The dibels tests: Is speed of barking at print what we mean by reading fluency?

Reading Research Quarterly

Volumn 42, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 563-566

  Samuels, S Jay ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 35548962310     PISSN: 00340553     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Note

References (8)

1. CRAMER, K. (in press). Effect of degree of challenge on reading performance. Reading and Writing Quarterly.
2. DENO, S. (1985). Curriculum based measurement: The emerging alternative. Exceptional Children, 52, 219-232.
3. GOODMAN, K.S. (2006). A critical review of DIBELS. In K.S. Goodman (Ed.), The truth about DIBELS: What it is, what it does (pp. 1-39). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
4. LABERGE, D., & SAMUELS, S.J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293-323.
5. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH AND HUMAN DEVELOPMENT. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Publication No. 00-4769). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
6. PEARSON, P.D. (2006). Foreword. In K.S. Goodman (Ed.), The truth about DIBELS: What it is, what it does (pp. v-xix). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
7. PRESSLEY, M., HILDEN, K., & SHANKLAND, R. (2005). An evaluation of end-grade-3 Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS): Speed reading without comprehension, predicting little (Tech. Rep.). East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University, Literacy Achievement Research Center.
8. SAMUELS, S.J. (1994). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading, revisited. In R. Ruddell, M.R. Ruddell, & H. Singer (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (4th ed., pp. 816-837). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.