DNA damage checkpoint triggers autophagy to regulate the initiation of anaphase

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 110, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Dotiwala, Farokh ^a,b   Eapen, Vinay V ^a   Harrison, Jacob C ^a,c   Arbel Eden, Ayelet ^a,d   Ranade, Vikram ^a,e   Yoshida, Satoshi ^a   Haber, James E ^a  

^a Department of Biology   (United States)

^b HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^c Samsung Advanced Institute of Technology (SAIT)   (South Korea)

^d Hadassah Academic College   (Israel)

^e Howard Hughes Medical Institute   (United States)

Author keywords

Adaptation; Cell cycle arrest; Securin; Separase

Indexed keywords

CELL PROTEIN; CHECKPOINT KINASE 2; ESP1 PROTEIN; PDS1 PROTEIN; RAPAMYCIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANAPHASE; ARTICLE; AUTOPHAGY; CELL NUCLEUS; CELL VACUOLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOPLASM; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA BREAK; ENZYME ACTIVITY; G2 PHASE CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINT; GOLGI COMPLEX; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

ACTIVE TRANSPORT, CELL NUCLEUS; ADAPTOR PROTEINS, SIGNAL TRANSDUCING; ANAPHASE; AUTOPHAGY; BLOTTING, WESTERN; CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINTS; CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; DNA BREAKS, DOUBLE-STRANDED; ENDOPEPTIDASES; GREEN FLUORESCENT PROTEINS; INTRACELLULAR SIGNALING PEPTIDES AND PROTEINS; NUCLEAR PROTEINS; PROTEIN-SERINE-THREONINE KINASES; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; SACCHAROMYCETALES; SIROLIMUS;

SACCHAROMYCETALES;

