Developmental data and phylogenetic systematics: Evolution of the vertebrate limb

American Zoologist

Volumn 40, Issue 5, 2000, Pages 789-800

  Mabee, Paula M ^a  

^a University of South Dakota   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33746018718     PISSN: 00031569     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/icb/40.5.789     Document Type: Article

References (83)

1. Ahlberg, P. E. 1992. Coelacanth fins and evolution. Nature 358:459.
2. Ahlberg, P. E. and A. R. Milner. 1994. The origin and early diversification of tetrapods. Nature 368:507-514.
3. Alberch, P. 1985. Problems with the interpretation of developmental sequences. Syst. Zool. 34:46-58.
4. Arthur, W. 1997. The origin of animal \body plans. Cambridge University Press, Melbourne, Australia.
5. Arthur, W., T. Jowett, and A. Panchen. 1999. Segments, limbs, homology, and co-option. Evolution and Development 1:74-76.
6. Bolker, J. A. 1995. Model systems in developmental biology. BioEssays 17:451-455.
7. Brooks, D. R. and D. A. McLennan. 1991. Pliylogeny, Ecology, and Behavior. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
8. Carroll, R..-L. 1997. Development and evolution. In Patterns and processes of vertebrate evolution, pp. 212-265. Cambridge University Press, New York.
9. Coates, M. I. 1994. The origin of vertebrate limbs. Development Supplement: 169-180.
10. Coates, M. I. and J. A. Clack. 1990. Polydactyly in the earliest known tetrapod limbs. Nature 347:6669.
11. Coates, M. I. and M. J. Cohn. 1998. Fins, limbs, and tails: Outgrowths and axial patterning in vertebrate evolution. BioEssays 20:371-381.
12. Compagno, L. J. 1973. Interrelationships of living elasmobranchs. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 53:15-61.
13. Cunningham, C. W. 1999. Some limitations of ancestral character-state reconstruction when testing evolutionary hypotheses. Syst. Biol. 48:665-674.
14. Cunningham, C. W., K. E. Omland, and T. H. Oakley. 1998. Reconstructing ancestral character states: A critical appraisal. TREE 13:361-366.
15. de Carvalho, M. R. 1996. Higher-level elasmobranch phytogeny, basal squaleans, and paraphyly. In M. L. J. Stiassny, L. R. Parenti, and G. D. Johnson (eds.), Interrelationships of fishes, pp. 35-62. Academic Press, San Diego.
16. De Queiroz, K. 1985. The ontogenetic method for determining character polarity and its relevance to phylogenetic systematics. Syst. Zool. 34:280-299.
17. Donoghue, M. L., R. H. Ree, and D. A. Baum. 1998. Phylogeny and the evolution of flower symmetry in the Asteridae. Trends Plant Sei. 3:311-317.
18. Farris, J. S. 1970. Methods for computing Wagner Trees. Syst. Zool. 19:83-92.
19. Farris, J. S. 1983. The logical basis of phylogenetic analysis. In N. I. Platnick and V. A. Funk (eds.), Advances in cladistics, Vol. 2, pp. 7-36. Columbia University Press, New York.
20. Fitch, W. M. 1971. Toward defining the course of evolution: Minimum change for a specific tree topology. Syst. Zool. 20:406-416.
21. Forey, P. L. and P. Janvier. 1993. Agnathans and the origin of jawed vertebrates. Nature 361:129-134.
22. Frumhoff, P. C. and H. K. Reeve. 1994. Using phytogenies to test hypotheses of adaptation: A critique of some current proposals. Evolution 48:172-180.
23. Gardiner, B. G. 1984. The relationships of the palaeoniscid fishes, a review based on new specimens of Mimia and Moythomasia from the Upper Devonian of Western Australia. Bull. Br. Mus. Nat. Hist. Geol. 37'. 173-428.
24. Gerard, M., D. Duboule, and J. C. Zakany. 1993. Cooperation of regulatory elements involved in the activation of the Hoxd-11 gene. Compt. R. Acad. Sei. Ill 316:985-994.
25. Gilbert, S. F. 1997. http://zygote.swarthmore.edu/ evo5.html.
26. Goodrich, E. S. 1930. Studies on the structure and development of vertebrates. Macmillan and Company, London.
27. Grandel, H. and S. Schulte-Merker. 1998. The development of the paired fins in the zebrafish (Danio rerio). Mechanisms of Development 79:99-120.
28. Hadfield, K. A., B. J. Swalla, and W. R. Jeffery. 1995. Multiple origins of anural development in ascidians inferred from rDNA sequences. J. Mol. Evol. 40:413-427.
