Law, environment, and the "nondismal" social sciences

Annual Review of Law and Social Science

Volumn 8, Issue , 2012, Pages 183-211

  Boyd, William ^a   Kysar, Douglas A ^b   Rachlinski, Jeffrey J ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^b YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c MIT Sloan School of Management   (United States)

Author keywords

global governance; Law and psychology; risk regulation; science and technology studies

Indexed keywords

EID: 84873287586     PISSN: 15503585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-102510-105408     Document Type: Review

References (186)

1. Ackerman BA, Rose-Ackerman S, Sawyer JW Jr. 1974. The Uncertain Search for Environmental Quality. New York: Free Press. 386 pp.
2. Abbott KW. 1989. Modern international relations theory: a prospectus for international lawyers. Yale J. Int. Law 14: 335-411
3. Adler JH. 2002. Fables of the Cuyahoga: reconstructing a history of environmental protection. Fordham Environ. Law J. 14: 89-146
4. Anderson TL, Leal DR. 1991. Free-Market Environmentalism. New York: Palgrave
5. Auld G, Bernstein S, Cashore B. 2008. The new corporate social responsibility. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 33: 413-35
6. Barrett S. 2010. Why Cooperate? The Incentive to Supply Global Public Goods. Oxford/New York: Oxford Univ. Press
7. Bartley T. 2007. Institutional emergence in an era of globalization: the rise of transnational private regulation of labor and environmental conditions. Am. J. Sociol. 113: 297-351
8. Bernstein S, Cashore B. 2007. Can non-state global governance be legitimate? An analytic framework. Regul. Gov. 1: 347-71
9. Biermann F, Pattberg P. 2008. Global environmental governance: taking stock, moving forward. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 33: 277-94
10. Bodansky D. 1999. The legitimacy of international governance: a coming challenge for international environmental law? Am. J. Int. Law 93: 596-624
11. Bourdieu P. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Transl. R Nice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
12. (From French) Bowler RM, Mergler D, Huel G, Cone JE. 1994. Psychological, psychosocial, and psychophysiological sequelae in a community affected by a railroad chemical disaster. J. Trauma Stress 7: 601-24
13. Boyd W. 2010a. Climate change, fragmentation, and the challenges of global environmental law: elements of a post-Copenhagen assemblage. Univ. Pa. J. Int. Law 32: 457-550
14. Boyd W. 2010b. Ways of seeing in environmental law: how deforestation became an object of climate governance. Ecol. Law Q. 37: 843-916
15. Braithwaite J, Drahos P. 2000. Global Business Regulation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
16. Brooks RRW, Keohane NO, Kysar DA. 2009. Economics of Environmental Law. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar
17. Burnett GM. 2007. Trying Leviathan: The Nineteenth-Century New York Court Case that Put the Whale on Trial and Challenged the Order of Nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
18. Burris S, Kempa M, Shearing C. 2008. Changes in governance: a cross-disciplinary review of current scholarship. Akron Law Rev. 41: 1-66
19. Callon M. 2009. Civilizing markets: carbon trading between in vitro and in vivo experiments. Account. Organ. Soc. 34: 535-48
20. Canan P, Reichman N. 2001. Ozone Connections: Expert Networks in Global Environmental Governance. New York: Greenleaf
21. Cashore B, Auld G, Newsom D. 2004. Governing Through Markets: Forest Certification and the Emergence of Non-State Authority. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
22. Caudill DS, LaRue LH. 2006. No Magic Wand: The Idealization of Science in Law. Oxford, UK: Rowman & Littlefield
23. Chayes A, Chayes AH. 1993. On compliance. Int. Organ. 47: 175-205
24. Checkel JT. 2008. Why comply? Social learning and European identity change. Int. Organ. 55: 553-88
