An independent genome duplication inferred from Hox paralogs in the American paddlefish-a representative basal ray-finned fish and important comparative reference

Genome Biology and Evolution

Volumn 4, Issue 9, 2012, Pages 937-953

  Crow, Karen D ^a   Smith, Christopher D ^a   Cheng, Jan Fang ^b   Wagner, Günter P ^b   Amemiya, Chris T ^c,d  

^a SAN FRANCISCO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^c BENAROYA RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Fin limb transition; Paralog retention; Polyodon spathula; Rate asymmetry; WGD; Whole genome duplication

Indexed keywords

ACIPENSERIFORMES; ACTINOPTERYGII; CROSSOPTERYGII; DANIO RERIO; OSTEICHTHYES; POLYODON SPATHULA; POLYODONTIDAE (FISH); TELEOSTEI; TETRAODONTIDAE; TETRAPODA; VERTEBRATA;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL ARTIFICIAL CHROMOSOME; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DNA SEQUENCE; FISH; GENE DUPLICATION; GENETICS; GENOME; HOMEOBOX; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR CLONING; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MOLECULAR GENETICS; MULTIGENE FAMILY; PHYLOGENY; SYNTENY;

ANIMALS; CHROMOSOMES, ARTIFICIAL, BACTERIAL; CLONING, MOLECULAR; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; FISHES; GENE DUPLICATION; GENES, HOMEOBOX; GENOME; MODELS, GENETIC; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE ANNOTATION; MULTIGENE FAMILY; PHYLOGENY; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SYNTENY;

EID: 84873161136     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17596653     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evs067     Document Type: Article

References (106)

