An integrative lens model approach to bias and accuracy in human inferences: Hindsight effects and knowledge updating in personality judgments

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Volumn 103, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 689-717

  Nestler, Steffen ^a   Egloff, Boris ^b   Küfner, Albrecht C P ^a   Back, Mitja D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

^b JOHANNES GUTENBERG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Accuracy; Hindsight bias; Human inferences; Knowledge updating; Lens model; Personality judgments

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; EPIDEMIOLOGY; FEMALE; HUMAN; KNOWLEDGE; MALE; PERCEPTION; PERSONALITY; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL;

ADULT; BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); FEMALE; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; KNOWLEDGE; MALE; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PERSONALITY; SOCIAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84873721326     PISSN: 00223514     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0029461     Document Type: Article

References (135)

1. Albright, L., & Malloy, T. E. (1999). Self-observation of behavior and metaperception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 726-734. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.4.726
2. Alloy, L. B., & Tabachnik, N. (1984). Assessment of covariation by humans and animals: The joint influence of prior expectations and current situational information. Psychological Review, 91, 112-149. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.91.1.112
3. Ambady, N., & Rosenthal, R. (1993). Half a minute: Predicting teacher evaluations from thin slices of nonverbal behavior and physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 431-441. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.64.3.431
4. Ambady, N., & Skowronski, J. J. (Eds.). (2008). First impressions. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
5. Arkes, H. R., Faust, D., Guilmette, T. J., & Hart, K. (1988). Eliminating the hindsight bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 305-307. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.73.2.305
6. Asendorpf, J. B. (1988). Individual response profiles in the behavioral assessment of personality. European Journal of Personality, 2, 155-167. doi:10.1002/per.2410020209
7. Back, M. D., Baumert, A., Denissen, J. J. A., Hartung, F.-M., Penke, L., Schmukle, S. C.,... Wrzus, C. (2011). PERSOC: A unified framework for understanding the dynamic interplay of personality and social relationships. European Journal of Personality, 25, 90-107. doi:10.1002/per.811
8. Back, M. D., & Egloff, B. (2009). Yes we can! A plea for direct behavioral observation in personality research. European Journal of Personality, 23, 403-405.
9. Back, M. D., Schmukle, S. C., & Egloff, B. (2008). How extraverted is honey.bunny77@hotmail.de? Inferring personality from e-mail addresses. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 1116-1122. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2008.02.001
10. Back, M. D., Schmukle, S. C., & Egloff, B. (2009). Predicting actual behavior from the explicit and implicit self-concept of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 533-548. doi:10.1037/a0016229
11. Back, M. D., Schmukle, S. C., & Egloff, B. (2010). Why are narcissists so charming at first sight? Decoding the narcissism-popularity link at zero acquaintance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 132-145. doi:10.1037/a0016338
12. Back, M. D., Schmukle, S. C., & Egloff, B. (2011). A closer look at first sight: Social relations lens model analyses of personality and interpersonal attraction at zero acquaintance. European Journal of Personality, 25, 225-238. doi:10.1002/per.790
13. Back, M. D., Stopfer, J. M., Vazire, S., Gaddis, S., Schmukle, S. C., Egloff, B., & Gosling, S. D. (2010). Facebook profiles reflect actual personality, not self-idealization. Psychological Science, 21, 372-374. doi:10.1177/0956797609360756
14. Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., & Funder, D. C. (2007). Psychology as the science of self-reports and finger movements: Whatever happened to actual behavior? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 396-403. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00051.x