25. ClarkWC, Jger J, Cavender-Bares J, Dickson NM. 2001. Acid rain, ozone depletion and climate change: an historical overview. See Social Learning Group 2001, pp. 21-56
26. Crowfoot JE, Wondolleck JM. 1990. Environmental Disputes: Community Involvement in Conflict Resolution. Washington, DC: Island Press
27. Daston L. 1991. Historical epistemology. In Questions of Evidence: Proof, Practice, and Persuasion Across the Disciplines, ed. J Chandler, AI Davidson, HD Harootunian, pp. 282-89. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
28. Daston L. 1992. Objectivity and the escape from perspective. Soc. Stud. Sci. 22: 597-618
29. Daston L. 2009. Science studies and the history of science. Crit. Inq. 35: 798-813
30. Daston L, Galison P. 2007. Objectivity. New York: Zone Books
31. Dietz T, Ostrom E, Stern PC. 2003. The struggle to govern the commons. Science 302: 1907-12
32. Downie DL. 2010. Global environmental policy: governance through regimes. In The Global Environment: Institutions, Law, and Policy Choice, ed. RS Axelrod, SD VanDeveer, DL Downie, pp. 70-91. Washington, DC: CQ Press
33. Driesen DM. 2010. Neoliberal instrument choice. In Economic Thought and U.S. Climate Change Policy, ed. DM Driesen, pp. 129-150. Cambridge: MIT Press
34. Edwards PN. 2010. A Vast Machine: Computer Models, Climate Data, and the Politics of Global Warming. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
35. Esty DC. 2006. Good governance at the supranational scale: globalizing administrative law. Yale Law J. 115: 1490-562
36. Farber DA. 2008. Modeling climate change and its impacts: law, policy, and science. Tex. Law Rev. 86: 1655-99
37. Ferguson J. 1994. The Anti-Politics Machine: "Development," Depoliticization, and Bureaucratic Power in Lesotho. Minneapolis: Univ. Minn. Press
38. Fine JD, Owen D. 2005. Technocracy and democracy: conflicts between models and participation in environmental law and planning. Hastings Law J. 56: 901-81
39. FinucaneML, Alhakami A, Slovic P, Johnson SM. 2001. The affect heuristic in judgment of risks and benefits. See Slovic 2001a, pp. 413-29
40. Fischhoff B, Slovic P, Lichtenstein S. 2001a.Weighing the risks: Which risks are acceptable? See Slovic 2001a, pp. 121-36
41. Fischhoff B, Slovic P, Lichtenstein S, Read S, Combs B. 2001b. How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits. See Slovic 2001a, pp. 137-53
42. Flournoy AC, Driesen DM. 2010. Beyond Environmental Law: Policy Proposals for a Better Environmental Future. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
43. Foucault M. 1991. Governmentality. In The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality. ed. G Burchell, C Gordon, P Miller, pp. 87-104. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
44. Frankl V. 1946. Man's Search for Meaning. New York: Beacon Press
45. Gelpe MR, Tarlock DA. 1974. The uses of scientific information in environmental decisionmaking. South. Calif. Law Rev. 48: 371-427
46. Gigerenzer G. 1993. The bounded rationality of probabilistic mental models. In Rationality: Psychological and Philosophical Perspectives, ed. KL Manktelow, DE Over. London/New York: Routledge
47. Gigerenzer G. 2000. Adaptive Thinking: Rationality in the Real World. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
48. Gigerenzer G. 2008. Moral intuition = fast and frugal heuristics. In Moral Psychology: Vol 2. The Cognitive Science of Morality: Intuition and Diversity, ed. W Sinnott-Armstrong, pp. 1-46. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
49. Gigerenzer G, Brighton H. 2009. Homo heuristicus: why biased minds make better inferences. Top. Cogn. Sci. 1: 107-43
50. Gigerenzer G, Swijtink Z, Porter T, Daston L, Beatty J, Kr?uger L. 1989. The Empire of Chance: How Probability Changed Science and Everyday Life. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