1. Amemiya CT, et al. 2010. Complete HOX cluster characterization of the coelacanth provides further evidence for slow evolution of its genome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 107:3622-3627.
2. Amores A, et al. 1998. Zebrafish Hox clusters and vertebrate genome evolution. Science 282:1711-1714.
3. Arratia G. 2000. New teleostean fishes from the Jurassic of southern Germany and the systematic problems concerning the 'pholidophoriforms'. Paläontologische Zeitschrift 74:113-143.
4. Arratia G. 2004. Systematics, paleoenvironments and biodiversity. In: Arratia G, Tintori A, editors. Mesozoic fishes 3. München, Germany: Verlag Dr. Friedrich Pfeil. p. 279-315.
5. Babbitt GA, Kim Y. 2008. Inferring natural selection on fine-scale chromatin organization in yeast. Mol Biol Evol. 25:1714-1727.
6. Bemis WE, Findeis EK, Grande L. 1997. An overview of Acipenseriformes. Environ Biol Fishes. 48:25-71.
7. Birstein VJ, DeSalle R. 1998. Molecular phylogeny of Acipenserinae. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 9:141-155.
8. Birstein VJ, Hanner R, DeSalle R. 1997. Phylogeny of the Acipenseriformes: cytogenetic and molecular approaches. Environ Biol Fishes. 48: 127-155.
9. Blacklidge KH, Bidwell CA. 1993. Three ploidy levels indicated by genome quantification in Acipenseriformes of North America. J Hered. 84: 427-430.
10. Borday-Birraux V, et al. 2006. Expression of Dlx genes during the development of the zebrafish pharyngeal dentition: evolutionary implications. Evol Dev. 8:130-141.
11. Boulikas T. 1992. Evolutionary consequences of nonrandom damage and repair of chromatin domains. J Mol Evol. 35:156-180.
12. Braasch I, Salzburger W, Meyer A. 2006. Asymmetric evolution in two fish-specifically duplicated receptor tyrosine kinase paralogons involved in teleost coloration. Mol Biol Evol. 23:1192-1202.
13. Braasch I, Schartl M, Volff J-N. 2007. Evolution of pigment synthesis pathways by gene and genome duplication in fish. BMC Evol Biol. 7:74.
14. Brudno M, et al. 2003. LAGAN and Multi-LAGAN: efficient tools for large-scale multiple alignment of genomic DNA. Genome Res. 13: 721-731.
15. Burke AC, Nelson CE, Morgan BA, Tabin C. 1995. Hox genes and the evolution of vertebrate axial morphology. Development 121:333-346.
16. Byrne KP, Wolfe KH. 2005. The Yeast Gene Order Browser: combining curated homology and syntenic context reveals gene fate in polyploid species. Genome Res. 15:1456-1461.
17. Cantarel BL, et al. 2008. MAKER: an easy-to-use annotation pipeline designed for emerging model organism genomes. Genome Res. 18: 188-196.
18. Cardoso J, et al. 2007. Persistence of duplicated PAC1 receptors in the teleost, Sparus auratus. BMC Evol Biol. 7:221.
19. Carlson DM, KettlerMK, Fisher SE, Whitt GS. 1982. Low genetic variability in paddlefish populations. Copeia 1982:721-725.
20. Christoffels A, et al. 2004. Fugu genome analysis provides evidence for a whole-genome duplication early during the evolution of ray-finned fishes. Mol Biol Evol. 21:1146-1151.
21. Crow KD, Amemiya CT, Roth J, Wagner GP. 2009. Hypermutability of Hoxa 13A and functional divergence from its paralog are associated with the origin of a novel developmental feature in zebrafish and related taxa (Cypriniformes). Evolution 63:1574-1592.
22. Crow KD, Wagner GP. 2006. What is the role of genome duplication in the evolution of complexity and diversity in vertebrates? Mol Biol Evol. 23:887-892.
23. Crow KD, et al. 2006. The "fish specific" Hox cluster duplication is coincident with the origin of teleosts. Mol Biol Evol. 23:121-136.
24. Danielson PB, et al. 1999. Duplication of the POMC gene in the paddlefish (Polyodon spathula): analysis of gamma-MSH, ACTH, and beta-endorphin regions of ray-finned fish POMC. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 116:164-177.
25. Davis MC, Dahn RD, Shubin NH. 2007. An autopodial-like pattern of Hox expression in the fins of a basal actinopterygian fish. Nature 447: 473-476.
26. de Souza FSJ, Bumaschny VF, Low MJ, Rubinstein M. 2005. Subfunctionalization of expression and peptide domains following the ancient duplication of the proopiomelanocortin gene in teleost fishes. Mol Biol Evol. 22:2417-2427.