15. Berry, D. S. (1990). Taking people at face value: Evidence for a kernel of truth hypothesis. Social Cognition, 8, 343-361. doi:10.1521/soco.1990.8.4.343
16. Berry, D. S., & Brownlow, S. (1989). Were the physiognomists right? Personality correlates of facial babyishness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 266-279. doi:10.1177/0146167289152013
17. Berry, D. S., & Wero, J. L. F. (1993). Accuracy in face perception: A view from ecological psychology. Journal of Personality, 61, 497-520. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1993.tb00780.x
18. Biesanz, J. C., West, S. G., & Millevoi, A. (2007). What do you learn about someone over time? The relationship between length of acquaintance and consensus and self-other agreement in judgments of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 119-135. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.1.119
19. Björkman, M. (1963). An exploratory study of predictive judgments in a traffic situation. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 4, 65-76. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9450.1963.tb01309.x
20. Blackman, M. C., & Funder, D. C. (1998). The effect of information on consensus and accuracy in personality judgment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 164-181. doi:10.1006/jesp.1997.1347
21. Blank, H., Musch, J., & Pohl, R. F. (2007). Hindsight bias: On being wise after the event. Social Cognition, 25, 1-9. doi:10.1521/soco.2007.25.1.1
22. Blank, H., & Nestler, S. (2007). Cognitive process models of hindsight bias. Social Cognition, 25, 132-146. doi:10.1521/soco.2007.25.1.132
23. Blank, H., Nestler, S., von Collani, G., & Fischer, V. (2008). How many hindsight biases are there? Cognition, 106, 1408-1440. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.07.007
24. Bollich, K. L., Johannet, P. M., & Vazire, S. (2011). In search for our true selves: Feedback as a path to self-knowledge. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 312.
25. Borkenau, P., Brecke, S., Möttig, C., & Paelecke, M. (2009). Extraversion is accurately perceived after a 50-ms exposure to a face. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 703-706. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2009.03.007
26. Borkenau, P., & Liebler, A. (1992). Trait inferences: Sources of validity at zero acquaintance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 645-657. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.62.4.645
27. Borkenau, P., & Liebler, A. (1993a). Consensus and self-other agreement for trait inferences from minimal information. Journal of Personality, 61, 477-496. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1993.tb00779.x
28. Borkenau, P., & Liebler, A. (1993b). Convergence of stranger ratings of personality and intelligence with self-ratings, partner ratings, and measured intelligence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 546-553. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.3.546
29. Borkenau, P., Mauer, N., Riemann, R., Spinath, F. M., & Angleitner, A. (2004). Thin slices of behavior as cues of personality and intelligence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 599-614. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.86.4.599
30. Brehmer, B. (1970). Inference behavior in a situation where the cues are not reliably perceived. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 5, 330-347. doi:10.1016/0030-5073(70)90024-3
31. Brehmer, B. (1974). Hypotheses about relations between scaled variables in the learning of probabilistic inference tasks. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 11, 1-27. doi:10.1016/0030-5073(74)90002-6
32. Brehmer, B. (1980). In one word: Not from experience. Acta Psychologica, 45, 223-241. doi:10.1016/0001-6918(80)90034-7
33. Brehmer, B. (1987). Note on subjects' hypotheses in multiple-cue probability learning. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 40, 323-329. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(87)90019-7
34. Brehmer, B. (1994). The psychology of linear judgment models. Acta Psychologica, 87, 137-154. doi:10.1016/0001-6918(94)90048-5
35. Brunswik, E. (1956). Perception and the representative design of psychological experiments (2nd ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press.
36. Bukszar, E., & Conolly, T. (1988). Hindsight bias and strategic choice: Some problems in learning from experience. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 628-641.