51. Gigerenzer G, Todd PM, ABC Res. Group. 1999. Simple Heuristics that Make Us Smart. New York: Oxford Univ. Press
52. Golan T. 2004. Laws of Men and Laws of Nature: The History of Scientific Expert Testimony in England and America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
53. Goldsmith JL, Posner EA. 2005. The Limits of International Law. Oxford/New York: Oxford Univ. Press
54. Goldsmith J, Posner EA. 2006. The new international law scholarship. Ga. J. Int. Comp. Law 34: 463-83
55. Gomez-Baggethun E, de Groot R, Lomas PL,Montes C. 2010. The history of ecosystem services in economic theory and practice: from early notions to markets and payment schemes. Ecol. Econ. 69: 1209-18
56. Goodman R, Jinks D. 2004. How to influence states: socialization and international human rights law. Duke Law J. 54: 621-703
57. Gunderson L. 2010. Ecological and human community resilience in response to natural disasters. Ecol. Soc. 15(2): 18. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/ vol15/iss2/art18/
58. GunninghamN,Kagan RA, ThorntonD. 2003. Shades ofGreen: Business, Regulation, and Environment. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
59. Guzman AT. 2008. How International Law Works: A Rational Choice Theory. Oxford/New York: Oxford Univ. Press
60. Haas PM. 1992. Epistemic communities and international policy coordination. Int. Organ. 46: 1-35
61. Haas PM,Keohane RO, Levy MA. 1993. Institutions for the Earth: Sources of Effective International Environmental Protection. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
62. Hacking I. 1990. The Taming of Chance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
63. Hacking I. 2002. Historical Ontology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
64. Halliday TC. 2009. Recursivity of global normmaking: a sociolegal agenda. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 5: 263-89
65. Hays SP. 1959. Conservation and the Gospel of Efficiency: The Progressive Conservation Movement, 1890-1920. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
66. Hertwig R, Pachur T, Kurzenhuser S. 2005. Judgment of risk frequencies: tests of possible cognitive mechanism. J. Exp. Psychol.: Learn. Mem. Cognit. 31: 621-42
67. Horkheimer M, Adorno TW. 1969. Dialectic of Enlightenment. New York: Continuum
68. Hornstein DT. 1992. Reclaiming environmental law. Columbia Law Rev. 92: 562-98
69. Jasanoff S. 1990. The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policymakers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
70. Jasanoff S. 1995. Procedural choices in regulatory science. Technol. Soc. 17: 279-93
71. Jasanoff S. 2003. Technologies of humility: citizen participation in governing science. Minerva 41: 223-44
72. Jasanoff S. 2004. Heaven and earth: the politics of environmental images. In Earthly Politics: Local and Global in Environmental Governance, ed. S Jasanoff, M Martello, pp. 31-52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
73. Jasanoff S. 2008. Making order: law and science in action. In The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, ed. EJ Hackett, O Amsterdamska, M Lynch, J Wajcman, pp. 761-86. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
74. Jasanoff S. 2010. A new climate for society. Theory Cult. Soc. 27: 233-53
75. Jasanoff S, Wynne B. 1998. Science and decision making. In Human Choice & Climate Change, Vol. 1: The Societal Framework, ed. S Rayner, EL Malone, pp. 1-87. Columbus, OH: Batelle Press
76. Kahan D. 2007. The cognitively illiberal state. Stanf. Law Rev. 60: 115-55
77. Kahan D. 2011. The tragedy of the risk-perception commons: culture, conflict, rationality conflict, and climate change. Public Law Work. Pap. No. 230, Yale Law School. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1871503
78. Kahan D, Braman D, Slovic P, Gastil J, Cohen G. 2009. Cultural cognition of the risks and benefits of nanotechnology. Nat. Nanotechnol. 4: 87-90
