Persuasive robotics: The influence of robot gender on human behavior

2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, IROS 2009

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 2563-2568

  Siegel, Mikey ^a   Breazeal, Cynthia ^a   Norton, Michael I ^b  

^a MIT MEDIA LAB   (United States)

^b HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APPEARANCE AND BEHAVIOR; HUMAN BEHAVIORS; HUMAN INTERACTIONS; HUMAN ROBOT INTERACTIONS; HUMANOID ROBOT; SOCIAL INTERACTIONS;

ANTHROPOMORPHIC ROBOTS; BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; INTELLIGENT ROBOTS; MACHINE DESIGN; MAN MACHINE SYSTEMS; ROBOTICS;

HUMAN ROBOT INTERACTION;

EID: 76249134196     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/IROS.2009.5354116     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. C. L. Breazeal, Designing sociable robots. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2002.
2. R. B. Cialdini, Influence: the psychology of persuasion, rev. ed ed. New York: Morrow, 1993.
3. J. S. Seiter and R. H. Gass, Perspectives on Persuasion, Social Influence, and Compliance Gaining. Allyn & Bacon, Sep. 2003.
4. C. D. Kidd and C. Breazeal, "A robotic weight loss coach," in Twenty-Second Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, 2007.
5. R. H. Gass and J. S. Seiter, Persuasion, social influence, and compliance gaining, 2nd ed. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon, 2003.
6. T. Fong, I. Nourbakhsh, and K. Dautenhahn, "A survey of socially interactive robots," Robotics and Autonomous Systems, vol. 42, no. 3-4, pp. 143-166, Mar. 2003.
7. B. Reeves and C. I. Nass, The media equation: how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI Publications, 1996.
8. K. Shinozawa, F. Naya, J. Yamato, and K. Kogure, "Differences in effect of robot and screen agent recommendations on human decision-making," Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud., vol. 62, no. 2, p. 267279, 2005.
9. C. Kidd, "Sociable robots: The role of presence and task in sociable robots: The role of presence and task in Human-Robot interaction," Ph.D. dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2000.
10. J. Goetz, S. Kiesler, and A. Powers, "Matching robot appearance and behavior to tasks to improve human-robot cooperation," in Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2003. Proceedings. ROMAN 2003. The 12th IEEE International Workshop on, 2003, pp. 55-60.
11. A. Powers, A. Kramer, S. Lim, J. Kuo, S. lai Lee, and S. Kiesler, "Eliciting information from people with a gendered humanoid robot," in Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2005. ROMAN 2005. IEEE International Workshop on, 2005, pp. 158-163.
12. W. A. Bainbridge, J. Hart, E. S. Kim, and B. Scassellati, "The effect of presence on human-robot interaction," Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2008. RO-MAN 2008. The 17th IEEE International Symposium on, pp. 701-706, Aug. 2008.
13. B. Reeves, The benefits of interactive online characters, 2004, published: Stanford University.
14. N. Yee, J. N. Bailenson, and K. Rickertsen, "A meta-analysis of the impact of the inclusion and realism of human-like faces on user experiences in interfaces," in CHI '07: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2007, p. 110.
15. S. Parise, S. Kiesler, L. Sproull, and K. Waters, "Cooperating with life-like interface agents," Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 15, no. 2, p. 123142, Mar. 1999.
16. B. J. Fogg, Persuasive technology: using computers to change what we think and do. Amsterdam: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers., 2003.
17. J. N. Bailenson and N. Yee, "Digital chameleons: Automatic assimilation of nonverbal gestures in immersive virtual environments," Psychological Science, vol. 16, no. 10, p. 814819, Oct. 2005.
18. R. E. Guadagno, J. Blascovich, J. N. Bailenson, and C. McCall, "Virtual humans and persuasion: The effects of agency and behavioral realism," Media Psychology, vol. 10, pp. 1-22, 2007.
19. J. N. Bailenson and N. Yee, "Virtual interpersonal touch and digital chameleons," Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 2007.
20. J. K. Burgoon, J. A. Bonito, B. Bengtsson, C. Cederberg, M. Lunde-berg, and L. Allspach, "Interactivity in human-computer interaction: a study of credibility, understanding, and influence," Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 553-574, Nov. 2000.
21. J. K. Burgoon, J. A. Bonito, A. R. Jr, N. E. Dunbar, K. Kam, and J. Fischer, "Testing the interactivity principle: Effects of mediation, propinquity, and verbal and nonverbal modalities in interpersonal interaction," The Journal of Communication, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 657-677, 2002.
22. R. B. Rubin, P. Palmgreen, and H. E. Sypher, Communication Research Measures: A Sourcebook, ser. Guilford communication series. New York: Guilford Press, 1994.
23. B. J. Fogg and H. Tseng, "The elements of computer credibility," in CHI '99: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. New York, NY, USA: ACM Press, 1999, p. 8087.
24. M. Lombard and T. Ditton, "At the heart of it all: The concept of presence," Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, vol. 3, no. 2, 1997.
25. J. Blascovich, Social influence within immersive virtual environments. Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., 2002, pp. 127-145.
26. D. A. Ward, K. Seccombe, R. Bendel, and L. F. Carter, "Cross-Sex context as a factor in persuasibility sex differences," Social Psychology Quarterly, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 269-276, Sep. 1985.
27. P. Schermerhorn, M. Scheutz, and C. R. Crowell, "Robot social presence and gender: do females view robots differently than males?" in Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE international conference on Human robot interaction. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: ACM, 2008, pp. 263-270.
28. R. E. Guadagno and R. B. Cialdini, "Persuade him by email, but see her in person: Online persuasion revisited," Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 999-1015, Mar. 2007.