Recursivity of global normmaking: A sociolegal agenda

Annual Review of Law and Social Science

Volumn 5, Issue , 2009, Pages 263-289

  Halliday, Terence C ^a  

^a AMERICAN BAR FOUNDATION   (United States)

Author keywords

Globalization; International law; International organizations; Legal change

Indexed keywords

EID: 76249102711     PISSN: 15503585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.093008.131606     Document Type: Article

References (97)

1. Abbott A. 1988. The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
2. Abbott A. 2005. Linked ecologies: states and universities as environments for professions. Sociol. Theory 23:245-274
3. Abbott K, Snidal D. 2000. Hard and soft law in international governance. Int. Organ. 54:421-456
4. Alford RP. 2008. The Nobel effect: Nobel Peace Prize laureates as international norm entrepreneurs. Va. J. Int. Law 49:61-153
5. Alkoby A. 2008. Global networks and international environmental lawmaking: a discourse approach. Chicago J. Int. Law 8:377-407
6. Alter K. 2009a. The European Court's political power across time and space. See Alter 2009b, pp. 1-29
7. Alter K, ed. 2009b. The New Terrain of International Law: International Courts in International Politics. New York: Oxford Univ. Press
8. Alvarez JE. 2006. International organizations: then and now. Am. J. Int. Law 100:324-347
9. Andersen SO, Madhava Sarma K, Sinclair L. 2002. Protecting the Ozone Layer: The United Nations History. London/Sterling, VA: Earthscan
10. Anderson K. 2000. The Ottawa convention banning landmines, the role of international non-governmental organizations and the idea of international civil society. Eur. J. Int. Law 11:91-120
11. Babb SL, Carruthers BG. 2008. Conditionality: forms, function and history. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 4:13-29
12. Backer LC. 2006. Multinational corporations, transnational law: the United Nations' norms on the responsibilities of transnational corporations as a harbinger of corporate social responsibility. Columbia Hum. Rights Law Rev. 37:287-390
13. Backer LC. 2007. Economic globalization and the rise of efficient systems of global private lawmaking: Wal-Mart as global legislator. Conn. Law Rev. 39:1739-1784
14. Barnett M. 1997. Bringing in the new world order: liberalism, legitimacy, and the United Nations. World Polit. 49:526-551
15. Barnett M, Finnemore M. 2005. Rules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
16. Berkovitch N. 1999. From Motherhood to Citizenship:Women's Rights and International Organizations. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press
17. Berman PS. 2007. Global legal pluralism. South. Calif. Law Rev. 80:1155-1237
18. Birdsall N. 2003. Why it matters who runs the IMF and the World Bank. Work. Pap. 22, Cent. Global Dev., Washington, DC
19. Block-Lieb S, Halliday TC. 2006. Legitimacy and global lawmaking. Fordham Law Legal Stud. Res. Pap.No. 952492. http://ssrn. com/abstract=952492
20. Block-Lieb S, Halliday TC. 2007. Incrementalisms in global lawmaking. Brooklyn J. Int. Law XXXII:851-903
21. Bodansky D. 1999. The legitimacy of international governance: a coming challenge for international environmental law? Am. J. Int. Law 93:596-624
22. Boli J. 1998. Rights and rules: constituting world citizens. In Public Rights, Public Rules: Constituting Citizens in the World Polity and National Policy, ed. C McNeely, pp. 271-293 New York: Garland
23. Boyle EH. 2002. Female Genital Cutting: Cultural Conflict in the Global Community. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press
24. Boyle EH, Preves SE. 2000. National politics as international process: the case of anti-female-genital-cutting laws. Law Soc. Rev. 34:703-737
25. Bradlow DD. 2006. The governance of the IMF: the need for comprehensive reform. Presented at G24Tech. Comm. Meet., Singapore, Sept. http://www. g24. org/brad0906. pdf
26. Braithwaite J. 2002. Rules and principles: a theory of legal certainty. Aust. J. Legal Philos. 27:47-82
27. Braithwaite J, Drahos P. 2000. Global Business Regulation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
28. Busch ML, Reinhardt E, Shaffer G. 2008. Does legal capacity matter? Explaining dispute initiation and antidumping actions in the WTO. Issue Pap. No. 4, Int. Cent. Trade Sustain. Dev., Geneva, Switz. http://ictsd. net/downloads/2009/02/legal capacity1. pdf
29. Cameron MA, Lawson RJ, TomlinBW, eds. 1998. ToWalkWithout Fear: The Global Movement to Ban Landmines. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press
30. Campbell JL. 2004. Institutional Change and Globalization. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
