Introduction: Principled science

Rescuing Science from Politics: Regulation and the Distortion of Scientific Research

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 1-20

  Wagner, Wendy ^a   Steinzor, Rena ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND SCHOOL OF LAW   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84859631226     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511751776.002     Document Type: Editorial

References (37)

1. Stephen G. Breyer, Breaking the Vicious Circle: Toward Effective Risk Regulation (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993)
2. Daniel R. Sarewitz, Frontiers of Illusion: Science, Technology, and the Politics of Progress (Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press, 1996).
3. National Research Council, Access to Research Data in the 21st Century: An Ongoing Dialogue among Interested Parties (Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2002)
4. Feature Issue: Corporate Corruption of Science, International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health 2, no. 4 (2005).
5. National Research Council, Trends in Federal Support of Research and Graduate Education (Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2001), 122-3.
6. National Research Council, Toxicity Testing: Strategies to Determine Needs and Priorities (Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1984), 48, 84-5.
7. Paul Brodeur, Outrageous Misconduct: The Asbestos Industry on Trial (New York: Pantheon, 1985)
8. Stanton A. Glantz et al., eds., The Cigarette Papers (Berkeley, CA:University of California Press, 1996)
9. Gerald Markowitz and David Rosner, Deceit and Denial: The Deadly Politics of Industrial Pollution (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2002)
10. Morton Mintz, At Any Cost: Corporate Greed, Women, and the Dalkon Shield (New York: Pantheon, 1985)
11. Christian Warren, Brush with Death: A Social History of Lead Poisoning (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2000).
12. Sheila Jasanoff, "Research Subpoenas and the Sociology of Knowledge," Law and Contemporary Problems 59, no. 3 (1996): 95, 98-100.
13. Marcia Angell, Science on Trial: The Clash of Medical Evidence and the Law in the Breast Implant Case (New York: W.W. Norton, 1996)
14. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors, "Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals" (Oct. 2004) (available at http://www.icmje.org/index.html).
15. Union of Concerned Scientists, "Restoring Scientific Integrity in Policymaking" (Feb. 18, 2004) (available at http://www.ucsusa.org/global environment/rsi/page.cfm?pageID=1320).
16. Peg Brickley, "Attack on Panel Politics," Scientist (March 12, 2003) (available at http://www.biomedcentral.com/news/20030312/01/).
17. Robert K. Merton, "The Normative Structure of Science," in Sociology of Science, ed. Jerry Gaston (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1973), 267, 275.
18. V.L. Melnick et al., "Participation of Biologists in the Formulation of National Science Policy," Federation Proceedings 35, no. 9 (1976): 1957.
19. David Blumenthal et al., "Withholding Research Results in Academic Life Science: Evidence from a National Survey of Faculty," Journal of the American Medical Association 277, no. 15 (1997): 1224-8
20. Catherine D. DeAngelis et al., "Reporting Financial Conflicts of Interest and Relationships between Investigators and Research Sponsors," Journal of the American Medical Association 286, no. 1 (2001): 89-91
21. Jeffrey M. Drazen and Gregory D. Curfman, "Financial Associations of Authors," New England Journal of Medicine 346, no. 24 (2002): 1901-2
22. Drummond Rennie, "Thyroid Storm," Journal of the American Medical Association 277, no. 15 (1997): 1238-43
23. Steven A. Rosenberg, "Secrecy in Medical Research," New England Journal of Medicine 334, no. 6 (1996): 392-3.
24. Glenn H. Reynolds, "'Thank God for the Lawyers': Some Thoughts on the (Mis)regulation of Scientific Misconduct," Tennesee Law Review 66, no. 3 (1999): 814.
25. Sheila Jasanoff, The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policymakers (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1990), 69-71.
26. Eyal Press and JenniferWashburn, "The Kept University," Atlantic Monthly 285, no. 3 (2000): 38-54.
27. Lawrence Busch et al., External Review of the Collaborative Research Agreement between Novartis Agricultural Discovery Institute, Inc. and The Regents of the University of California (East Lansing, MI: Institute for Food and Agricultural Standards, Michigan State University, 2004) (available at http://evcp.chance.berkeley.edu/documents/Reports/documents/NovartisBerkeleyFinalReport071204.pdf).
28. Robert K. Merton, The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations, ed. Norman Storer (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1973), 273-5.
29. National Research Council, Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Managing the Process (Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1983), 7-8
30. National Research Council, Science and Judgment in Risk Assessment (Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1994), 81
31. National Research Council, Sharing Publication-Related Data (Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2003), 4-11, 51-60.
32. Howard Latin, "Good Science, Bad Regulation, and Toxic Risk Assessment," Yale Journal on Regulation 5, no. 1 (1988): 89.
33. Mark E. Rushefsky, Making Cancer Policy (Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1986), 6.
34. Wendy E. Wagner, "Commons Ignorance: The Failure of Environmental Law to Produce Needed Information on Health and the Environment," Duke Law Journal 53, no. 6 (2004): 1619, 1699-1711.
35. National Research Council, Building a Foundation for Sound Environmental Decisions (Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1997), 15, 53-4.
36. Donald Kennedy, "Science in the U.S. Government: Interim Report," Science 296, no. 5570 (2002): 981
37. David Michaels et al., "Advice without Dissent," Science. 298, no. 5594 (2002): 703.