EID: 84871981888     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1218065109     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Clémenson C, Marsolier-Kergoat MC (2009) DNA damage checkpoint inactivation: Adaptation and recovery. DNA Repair 8(9):1101-1109.
2. Putnam CD, Jaehnig EJ, Kolodner RD (2009) Perspectives on the DNA damage and replication checkpoint responses in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. DNA Repair 8(9): 974- 982.
3. Harrison JC, Haber JE (2006) Surviving the breakup: The DNA damage checkpoint. Annu Rev Genet 40:209-235. (Pubitemid 44956785)
4. Sandell LL, Zakian VA (1993) Loss of a yeast telomere: Arrest, recovery, and chromosome loss. Cell 75(4):729-739. (Pubitemid 23346371)
5. Toczyski DP, Galgoczy DJ, Hartwell LH (1997) CDC5 and CKII control adaptation to the yeast DNA damage checkpoint. Cell 90(6):1097-1106. (Pubitemid 27408523)
6. Lee SE, et al. (1998) Saccharomyces Ku70, mre11/rad50 and RPA proteins regulate adaptation to G2/M arrest after DNA damage. Cell 94(3):399-409. (Pubitemid 28376083)
7. Pellicioli A, Lee SE, Lucca C, Foiani M, Haber JE (2001) Regulation of Saccharomyces Rad53 checkpoint kinase during adaptation from DNA damage-induced G2/M arrest. Mol Cell 7(2):293-300. (Pubitemid 32206497)
8. Melo JA, Cohen J, Toczyski DP (2001) Two checkpoint complexes are independently recruited to sites of DNA damage in vivo. Genes Dev 15(21):2809-2821. (Pubitemid 33042052)
9. Lee SE, Pellicioli A, Malkova A, Foiani M, Haber JE (2001) The Saccharomyces recombination protein Tid1p is required for adaptation from G2/M arrest induced by a double-strand break. Curr Biol 11(13):1053-1057. (Pubitemid 32632721)
10. Lee SE, et al. (2003) Yeast Rad52 and Rad51 recombination proteins define a second pathway of DNA damage assessment in response to a single double-strand break. Mol Cell Biol 23(23):8913-8923. (Pubitemid 37433389)
11. Leroy C, et al. (2003) PP2C phosphatases Ptc2 and Ptc3 are required for DNA checkpoint inactivation after a double-strand break. Mol Cell 11(3):827-835. (Pubitemid 36385133)
12. Vaze MB, et al. (2002) Recovery from checkpoint-mediated arrest after repair of a double-strand break requires Srs2 helicase. Mol Cell 10(2):373-385. (Pubitemid 35007351)
13. Guillemain G, et al. (2007) Mechanisms of checkpoint kinase Rad53 inactivation after a double-strand break in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 27(9):3378-3389. (Pubitemid 46685214)
14. Eapen VV, Sugawara N, Tsabar M, Wu W-H, Haber JE (2012) The Saccharomyces cerevisiae chromatin remodeler Fun30 regulates DNA end-resection and checkpoint deactivation. Mol Cell Biol 32(22):4727-4740.
15. Unal E, et al. (2004) DNA damage response pathway uses histone modification to assemble a double-strand break-specific cohesin domain. Mol Cell 16(6):991-1002. (Pubitemid 40018408)
16. Kim JA, Kruhlak M, Dotiwala F, Nussenzweig A, Haber JE (2007) Heterochromatin is refractory to gamma-H2AX modification in yeast and mammals. J Cell Biol 178(2): 209-218. (Pubitemid 47076458)
17. van Vugt MA, et al. (2004) Polo-like kinase-1 is required for bipolar spindle formation but is dispensable for anaphase promoting complex/Cdc20 activation and initiation of cytokinesis. J Biol Chem 279(35):36841-36854.
18. Demeter J, Lee SE, Haber JE, Stearns T (2000) The DNA damage checkpoint signal in budding yeast is nuclear limited. Mol Cell 6(2):487-492.
19. Enserink JM, Smolka MB, Zhou H, Kolodner RD (2006) Checkpoint proteins control morphogenetic events during DNA replication stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Cell Biol 175(5):729-741. (Pubitemid 44878506)
20. Dyavaiah M, Rooney JP, Chittur SV, Lin Q, Begley TJ (2011) Autophagy-dependent regulation of the DNA damage response protein ribonucleotide reductase 1. Mol Cancer Res 9(4):462-475.
21. Bae H, Guan JL (2011) Suppression of autophagy by FIP200 deletion impairs DNA damage repair and increases cell death upon treatments with anticancer agents. Mol Cancer Res 9(9):1232-1241.
22. Potenski CJ, Klein HL (2011) Molecular biology: The expanding arena of DNA repair. Nature 471(7336):48-49.
23. Rodriguez-Rocha H, Garcia-Garcia A, Panayiotidis MI, Franco R (2011) DNA damage and autophagy. Mutat Res 711(1-2):158-166.
24. Kroemer G, White E (2010) Autophagy for the avoidance of degenerative, inflammatory, infectious, and neoplastic disease. Curr Opin Cell Biol 22(2):121-123.
25. Robert T, et al. (2011) HDACs link the DNA damage response, processing of doublestrand breaks and autophagy. Nature 471(7336):74-79.