31. Canan P, Reichman N. 2001. Ozone Connections: Expert Networks in Global Environmental Governance. New York: Greenleaf
32. Carruthers BG, Halliday TC. 1998. Rescuing Business: The Making of Corporate Bankruptcy Law in England and the United States. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press
33. Carruthers BG, Halliday TC. 2006. Negotiating globalization: global templates and the construction of insolvency regimes in East Asia. Law Soc. Inq. 31:521-584
34. Carruthers BG, Halliday TC. 2007. Law, economy and globalization: Max Weber and how international financial institutions understand law. In On Capitalism, ed. V Nee, R Swedberg, pp. 128-151. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
35. Conti J. 2008a. Power through process: disputing at theWorld Trade Organization. PhD Diss., Dep. Sociol., Univ. Calif., Santa Barbara
36. Conti JA. 2008b. The good case: decisions to litigate at theWorldTrade Organization. Law Soc. Rev. 42:145-182
37. de Sousa Santos B. 2002. Toward a New Legal Common Sense. London: Butterworths
38. de Sousa Santos B, Rodŕiguez-Garavito CA, eds. 2005. Law and Globalization from Below: Towards a Cosmopolitan Legality (Cambridge Studies in Law and Society). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
39. Dezalay Y, Garth BG. 2002. The Internationalization of Palace Wars: Lawyers, Economists, and the Contest to Transform Latin American States. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
40. DiMaggio PJ, Powell WW. 1983. The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Am. Sociol. Rev. 48:147-160
41. DiMaggio PJ, Powell WW. 1991. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
42. Espeland W, Vannebo B. 2007. Accountability, quantification and law. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 3:21-43
43. Finnemore M, Sikkink K. 1998. International norm dynamics and political change. Int. Organ. 52:887-917
44. Fiss PC, Hirsch PM. 2005. The discourse of globalization: framing and sensemaking of an emerging concept. Am. Sociol. Rev. 70:29-52
45. Franck TM. 2006. The power of legitimacy and the legitimacy of power: international law in an age of power disequilibrium. Am. J. Int. Law 100:88-106
46. Frank DJ. 1997. Science, nature, and the globalization of the environment, 1870-1990. Soc. Forces 76:409-435
47. Grattet R, Jenness V. 2001a. Examining the boundaries of hate crime law: disabilities and the dilemma of difference. J. Crim. Law Criminol. 91:11-50
48. Grattet R, Jenness V. 2001b. The birth and maturation of hate crime policy in the United States. Am. Behav. Sci. 45:668-696
49. Grattet R, Jenness V, Curry TR. 1998. The homogenization and differentiation of hate crime law in the United States, 1978 to 1995. Am. Sociol. Rev. 63:286-307
50. Hagan J. 2003. Justice in the Balkans: Prosecuting War Crimes in the Hague Tribunal. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
51. Hagan J, Levi R. 2005. Crimes of war and the force of law. Soc. Forces 83:1499-1534
52. Hagan J, Palloni A. 2006. Death in Darfur. Science 313:1578-1579
53. Hagan J, Rothenberg D. 2009. Rape in the republic of fear: sexual violence and torture as state-led-organized crime in pre-invasion Iraq. Work. Pap., Am. Bar Found., Chicago
54. Halliday TC. 1985. Knowledge mandates: collective influence by scientific, normative and syncretic professions. Br. J. Sociol. 36:421-447
55. Halliday TC, Carruthers BG. 2007a. Foiling the hegemons: limits to the globalization of corporate insolvency regimes in Indonesia, Korea and China. In Law and Globalization in Asia: From the Asian Financial Crisis to September 11, ed. C Anton, V Gessner, pp. 255-301. Oxford: Hart
56. Halliday TC, Carruthers BG. 2007b. The recursivity of law: global normmaking and national lawmaking in the globalization of bankruptcy regimes. Am. J. Sociol. 112:1135-1202
57. Halliday TC, Carruthers BG. 2009. Bankrupt: Global Lawmaking and Systemic Financial Crisis. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
58. Halliday T, Karpik L, Feeley MM. 2007. Fighting for political freedom: comparative studies of the legal complex and political change. In The Legal Complex and Struggles for Political Liberalism, ed. TC Halliday, L Karpik, MM Feeley, pp. 1-42. Oxford: Hart
59. Halliday TC, Osinsky P. 2006. Globalization of law. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 32:447-470
60. Hathaway OA. 2005. Between power and principle: an integrated theory of international law. Univ. Chicago Law Rev. 72:469-536
61. Holton R. 2000. Globalization's cultural consequences. Ann. Am. Acad. Polit. Soc. Sci. 570:140-152
62. Hurd I. 1999. Legitimacy and authority in international politics. Int. Organ. 53:379-408
