Simple but complex: Components of the simple view of reading across grade levels

Journal of Research in Reading

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 383-401

  Tilstra, Janet ^a   McMaster, Kristen ^a   Van Den Broek, Paul ^b   Kendeou, Panayiota ^c   Rapp, David ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^d NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 70350515954     PISSN: 01410423     EISSN: 14679817     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9817.2009.01401.x     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Aaron, P.G., Joshi, M. Williams, K.A. (1999). Not all reading disabilities are alike. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 120 137.
2. Adlof, S.M., Catts, H.W. Little, T.D. (2006). Should the simple view of reading include a fluency component? Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 19, 933 958.
3. Brookheart, S.M. Cross, L.H. (2003). Review of the Iowa test of basic skills forms K, L, and M. In Fifteenth mental measurements yearbook. Lincoln, NE : Buros Institute Inc., University of Nebraska Press.
4. Cain, K. Oakhill, J. (2006). Assessment matters: Issues in the measurement of reading comprehension. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 697 708.
5. Cain, K., Oakhill, J. Bryant, P. (2004). Children's reading comprehension ability: Concurrent prediction by working memory, verbal ability, and component skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96 (1), 31 42.
6. Catts, H.W., Adlof, S.M., Hogan, T.P. Weismer, S.E. (2005). Are specific language impairment and dyslexia distinct disorders? Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 48, 1378 1396.
7. Catts, H.W., Adlof, S.M. Weismer, S.E. (2006). Language deficits in poor comprehenders: A case for the simple view of reading. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49, 278 293.
8. Chen, R. Vellutino, F.R. (1997). Prediction of reading ability: A cross-validation study of the simple view of reading. Journal of Literacy Research, 29, 1 24.
9. Cizek, G.J. Sandoval, J. (2003). Review of the Woodcock Johnson (r) III. In Fifteenth mental measurements yearbook. Lincoln, NE : Buros Institute Inc., University of Nebraska Press.
10. Cromley, J.G. Azevedo, R. (2007). Testing and refining the direct and inferential mediation model of reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 311 325.
11. Cummins, J. (1980). The entry and exit fallacy in bilingual education. NABE Journal, 4, 25 29.
12. Cutting, L.E. Scarborough, H.S. (2006). Prediction of reading comprehension: Relative contributions of word recognition, language proficiency, and other cognitive skills can depend on how comprehension is measured. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10 (3), 277 299.
13. Demont, E. Gombert, J.E. (1996). Phonological awareness as a predictor of recoding skills and syntactic awareness as a predictor of comprehension skills. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 315 332.
14. Deno, S.L. (1985). Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative. Exceptional Children, 16 (2), 99 104.
15. Diakidoy, I.N., Stylianou, P., Karefillidou, C. Papageorgiou, P. (2005). The relationship between listening and reading comprehension of different types of text at increasing grade levels. Reading Psychology, 26, 55 80.
16. Dreyer, L.G. Katz, L. (1992). An examination of 'the simple view of reading'. National Reading Conference Yearbook, 41, 169 175.
17. Elliott, C., Smith, P. McCulloch, K. (1996). British Abilities Scales II. Windsor, UK : NFER.
18. Espin, C.A. Foegen, A. (1996). Validity of general outcome measures for predicting secondary students' performance on content-area tasks. Exceptional Children, 62 (6), 497 514.
19. Fuchs, L.S. Deno, S.L. (1992). Effects of curriculum within curriculum-based measurement. Exceptional Children, 58, 232 243.
20. Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., Hosp, M.K. Jenkins, J.R. (2001). Oral reading fluency as an indicator of reading competence: A theoretical, empirical, and historical analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 239 256.
21. Gough, P.B. Tunmer, W.E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7 (1), 6 10.
22. Hatcher, J., Snowling, M.J. Griffiths, Y.M. (2002). Cognitive assessment of dyslexic students in higher education. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 119 133.
23. Hintze, J.M. Silberglitt, B. (2005). A longitudinal examination of the diagnostic accuracy and predictive validity of R-CBM and high-stakes testing. School Psychology Review, 34, 372 386.
24. Hoover, H.D., Heironymus, A.N., Frisbie, D.A. Dunbar, S.B. (1996). Iowa Test of Basic Skills. Itasca, IL : Riverside Publishing.
25. Hoover, W.A. Gough, P.B. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing, 2 (2), 127 160.
26. Jackson, N.E. Doellinger, H. (2002). Resilient readers? University students who are poor decoders but sometimes good text comprehenders. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 64 78.
27. Jenkins, J.R., Fuchs, L.S., Van den Broek, P., Espin, C. Deno, S.L. (2003). Accuracy and fluency in list and context reading of skilled and RD groups: Absolute and relative performance levels. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 18 (4), 237 245.
28. Johnson, K.M. McCabe, P.P. (2003). Review of the Gates-MacGinitie 4th edition, forms S and T. In Fifteenth mental measurements yearbook. Lincoln, NE : Buros Institute Inc., University of Nebraska Press.
29. Johnston, T.C. Kirby, J.R. (2006). The contribution of naming speed to the simple view of reading. Reading and Writing, 19, 339 361.
30. Joshi, R.M. Aaron, P.G. (2000). The component model of reading: Simple view of reading made a little more complex. Reading Psychology, 21, 85 97.
