Robotic assessment of upper limb motor function after stroke

American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Volumn 91, Issue 11 SUPPL.3, 2012, Pages

  Balasubramanian, Sivakumar ^a   Colombo, Roberto ^b   Sterpi, Irma ^b   Sanguineti, Vittorio ^c,d   Burdet, Etienne ^a  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b IRCCS   (Italy)

^c ISTITUTO ITALIANO DI TECNOLOGIA   (Italy)

^d UNIVERSITY OF GENOA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Clinical Scales; Motor Recovery; Quantitative Assessment; Review; Robot Assisted Neurorehabilitation; Robotic Assessment; Sensorimotor Assessment; Sensorimotor Function; Stroke; Upper Limb

Indexed keywords

ARM; BIOMECHANICS; BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; REHABILITATION; REVIEW; ROBOTICS; SENSORY FEEDBACK;

BIOMECHANICS; FEEDBACK, SENSORY; HUMANS; MOTOR SKILLS; REHABILITATION; ROBOTICS; STROKE; TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, BIOMEDICAL; UPPER EXTREMITY;

EID: 84871888034     PISSN: 08949115     EISSN: 15377385     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e31826bcdc1     Document Type: Review

References (78)

1. Gladstone DJ, Danells CJ, Black SE: The Fugl-Meyer assessment of motor recovery after stroke: A critical review of its measurement properties. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2002;16:232-40
2. Wolf SL, Catlin PA, Ellis M, et al: Assessing Wolf Motor Function Test as outcome measure for research in patients after stroke. Stroke 2001;32:1635-9
3. Balasubramanian S, Klein J, Burdet E: Robot-assisted rehabilitation of hand function. Curr Opin Neurol 2010;23:661-70
4. Brewer BR, McDowell SK, Worthen-Chaudhari LC: Poststroke upper extremity rehabilitation: A review of robotic systems and clinical results. Top Stroke Rehabil 2007;14:22-44
5. Riener R, Nef T, Colombo G: Robot-aided neuroreh-abilitation of the upper extremities. Med Biol Eng Comput 2005;43:2-10
6. Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, Krebs HI: Effects of robotassisted therapy on upper limb recovery after stroke: A systematic review. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2008;22:111-21
7. Prange GB, Jannink MJ, Groothuis-Oudshoorn CGM, et al: Systematic review of the effect of robot-aided therapy on recovery of the hemiparetic arm after stroke. J Rehabil Res Devel 2006;43:171-84
8. Huang VS, Krakauer JW: Robotic neurorehabilita-tion: A computational motor learning perspective. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2009;6:5
9. Marchal-Crespo L, Reinkensmeyer DJ: Review of control strategies for robotic movement training after neurologic injury. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2009;6:20
10. Sukal TM, Ellis MD, Dewald JPA: Shoulder abduction-induced reductions in reaching work area following hemiparetic stroke: Neuroscientific implications. Exp Brain Res 2007;183:215-23
11. Reinkensmeyer DJ, Dewald, JPA, Rymer WZ: Guidance-based quantification of arm impairment following brain injury: A pilot study. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng 1999;7:1-11
12. Yeong CF: ReachMAN to Help Sub-acute Patients Training Reaching and Manipulation [dissertation]. London, England, Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, 2010
13. Colombo R, Pisano F, Micera S, et al: Robotic techniques for upper limb evaluation and rehabilitation of stroke patients. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2005;13:311-24
14. Bosecker C, Dipietro L, Volpe B, et al: Kinematic robot-based evaluation scales and clinical counterparts to measure upper limb motor performance in patients with chronic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2010;24:62-9
15. Vergaro E, Casadio M, Squeri V, et al: Self-adaptive robot training of stroke survivors for continuous tracking movements. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2010;7:13
16. Lambercy O, Dovat L, Yun H, et al: Robotic Assessment of Hand Function with the HapticKnob. Proceedings of the 4th International Convention on Rehabilitation Engineering & Assistive Technology. Singapore, 2010, pp 33:1-4
17. Balasubramanian S, Wei RH, Herman R, et al: Robot-Measured Performance Metrics in Stroke Rehabilitation. 2009 ICME International Conference on Complex Medical Engineering. Tempe, AZ, 2009, pp 330-5
18. Coderre AM, Zeid AAZ, Dukelow SP, et al: Assessment of upper-limb sensorimotor function of subacute stroke patients using visually guided reaching. Neu-rorehabil Neural Repair 2010;24:528-41
19. Daly JJ, Hogan N, Perepezko EM, et al: Response to upper-limb robotics and functional neuromuscular stimulation following stroke. J Rehabil Res Dev 2005; 42:723-36