27. Dingerkus G, Howell W. 1976. Karyotypic analysis and evidence of tetraploidy in the North American paddlefish, Polyodon spathula. Science 194:842-844.
28. Duda TF, Palumbi SR. 1999. Molecular genetics of ecological diversification: duplication and rapid evolution of toxin genes of the venomous gastropod Conus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 96:6820-6823.
29. Ewing B, Hillier L, Wendl MC, Green P. 1998. Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. I. Accuracy assessment. Genome Res. 8: 175-185.
30. Feiner N, Ericsson R, Meyer A, Kuraku S. 2011. Revisiting the origin of the vertebrate Hox14 by including its relict sarcopterygian members. J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol. 316:515-525.
31. Fontana F. 1994. Chromosomal nucleolar organizer regions in four sturgeon species as markers of karyotype evolution in Acipenseriformes (Pisces). Genome Res. 37:888-892.
32. Frazer KA, et al. 2004. VISTA: computational tools for comparative genomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 32:W273-W279.
33. Fudenberg G, Getz G, Meyerson M, Mirny LA. 2011. High order chromatin architecture shapes the landscape of chromosomal alterations in cancer. Nat Biotechnol. 29:1109-1113.
34. Gardiner BG. 1993. Osteichthyes: basal actinopterygians. In: Benton M, editor. The fossil record 2. London: Chapman & Hall, p. 611-619.
35. Gellon G, McGinnis W. 1998. Shaping animal body plans in development and evolution by modulation of Hox expression patterns. BioeEssays 20:116-125.
36. Goldman N, Yang Z. 1994. A codon-based model of nucleotide substitution for protein-coding DNA sequences. Mol Biol Evol. 11: 725-736.
37. Gordon D, Abajian C, Green P. 1998. Consed: a graphical tool for sequence finishing. Genome Res. 8:195-202.
38. HawkinsMB, et al. 2000. Identification of a third distinct estrogen receptor and reclassification of estrogen receptors in teleosts. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000:10 751-710 756.
39. Hedges SB, Kumar S. 2003. Genomic clocks and evolutionary timescales. Trends Genet. 19:200-206.
40. Heist EJ,Nicholson EH, Sipiorski JT,KeeneyDB. 2002. Microsatellite markers for the paddlefish (Polyodon spathula). Conserv Genet. 3:205-207.
41. Hoegg S, Brinkmann H, Taylor JS, Meyer A. 2004. Phylogenetic timing of the fish-specific genome duplication correlates with the diversification of teleost fish. J Mol Evol. 59:190-203.
42. Holland PW, Garcia-Fernandez J, Williams NA, Sidow A. 1994. Gene duplications and the origins of vertebrate development. Development Suppl: 125-133.
43. Holland PWH, Garcia-Fernandez J. 1996. Hoxgenes and chordate evolution. Dev Biol. 173:382-395.
44. Huelsenbeck JP, Fredrik Ronquist. 2001. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17:754-755.
45. Inoue JG, Miya M, Tsukamoto K, Nishida M. 2002. Basal actinopterygian relationships: a mitogenomic perspective on the phylogeny of the "ancient fish." Integr Comp Biol. 42:1249-1249.
46. Inoue JG, Miya M, Venkatesh B, Nishida M. 2005. The mitochondrial genome of Indonesian coelacanth Latimeria menadoensis (Sarcopterygii: Coelacanthiformes) and divergence time estimation between the two coelacanths. Gene 349:227-235.
47. Jaillon O, et al. 2004. Genome duplication in the teleost fish Tetraodon nigroviridis reveals the early vertebrate proto-karyotype. Nature 431: 946-957.
48. Kikugawa K, et al. 2004. Basal jawed vertebrate phylogeny inferred from multiple nuclear DNA-coded genes. BMC Biol. 2:3.
49. Kim DS, et al. 2005. Karyotype of North American shortnose sturgeon Acipenser brevirostrum with the highest chromosome number in the Acipenseriformes. Ichthyol Res. 52:94-97.
50. KosakovskyPond SL, et al.2011.Arandomeffectsbranch-sitemodelfor detecting episodic diversifying selection. Mol Biol Evol. 28:3033-3043.
51. Krieger J, et al. 2008. The molecular phylogeny of the order Acipenseriformes revisited. J Appl Ichthyol. 24:36-45.
52. Kumar S, Hedges SB. 1998. Amolecular timescale for vertebrate evolution. Nature 392:917-920.
