Effects of visual appearance on the attribution of applications in social robotics

Proceedings - IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 64-71

  Hegel, Frank ^a   Lohse, Manja ^a   Wrede, Britta ^a  

^a BIELEFELD UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GENERAL FUNCTIONS; POTENTIAL APPLICATIONS; SOCIAL ROBOTICS; SOCIAL ROBOTS; VISUAL APPEARANCE;

INTELLIGENT ROBOTS;

VISUALIZATION;

EID: 72849122020     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ROMAN.2009.5326340     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (42)

1. P. Dietz (2003). 'Menschengleiche Maschinen'. Bühler u. Heckel - Verlag für Kunst und Wissenschaft.
2. G. Wood (2002). 'Living Dolls: A Magical History of the Quest for Mechanical Life', Faber & Faber.
3. T. W. Fong, I. Nourbakhsh, and K. Dautenhahn (2002). 'A Survey of Socially Interactive Robots: Concepts, Design, and Applications', Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 42(3 - 4), 142 - 166.
4. B. Duffy (2000). 'The Social Robot'. PhD Thesis, Department of Computer Science, University College Dublin.
5. C. Breazeal (2002). 'Designing Sociable Robots'. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. S. Ljungblad and L. E. Holmquist (2005). 'Designing robot applications for everyday environments', in sOc-EUSAI '05: Proceedings of the 2005 joint conference on Smart objects and ambient intelligence, pp. 65-68, New York, NY, USA. ACM Press.
7. F. Kaplan (2005). 'Everyday robotics: robots as everyday objects', in Proceedings of Soc-Eusai 2005, pp. 59 - 64, Grenoble, France.
8. L. Takayama, W. Ju, and C. Nass (2008).'Beyond dirty, dangerous and dull: what everyday people think robots should do'. Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE international conference on Human robot interaction (HRI), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
9. H. I. Christensen (2003). 'Intelligent home appliances'. In Robotics Research, R. A. Jarvis and A. Zelinsky, Eds., no. 6 in Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics (STAR), pp. 319-330 Springer Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany.
10. M. Lohse, F. Hegel, A. Swadzba, K. Rohlfing, S. Wachsmuth, and B. Wrede (2007). 'What can I do for you? Appearance and Applications of Robots'. Proceedings of AISB'07. Artificial and Ambient Intelligence, Newcastle upon Tyne.
11. F. Hegel, M. Lohse, A. Swadzba, S. Wachsmuth, K. Rohlfing, and B. Wrede (2007). 'Classes of Applications for Social Robots: a User Study'. Proc. Intl. Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), Jeju Island, Korea.
12. M. Lohse, F. Hegel, and B. Wrede (2008). 'Domestic Applications for social robots - a user study on appearance and function', Journal of Physical Agents Vol. 2, No. 2.
13. D. Steffen (1997). 'On a Theory of Product Language, Perspectives on the hermeneutic interpretation of design objects', in: formdiskurs, Journal of Design and Design Theory, No. 3, 2/1997.
14. B. Duffy and G. Joue (2004). 'I, robot being', Intelligent Autonomous Systems Conference (IAS8), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
15. C.F. DiSalvo, F. Gemperle, J. Forlizzi, and S. Kiesler, 'All robots are not created equal: the design and perception of humanoid robot heads', in DIS '02: Proceedings of the conference on Designing interactive systems, pp. 321-326, New York, NY, USA, (2002). ACM Press.
16. N. Epley, A. Waytz, J.T. Cacioppo (2007). 'On Seeing Human: A Three-Factor Theory of Anthropomorphism'. Psychological Review 114: 864-886.
17. F. Hegel, S. Krach, T. Kircher, B. Wrede, and G. Sagerer (2008) 'Theory of Mind (ToM) on Robots: A Neuroimaging Study'. The Third ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
18. R.L. Stevenson (1886). 'The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde and other Tales of Terror'. Penguin Classics, revised 2003.
