Microtubule catastrophe and rescue

Current Opinion in Cell Biology

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 14-22

  Gardner, Melissa K ^a   Zanic, Marija ^b   Howard, Jonathon ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE OF MOLECULAR CELL BIOLOGY AND GENETICS   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

KINESIN; MICROTUBULE ASSOCIATED PROTEIN; TUBULIN;

BIOACCUMULATION; CELL AGING; CELL FUNCTION; CELL GROWTH; CELL POLARITY; DEPOLYMERIZATION; IN VITRO STUDY; MICROTUBULE; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN STABILITY; REVIEW; SCHIZOSACCHAROMYCES POMBE;

EID: 84873709266     PISSN: 09550674     EISSN: 18790410     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceb.2012.09.006     Document Type: Review

References (71)

1. Mitchison T.J., Kirschner M.W. Dynamic instability of microtubule growth. Nature 1984, 312:237-242.
2. Desai A., Mitchison T.J. Microtubule polymerization dynamics. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 1997, 13:83-117.
3. Howard J., Hyman A.A. Growth, fluctuation and switching at microtubule plus ends. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2009, 10:569-574.
4. Cassimeris L., Wadsworth P., Salmon E.D. Dynamics of microtubule depolymerization in monocytes. J Cell Biol 1986, 102:2023-2032.
5. Du Y., English C.A., Ohi R. The kinesin-8 Kif18A dampens microtubule plus-end dynamics. Curr Biol 2010, 20:374-380.
6. Foethke D., Makushok T., Brunner D., Nédélec F. Force- and length-dependent catastrophe activities explain interphase microtubule organization in fission yeast. Mol Syst Biol 2009, 5:241.
7. Fygenson D., Braun E., Libchaber A. Phase diagram of microtubules. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys 1994, 50:1579-1588.
8. Janson M.E., de Dood M.E., Dogterom M. Dynamic instability of microtubules is regulated by force. J Cell Biol 2003, 161:1029-1034.
9. Odde D.J., Cassimeris L., Buettner H.M. Kinetics of microtubule catastrophe assessed by probabilistic analysis. Biophys J 1995, 69:796-802.
10. Stepanova T., Smal I., van Haren J., Akinci U., Liu Z., Miedema M., Limpens R., van Ham M., van der Reijden M., Poot R., et al. History-dependent catastrophes regulate axonal microtubule behavior. Curr Biol 2010, 20:1023-1028.
11. Tischer C., Brunner D., Dogterom M. Force- and kinesin-8-dependent effects in the spatial regulation of fission yeast microtubule dynamics. Mol Syst Biol 2009, 5:250.
12. Voter W.A., O'Brien E.T., Erickson H.P. Dilution-induced disassembly of microtubules: relation to dynamic instability and the GTP cap. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton 1991, 18:55-62.
13. Walker R.A., Pryer N.K., Salmon E.D. Dilution of individual microtubules observed in real time in vitro: evidence that cap size is small and independent of elongation rate. J Cell Biol 1991, 114:73-81.
14. Gardner M.K., Zanic M., Gell C., Bormuth V., Howard J. Depolymerizing kinesins Kip3 and MCAK shape cellular microtubule architecture by differential control of catastrophe. Cell 2011, 147:1092-1103.
15. Odde D.J., Buettner H., Cassimeris L. Spectral analysis of microtubule assembly dynamics. AIChE J 1996, 42:1434-1442.
16. Howard J., Hyman A.A. Microtubule polymerases and depolymerases. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2007, 19:31-35.
17. Akhmanova A., Steinmetz M.O. Tracking the ends: a dynamic protein network controls the fate of microtubule tips. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2008, 9:309-322.