20. Rohrer B, Fasoli S, Krebs HI, et al: Movement smoothness changes during stroke recovery. J Neurosci 2002; 22:8297-304
21. Dovat L, Lambercy O, Salman B, et al: A technique to train finger coordination and independence after stroke, Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2010;5:279-87
22. Dipietro L, Krebs HI, Fasoli SE, et al: Changing motor synergies in chronic stroke. J Neurophysiol 2007; 98:757-68
23. Guidali M, Schmiedeskamp M, Klamroth V, et al: Assessment and Training of Synergies with an Arm Rehabilitation Robot. 2009 IEEE 11th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, Volumes 1 and 2. Kyoto, Japan, 2009, pp 899-903
24. Colombo R, Sterpi I, Mazzone A, et al: Measuring changes of movement dynamics during robot-aided neurorehabilitation of stroke patients. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2010;18:75-85
25. Lum PS, Burgar CG, Kenney DE, et al: Quantification of force abnormalities during passive and active-assisted upper-limb reaching movements in post-stroke hemiparesis. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1999;46:652-62
26. Reinkensmeyer DJ, Schmit BD, Rymer WZ: Assessment of active and passive restraint during guided reaching after chronic brain injury. Ann Biomed Eng 1999;27:805-14
27. Palazzolo JJ, Ferraro M, Krebs HI, et al: Stochastic estimation of arm mechanical impedance during robotic stroke rehabilitation. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2007;15:94-103
28. Ellis MD, Sukal-Moulton T, Dewald JP: Progressive shoulder abduction loading is a crucial element of arm rehabilitation in chronic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009;23:862-9
29. Thies SB, Tresadern PA, Kenney LP, et al: Movement variability in stroke patients and controls performing two upper limb functional tasks: A new assessment methodology. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2009;6:2
30. Chow JW, Stokic DS: Force control of quadriceps muscle is bilaterally impaired in subacute stroke. J Appl Physiol 2011;111:1290-5
31. Wagner JM, Rhodes JA, Patten C: Reproducibility and minimal detectable change of three-dimensional kinematic analysis of reaching tasks in people with hemiparesis after stroke. Phys Ther 2008;88: 652-63
32. Balasubramanian S, Melendez-Calderon A, Burdet E: A robust and sensitive metric for quantifying movement smoothness. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2012;59: 2126-36
33. Milner TE: A model for the generation of movements requiring endpoint precision. Neuroscience 1992;49: 487-96
34. Rohrer B, Fasoli S, Krebs HI, et al: Submovements grow larger, fewer, and more blended during stroke recovery. Motor Control 2004;8:472-83
35. Teo CL, Burdet E, Lim HP: A Robotic Teacher of Chinese Handwriting. Proceedings of the 10th Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator System. Orlando, FL, 2002, pp 335-41
36. Alt Murphy M, Willen C, Sunnerhagen KS: Kinematic variables quantifying upper-extremity performance after stroke during reaching and drinking from a glass. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2011;25:71-80
37. Lum PS, Burgar CG, Shor PC: Evidence for improved muscle activation patterns after retraining of reaching movements with the MIME robotic system in subjects with post-stroke hemiparesis. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2004;12:186-94
38. Colombo R, Pisano F, Micera S, et al: Assessing mech anisms of recovery during robot-aided neurorehabil-itation of the upper limb. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2008;22:50-63
39. Kahn LE, Zygman ML, Rymer WZ, et al: Robot-assisted reaching exercise promotes arm movement recovery in chronic hemiparetic stroke: A randomized controlled pilot study. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2006;3:12
40. Dukelow SP, Herter TM, Moore KD, et al: Quantitative assessment of limb position sense following stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2010;24:178-87
41. Dipietro L, Krebs HI, Fasoli SE, et al: Submovement changes characterize generalization of motor recovery after stroke. Cortex 2009;45:318-24
42. Dipietro L, Krebs HI, Volpe, BT, et al: Learning, not adaptation, characterizes stroke motor recovery: Evidence from kinematic changes induced by robotassisted therapy in trained and untrained task in the same workspace. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2012;20:48-57
43. Colombo R, Pisano F, Mazzone A, et al: Design strategies to improve patient motivation during robot-aided rehabilitation. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2007;4:3