37. Campbell, J. D., & Tesser, A. (1983). Motivational interpretations of hindsight bias: An individual difference analysis. Journal of Personality, 51, 605-620. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1983.tb00868.x
38. Castellan, N. J. (1973). Multiple-cue probability learning with irrelevant cues. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 9, 16-29. doi:10.1016/0030-5073(73)90033-0
39. Chaiken, S., & Trope, Y. (Eds.). (1999). Dual-process theories in social psychology. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
40. Colvin, C. R., & Funder, D. C. (1991). Predicting personality and behavior: A boundary on the acquaintanceship effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 884-894. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.60.6.884
41. Cooksey, R. W. (1996). Judgment analysis: Theory, methods and applications. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
42. Cunningham, M. R. (1986). Measuring the physical in physical attractiveness: Quasi-experiments on the sociobiology of female facial beauty.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 925-935. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.50.5.925
43. Edwards, W. (1954). The theory of decision making. Psychological Bulletin, 51, 380-417. doi:10.1037/h0053870
44. Einhorn, H. J., & Hogarth, R. M. (1981). Behavioral decision theory: Processes of judgment and choice. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 53-88. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.32.020181.000413
45. Erdfelder, E., & Buchner, A. (1998). Decomposing the hindsight bias: A multinomial processing tree model for separating recollection and reconstruction in hindsight. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 387-414. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.24.2.387
46. Fiedler, K. (2000). Beware of samples! A cognitive-ecological sampling approach to cognitive biases. Psychological Review, 107, 659-676. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.107.4.659
47. Fiedler, K., & Freytag, P. (2004). Pseudocontingencies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 453-467. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.4.453
48. Fischhoff, B. (1975). Hindsight is not equal to foresight: The effect of outcome knowledge on judgment under uncertainty. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1, 288-299. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.1.3.288
49. Fischhoff, B. (1982). For those condemned to study the past: Heuristics and biases in hindsight. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 201-208). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
50. Fischhoff, B., & Beyth, R. (1975). "I knew it would happen": Remembered probabilities of once-future things. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13, 1-16. doi:10.1016/0030-5073(75)90002-1
51. Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
52. Funder, D. C. (1995). On the accuracy of personality judgment: A realistic approach. Psychological Review, 102, 652-670. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.102.4.652
53. Funder, D. C. (1999). Personality judgment: A realistic approach to person perception. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
54. Funder, D. C. (2001). The realistic accuracy model and Brunswik's approach to social judgment. In K. R. Hammond & T. R. Stewart (Eds.), The essential Brunswik: Beginnings, explications, applications (pp. 365-369). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
55. Funder, D. C., & Colvin, C. R. (1988). Friends and strangers: Acquaintanceship, agreement, and the accuracy of personality judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 149-158. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.55.1.149
56. Funder, D. C., Furr, R. M., & Colvin, C. R. (2000). The Riverside Behavioral Q-Sort: A tool for the description of social behavior. Journal of Personality, 68, 451-489. doi:10.1111/1467-6494.00103
57. Funder, D. C., Place, S. S., Penke, L., Todd, P. M., & Asendorpf, J. B.(2011). [No evidence for the trainability of romantic interest judgments]. Unpublished raw data.
58. Funder, D. C., & Sneed, C. D. (1993). Behavioral manifestations of personality: An ecological approach to judgmental accuracy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 479-490. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.64.3.479
59. Ganzach, Y. (2009). Coherence and correspondence in the analysis of numerical predictions: How error-prone heuristics are replaced by ecologically valid heuristics. Judgment and Decision Making, 4, 175-185.
60. Gifford, R. (1994). A lens-mapping framework for understanding the encoding and decoding of interpersonal dispositions in nonverbal behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 398-412. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.66.2.398
61. Gigerenzer, G. (1996). On narrow norms and vague heuristics: A reply to Kahneman and Tversky (1996). Psychological Review, 103, 592-596. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.103.3.592
62. Gluck, M. A., Shohamy, D., & Myers, C. (2002). How do people solve the "weather prediction" task? Individual variability in strategies for probabilistic category learning. Learning & Memory, 9, 408-418. doi:10.1101/lm.45202
