The effects of overall robot shape on the emotions invoked in users and the perceived personalities of robot

Applied Ergonomics

Volumn 44, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 459-471

  Hwang, Jihong ^a   Park, Taezoon ^b   Hwang, Wonil ^c  

^a Seoul National University of Science and Technology   (South Korea)

^b NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

^c Soongsil University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Invoked emotion; Perceived personality; Shape of robot

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; GEOMETRY; ROBOTS;

AFFECTIVE DESIGN; AFFECTIVE INTERACTION; BIG FIVE; DIFFERENT SHAPES; INVOKED EMOTION; PERCEIVED PERSONALITY; VISUAL IMAGE;

MACHINE DESIGN;

ADULT; ARTICLE; EMOTION; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MALE; MAN MACHINE INTERACTION; PERSONALITY; PROCESS TECHNOLOGY; ROBOT SHAPE; ROBOTICS;

EID: 84872366810     PISSN: 00036870     EISSN: 18729126     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2012.10.010     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Arnold M.B. Emotion and Personality 1960, Columbia University Press, New York.
2. Bartneck, C., 2002. eMuu - an embodied emotional character for the ambient intelligent home. Ph.D. thesis, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, Eindhoven, Duitsland.
3. Bartneck, C., Forlizzi, J., 2004. A design-centred framework for social human-robot interaction. In: The 13th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN'04), pp. 591-594.
4. Bickmore, T., Picard, R., 2004. Towards caring machines. In: Extended Abstracts of the 2004 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2004), Vienna, Austria, pp. 1489-1492.
5. Breazeal C., Takanishi A., Kobayashi T. Social robots that interact with people. Springer Handbook of Robotics 2008, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1349-1369.
6. Cronbach L.J. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 1951, 16:297-334.
7. Dautenhahn K., Ogden B., Quick T. From embodied to socially embedded agents - implications for interaction-aware robots. Cogn. Syst. Res. 2002, 3:397-428.
8. DiSalvo C.F., Gemperle F., Forlizzi J., Kiesler S. All robots are not created equal: the design and perception of humanoid robot heads. Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems 2002, 321-326. ACM, New York, USA.
9. Ekman P.P., Friesen V.W., Ellsworth P. What emotion categories or dimensions can observers judge from facial behavior?. Emotion in the Human Face 1982, 39-55. Cambridge University Press, New York.
10. Fong T., Nourbakhsh I., Dautenhahn K. A survey of socially interactive robots. Robot. Auton. Syst. 2003, 42:143-166.
11. Frijda N.H. The Emotions 1986, Cambridge University Press, New York.
12. Goetz, J., Kiesler, S., Powers, A., 2003. Matching robot appearance and behavior to tasks to improve human-robot cooperation. In: The 12th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN'03), pp. 55-60.
13. Goldberg L.R. An alternative " description of personality" : the big-five factor structure. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1990, 59:1216-1229.
14. Goldberg L.R. The development of markers for the big-five factor structure. Psychol. Assess. 1992, 4:26-42.
15. Gray J.A. The Neuropsychology of Anxiety 1982, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
16. Hegel, F., Krach, S., Kircher, T., Wrede, B., Sagerer, G., 2008. Understanding social robots: a user study on anthropomorphism. In: The 17th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN'08), pp. 574-579.
17. Hegel, F., Lohse, M., Wrede, B., 2009. Effects of visual appearance on the attribution of applications in social robotics. In: The 18th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN'09), pp. 64-71.
18. Hiroi Y., Ito A. Influence of the size factor of a mobile robot moving toward a human on subjective acceptable distance. Mobile Robots - Current Trend 2011, 177-190. Intech, Rijeka, Croatia. Z. Gacovski (Ed.).
19. Izard C.E. The Face of Emotion 1971, Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York.
20. Jenkins D.P., Stanton N.A., Salmon P.M., Walker G.H. A formative approach to developing synthetic environment fidelity requirements for decision-making training. Appl. Ergon. 2011, 42:757-769.
21. Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., Ishida, T., 2001. Psychological analysis on human-robot interaction. In: Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 4166-4173.
22. Kirby R., Forlizzi J., Simmons R. Affective social robots. Robot. Auton. Syst. 2010, 58:322-332.
23. Ku J., Jang H.J., Kim K.U., Kim J.H., Park S.H., Lee J.H., Kim J.J., Kim I.Y., Kim S.I. Experimental result of affective valence and arousal to avatar's facial expressions. Cyberpsychol. Behav. 2005, 8:493-503.
24. Kulic D., Croft E.A. Affective state estimation for human-robot interaction. IEEE Trans. Robot. 2007, 23:991-1000.