63. Hurd I. 2005. Security Council expansion and institutional legitimacy: five hypotheses in search of a test. Work. Pap., Northwestern Univ., Evanston
64. Hurd I. 2007a. After Anarchy: Legitimacy and Power in the United Nations Security Council. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
65. Hurd I. 2007b. Breaking and making norms: American revisionism and crises of legitimacy. Int. Polit. 44:194-213
66. Hurd I. 2008. Myths of membership: the politics of legitimation in UN security council reform. Global Gov. 14:199-217
67. Kapur D. 2000. Who gets to run the world? Foreign Policy 121:44-50
68. Keck ME, Sikkink K. 1998. Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
69. Kingdon JW. 2002. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. New York: Longman. 2nd ed.
70. La Porta R, Lopez-de-Silanes F, Shleifer A, Vishny RW. 1997. Legal determinants of external finance. J. Financ. 52:1131-1150
71. Liu S, Halliday TC. 2009. Recursivity in legal change: lawyers and reforms of China's criminal procedural law. Law Soc. Inq. In press
72. Maresca L, Maslen S, eds. 2000. The Banning of Anti-Personnel Landmines: The Legal Contribution of the International Committee of the Red Cross. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
73. Matthew RA, McDonald B, Rutherford KR, eds. 2004. Landmines and Human Security: International Politics and War's Hidden Legacy. Albany: Albany State Univ. New York Press
74. Merry SE. 2003a. Constructing a global law-violence against women and the human rights system. Law Soc. Inq. 28:941-978
75. Merry S. 2003b. Rights talk and the experience of law: implementing women's human rights to protection from violence. Hum. Rights Q. 25:343-381
76. Merry SE. 2005. Human Rights and Gender Violence: Translating International Law into Local Justice. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
77. Merry SE. 2006. Transnational human rights and local activism: mapping the middle. Am. Anthropol. 108:38-51
78. Meyer J, Boli J, Thomas G, Ramirez F. 1997. World society and the nation-state. Am. J. Sociol. 103:144-181
79. Nadelmann EA. 1990. Global prohibition regimes: the evolution of norms in international society. Int. Organ. 44:479-526
80. Price RM. 2003. Review: transnational civil society and advocacy in world politics. World Polit. 55:579-606
81. Ruggie JG. 1998. What makes the world hang together? Neo-utilitarianism and the social constructivist challenge. Int. Organ. 52:855-885
82. Sanchez MR, Rosenberg B, Shaffer G. 2008. Winning at the WTO: the development of a trade policy community within Brazil. Presented at Inaugural Conf., Soc. Int. Econ. Law, Geneva, Switz., July
83. Schwartz A, Scott RE. 1995. The political economy of private legislatures. Univ. Pa. Law Rev. 143:595-653
84. Scott RE. 1994. The politics of Article 9. Va. Law Rev. 80:1783-1851
85. Shaffer G. 2001. TheWorld Trade Organization under challenge: democracy and the law and politics of the WTO's treatment of trade and environment matters. Harvard Environ. Law Rev. 25:1-93
86. Shaffer G. 2003. Defending Interests: Public-Private Partnerships in W. T. O. Litigation. Washington, DC: Brookings Inst.
87. Shaffer GC, Pollack MA. 2008. How hard and soft law interact in international regulatory governance: alternatives, complements and antagonists. Cornell Int. Law J. 41:383
88. Shelton D. 2006. Normative hierarchy in international law. Am. J. Int. Law 100:291-323
89. Silbey S. 1997. "Let Them Eat Cake": globalization, postmodern colonialism, and the possibilities of justice. Law Soc. Rev. 31:207-235 (Pubitemid 127364258)
90. Slaughter A-M. 2004. A New World Order. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
91. Tamanaha BZ. 2008. Understanding legal pluralism: past to present, local to global. Sydney Law Rev. 30:375-411
92. Thelen K. 1999. Historical institutionalism in comparative politics. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 2:369-404
93. Wallerstein I. 1984. The Politics of theWorld-Economy: The States, the Movements, and the Civilizations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
94. Wallerstein I. 2002. Opening remarks: legal constraints in the capitalist world-economy. In Transnational Legal Processes: Globalization and Power Disparities, ed. MLikosky, pp. 61-64. London: Butterworths Lexis Nexis
95. Waltz KN. 1979. Theory of International Politics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley
96. Weiler JHH. 2001. The rule of lawyers and the ethos of diplomats: reflections on the internal and external legitimacy of WTO dispute settlement. J. World Trade 35:191-207
97. Wendt A. 1991. Anarchy is what states make of it: the social construction of power politics. Int. Organ. 46:391-425