18. Wollman R., Cytrynbaum E.N., Jones J.T., Meyer T., Scholey J.M., Mogilner A. Efficient chromosome capture requires a bias in the " search-and-capture" process during mitotic-spindle assembly. Curr Biol 2005, 15:828-832.
19. Gupta M.L., Carvalho P., Roof D.M., Pellman D. Plus end-specific depolymerase activity of Kip3, a kinesin-8 protein, explains its role in positioning the yeast mitotic spindle. Nat Cell Biol 2006, 8:913-923.
20. Varga V., Helenius J., Tanaka K., Hyman A.A., Tanaka T.U., Howard J. Yeast kinesin-8 depolymerizes microtubules in a length-dependent manner. Nat Cell Biol 2006, 8:957-962.
21. Varga V., Leduc C., Bormuth V., Diez S., Howard J. Kinesin-8 motors act cooperatively to mediate length-dependent microtubule depolymerization. Cell 2009, 138:1174-1183.
22. Stumpff J., Wagenbach M., Franck A., Asbury C.L., Wordeman L. Kif18A and chromokinesins confine centromere movements via microtubule growth suppression and spatial control of kinetochore tension. Dev Cell 2012, 22:1017-1029.
23. Mayr M.I., Hümmer S., Bormann J., Grüner T., Adio S., Woehlke G., Mayer T.U. The human kinesin Kif18A is a motile microtubule depolymerase essential for chromosome congression. Curr Biol 2007, 17:488-498.
24. Stumpff J., Dassow von G., Wagenbach M., Asbury C.L., Wordeman L. The kinesin-8 motor Kif18A suppresses kinetochore movements to control mitotic chromosome alignment. Dev Cell 2008, 14:252-262.
25. Zhu C., Zhao J., Bibikova M., Leverson J.D., Bossy-Wetzel E., Fan J.-B., Abraham R.T., Jiang W. Functional analysis of human microtubule-based motor proteins, the kinesins and dyneins, in mitosis/cytokinesis using RNA interference. Mol Biol Cell 2005, 16:3187-3199.
26. Stumpff J., Du Y., English C.A., Maliga Z., Wagenbach M., Asbury C.L., Wordeman L., Ohi R. A tethering mechanism controls the processivity and kinetochore-microtubule plus-end enrichment of the Kinesin-8 Kif18A. Mol Cell 2011, 43:764-775.
27. Wargacki M.M., Tay J.C., Muller E.G., Asbury C.L., Davis T.N. Kip3, the yeast kinesin-8, is required for clustering of kinetochores at metaphase. Cell Cycle 2010, 9:2581-2588.
28. Garcia M.A., Koonrugsa N., Toda T. Two kinesin-like Kin I family proteins in fission yeast regulate the establishment of metaphase and the onset of anaphase A. Curr Biol 2002, 12:610-621.
29. West R.R., Malmstrom T., Mcintosh J.R. Kinesins klp5(+) and klp6(+) are required for normal chromosome movement in mitosis. J Cell Sci 2002, 115:931-940.
30. Desai A., Verma S., Mitchison T.J., Walczak C.E. Kin I kinesins are microtubule-destabilizing enzymes. Cell 1999, 96:69-78.
31. Goshima G., Vale R.D. Cell cycle-dependent dynamics and regulation of mitotic kinesins in Drosophila S2 cells. Mol Biol Cell 2005, 16:3896-3907.
32. Maney T., Hunter A.W., Wagenbach M., Wordeman L. Mitotic centromere-associated kinesin is important for anaphase chromosome segregation. J Cell Biol 1998, 142:787-801.
33. Rogers G.C., Rogers S.L., Schwimmer T.A., Ems-McClung S.C., Walczak C.E., Vale R.D., Scholey J.M., Sharp D.J. Two mitotic kinesins cooperate to drive sister chromatid separation during anaphase. Nature 2004, 427:364-370.
34. Tournebize R., Popov A., Kinoshita K., Ashford A.J., Rybina S., Pozniakovsky A., Mayer T.U., Walczak C.E., Karsenti E., Hyman A.A. Control of microtubule dynamics by the antagonistic activities of XMAP215 and XKCM1 in Xenopus egg extracts. Nat Cell Biol 2000, 2:13-19.
35. Walczak C.E., Mitchison T.J., Desai A. XKCM1: a Xenopus kinesin-related protein that regulates microtubule dynamics during mitotic spindle assembly. Cell 1996, 84:37-47.