26. Raymond CK, Howald-Stevenson I, Vater CA, Stevens TH (1992) Morphological classification of the yeast vacuolar protein sorting mutants: Evidence for a prevacuolar compartment in class E vps mutants. Mol Biol Cell 3(12):1389-1402. (Pubitemid 23091465)
27. Woolford CA, et al. (1993) Phenotypic analysis of proteinase A mutants. Implications for autoactivation and the maturation pathway of the vacuolar hydrolases of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 268(12):8990-8998. (Pubitemid 23118694)
28. Ciosk R, et al. (1998) An ESP1/PDS1 complex regulates loss of sister chromatid cohesion at the metaphase to anaphase transition in yeast. Cell 93(6):1067-1076. (Pubitemid 28280799)
29. Cohen-Fix O, Peters JM, Kirschner MW, Koshland D (1996) Anaphase initiation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is controlled by the APC-dependent degradation of the anaphase inhibitor Pds1p. Genes Dev 10(24):3081-3093. (Pubitemid 27020537)
30. Jensen S, Segal M, Clarke DJ, Reed SI (2001) A novel role of the budding yeast separin Esp1 in anaphase spindle elongation: Evidence that proper spindle association of Esp1 is regulated by Pds1. J Cell Biol 152(1):27- 40.
31. Sarin S, et al. (2004) Uncovering novel cell cycle players through the inactivation of securin in budding yeast. Genetics 168(3):1763-1771. (Pubitemid 40007384)
32. Agarwal R, Cohen-Fix O (2002) Mitotic regulation: The fine tuning of separase activity. Cell Cycle 1(4):255-257.
33. Agarwal R, Cohen-Fix O (2002) Phosphorylation of the mitotic regulator Pds1/securin by Cdc28 is required for efficient nuclear localization of Esp1/separase. Genes Dev 16 (11):1371-1382. (Pubitemid 34615090)
34. Reggiori F, Wang CW, Stromhaug PE, Shintani T, Klionsky DJ (2003) Vps51 is part of the yeast Vps fifty-three tethering complex essential for retrograde traffic from the early endosome and Cvt vesicle completion. J Biol Chem 278(7):5009-5020. (Pubitemid 36801010)
35. Gill DJ, et al. (2007) Structural insight into the ESCRT-I/-II link and its role in MVB trafficking. EMBO J 26(2):600-612. (Pubitemid 46160959)
36. Klionsky DJ (2007) Autophagy: From phenomenology to molecular understanding in less than a decade. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 8(11):931-937.
37. Kamada Y (2010) Prime-numbered Atg proteins act at the primary step in autophagy: Unphosphorylatable Atg13 can induce autophagy without TOR inactivation. Autophagy 6(3):415-416.
38. Kamada Y, Sekito T, Ohsumi Y (2004) Autophagy in yeast: A TOR-mediated response to nutrient starvation. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 279:73-84. (Pubitemid 37047257)
39. Loewith R, Hall MN (2011) Target of rapamycin (TOR) in nutrient signaling and growth control. Genetics 189(4):1177- 1201.
40. Kamada Y, et al. (2010) Tor directly controls the Atg1 kinase complex to regulate autophagy. Mol Cell Biol 30(4):1049-1058.
41. Dotiwala F, Haase J, Arbel-Eden A, Bloom K, Haber JE (2007) The yeast DNA damage checkpoint proteins control a cytoplasmic response to DNA damage. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104(27):11358-11363. (Pubitemid 47175145)
42. Vergés E, Colomina N, Garí E, Gallego C, Aldea M (2007) Cyclin Cln3 is retained at the ER and released by the J chaperone Ydj1 in late G1 to trigger cell cycle entry. Mol Cell 26(5):649-662. (Pubitemid 46856242)
43. Zhang T, Nirantar S, Lim HH, Sinha I, Surana U (2009) DNA damage checkpoint maintains CDH1 in an active state to inhibit anaphase progression. Dev Cell 17(4): 541-551.
44. Hill E, Clarke M, Barr FA (2000) The Rab6-binding kinesin, Rab6-KIFL, is required for cytokinesis. EMBO J 19(21):5711-5719.
45. Gao W, Shen Z, Shang L, Wang X (2011) Upregulation of human autophagy-initiation kinase ULK1 by tumor suppressor p53 contributes to DNA-damage-induced cell death. Cell Death Differ 18(10):1598-1607.
46. Chen H, et al. (2011) The mTOR inhibitor rapamycin suppresses DNA double-strand break repair. Radiat Res 175(2):214-224.
47. Longtine MS, et al. (1998) Additional modules for versatile and economical PCR-based gene deletion and modification in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 14(10):953-961. (Pubitemid 28328001)
48. Ross-Macdonald P, Sheehan A, Roeder GS, Snyder M (1997) A multipurpose transposon system for analyzing protein production, localization, and function in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94(1):190-195. (Pubitemid 27027185)
49. Yoshida S, Bartolini S, Pellman D (2009) Mechanisms for concentrating Rho1 during cytokinesis. Genes Dev 23(7):810-823.