Comparing a computer agent with a humanoid robot

HRI 2007 - Proceedings of the 2007 ACM/IEEE Conference on Human-Robot Interaction - Robot as Team Member

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 145-152

  Powers, Aaron ^a   Kiesler, Sara ^a   Fussell, Susan ^a   Torrey, Cristen ^a  

^a Carnegie Mellon University

Author keywords

Embodiment; Human robot interaction; Social robots

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER MONITORS; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; INTELLIGENT AGENTS; REMOTE CONSOLES;

EMBODIMENT; HUMAN-ROBOT INTERACTION; SOCIAL ROBOTS;

INTELLIGENT ROBOTS;

EID: 34548261330     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1228716.1228736     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. Berry, D. C., Butler, L. T., de Rosis, F. Evaluating a realistic agent in an advice-giving task. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 65, 2005, 304-327.
2. Bradner, E., & Mark, G. Social presence with video and application sharing. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Supporting Group Work (GROUP'01). Sept30-Oct3, 2001, Boulder, CO). NY: ACM Press, 2001, 154 - 161.
3. Guerin, B. Mere presence effects in humans. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 1986, 38-77.
4. Hall, M.A., Zheng, B., Dugan, E., Fabian, C., Kidd, K, Mishra, A., and Balkrishnan, R. Measuring patients' trust in their primary care providers. Medical Care Research and Review, 59 (3), Sept. 2002, 293-318.
5. Hinds, P., D. Bailey. Out of sight, out of sync: Understanding conflict in distributed teams: An empirical investigation. Organization Science, 14(6), 2003, 615-532.
6. Huang, W., Olson, J. S., & Olson, G. M. (2002). Camera angle affects dominance in video-mediated communication. CHI 2002 Late Breaking Results (pp. 716-717).
7. Jettmar, E. & Nass, C. Adaptive testing: Effects on user performance.. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Computer Systems CHI'02. (April 20-25,2001, Minneapolis). NY: ACM Press, 2002, 129-134.
8. Judge, T., & Cable, D. M. The effect of physical height on workplace success and income: Preliminary test of a theoretical model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89 (3), 2004, 428-441.
9. Kiesler, S., & Cummings, J. What do we know about proximity in work groups? A legacy of research on physical distance. In P. Hinds & S. Kiesler, Distributed Work, Cambridge: MIT Press, 2002, 57-80.
10. Lenzo, K.A., and Black, A.W., Theta, Cepstral, http ://www.cepstral.com
11. Levav, J., & Fitzsimons, G. J. When questions change behavior: The role of ease of representation. Psychological Science, 17 (3), 2006, 207-213.
12. Powers, A. An Easy To Use Dialogue Tool: AIMLE. Unpublished ms., HCII, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.
13. Powers, A., & Kiesler, S. The advisor robot: Tracing people's mental model from a robot's physical attributes. Conference on Human-Robot Interaction 2006. Salt Lake City, March 1-3, 2006, 218-225.
14. Powers, A., Kramer, A. D. I., Lim, S., Kuo, J., Lee, S-L., Kiesler, S. Eliciting information from people with a gendered humanoid robot. Robot and Human Interactive Communication Proceedings. ROMAN 2005. The 14th IEEE International Workshop (Nashville, TE. Aug 14-15), 2005.
15. Rakison, D. H. & Poulin-Dubois, D. Developmental origin of the animate-inanimate distinction. Psychological Bulletin, 127 (2), 2001, 209-228.
16. Richman, W. L., Kiesler, S., Weisband, S., Drasgow, F. A meta-analytic study of social desirability distorion in computer-administered questionnaires, traditional questionnaires, and interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84 (5), 1999, 754-775.
17. Robinson, J. P., Shaver, P. R., & Wrightsman, L. S. (Eds.), Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Attitudes. NY: Academic Press, 1991.
18. Sheridan, T. B. Defining our terms. Presence, 1, 272-274.
19. Simmons, R., et al., GRACE: An autonomous robot for the AAAI Robot Challenge, AAAIMagazine, 24, 2, 2003, 51-72.
20. Tan, D. S., & Czerwinski, M. Information voyeurism: Social impact of physical large displays on information privacy. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Computer Systems CHI'03. (April 5-10, 2003, Ft. Lauderdale). NY: ACM Press, 2003, 748-749.
21. Torrey, C. Powers, A., Marge, M., Fussell, S., & Kiesler, S. Effects of adaptive robot dialogue on information exchange and social relation. Proceedings of the Conference on HumanRobot Interaction 2006. (Salt Lake City, March 1-3), 2006, 126-133.
22. Welch, R. B. How can we determine if the sense of presence affects task performance? Presence, 8 (5), 1999, 574-577.
23. Yamato, J., Shinozawa, K., Naya, F., Kogure, K. Evaluation of communication with robot and agent: Are robots better social actors than agents? In Proceedings of the 8 th IFIP TC.13 International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (INTERACT '01) (Tokyo, Japan, July 9-13), 2001, 690-691.
24. Witmer, B. G., & Singer, M. J. Measuring presence in virtual environments. (ARI Technical Report 1014). Alexandria, VA: U. S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 1998.
25. Zajonc, R. B. Social facilitation. Science, 149, 1965, 269-274.