36. Kline-Smith S.L., Walczak C.E. The microtubule-destabilizing kinesin XKCM1 regulates microtubule dynamic instability in cells. Mol Biol Cell 2002, 13:2718-2731.
37. Montenegro Gouveia S., Leslie K., Kapitein L.C., Buey R.M., Grigoriev I., Wagenbach M., Smal I., Meijering E., Hoogenraad C.C., Wordeman L., et al. In vitro reconstitution of the functional interplay between MCAK and EB3 at microtubule plus ends. Curr Biol 2010, 20:1717-1722.
38. Domnitz S.B., Wagenbach M., Decarreau J., Wordeman L. MCAK activity at microtubule tips regulates spindle microtubule length to promote robust kinetochore attachment. J Cell Biol 2012, 197:231-237.
39. Helenius J., Brouhard G.J., Kalaidzidis Y., Diez S., Howard J. The depolymerizing kinesin MCAK uses lattice diffusion to rapidly target microtubule ends. Nature 2006, 441:115-119.
40. Friel C.T., Howard J. The kinesin-13 MCAK has an unconventional ATPase cycle adapted for microtubule depolymerization. EMBO J 2011, 30:3928-3939.
41. Bakhoum S.F., Genovese G., Compton D.A. Deviant kinetochore microtubule dynamics underlie chromosomal instability. Curr Biol 2009, 19:1937-1942.
42. Kline-Smith S.L., Walczak C.E. Mitotic spindle assembly and chromosome segregation: refocusing on microtubule dynamics. Mol Cell 2004, 15:317-327.
43. Wordeman L., Wagenbach M., von Dassow G. MCAK facilitates chromosome movement by promoting kinetochore microtubule turnover. J Cell Biol 2007, 179:869-879.
44. Rankin K.E., Wordeman L. Long astral microtubules uncouple mitotic spindles from the cytokinetic furrow. J Cell Biol 2010, 190:35-43.
45. Komarova Y.A., Vorobjev I.A., Borisy G.G. Life cycle of MTs: persistent growth in the cell interior, asymmetric transition frequencies and effects of the cell boundary. J Cell Sci 2002, 115:3527-3539.
46. Wittmann T., Waterman C.M. Spatial regulation of CLASP affinity for microtubules by Rac1 and GSK3beta in migrating epithelial cells. J Cell Biol 2005, 169:929-939.
47. Myers K.A., Applegate K.T., Danuser G., Fischer R.S., Waterman C.M. Distinct ECM mechanosensing pathways regulate microtubule dynamics to control endothelial cell branching morphogenesis. J Cell Biol 2011, 192:321-334.
48. Erent M., Drummond D.R., Cross R.A. S. pombe Kinesins-8 promote both nucleation and catastrophe of microtubules. PLoS ONE 2012, 7:e30738.
49. Mimori-Kiyosue Y., Grigoriev I., Lansbergen G., Sasaki H., Matsui C., Severin F., Galjart N., Grosveld F., Vorobjev I., Tsukita S., et al. CLASP1 and CLASP2 bind to EB1 and regulate microtubule plus-end dynamics at the cell cortex. J Cell Biol 2005, 168:141-153.
50. Efimov A., Schiefermeier N., Grigoriev I., Ohi R., Brown M.C., Turner C.E., Small J.V., Kaverina I. Paxillin-dependent stimulation of microtubule catastrophes at focal adhesion sites. J Cell Sci 2008, 121:196-204.
51. Laan L., Pavin N., Husson J., Romet-Lemonne G., van Duijn M., López M.P., Vale R.D., Jülicher F., Reck-Peterson S.L., Dogterom M. Cortical dynein controls microtubule dynamics to generate pulling forces that position microtubule asters. Cell 2012, 148:502-514.
52. Walker R.A., O'Brien E.T., Pryer N.K., Soboeiro M.F., Voter W.A., Erickson H.P., Salmon E.D. Dynamic instability of individual microtubules analyzed by video light microscopy: rate constants and transition frequencies. J Cell Biol 1988, 107:1437-1448.
53. Dimitrov A., Quesnoit M., Moutel S., Cantaloube I., Poüs C., Perez F. Detection of GTP-tubulin conformation in vivo reveals a role for GTP remnants in microtubule rescues. Science 2008, 322:1353-1356.