63. Gordon, I. E. (2004). Theories of visual perception. Hove, England: Psychology Press.
64. Gosling, S. D., Ko, S. J., Mannarelli, T., & Morris, M. E. (2002). A room with a cue: Personality judgments based on offices and bedrooms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 379-398. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.3.379
65. Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J., & Swann, W. B., Jr. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 504-528. doi:10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00046-1
66. Hammond, K. R. (1996). Human judgment and social policy: Irreducible uncertainty, inevitable error, unavoidable injustice. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
67. Hammond, K. R., & Summers, D. A. (1965). Cognitive dependence on linear and non-linear cues. Psychological Review, 72, 215-224. doi:10.1037/h0021798
68. Hammond, K. R., & Summers, D. R. (1972). Cognitive control. Psychological Review, 79, 58-67. doi:10.1037/h0031851
69. Harley, E. M. (2007). Hindsight bias in legal decision making. Social Cognition, 25, 48-63. doi:10.1521/soco.2007.25.1.48
70. Harley, E. M., Carlsen, K. A., & Loftus, G. R. (2004). The saw-it-all-along effect: Demonstrations of visual hindsight bias. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 960-968. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.30.5.960
71. Hastie, R., Schkade, D. A., & Payne, J. W. (1999). Juror judgments in civil cases: Hindsight effects on judgments of liability for punitive damages. Law and Human Behavior, 23, 597-614. doi:10.1023/A: 1022352330466
72. Hawkins, S. A., & Hastie, R. (1990). Hindsight: Biased judgments of past events after the outcomes are known. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 311-327. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.3.311
73. Hertwig, R., Fanselow, C., & Hoffrage, U. (2003). Hindsight bias: How knowledge and heuristics affect our reconstruction of the past. Memory, 11, 357-377. doi:10.1080/09658210244000595
74. Hoch, S. J., & Loewenstein, G. F. (1989). Outcome feedback: Hindsight and information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 605-619. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.15.4.605
75. Hoffrage, U., Hertwig, R., & Gigerenzer, G. (2000). Hindsight bias: A by-product of knowledge updating? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 566-581. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.26.3.566
76. Hofmann, W., Gschwendner, T., & Schmitt, M. (2009). The road to the implicit self not taken: Discrepancies between self-and observerinferences about implicit dispositions from nonverbal behavioral cures. European Journal of Personality, 23, 343-366. doi:10.1002/per.722
77. Hogarth, R. M., & Karelaia, N. (2007). Heuristic and linear models of judgment: Matching rules and environments. Psychological Review, 114, 733-758. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.114.3.733
78. Holleran, S. E., & Mehl, M. R. (2008). Let me read your mind: Personality judgments based on a person's natural stream of thought. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 747-754. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2007.07.011
79. Hursch, C. J., Hammond, K. R., & Hursch, J. L. (1964). Some methodological considerations in multiple-probability studies. Psychological Review, 71, 42-60. doi:10.1037/h0041729
80. Juslin, P., Karlsson, L., & Olsson, H. (2008). Information integration in multiple cue judgment: A division of labor hypothesis. Cognition, 106, 259-298. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.02.003
81. Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (Eds.). (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
82. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973). On the psychology of prediction. Psychological Review, 80, 237-251. doi:10.1037/h0034747
83. Karelaia, N., & Hogarth, R. M. (2008). Determinants of linear judgment: A meta-analysis of lens-model studies. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 404-426. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.3.404
84. Karlsson, L., Juslin, P., & Olsson, H. (2008). Exemplar-based inference in multi-attribute decision making: Contingent, not automatic, strategy shifts? Judgment and Decision Making, 3, 244-260.