79. Kahneman D. 2011. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.
80. Kennedy D. 2005. Challenging expert rule: the politics of global governance. Sydney Law Rev. 27: 1-24
81. Kennedy D. 2008. The mystery of global governance. Ohio North. Univ. Law Rev. 34: 827-60
82. Kenrick DT, Griskevicius V, Sundie JM, Li NP, Li YJ, Neuberg SL. 2009 . Deep rationality: the evolutionary economics of decision-making. Soc. Cognit. 27: 764-85
83. Kingsbury B, Krisch N, Stewart RB. 2005. The emergence of global administrative law. Law Contemp. Probl. 68: 15-61
84. Koehler JJ, Gershoff AD. 2002. Betrayal aversion: when agents of protection become agents of harm. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 90: 244-61
85. Koehler JJ, Gershoff A. 2005. Betrayal aversion is reasonable. Behav. Brain Sci. 28: 556
86. Koh HH. 1997. Why do nations obey international law? Yale Law J. 106: 2599-659
87. Koh HH. 1998a. Bringing international law home. Houst. Law Rev. 35: 623-81
88. Koh HH. 1998b. How is international law enforced? Indiana Law J. 74: 1397-417
89. KoskenneimiM. 2007. The fate of public international law: between technique and politics. Modern Law Rev. 70: 1-30
90. Kuhn TS. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
91. Kuran T, Sunstein CR. 1999. Availability cascades and risk regulation. Stanford Law Rev. 51: 683-768
92. Kysar DA. 2003. Law, environment, and vision. Northwest. Univ. Law Rev. 97: 675-730
93. Kysar DA. 2010. Regulating from Nowhere: Environmental Law and the Search for Objectivity. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
94. Kysar DA. 2011. Politics by other meanings: a comment on "Retaking Rationality Two Years Later." Houst. Law Rev. 47: 43-77
95. Kysar DA, Li YW. 2008. Regulating from nowhere: domestic environmental law and the nation-state subject. In The Impact of Globalization on the United States. Vol. 2, Law and Governance, ed. B Crawford, M Bertho, E Fogarty, pp. 47-72. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger
96. Kysar DA, Meyler BA. 2008. Like a nation state. UCLA Law Rev. 55: 1621-73
97. Latin HW. 1988. Good science, bad regulation, and toxic risk assessment. Yale J. Regul. 5: 89-148
98. Latour B. 2004. Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern. Crit. Inq. 30: 225-48
99. Latour B, Woolgar S. 1986. Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
100. Lazarus RJ. 2000. Environmental racism! That's what it is. Univ. Ill. Law Rev. 2000: 255-74
101. Lazarus RJ. 2004. The Making of Environmental Law. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
102. Leopold A. 1949. A Sand County Almanac: And Sketches Here and There. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
103. Levin P, Espeland WN. 2002. Pollution futures: commensuration, commodification, and the market for air. In Organizations, Policy, and the Natural Environment: Institutional and Strategic Perspectives, ed. AJ Hoffman, MJ Ventresca, pp. 119-47. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
104. Levy DL, Newell PJ, eds 2005. The Business of Global Environmental Governance. Cambridge,MA MIT Press
105. Li TM. 2007. The Will To Improve: Governmentality, Development, and the Practice of Politics. Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
106. Macey G. 2010. Coasean blindspots: charting the incomplete institutionalism. Georgetown Law J. 98: 863-919
107. MacKenzie D. 2009a. Making things the same: gases, emission rights and the politics of carbon markets. Account. Organ. Soc. 34: 440-55
108. MacKenzie D. 2009b. Material Markets: How Economic Agents Are Constructed. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
109. Marewski JN, Schooler LJ. 2011 . Cognitive niches: an ecological model of strategy selection. Psychol. Rev. 118: 3, 393-437
110. Margolis H. 1994. Dealing with Risk: Why the Public and the Experts Disagree on Environmental Issues. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
111. Mattli W, Buthe T. 2003. Setting international standards: technological rationality or primacy of power? World Polit. 56: 1-42
112. McEvoy AF. 1986. The Fisherman's Problem: Ecology and Law in the California Fisheries, 1850-1980. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
113. Miller C. 2005. New civic epistemologies of quantification: making sense of indicators of local and global sustainability. Sci. Technol. Hum. Values 30: 403-32
114. Missouri v. Illinois, 200 U.S. 496 (1906) Mitchell T. 2002. Rule of Experts: Egypt, Techno-Politics, Modernity. Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
115. Mnookin JL. 2007. Idealizing science and demonizing experts: an intellectual history of expert evidence. Villanova Law Rev. 52: 101-36
116. Nelson N, Geltzer A, Hilgartner S. 2008. The anticipatory state: making policy-relevant knowledge about the future. Sci. Public Policy 35: 546-50
117. NorgaardR. 2010. Ecosystem services: from eye-opening metaphor to complexity blinder. Ecol. Econ. 69: 1219 27 Nuclear Energy Institute v. EPA, 373 F.3d 1251 (D.C. Cir. 2004
118. O'Neill K. 2009. The Environment and International Relations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
119. OreskesN. 2000. Why believe a computer?Models,measures, andmeaning in the natural world. In The Earth Around Us: Maintaining a Livable Planet, ed. JS Schneiderman, pp. 70-92. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman &Co
120. Parson EA. 1998. The Montreal protocol: the first adaptive global environmental regime? In Protecting the Ozone Layer: Lessons, Models, and Prospects, ed. PG Le Pestre, JD Reid, ET Morehouse Jr, pp. 127-34. Boston: Kluwer Acad. Publ.