31. Kaufman, A.S. Kaufman, N.L. (2004). The Kaufman Test of Educational Achievement. Circle Pines, MN : American Guidance Service.
32. Keenan, J.S. Betjemann, R.S. (2006). Comprehending the Gray Oral Reading Test without reading it: Why comprehension tests should not include passage-independent item. Scientific Studies in Reading, 4 (10), 363 380.
33. Keenan, J.S. Miller, A. (2007). The power of prior knowledge to compensate for deficits in reading disability. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for the Scientific Study of Reading, Prague, Czech Republic.
34. Keith, T.Z., Lindskog, C.O. Smith, J.V. (2003). Review of the Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence. In Fifteenth mental measurements yearbook. Lincoln, NE : Buros Institute Inc., University of Nebraska Press.
35. Kershaw, S. (2005). The relationship between oral comprehension and reading fluency as it relates to reading comprehension. Unpublished manuscript. Florida State University.
36. Kintsch, W. Kozminski, E. (1977). Summarizing stories after reading and listening. Journal of Educational Psychology, 20, 491 499.
37. Kirby, J.R. Savage, R.S. (2008). Can the simple view deal with the complexities of reading? Literacy, 42 (2), 75 82.
38. LaBerge, D. Samuels, S. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293 323.
39. Lovett, M.W. (1987). A developmental approach to reading disability: Accuracy and speed criteria of normal and deficient reading skill. Child Development, 58, 234 260.
40. MacGinitie, W.H., MacGinitie, R.K., Maria, K. Dreyer, L.G. (2000). Gates-MacGinitie Reading Tests 4th edn). Itasca, IL : Riverside.
41. McBride-Chang, C. Manis, F.R. (1996). Structural invariance in the associations of naming speed, phonological awareness, and verbal reasoning in good and poor readers: A test of the double deficit hypothesis. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 8 (4), 323 339.
42. Meyer, M.S. Felton, R.H. (1999). Repeated reading to enhance fluency: Old approaches and new directions. Annals of Dyslexia, 49, 283 306.
43. National Reading Panel (NRP) (2000). Teaching students to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instructions. Bethesda, MD : National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
44. Perfetti, C.A. (1986). Continuities in reading acquisition, reading skill, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7, 11 21.
45. Perfetti, C.A., Landi, N. Oakhill, J. (2005). The acquisition of reading comprehension skill. In M.J. Snowling C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook pp. 227 247). Malden, MA : Blackwell Publishing.
46. RAND Reading Study Group (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension. Washington, DC : RAND Education.
47. Rapp, D.N., Van den Broek, P., McMaster, K.L., Kendeou, P. Espin, C.A. (2007). Higher-order comprehension processes in struggling readers: A perspective for research and intervention. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11, 289 312.
48. Riedel, B.W. (2007). The relation between DIBELS, reading comprehension, and vocabulary in urban first-grade students. Reading Research Quarterly, 42, 546 567.
49. Royer, J.M. Sinatra, G.M. (1994). A cognitive theoretical approach to reading diagnostics. Educational Psychology Review, 6 (4), 81 113.
50. Rupley, W.H., Willson, V.L. Nichols, W.D. (1998). Exploration of the developmental components contributing to elementary school children's reading comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 2, 143 158.
51. Savage, R. (2001). The 'simple view' of reading: Some evidence and possible implications. Educational Psychology in Practice, 17 (1), 17 33.
52. Savage, R. (2006). Reading comprehension is not always the product of nonsense-word decoding and listening comprehension: Evidence from teenagers who are extremely poor readers. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10 (2), 143 164.
53. Shin, J., Deno, S.L. Espin, C. (2000). Technical adequacy of the maze task for curriculum-based measurement of reading growth. Journal of Special Education, 34 (3), 164 172.
54. Sinatra, G.M. (1990). Convergence of listening and reading processing. Reading Research Quarterly, 33, 96 116.
55. Stanovich, K.E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360 406.
56. Stanovich, K.E. Cunningham, A.E. (1992). Studying the consequences of literacy within a literate society: The cognitive correlates of print exposure. Memory and Cognition, 20, 51 68.
57. Van den Broek, W.P., Kendeou, P., Kremer, K., Lynch, J.S., Butler, J., White, M.J. et al 2005). Assessment of comprehension abilities in young children. In S. Stahl S. Paris (Eds.), Children's reading comprehension and assessment. Center for Improvement of Early Reading Achievement (CIERA) pp. 107 130). Mahwah, NJ : Erlbaum.
58. Wayman, M.M., Wallace, T., Wiley, H.I., Ticha, R. Espin, C.A. (2007). Literature synthesis on curriculum-based measurement in reading. Journal of Special Education, 41 (2), 85 120.
59. Wechsler, D.S. (1999). Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence. San Antonio, TX : Psychological Corporation.
60. Wechsler, D.S. (2001). Wechsler Individual Achievement Test. San Antonio, TX : Psychological Corporation.
61. Wiley, H.I. Deno, S.L. (2005). Oral reading and maze measures as predictors of success for English learners on a state standards assessment. Remedial and Special Education, 26 (4), 207 214.
62. Wolf, M. Katzir-Cohen, T. (2001). Reading fluency and its intervention. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 211 239.
63. Woodcock, R.W. (1998). Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests - Revised. Circle Pines, MN : American Guidance Service.
64. Woodcock, R.W., McGrew, K.S., Mather, N. Schrank, F.A. (2001). Woodcock Johnson III Tests of Achievement. Itasca, IL : Riverside.