29. Harvey, P. H. and M. D. Pagel. 1991. The comparative method in evolutionary biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
30. Hauser, D. and W. Presch. 1991. The effects of ordered characters on phylogenetic reconstruction. Cladistics 7:243-265.
31. Hennig, W. 1966. Phylogeiietic systematic!. University of Illinois Press, Urbana.
32. Hillis, D. M., C. Moritz, and B. K. Mable. 1996. Molecular systematics. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
33. Holland, P. W. H. 1996. Molecular biology of lancelets: Insights into development and evolution. Isr. J. Zool. 42:5247-5272.
34. Holland, P. W. H. and J. Garcia-Fernandez. 1996. Hox genes and chordate evolution. Dev. Biol. 173: 382-395.
35. Huey, R. B. and A. F. Bennett. 1986. A comparative approach to field and laboratory studies in evolutionary biology. In M. E. Feder and G. V. Lauder (eds.), Predator-prey relationships: Perspectives and approaches from the study of lower vertebrates, pp. 82-98. University Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois.
36. Hull, D. L. 1988. Science as a process. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
37. Janvier, P. 1981. The phytogeny of the Craniata, with particular reference to the significance of fossil 'Agnathans.' J. Vertebr. Paleontol. 1:121-159.
38. Janvier, P. 1999. Catching the first fish. Nature 402: 21-22.
39. Jarvik, E. 1980. Basic structure and evolution of vertebrates. Academic Press, London.
40. Jessen, H. L. 1972. Schultergurtel und Pectoralflosse bei Actinopterygiem. Fossils Strata 1:1-101.
41. Johnson, G. D. and C. Patterson. 1996. Relationships of lower euteleostean fishes. In M. L. J. Stiassny, L. R. Parenti, and G. D. Johnson (eds.). Interrelationships of fishes, pp. 251-332. Academic Press, San Diego.
42. Kellogg, E. A. and H. B. Shaffer. 1993. Model organisms in evolutionary studies. Syst. Biol. 42:409414.
43. Knoll, A. H. and S. B. Carroll. 1999. Early animal evolution: Emerging views from comparative biology and geology. Science 284:2129-2137.
44. Lauder, G. V. and K. F. Liem. 1983. The evolution and interrelationships of the actinopterygian fishes. Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. 150:95-197.
45. Lundberg, J. G. 1973. More on primitiveness, higher level phylogenies and ontogenetic transformations. Syst. Zool. 22:327-329.
46. Mabee, P. M. 1989. An empirical rejection bf the ontogenetic polarity criterion. Cladistics 5f:409-416.
47. Mabee, P. M. 1993. Phylogenetic interpretation of ontogenetic change: Sorting out the actual and artefactual in an empirical case study of centrarchid fishes. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 107:175-291.
48. Mabee, P. M. 2000. The usefulness of ontogeny in interpreting morphological characters. In 3. Wiens (ed.), Phylogenetic analysis of morphological data, pp. 84-114. Smithsonian Press, Washington.
49. Maddison, D. R. 1994. Phylogenetic methods for inferring the evolutionary history and processes of change in discretely valued characters. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 39:267-292.
50. Maddison, W. P. 1990. A method for testing the correlated evolution of two binary characters: Are gains or losses concentrated on certain branches of a phylogenetic tree? Evolution 44:539-557.
51. Maddison, W. P. and D. R. Maddison. 1992. MacClade: Analysis of phylogeny and character evolution, version 3.0. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
52. Maisey, J. G. 1984. Chondrichthyan phylogeny: A look at the evidence. J. Vertebr. Paleontol. 4:359371.
53. Maisey, J. G. 1986. Heads and tails: A chordate phylogeny. Cladistics 2:201-256.
54. Nelson, C. E. and C. Tabin. 1995. Footnote on limb evolution. Nature 375:630-631.
55. Nelson, C. E., B. A. Morgan, A. C. Burke, E. Laufer, E. DiMambro, L. C. Murtaugh, E. Gonzales, L. Tessarollo, L. Parada, and C. Tabin. 1996. Analysis of Hox gene expression in the chick limb bud. Development 122:1449-1466.
56. Nelson, G. J. 1973. The higher-level phylogeny of vertebrates. Syst. Zool. 22:87-91.
57. Nelson, G. J. 1978. Ontogeny, phylogeny, paleontology, and the biogenetic law. Syst. Zool. 27:324345.
