Islands containing slowly hydrolyzable GTP analogs promote microtubule rescues

PLoS ONE

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2012, Pages

  Tropini, Carolina ^a,d   Roth, Elizabeth A ^a,e   Zanic, Marija ^a,b   Gardner, Melissa K ^a,c   Howard, Jonathon ^a,b  

^a MARINE BIOLOGICAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE OF MOLECULAR CELL BIOLOGY AND GENETICS   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^d STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GUANOSINE DIPHOSPHATE; GUANOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; POLYMER; TUBULIN; 5' GUANYLYLMETHYLENEBISPHOSPHONATE; 5'-GUANYLYLMETHYLENEBISPHOSPHONATE; DRUG DERIVATIVE;

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPOLYMERIZATION; IN VITRO STUDY; MICROTUBULE; MICROTUBULE ASSEMBLY; NONHUMAN; PROBABILITY; PROTEIN HYDROLYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY; STOCHASTIC MODEL; FLUORESCENCE MICROSCOPY; HYDROLYSIS; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS;

GUANOSINE DIPHOSPHATE; GUANOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; HYDROLYSIS; MICROSCOPY, FLUORESCENCE; MICROTUBULES; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATION; POLYMERS; TUBULIN;

EID: 84855832567     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030103     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Howard J, Hyman AA, (2003) Dynamics and mechanics of the microtubule plus end. Nature 422: 753-758 doi:10.1038/nature01600.
2. Desai A, Mitchison TJ, (1997) Microtubule Polymerization Dynamics. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology 13: 83-117 doi:10.1146/annurev.cellbio.13.1.83.
3. Mitchison T, Kirschner M, (1984) Dynamic instability of microtubule growth. Nature 312: 237-242 doi:10.1038/312237a0.
4. Dimitrov A, Quesnoit M, Moutel S, Cantaloube I, Pous C, et al. (2008) Detection of GTP-Tubulin Conformation in Vivo Reveals a Role for GTP Remnants in Microtubule Rescues. Science 322: 1353-1356 doi:10.1126/science.1165401.
5. Cassimeris L, (2009) Microtubule Assembly: Lattice GTP to the Rescue. Current Biology 19: R174-R176 doi:10.1016/j.cub.2008.12.035.
6. Gardner MK, Charlebois BD, Jánosi IM, Howard J, Hunt AJ, et al. (2011) Rapid Microtubule Self-Assembly Kinetics. Cell 146: 582-592 doi:10.1016/j.cell.2011.06.053.
7. Hyman AA, Salser S, Drechsel DN, Unwin N, Mitchison TJ, (1992) Role of GTP hydrolysis in microtubule dynamics: information from a slowly hydrolyzable analogue, GMPCPP. Mol Biol Cell 3: 1155-1167.
8. Drechsel DN, Kirschner MW, (1994) The minimum GTP cap required to stabilize microtubules. Current Biology 4: 1053-1061 doi:10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00243-8.
9. Mickey B, Howard J, (1995) Rigidity of microtubules is increased by stabilizing agents. J Cell Biol 130: 909-917 doi:10.1083/jcb.130.4.909.
10. Caplow M, Shanks J, (1996) Evidence that a single monolayer tubulin-GTP cap is both necessary and sufficient to stabilize microtubules. Mol Biol Cell 7: 663-675.
11. Vitre B, Coquelle FM, Heichette C, Garnier C, Chrétien D, et al. (2008) EB1 regulates microtubule dynamics and tubulin sheet closure in vitro. Nature Cell Biology 10: 415-421 doi:10.1038/ncb1703.
12. Zanic M, Stear JH, Hyman AA, Howard J, (2009) EB1 Recognizes the Nucleotide State of Tubulin in the Microtubule Lattice. PLoS ONE 4: e7585 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0007585.
13. Caplow M, Ruhlen RL, Shanks J, (1994) The free energy for hydrolysis of a microtubule-bound nucleotide triphosphate is near zero: all of the free energy for hydrolysis is stored in the microtubule lattice. J Cell Biol 127: 779-788 doi:10.1083/jcb.127.3.779.
14. Hyman AA, Chrétien D, Arnal I, Wade RH, (1995) Structural changes accompanying GTP hydrolysis in microtubules: information from a slowly hydrolyzable analogue guanylyl-(alpha,beta)-methylene-diphosphonate. J Cell Biol 128: 117-125.
15. Fygenson DK, Braun E, Libchaber A, (1994) Phase diagram of microtubules. Physical Review E 50: 1579-1588 doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.50.1579.
16. Ashford A, Hyman A, (2006) Preparation of Tubulin from Porcine Brain. Cell Biology pp. 155-160 Elsevier, Vol. 2 Available:http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/B9780121647308500940. Accessed 6 October 2011.
17. Hyman A, Drechsel D, Kellogg D, Salser S, Sawin K, et al. (1991) Preparation of modified tubulins. Meth Enzymol 196: 478-485 doi:10.1016/0076-6879(91)96041-O.
18. Hunter AW, Caplow M, Coy DL, Hancock WO, Diez S, et al. (2003) The Kinesin-Related Protein MCAK Is a Microtubule Depolymerase that Forms an ATP-Hydrolyzing Complex at Microtubule Ends. Molecular Cell 11: 445-457 doi:10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00049-2.
19. Gell C, Bormuth V, Brouhard GJ, Cohen DN, Diez S, et al. (2010) Microtubule Dynamics Reconstituted In Vitro and Imaged by Single-Molecule Fluorescence Microscopy. Methods in Cell Biology pp. 221-245 Elsevier, Vol. 95 Available: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0091679X10950139. Accessed 6 October 2011.
20. Helenius J, Brouhard G, Kalaidzidis Y, Diez S, Howard J, (2006) The depolymerizing kinesin MCAK uses lattice diffusion to rapidly target microtubule ends. Nature 441: 115-119 doi:10.1038/nature04736.
21. Brouhard GJ, Stear JH, Noetzel TL, Al-Bassam J, Kinoshita K, et al. (2008) XMAP215 Is a Processive Microtubule Polymerase. Cell 132: 79-88 doi:10.1016/j.cell.2007.11.043.