85. Kenny, D. A. (1994). Interpersonal perception: A social relations analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
86. Kenny, D. A., & West, T. V. (2008). Zero acquaintance: Definitions, statistical model, findings, and process. In J. Skowronski & N. Ambady (Eds.), First impressions (pp. 129-146). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
87. Klayman, J. (1988). Cue discovery in probabilistic environments: Uncertainty and experimentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 317-330. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.14.2.317
88. Krueger, J. I., & Funder, D. C. (2004). Towards a balanced social psychology: Causes, consequences, and cures for the problem-seeking approach to social behavior and cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 313-327. doi:10.1017/S0140525X04000081
89. Küfner, A. C. P., Back, M. D., Nestler, S., & Egloff, B. (2010). Tell me a story and I will tell you who you are! Lens model analyses of personality and creative writing. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 427-435. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2010.05.003
90. Lagnado, D. A., Newell, B. R., Kahan, S., & Shanks, D. R. (2006). Insight and strategy in multiple-cue learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 162-183. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.135.2.162
91. Leary, M. R. (1981). The distorted nature of hindsight. The Journal of Social Psychology, 115, 25-29. doi:10.1080/00224545.1981.9711984
92. Leary, M. R. (1982). Hindsight distortion and the 1980 presidential election. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 8, 257-263. doi:10.1177/0146167282082012
93. Letzring, T. D. (2008). The good judge of personality: Characteristics, behaviors, and observer accuracy. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 914-932. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2007.12.003
94. Levesque, M. J., & Kenny, D. A. (1993). Accuracy of behavioral predictions at zero acquaintance: A social relations analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1178-1187. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.6.1178
95. Lippa, R. A., & Dietz, J. K. (2000). The relation of gender, personality, and intelligence to judges' accuracy in judging strangers' personality from brief video segments. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 24, 25-43. doi:10.1023/A:1006610805385
96. Muchinsky, P. M., & Dudycha, A. L. (1975). Human inference in abstract and meaningful environments. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13, 377-391. doi:10.1016/0030-5073(75)90057-4
97. Müller, P., & Stahlberg, D. (2007). The role of surprise in hindsight bias: A metacognitive model of reduced and reversed hindsight bias. Social Cognition, 25, 165-184. doi:10.1521/soco.2007.25.1.165
98. Naumann, L. P., Vazire, S., Rentfrow, P. J., & Gosling, S. D. (2009). Personality judgments based on physical appearance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 1661-1671. doi:10.1177/0146167209346309
99. Nestler, S., Blank, H., & Egloff, B. (2010). Hindsight ≠ hindsight: Experimentally induced dissociations between hindsight components. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 1399-1413. doi:10.1037/a0020449
100. Nestler, S., Blank, H., & von Collani, G. (2008a). Hindsight bias and causal attribution: A causal model theory of creeping determinism. Social Psychology, 39, 182-188. doi:10.1027/1864-9335.39.3.182
101. Nestler, S., Blank, H., & von Collani, G. (2008b). Hindsight bias doesn't always come easy: Causal models, cognitive effort, and creeping determinism. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 1043-1054. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.34.5.1043
102. Nestler, S., & Egloff, B. (2009). Increased or reversed: The effect of surprise on hindsight bias depends on the hindsight component. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 1539-1544. doi:10.1037/a0017006
103. Nestler, S., & Egloff, B. (2011). Hindsight bias and learning: Two sides of the same coin? Unpublished manuscript.
104. Nestler, S., & von Collani, G. (2008). Hindsight bias and the activation of counterfactual mind-sets. Experimental Psychology, 55, 342-349. doi:10.1027/1618-3169.55.5.342
105. Nisbett, R. E., & Ross, L. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgments. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
106. Penton-Voak, I. S., Pound, N., Little, A. C., & Perrett, D. I. (2006). Personality judgments from natural and composite facial images: More evidence for a "kernel of truth" in social perception. Social Cognition, 24, 607-640. doi:10.1521/soco.2006.24.5.607
107. Pezzo, M. V. (2003). Surprise, defence, or making sense: What removes the hindsight bias? Memory, 11, 421-441. doi:10.1080/09658210244000603
108. Pezzo, M. V. (2011). Hindsight bias: A primer for motivational researchers. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5, 665-678. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00381.x
109. Pezzo, M. V., & Pezzo, S. P. (2007). Making sense of failure: A motivated model of hindsight bias. Social Cognition, 25, 147-164. doi:10.1521/soco.2007.25.1.147
110. Pohl, R. F. (2007). Ways to assess hindsight bias. Social Cognition, 25, 14-31. doi:10.1521/soco.2007.25.1.14
111. Pohl, R. F., Eisenhauer, M., & Hardt, O. (2003). SARA: A cognitive process model to simulate the anchoring effect and hindsight bias. Memory, 11, 337-356. doi:10.1080/09658210244000487
112. Pohl, R. F., & Hell, W. (1996). No reduction in hindsight bias after complete information and repeated testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67, 49-58. doi:10.1006/obhd.1996.0064
113. Rammstedt, B., & John, O. P. (2007). Measuring personality in one minute or less: A 10-item short version of the Big Five Inventory in English and German. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 203-212. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2006.02.001
114. Reisenzein, R. (2000). Exploring the strength of association between the components of emotion syndromes: The case of surprise. Cognition & Emotion, 14, 1-38. doi:10.1080/026999300378978
115. Rentfrow, P. J., & Gosling, S. D. (2006). Message in a ballad: The role of music preferences in interpersonal perception. Psychological Science, 17, 236-242.