53. Kuraku S, et al. 2008. Noncanonical role of Hox14 revealed by its expression patterns in lamprey and shark. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 105: 6679-6683.
54. Leggatt RA, Iwama GK. 2003. Occurrence of polyploidy in the fishes. Rev Fish Biol Fisheries. 13:237-246.
55. Lemons D, McGinnis W. 2006. Genomic evolution of Hox gene clusters. Science 313:1918-1922.
56. Liang D, et al. 2011. A general scenario of Hox gene inventory variation among major sarcopterygian lineages. BMC Evol Biol. 11:25.
57. Ludwig A, et al. 2001. Genome duplication events and functional reduction of ploidy levels in sturgeon (Acipenser, Huso and Scaphirhynchus). Genetics 158:1203-1215.
58. Lynch M, Force A. 2000. The origin of interspecific genomic incompatibility via gene duplication. Am Nat. 156:590-605.
59. Lynch M, Katju V. 2004. The altered evolutionary trajectories of gene duplicates. Trends Genet. 20:544-549.
60. Lynch VJ, et al. 2008. Adaptive changes in the transcription factor HoxA-11 are essential for the evolution of pregnancy in mammals. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 105:14928-14933.
61. Mabee PM. 2000. Developmental data and phylogenetic systematics: evolution of the vertebrate limb. Am Zool. 40:789-800.
62. Malaga-Trillo E, Meyer A. 2001. Genome duplication and accelerated evolution of Hox genes and cluster architecture in teleost fishes. Am Zool. 41:676-686.
63. Mallo M, Wellik DM, Deschamps J. 2010. Hox genes and regional patterning of the vertebrate body plan. Dev Biol. 344:7-15.
64. Mayor C, et al. 2000. VISTA: visualizing global DNA sequence alignments of arbitrary length. Bioinformatics 16:1046-1047.
65. Metscher BD, Ahlberg PE. 1999. Zebrafish in context: uses of a laboratory model in comparative studies. Dev Biol. 210:1-14.
66. Metscher BD, et al. 2005. Expression of Hoxa-11 and Hoxa-13 in the pectoral fin of a basal ray finned fish, Polyodon spathula: implications for the origin of tetrapod limbs. Evol Dev. 7:186-195.
67. Meyer A, Schartl M. 1999. Gene and genome duplications in vertebrates: the one-to-four (-to-eight in fish) rule and the evolution of novel gene functions. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 11:699-704.
68. Miya M, et al. 2003. Major patterns of higher teleostean phylogenies: a new perspective based on 100 complete mitochondrial DNA sequences. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 26:121-138.
69. Morescalchi M, et al. 2008. Karyotypic characterization and genomic organization of the 5S rDNA in Polypterus senegalus (Osteichthyes, Polypteridae). Genetica 132:179-186.
70. Naruse K, et al. 2000. A detailed linkage map of Medaka, Oryzias latipes: comparative genomics and genome evolution. Genetics 154: 1773-1784.
71. Nylander JAA. 2008. MrModeltest2.3. Distributed by author. Uppsala, Sweden: Department of Systematic Zoology, Uppsala University.
72. Ohno S. 1970. Evolution by gene duplication. New York: Springer-Verlag.
73. Oulion S, et al. 2011. Evolution of repeated structures along the body axis of jawed vertebrates, insights from the Scyliorhinus canicula Hox code. Evol Dev. 13:247-259.
74. Peng Z, et al. 2007. Age and biogeography of major clades in sturgeons and paddlefishes (Pisces: Acipenseriformes). Mol Phylogenet Evol. 42: 854-862.
75. Pond SL, Frost SD, Muse SV. 2005. HyPhy: hypothesis testing using phylogenies. Bioinformatics 21:676-679.
76. Postlethwait J, et al. 2004. Subfunction partitioning, the teleost radiation and the annotation of the human genome. Trends Genet. 20: 481-490.
77. Powers TP, Amemiya CT. 2004. Evidence for a Hox14 paralog group in vertebrates. Curr Biol. 14:R183-R184.
78. Prohaska SJ, Stadler PF. 2004. The duplication of the Hox gene clusters in teleost fishes. Theory Biosci. 123:89-110.
79. Rambaut A. 2002. SE-AL v. 2.0a11: sequence alignment program, Available from: http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/seal/.
80. Ravi V, et al. 2009. Elephant shark (Callorhinchus milii) provides insights into the evolution of Hox gene clusters in gnathostomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 106:16327-16332.