19. A.H. Eagly, R.D. Ashmore, M.G. Makhijani, and L.C. Longo (1991) 'What is beautiful is good, but.: a meta-analytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype'. Psychological Bulletin 110, pp. 109-128.
20. K. Dion, E. Berscheid, E. Walster (1972). 'What is beautiful is good'. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 24 (3), pp. 285-290.
21. N. Ambady and R. Rosenthal (1993). 'Half a minute: Predicting teacher evaluations from thin slices of nonverbal behavior and physical attractiveness'. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, pp.431-441.
22. K. Dion (1973). 'Young children's stereotyping of facial attractiveness'. Developmental Psychology, 9, pp. 183-188.
23. R.L. Dipboye, R.D. Arvey, and D.E. Terpstra (1977). 'Sex and physical attractiveness of raters and applicants as determinants of resumé evaluations'. Journal of Applied Psychology, 4, pp. 288-294.
24. J.H. Langlois, L.A. Roggman, and L.A. Ricser-Danner, (1990). 'Infants' Differential Social Responses to Attractive and Unattractive Faces'. Developmental Psychology, 26, pp.153-159.
25. D.A. Norman (2004). 'Emotional Design: Why We Love (Or Hate) Everyday Things'. New York: Basic Books.
26. M. Mori (1997). 'The Buddha in the Robot'. Charles E. Tuttle Co.
27. J. Seyama and R.S. Nagayama (2007). 'The uncanny valley: Effect of realism on the impression of artifcial human faces'. Presence. Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 16(4), pp. 337-351.
28. M. Hackel, M. Schwope, J. Fritsch, B. Wrede, and G. Sagerer (2006). 'Designing a sociable humanoid robot for interdisciplinary research'. Advanced Robotics, 20(11), 1219-1235.
29. http://www.hitech-projects.com/icat/ (2008).
30. http://support.sony-europe.com/AIBO/6-1-3-aibolinks.asp?language=en (2008).
31. A. Haasch, S. Hohenner, S. Hüwel, M. Kleinehagenbrock, S. Lang, I. Toptsis, G. A. Fink, J. Fritsch, B. Wrede, and G. Sagerer, (2004). 'BIRON - The Bielefeld Robot Companion', in Proc. Int. Workshop on Advances in Service Robotics, eds., E. Prassler, G. Lawitzky, P. Fiorini, and M. Hägele, pp. 27-32, Stuttgart, Germany.
32. H. Kozima, C. Nakagawa, and M.P. Michalowski (2007) 'Keepon: A playful robot in therapeutic, educational, and entertainment felds'. International Conference on Playful Robotic Art, Odense, Denmark.
33. http://robotic.media.mit.edu/projects/robots/leo-nardo/overview/overview. html (2008).
34. http://www.irc.atr.jp/productRobovie/robovie-2-e.html (2008)
35. T. Minato, M. Shimada, S. Itakura, K. Lee, and H. Ishiguro (2005). 'Does Gaze Reveal the Human Likeness of an Android?' The 4nd International Conference on Development and Learning, pp. 106-111.
36. http://world.honda.com/ASIMO/ (2008).
37. http://paro.jp/english/ (2008).
38. M. Pollack, S. Engberg, J.T. Matthews, S. Thrun, L. Brown, D. Colbry, C. Orosz, B. Peintner, S. Ramakrishnan, J. Dunbar-Jacob, C. McCarthy, M. Montemerlo, J. Pineau, and N. Roy (2002). 'Pearl: A Mobile Robotic Assistant for the Elderly'. Workshop on Automation as Caregiver: the Role of Intelligent Technology in Elder Care (AAAI).
39. J. Goetz, S. Kiesler, and A. Powers (2003) 'Matching robot appearance and behavior to tasks to improve human-robot cooperation', in Proceedings of the 12th IEEE Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN 03), pp. 55-60, San Francisco
40. M. R. Banks, L. M. Willoughby, and W. A. Banks (2008). 'Animal-Assisted Therapy and Loneliness in Nursing Homes: Use of Robotic versus Living Dogs'. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, Vol. 9, Issue 3, pp. 173-177.
41. R.L. Moreland and R.B. Zajonc (1979). 'Exposure effects may not depend on stimulus recognition'. Journal of Comparative Physiological Psychology, 37, pp. 1085-1089.
42. R.L. Moreland and R.B. Zajonc (1982). 'Exposure effects in person perception: Familiarity, similarity, and attraction'. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18, pp. 395-415.