Looking good? Appearance preferences and robot personality inferences at zero acquaintance

AAAI Spring Symposium - Technical Report

Volumn SS-07-07, Issue , 2007, Pages 86-92

  Syrdal, Dag Sverre ^a   Dautenhahn, Kerstin ^a   Woods, Sarah N ^a   Walters, Michael L ^a   Koay, Kheng Lee ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HERTFORDSHIRE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Anthropomorphism; Human robot interaction; Personality; Robot appearance; Robot personality; Social robotics; Video trials

Indexed keywords

INDUSTRIAL ROBOTS; INFERENCE ENGINES; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; ROBOT APPLICATIONS;

ANTHROPOMORPHISM; HUMAN ROBOT INTERACTION; PERSONALITY; ROBOT APPEARANCE; ROBOT PERSONALITY; SOCIAL ROBOTICS; VIDEO TRIALS;

ROBOTICS;

EID: 37349045999     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. Albright, L.;Kenny, D. A.; & Malloy, T. E. 1988. Consensus in Personality Judgments at Zero Acquaintance. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology 55(3): 387-395.
2. Asch, S. E. 1946. Forming impressions of personality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 41: 258-290.
3. Asquith, P. J. 1997. Why Anthropomorphism is not metaphor: Crossing Concepts and Cultures in Animal Behaviour Studies. In R. W. Mitchell, N. S. Thompson & H. L. Miles (Eds.), Anthropomorphism, Anecdotes and Animals (pp. 22-34). Albany, New York: State University of New York Press.
4. Blow, M.;Dautenhahn, K.;Appleby, A.;Nehaniv, C. L.; & Lee, D. 2006. The Art of Designing Robot Faces -Dimensions for Human-Robot Interaction. Proceedings of HRI06, Salt Lake City.: 331-332.
5. Borkenau, P.; & Liebler, A. 1992. Trait inferences: Sources of validity at zero acquaintance. Journal-of-Personality-and-Social-Psychology 62(4): 645-657.
6. Breazal, C. L. 2002. Designing Sociable Robots. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
7. Dautenhahn, K. 2004. Robots We Like to Live With? - A Developmental Perspective on a Personalized, Life-Long Robot Companion. Proceedings of the 13th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication(RO-MAN2004): 17-22.
8. Davis, H. 1997. Animal Cognition versus Animal Thinking: The Anthropomorphic. In R. W. Mitchell, N. S. Thompson & H. L. Miles (Eds.), Anthropomorphism, Anecdotes, and Animals. Albany: State University of New York Press.
9. DiSalvo, C.; & Gemperle, F. 2003. From seduction to fulfillment: the use of anthropomorphic form in design. Proceedings of the 2003 international conference on Designing pleasurable products and interfaces, June 23-26, 2003, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
10. DiSalvo, C. F.;Gemperle, C. F.;Forlizzi, J.; & Kiesler, S. 2002. All robots are not created equal: the design and perception of humanoid robot heads. Proceedings of the conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques, June 25-28, 2002, London, England.
11. Duffy, B. R. 2003. Anthropomorphism and the social robot. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 42: 177-190.
12. Gill, A. J.;Oberlander, J.; & Austin, E. 2006. Rating e-mail personality at zero acquaintance. Personality-and-Individual-Differences 40(3): 497-507.
13. Gockley, R.; & Mataric', M. J. 2006. Encouraging Physical Therapy Compliance with a Hands off Mobile Robot. Proc. HRI06, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, 2006: 150-155.
14. Goetz, J.;Kiesler, S.; & Powers, A. 2003. Matching robot appearance and behavior to tasks to improve human-robot cooperation. Proceedings. ROMAN 2003. The 12th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN 2003): 55-60.
15. Goldberg, L. R. 1999. A broad-bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. Personality Psychology in Europe 1: 7-28.
16. Hall, E. T. 1966. The Hidden Dimension. New York: Doubleday.
17. Jordan, P. W. 1998. Human factors for pleasure in product use. Applied Ergonomics 29(1): 25-33.
18. Kiesler, S.; & Goetz, J. 2002. Mental Models and Cooperation with Robotic Assistants. Proceedings of the ACM CHI'02 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: 576-577.
19. Matthews, G.;Deary, I. J.; & Whiteman, M. C. 2003. Personality Traits. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
20. Nass, C.;Moon, Y.;Fogg, B. J.; & Reeves, B. 1995. Can computer personalities be human personalities? International-Journal-of-Human- Computer-Studies 43(2): 223-239.
21. Nass, C. I.;Lombard, M.;Henriksen, L.; & Steuer, J. 1995. Anthropocentrism and computers. Behaviour-and-Information-Technology 14(4): 229-238.
22. Reeves, B.; & Nass, C. 1996. The Media Equation: How people computers, television, and new media like real people and places. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. Robins, B.;Dautenhahn, K.;te Boerkhorst, R.; & Billard, A. 2004. Robots as assistive technology - does appearance matter? Proceedings, 13th IEEE International Workshop On Robot And Human Interactive Communication(RO-MAN 2004): 277-282.
24. Syrdal, D. S.;Dautenhahn, K.;Woods, S.;Walters, M. L.; & Koay, K. L. 2006. 'Doing the right thing wrong' - Personality and tolerance to uncomfortable robot approaches. Proc. 15th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication(RO-MAN 2006): 183-188.
25. Tapus, A.; & Mataric', M. J. 2006. User Personality Matching with Hands-Off Robot for Post-Stroke Rehabilitation Therapy. Proceedings, 10th International Symposium on Experimental Robotics (ISER-06).
26. Tractinsky, N.;Katz, A. S.; & Ika, R. D. 2000. What is beautiful is usable. Interacting With Computers 13 (2): 127-145.
27. Walters, M. L.;Dautenhahn, K.;Boekhorst, R. T.;Koay, K. L.;Kaouri, C.;Woods, S., et al. 2005. The influence of subjects' personality traits on personal spatial zones in a human-robot interaction experiment. Proc. 14th IEEE International Workshop On Robot And Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN 2005): 347-352.
28. Woods, S.;Dautenhahn, K.;Kaouri, C.;te Boekhorst, R.; & Koay, K. L. 2005. Is this robot like me? Links between human and robot personality traits. Proc. IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids2005), December 5-7, 2005 Tsukuba International Congress Center, (EPOCHAL TSUKUBA),Tsukuba, Japan: 375-380.
29. Woods, S.;Dautenhahn, K.; & Schulz, J. 2004. The design space of robots: Investigating children's views. Proceedings, 13th IEEE International Workshop On Robot And Human Interactive Communication(RO-MAN 2004): 47-52.
30. Woods, S.;Walters, M.;Koay, K. L.; & Dautenhahn, K. 2006. Comparing Human Robot Interaction Scenarios Using Live and Video Based Methods: Towards a Novel Methodological Approach. Proc. AMC'06, The 9th International Workshop on Advanced Motion Control, Istanbul March 27-29: 750-755.
31. Woods, S. N.;Walters, M. L.;Koay, K. L.; & Dautenhahn, K. 2006. Methodological Issues in HRI: A Comparison of Live and Video-Based Methods in Robot to Human Approach Direction Trials. Proceedings, 15th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN2006) (51-58): 51-58.
32. Zebrowitz, L. A.;Hall, J. A.;Murphy, N. A.; & Rhodes, G. 2002. Looking smart and looking good: Facial cues to intelligence and their origins. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 28: 238-249.