116. Roese, N. J., Fessel, F., Summerville, A., Kruger, J., & Dilich, M. A. (2006). The propensity effect: When foresight trumps hindsight. Psychological Science, 17, 305-310. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01703.x
117. Roese, N. J., & Maniar, S. D. (1997). Perceptions of purple: Counterfactualand hindsight judgments at Northwestern Wildcats football games. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 1245-1253. doi:10.1177/01461672972312002
118. Roese, N. J., & Olson, J. M. (1996). Counterfactuals, causal attributions, and the hindsight bias: A conceptual integration. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32, 197-227. doi:10.1006/jesp.1996.0010
119. Sanna, L. J., & Schwarz, N. (2004). Integrating temporal biases: The interplay of focal thoughts and accessibility experiences. Psychological Science, 15, 474-481. doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00704.x
120. Sanna, L. J., & Schwarz, N. (2007). Metacognitive experiences and hindsight bias: It's not just the thought (content) that counts! Social Cognition, 25, 185-202. doi:10.1521/soco.2007.25.1.185
121. Schwarz, S., & Stahlberg, D. (2003). Strength of the hindsight bias as a consequence of meta-cognitions. Memory, 11, 395-410. doi:10.1080/09658210244000496
122. Shevlin, M., Walker, S., Davies, M. N. O., Banyard, P., & Lewis, C. A. (2003). Can you judge a book by its cover? Evidence of self-stranger agreement on personality at zero-acquaintance. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 1373-1383. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00356-2
123. Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 420-428. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420
124. Speekenbrink, M., & Shanks, D. R. (2010). Learning in a changing environment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139, 266-298.
125. Strack, F., & Deutsch, R. (2004). Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 220-247. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0803_1
126. Tucker, L. R. (1964). A suggested alternative formulation in the developments by Hursch, Hammond, and Hursch and by Hammond, Hursch, and Todd. Psychological Review, 71, 528-530. doi:10.1037/h0047061
127. Vazire, S. (2010). Who knows what about a person? The self-other knowledge asymmetry (SOKA) model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 281-300. doi:10.1037/a0017908
128. Vazire, S., Mehl, M., & Carlson, E. (2010). Shining a light on the blind spots in self-perception. Talk presented at the 15th European Congress of Personality, Brno, Czechia.
129. von Helversen, B., & Rieskamp, J. (2009). Models of quantitative estimations: Rule-based and exemplar-based processes compared. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 867-889.
130. Werth, L., & Strack, F. (2003). An inferential approach to the knew-it-allalong-phenomenon. Memory, 11, 411-419. doi:10.1080/09658210244000586
131. Winman, A., Juslin, P., & Björkman, M. (1998). The confidence hindsight mirror effect in judgment: An accuracy-assessment model for the knewit-all-along phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 415-431. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.24.2.415
132. Wood, G. (1978). The knew-it-all-along effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4, 345-353. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.4.2.345
133. Zebrowitz, L. A. (1997). Reading faces: Window to the soul? Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
134. Zebrowitz, L. A., & Collins, M. A. (1997). Accurate social perception at zero acquaintance: The affordances of a Gibsonian approach. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 203-222.
135. Zebrowitz, L. A., Montepare, J. M., & Lee, H. K. (1993). They don't all look alike: Differentiating same versus other race individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 85-101.