25. Lee K.M., Nass C. The multiple source effect and synthesized speech: doubly-disembodied language as a conceptual framework. Hum. Commun. Res. 2004, 30:182-207.
26. Lee K.M., Jung Y., Kim J., Kim S.R. Are physically embodied social agents better than disembodied social agents?: the effects of physical embodiment, tactile interaction and people's loneliness in human-robot interaction. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 2006, 64:962-973.
27. Looije R., Neerincx M.A., Cnossen F. Persuasive robotic assistant for health self-management of older adults: design and evaluation of social behaviors. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 2010, 68:386-397.
28. McCrae R.R., Costa P.T. Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1987, 52:81-90.
29. McDougall W. Outline of Abnormal Psychology 1926, Charles Scribner & Sons, New York.
30. Mitsunaga, N., Miyashita, Z., Shinozawa, K., Miyashita, T., Ishiguro, H., Hagita, N., 2008. What makes people accept a robot in a social environment - discussion from six-week study in an office. In: Proceedings of the 2008 International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 3336-3343.
31. Mori M. The uncanny valley. Energy 1970, 7:33-35.
32. Nass, C., Steuer, J., Tauber, E.R., 1994. Computers are social actors. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: Celebrating Interdependence, pp. 72-78.
33. Nass C., Moon Y., Fogg B.J., Reeves B., Dryer D.C. Can computer personalities be human personalities?. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 1995, 43:223-239.
34. Nehaniv, C.L., Dautenhahn, K., Kubacki, J., Haegele, M., Parlitz, C., Alami, R., 2005. A methodological approach relating the classification of gesture to identification of human intent in the context of human-robot interaction. In: The 14th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN'05), pp. 371-377.
35. Norman W.T., Goldberg L.R. Raters, ratees, and randomness in personality structure. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1966, 4:681-691.
36. Oatley K., Johnson-Laird P.N. Towards a cognitive theory of the emotions. Cogn. Emot. 1987, 1:29-50.
37. Panksepp J. Toward a general psychobiological theory of emotions. Behav. Brain Sci. 1982, 5:407-467.
38. Plutchik R. Emotions: a Psychoevolutionary Synthesis 1980, Harper and Row, New York.
39. Powers, A., Kiesler, S., Fussell, S., Torrey, C., 2007. Comparing a computer agent with a humanoid robot. In: Proceedings of the 2nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interactions (HRI'07), pp. 145-152.
40. Sakagami, Y., Watanabe, R., Aoyama, C., Matsunaga, S., Higaki, N., Fujimura, K., 2002. The intelligent ASIMO: system overview and integration. In: Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS'02), pp. 2478-2483.
41. Scopelliti M., Giuliani M.V., Fornara F. Robots in a domestic setting: a psychological approach. Univ. Access Inform. Soc. 2005, 4:146-155.
42. Severinson-Eklundh K., Green A., Hüttenrauch H. Social and collaborative aspects of interaction with a service robot. Robot. Auton. Syst. 2003, 42:223-234.
43. Siegel, M., Breazeal, C., Norton, M.I., 2009. Persuasive robotics: the influence of robot gender on human behavior. In: Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS'09), pp. 2563-2568.
44. Syrdal, D.S., Dautenhahn, K., Woods, S.N., Walters, M.L., Koay, K.L., 2007. Looking good? Appearance preferences and robot personality inferences at zero acquaintance. In: Technical Report of the AAAI - Spring Symposium 2007, Multidisciplinary Collaboration for Socially Assistive Robotics, pp. 86-92.
45. Takeuchi, J., Kushida, K., Nishimura, Y., Dohi, H., Ishizuka, M., Nakano, M., Tsujino, H., 2006. Comparison of a humanoid robot and an on-screen agent as presenters to audiences. In: Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS'06), pp. 3964-3969.
46. Tomkins S.S. Affect theory. Approaches to Emotion 1984, 193-195. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey. K.R. Sherer, P. Ekman (Eds.).
47. Walters M.L., Syrdal D.S., Dautenhahn K., Te Boekhorst R., Koay K.L. Avoiding the uncanny valley: robot appearance, personality and consistency of behavior in an attention-seeking home scenario for a robot companion. Auton. Robots 2008, 24:159-178.
48. Watson J.B. Behaviorism 1930, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
49. Weiner B.M., Graham S.S. An attributional approach to emotional development. Emotions, Cognition, and Behavior 1984, 167-191. Cambridge University Press, New York. C.E. Izard, J. Kagan, R.B. Zajonc (Eds.).
50. Weinschenk S., Barker D.T. Designing Effective Speech Interfaces 2000, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
51. Weiss A., King J.E., Hopkins W.D. A cross-setting study of chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) personality structure and development: zoological parks and Yerkes National Primate research center. Am. J. Primatol. 2007, 69:1264-1277.
52. Woods S. Exploring the design space of robots: children's perspectives. Interact. Comput. 2006, 18:1390-1418.