English learners on a state standards assessment. Remedial and Special Education, 26, 207-214. http://rse.sagepub.com/ (http://rse.sagepub.com/)
57. Wolf, M. and Denckla, M. B. 2005. Rapid Automatized Naming and Rapid Alternating Stimulus Tests, Examiner's manual, Austin, TX: Pro-.
58. Woodcock, R., McGrew, K., Mather, N. and Schrank, F. 2001. Woodcock-Johnson Tests of Achievement, Third, Itasca, IL: Riverside.
59. Zeno, S. M., Ivens, S. H., Millard, R. T. and Duvuri, R. 1995. The educator's word frequency guide, New York, NY: Touchstone Applied Science Associates.