121. Parson EA. 2003. Protecting the Ozone Layer: Science and Strategy. Oxford/New York: Oxford Univ. Press
122. Parson E, Zeckhauser RJ. 1995. Cooperation in the unbalanced commons. In Barriers to Conflict Resolution, ed. K Arrow, RH Mnookin, L Ross, A Tversky, RB Wilson, pp. 212-34. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.
123. Pollack MA, Shaffer GC. 2009. When Cooperation Fails: The International Law and Politics of Genetically Modified Foods. Oxford/New York: Oxford Univ. Press
124. Poovey M. 1998. AHistory of theModern Fact: Problems of Knowledge in the Sciences ofWealth and Society.Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
125. Porter TM. 1995. Trust inNumbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life. Princeton,NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
126. Posner EA. 2007. Agencies should ignore distant future generations. U. Chic. Law Rev. 74: 139-43
127. Posner EA. 2009. The Perils of Global Legalism. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
128. Purdy J. 2010. The politics of nature: climate change, environmental law, and democracy. Yale Law J. 119: 1122 209
129. Rachlinski JJ. 2000. The psychology of global climate change. Univ. Ill. Law Rev. 2000: 299-319
130. Raustiala K, Slaughter A. 2002. International law, international relations, and compliance. In The Handbook of International Relations, ed.WCarlnaes, T Risse, B Simmons, pp. 538-58. Thousand Oaks, CA/London: Sage Publ., Ltd.
131. Raustiala K, Victor D. 2004. The regime complex for plant genetic resources. Int. Organ. 58: 277-309
132. Revesz R, Stavins R. 2004. Environmental law and policy. In The Handbook of Law and Economics, ed. AM Polinsky, S Shavell, pp. 499-590. Amsterdam: North-Holland/Elsevier Sci.
133. Reyna VR, BrainerdCJ. 2008. Numeracy, ratio bias, denominator neglect in judgments of risk and probability. Learn. Ind. Differ. 18: 89-107
134. Riles A. 2005. A new agenda for the cultural study of law: taking on the technicalities. Buffalo Law Rev. 53: 973-1033
135. Riles A. 2011. Collateral Knowledge: Legal Reasoning in the Global Financial Markets. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
136. Rockstrm J, Steffen W, Noone K, Persson A, Chapin FC III, et al. 2009, A safe operating space for humanity. Nature, 461, 472-75
137. Rorty R. 1979. Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
138. Rose CM. 2008. From H2O to CO2: lessons of water rights for carbon trading. Ariz. Law Rev. 50: 91-110
139. Rose N. 1999. Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
140. Rose N, O'Malley P, Valverde M. 2006. Governmentality. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 2: 83-104
141. Rubin E. 2002. Public choice, phenomenology, and the meaning of the modern state: keep the bathwater, but throw out the baby. Cornell Law Rev. 87: 309-61
142. Ruggie JG. 1998. What makes the world hang together? Neo-utilitarianism and the social constructivist challenge. Int. Organ. 52: 855-85
143. Salzman J, Ruhl JB. 2000. Currencies and the commodification of environmental law. Stanf. Law Rev. 53: 607-94
144. Sassen S. 2006. Territory, Authority, Rights: From Medieval to Global Assemblages. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
145. Scheiber HN. 1997. From science to law to politics: an historical view of the ecosystem idea and its effect on resource management. Ecol. Law Q. 24: 631-51
146. Scott JC. 1998. Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
147. Shaffer GC, Pollack MA. 2010. Hard versus soft law: alternatives, complements and antagonists in international governance. Minn. Law Rev. 94: 706-99
148. Shapin S. 1994. A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth-Century England. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
149. Simon J. 1988. The ideological effects of actuarial practices. Law Soc. Rev. 22: 771-800
150. Slaughter A-M. 2004. A New World Order. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
151. Slaughter A-M, Tullumello AS, Wood S. 1998. International law and international relations theory: a new generation of interdisciplinary scholarship. Am. J. Int. Law 92: 367-97