54. Thoma C.R., Matov A., Gutbrodt K.L., Hoerner C.R., Smole Z., Krek W., Danuser G. Quantitative image analysis identifies pVHL as a key regulator of microtubule dynamic instability. J Cell Biol 2010, 190:991-1003.
55. Bhattacharya R., Yang H., Cabral F. Class V β-tubulin alters dynamic instability and stimulates microtubule detachment from centrosomes. Mol Biol Cell 2011, 22:1025-1034.
56. Nakata T., Niwa S., Okada Y., Perez F., Hirokawa N. Preferential binding of a kinesin-1 motor to GTP-tubulin-rich microtubules underlies polarized vesicle transport. J Cell Biol 2011, 194:245-255.
57. Bouissou A., Vérollet C., Sousa A., Sampaio P., Wright M., Sunkel C.E., Merdes A., Raynaud-Messina B. {gamma}-Tubulin ring complexes regulate microtubule plus end dynamics. J Cell Biol 2009, 187:327-334.
58. Tropini C., Roth E.A., Zanic M., Gardner M.K., Howard J. Islands containing slowly hydrolyzable GTP analogs promote microtubule rescues. PLoS ONE 2012, 7:e30103.
59. Seetapun D., Castle B.T., McIntyre A.J., Tran P.T., Odde D.J. Estimating the microtubule GTP cap size in vivo. Curr Biol 2012, 22:1681-1687.
60. Al-Bassam J., Kim H., Brouhard G.J., van Oijen A., Harrison S.C., Chang F. CLASP promotes microtubule rescue by recruiting tubulin dimers to the microtubule. Dev Cell 2010, 19:245-258.
61. Hendricks A.G., Lazarus J.E., Perlson E., Gardner M.K., Odde D.J., Goldman Y.E., Holzbaur E.L.F. Dynein tethers and stabilizes dynamic microtubule plus ends. Curr Biol 2012, 22:632-637.
62. Moore J.K., Li J., Cooper J.A. Dynactin function in mitotic spindle positioning. Traffic 2008, 9:510-527.
63. Levy J.R., Holzbaur E.L.F. Dynein drives nuclear rotation during forward progression of motile fibroblasts. J Cell Sci 2008, 121:3187-3195.
64. Tirnauer J.S., Canman J.C., Salmon E.D., Mitchison T.J. EB1 targets to kinetochores with attached, polymerizing microtubules. Mol Biol Cell 2002, 13:4308-4316.
65. Gardner M.K., Pearson C., Sprague B., Zarzar T., Bloom K., Salmon E.D., Odde D.J. Tension-dependent regulation of microtubule dynamics at kinetochores can explain metaphase congression in yeast. Mol Biol Cell 2005, 16:3764-3775.
66. Jaqaman K., King E.M., Amaro A.C., Winter J.R., Dorn J.F., Elliott H.L., Mchedlishvili N., McClelland S.E., Porter I.M., Posch M., et al. Kinetochore alignment within the metaphase plate is regulated by centromere stiffness and microtubule depolymerases. J Cell Biol 2010, 188:665-679.
67. Ribeiro S.A., Gatlin J.C., Dong Y., Joglekar A., Cameron L., Hudson D.F., Farr C.J., McEwen B.F., Salmon E.D., Earnshaw W.C., et al. Condensin regulates the stiffness of vertebrate centromeres. Mol Biol Cell 2009, 20:2371-2380.
68. Dumont S., Salmon E.D., Mitchison T.J. Deformations within moving kinetochores reveal different sites of active and passive force generation. Science 2012, 337:355-358.
69. Wan X., Cimini D., Cameron L.A., Salmon E.D. The coupling between sister kinetochore directional instability and oscillations in centromere stretch in metaphase PtK1 cells. Mol Biol Cell 2012, 23:1035-1046.
70. Franck A.D., Powers A.F., Gestaut D.R., Gonen T., Davis T.N., Asbury C.L. Tension applied through the Dam1 complex promotes microtubule elongation providing a direct mechanism for length control in mitosis. Nat Cell Biol 2007, 9:832-837.
71. Akiyoshi B., Sarangapani K.K., Powers A.F., Nelson C.R., Reichow S.L., Arellano-Santoyo H., Gonen T., Ranish J.A., Asbury C.L., Biggins S. Tension directly stabilizes reconstituted kinetochore-microtubule attachments. Nature 2010, 468:576-579.