58. Omland, K. E. 1999. Assumptions and challenges of ancestral state reconstructions. Syst. Biol. 48:604611.
59. Patterson, C. 1982. Morphological characters and homology. /;i K. A. Joysey and A. E. Friday (eds.), Problems of phylogenetic reconstruction, Vol. 21, pp. 21-74. Academic Press, London.
60. Raff, R. A. 1996. The shape of life. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
61. Richardson, M. K. 1999. Vertebrate evolution: The developmental origins of adult variation. BioEssays 21:604-613.
62. Richardson, M. K., J. Hanken, M. L. Gooneratne, C. Pieau, A. Raynaud, and L. Sei wood. 1997. There is no highly conserved embryonic stage in the vertebrates: Implications for current theories of evo-lution and development. Anat. Embryol. 196:91-106.
63. Rosen, D. E., P. L. Forey, B. G. Gardiner, and C. Patterson. 1981. Lungfishes, tetrapods, paleontology, and plesiomorphy. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 167: 159-276.
64. Roth, V. L. 1984. On homology. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 22:13-29.
65. Roth, V. L. 1988. The biological basis of homology. //: C. J. Humphries (ed.), Ontogeny and systematics, pp. 1-26. Columbia University Press, New York.
66. Ryan, M. J. 1996. Phylogenetics in behavior: Some cautions and expectations. In E. P. Martins (ed.), Phytogenies and the comparative method in animal behavior, pp. 1-21. Oxford University Press, New York.
67. Sanderson, M. J. 1991. In search of homoplastic tendencies: Statistical inference of topological patterns in homoplasy. Evolution 45:351-358.
68. Schultz, T. R., R. B. Crocroft, and G. A. Churchill. 1996. The reconstruction of ancestral character . -states. Evolution 50:504-511.
69. Shirai, S. 1996. Phylogenetic interrelationships ofneoselachians (Chondrichthyes: Euselachii). In M. L. J. Stiassny, L. R. Parenti and G. D. Johnson (eds.), Interrelationships ofshes, pp. 9-34. Academic Press, San Diego.
70. Shubin, N. H. and P. Alberch. 1986. A morphogenetic approach to the origin and basic organization of the tetrapod limb. Evol. Biol. 20:319-387.
71. Shubin, N., C. J. Tabin, and S. B. Carroll. 1997. Fossils, genes and the evolution of animal limbs. Nature 388:638-648.
72. Sordino, P., F. van der Hoeven, and D. Duboule. 1995. Hox gene expression in teleost fins and the origin of vertebrate digits. Nature 375:678-681.
73. Sordino, P. and D. Duboule. 1996. A molecular approach to the evolution of vertebrate paired appendages. TREE 11:114-119.
74. Swalla, B. J. and A. Collazo. 2000. Systematics and the evolution of developmental patterns. Syst. Biol. 49:1-2.
75. Swofford, D. L. and W. P. Maddison. 1992. Parsimony, character-state reconstructions, and evolutionary inferences. In R. L. Mayden (ed.), Systematics, historical ecology, and North American freshwater fishes, pp. 186-223. Stanford University Press, Stanford.
76. Tabin, C. J., S. B. Carroll, and G. Panganiban. 1999. Out on a limb: Parallels in vertebrate and invertebrate limb patterning and the origin of appendages. Amer. Zool. 39:650-663.
77. van der Hoeven, F., J. Zakany, and D. Duboule. 1996. Gene transpositions in the HoxD complex reveal a hierarchy of regulatory controls. Cell 85:10251035.
78. Wada, H., H. Saiga, N. Satoh, and P. W. H. Holland. 1998. Tripartite organization of the ancestral chordate brain and the antiquity of placodes: Insights from ascidian Pax-2/5/8, Hox and Otx genes. Development 125:1113-1122.
79. Wagner, G. P. 1989a. The biological homology concept. Annu. Rev. EcoL Syst. 20:51-69.
80. Wagner, G. P. \989b. The origin of morphological characters and the biological basis of homology. Evolution 43:1157-1171.
81. Wake, D. B., P. M. Mabee, J. Hanken, and G. Wagner. 1991. Development and evolution-the emergence of a new field. In E. C. Dudley (ed.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Congress of Systematic and Evolutionary Biology, ICSEB IV, 1, pp. 582-588. Dioscorides, Portland.
82. Wiley, E. O. 1981. Phylogenetics: The theory and practice of phylogenetic systematics. John Wiley, New York
83. Wray, G. A. 1996. Parallel evolution of nonfeeding larvae in echinoids. Syst. Biol. 45:308-322.