152. Slovic P, ed. 2001a. The Perception of Risk. London/Sterling, VA: Earthscan Publ., Ltd.
153. Slovic P. 2001b. Introduction and overview. See Slovic 2001a, pp. xxi-xxxvii.
154. Slovic P, Fischhoff B, Lichtenstein S. 2001a. Cognitive processes and societal risk taking. See Slovic 2001a, pp. 32-50
155. Slovic P, Fischhoff B, Lichtenstein S. 2001b. Facts and fears: understanding perceived risk. See Slovic 2001a, pp. 137-53
156. Social Learning Group. 2001. Learning to Manage Global Environmental Risks, Vol 1: A Comparative History of Social Responses to Climate Change, Ozone Depletion, and Acid Rain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
157. Spiro PJ. 2007. NGO's in international environmental lawmaking: theoretical models. In The Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law, ed. D Bodansky, J Brunne, E Hey. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
158. Sunstein CR. 2000. The Laws of fear. Harvard Law Rev. 115: 1119-68
159. Sunstein CR. 2003. What's available? Social influences and behavioral economics. Northwestern Univ. Law Rev. 97: 1295-314
160. Sunstein CR. 2005. Moral heuristics. Behav. Brain Sci. 28: 531-73
161. Susskind LE. 1994. Environmental Diplomacy: NegotiatingMore Effective Global Agreements. Oxford/New York: Oxford Univ. Press
162. Tarlock D. 1994. The nonequilibrium paradigm in ecology and the partial unraveling of environmental law. Loyola Los Angel. Law Rev. 27: 1121-44
163. Tribe L. 1972. Policy science: analysis or ideology? Philos. Public Aff. 2: 66-110
164. Tribe L. 1973. Technology assessment and the fourth discontinuity: the limits of instrumental rationality. South. Calif. Law Rev. 46: 617-60
165. Tribe L. 1974. Ways not to think about plastic trees: new foundations for environmental law. Yale Law J. 83: 1315-48
166. Tversky A, Kahneman D. 1974. Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science 185: 1124-31
167. Tversky A, Kahneman D. 1983. Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: the conjunction fallacy in probability judgment. Psychol. Rev. 90: 293-315
168. Veggeland F, Borgen SO. 2005. Negotiating international food standards: the World Trade Organization's impact on the Codex Alimentarius Commission. Governance 18: 675-708
169. Victor DG, Raustiala K, Skolnikoff EB. 1998. The Implementation and Effectiveness of International Environmental Commitments. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
170. Wagner W. 1995. The science charade in toxic risk regulation. Columbia Law Rev. 95: 1613-723
171. Wagner W, Fisher E, Pascual P. 2010. Misunderstanding models in environmental and public health regulation. N. Y. Univ. Environ. Law J. 18: 293-356
172. Wagner W, Steinzor R. 2006. Introduction: principled science. In Rescuing Science from Politics: Regulation and the Distortion of Scientific Research, ed. W Wagner, R Steinzor, pp. 1-20. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
173. Waltz KN. 1979. Theory of International Politics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
174. Wapner P. 1996. Environmental Activism and World Civic Politics. Albany, NY: State Univ. New York Press
175. Weber M. 1978. Economy & Society, ed. G Roth, CWittich. Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
176. Wendt A. 1999. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
177. Wiener JB. 1995. Law and the new ecology: evolution, categories, and consequences. Ecol. Law Q. 22: 325-57
178. William E, Viscusi WK. 1991. Estimation of state-dependent utility functions using survey data. Rev. Econ. Stat. 73: 94-104
179. Williams R. 1980. Problems in Materialism and Culture. London: Verso
180. Williams T. 2010. Why commit? International socialization theory and China's climate change policy. SSRNWork. Pap. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/ papers.cfm?abstract-id=1676207
181. Winner L. 1980. Do artifacts have politics? Daedalus 109: 121-36
182. Worster D. 1977. Nature's Economy: A History of Ecological Ideas. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
183. Yang T, Percival RV. 2009. The emergence of global environmental law. Ecol. Law Q. 36: 615-64
184. Yearley S. 2008. Nature and the environment in science and technology studies. In The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, ed. EJ Hackett, O Amsterdamska,M Lynch, J Wajcman, pp. 921-47. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
185. Zaring D. 2009. Three challenges for regulatory networks. Int. Lawyer 43: 211-17
186. Zerbe RO. 1991. Comment: Does benefit cost analysis stand alone? Rights and standing. J. Policy Anal. Manag. 10: 96-105