81. Roberts DJ, et al. 1995. Sonic hedgehog is an endodermal signal inducing Bmp-4 and Hox genes during induction and regionalization of the chick hindgut. Development 121:3163-3174.
82. Roth C, et al. 2007. Evolution after gene duplication: models,mechanisms, sequences, systems, and organisms. J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol. 308B: 58-73.
83. Ruddle FH, et al. 1994. Evolution of Hox genes. Annu Rev Genet. 28: 423-442.
84. Salaneck E, Larsson T, Larson E, Larhammar D. 2008. Birth and death of neuropeptide Y receptor genes in relation to the teleost fish tetraploidization. Gene 409:61-71.
85. Sanderson MJ. 2002. Estimating absolute rates ofmolecular evolution and divergence times: a penalized likelihood approach. Mol Biol Evol. 19: 101-109.
86. Sanderson MJ. 2003. r8s: inferring absolute rates of molecular evolution and divergence times in the absence of a molecular clock. Bioinformatics 19:301-302.
87. Scannell DR, Butler G, Wolfe KH. 2007. Yeast genome evolution-the origin of the species. Yeast 24:929-942.
88. Scannell DR, et al. 2006. Multiple rounds of speciation associated with reciprocal gene loss in polyploid yeasts. Nature 440:341-345.
89. Schweitzer J, et al. 2006. Evolution of myelin proteolipid proteins: gene duplication in teleosts and expression pattern divergence. Mol Cell Neurosci. 31:161-177.
90. Semon M, Wolfe KH. 2007a. Consequences of genome duplication. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 17:505-512.
91. Semon M, Wolfe KH. 2007b. Reciprocal gene loss between Tetraodon and zebrafish after whole genome duplication in their ancestor. Trends Genet. 23:108-112.
92. Shubin N, Tabin C, Carroll S. 1997. Fossils, genes and the evolution of animal limbs. Nature 388:639-648.
93. Sifuentes-Romero I, Merchant-Larios H, Garcia-Gasca A. 2010. Hox gene expression in the embryonic genital system of the sea turtle Lepidochelys olivacea (Eschscholt, 1829), a species with temperature-dependent sex determination. Gene Expr Patterns. 10: 290-298.
94. Swofford DL. 2002. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (* and other methods). Version 4. Sunderland (MA): Sinauer Associates.
95. Taylor JS, et al. 2003. Genome duplication, a trait shared by 22,000 species of ray-finned fish. Genome Res. 13:382-390.
96. van Eenennaam AL, Murray JD, Medrano JF. 1998. Synaptonemal complex analysis in spermatocytes of white sturgeon Acipenser transmontanus Richardson (Pisces, Acipenseridae), a fish with a very high chromosome number. Genome 41:51-61.
97. Vandepoele K, et al. 2004. Major events in the genome evolution of vertebrates: paranome age and size differ considerably between ray-finned fishes and land vertebrates. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 101: 1638-1643.
98. Wagner GP, Amemiya C, Ruddle F. 2003. Hox cluster duplications and the opportunity for evolutionary novelties. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 100: 14603-14606.
99. Wagner GP, et al. 2005. Molecular Evolution of duplicated ray finned fish HoxA clusters: increased synonymous substitution rate and asymmetrical co-divergence of coding and non-coding sequences. J Mol Evol. 60:665-676.
100. Wang Z, et al. 2009. Adaptive evolution of 5'HoxD genes in the origin and diversification of the cetacean flipper. Mol Biol Evol. 26: 613-622.
101. Warot X, et al. 1997. Gene dosage-dependent effects of the Hoxa-13 and Hoxd-13 mutations on morphogenesis of the terminal parts of the digestive and urogenital tracts. Development 124:4781-4791.
102. Werth CR, Windham MD. 1991. A model for divergent, allopatric speciation of polyploid pteridophytes resulting from silencing of duplicategene expression. Am Nat. 137:515-526.
103. Wolfe K. 2000. Robustness-it's not where you think it is. Nat Genet. 25: 3-4.
104. Zhang JZ. 2003. Evolution by gene duplication: an update. Trends Ecol Evol. 18:292-298.
105. Zhang JZ, Zhang YP, Rosenberg HF. 2002. Adaptive evolution of a duplicated pancreatic ribonuclease gene in a leaf-eating monkey. Nat Genet. 30:411-415.
106. Zhou RJ, Cheng HH, Tiersch TR. 2001. Differential genome duplication and fish diversity. Rev Fish Biol Fisheries. 11:331-337.