44. Hogan N, Krebs HI, Rohrer B, et al: Motions or muscles? Some behavioral factors underlying robotic assistance of motor recovery. J Rehabil Res Dev 2006;43:605-18
45. Kahn LE, Lum PS, Rymer WZ, et al: Robot-assisted movement training for the stroke-impaired arm: Does it matter what the robot does? J Rehabil Res Dev 2006;43:619-30
46. Krebs HI, Hogan N, Aisen ML, et al: Robot-aided neurorehabilitation. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 1998;6:75-87
47. Finley MA, Fasoli SE, Dipietro L, et al: Short-duration robotic therapy in stroke patients with severe upper-limb motor impairment. J Rehabil Res Dev 2005;42:683-92
48. Krakauer JW: Motor learning: Its relevance to stroke recovery and neurorehabilitation. Curr Opin Neurol 2006;19:84-90
49. Han CE, Arbib MA, Schweighofer N: Stroke rehabilitation reaches a threshold. PLoS Comput Biol 2008; 4:e1000133
50. Schweighofer N, Han CE, Wolf SL, et al: A functional threshold for long-term use of hand and arm function can be determined: Predictions from a computational model and supporting data from the Extremity Constraint-Induced Therapy Evaluation (EXCITE) Trial. Phys Ther 2009;89:1327-36
51. Cheng S, Sabes PN: Modeling sensorimotor learning with linear dynamical systems. Neural Comput 2006;18:760-93
52. Donchin O, Francis JT, Shadmehr R: Quantifying generalization from trial-by-trial behavior of adaptive systems that learn with basis functions: Theory and experiments in human motor control. J Neurosci 2003;23:9032-45
53. Kording KP, Tenenbaum JB, Shadmehr R: The dynamics of memory as a consequence of optimal adaptation to a changing body. Nat Neurosci 2007;10: 779-86
54. Smith MA, Ghazizadeh A, Shadmehr R: Interacting adaptive processes with different timescales underlie short-term motor learning. PLoS Biol 2006;4:e179
55. Wainscott SK, Donchin O, Shadmehr R: Internal models and contextual cues: Encoding serial order and direction of movement. J Neurophysiol 2005;93: 786-800
56. Casadio M, Sanguineti V, Morasso P, et al: Abnormal sensorimotor control, but intact force field adaptation, in multiple sclerosis subjects with no clinical disability. Mult Scler 2008;14:330-42
57. Smith MA, Shadmehr R: Intact ability to learn internal models of arm dynamics in Huntington's disease but not cerebellar degeneration. J Neurophysiol 2005;93:2809-21
58. Casadio M, Sanguineti V: Learning, retention and slacking: A model of the dynamics of recovery in robot therapy. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2012;20:286-96
59. Emken JL, Benitez R, Sideris A, et al: Motor adaptation as a greedy optimization of error and effort. J Neurophysiol 2007;97:3997-4006
60. Panarese A, Colombo R, Sterpi I, et al: Tracking motor improvement at the subtask level during robot-aided neurorehabilitation of stroke patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2012;26:822-33
61. Langhorne P, Bernhardt J, Kwakkel G: Stroke rehabilitation. Lancet 2011;377:1693-702
62. Celik O, O'Malley MK, Boake C, et al: Comparison of Robotic and Clinical Motor Function Improvement Measures for Sub-acute Stroke Patients. 2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Vols 1-9. Pasadena, CA, 2008, pp 2477-82
63. Celik O, O'Malley M, Boake C, et al: Normalized movement quality measures for therapeutic robots strongly correlate with clinical motor impairment measures. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2010;18:433-44
64. Ellis MD, Sukal T, DeMott T, et al: Augmenting clinical evaluation of hemiparetic arm movement with a laboratory-based quantitative measurement of kinematics as a function of limb loading. Neuror-ehabil Neural Repair 2008;22:321-9
65. Krebs HI, Palazzolo JJ, Dipietro L, et al: Rehabilitation robotics: Performance-based progressive robotassisted therapy. Autonomous Robots 2003;15:7-20
66. Lambercy O, Dovat L, Yun H, et al: Effects of a robotassisted training of grasp and pronation/supination in chronic stroke: A pilot study. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2011;8:63
67. Wolbrecht ET, Chan V, Reinkensmeyer DJ, et al: Optimizing compliant, model-based robotic assistance to promote neurorehabilitation. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2008;16:286-97
68. Rohrer B, Hogan N: Avoiding spurious submovement decompositions II: A scattershot algorithm. Biol Cybern 2006;94:409-14
69. Alberts JL, Wolf SL: The use of kinetics as a marker for manual dexterity after stroke and stroke recovery. Top Stroke Rehabil 2009;16:223-36
70. Patel S, Hughes R, Hester T, et al: A novel approach to monitor rehabilitation outcomes in stroke survivors using wearable technology. Proc IEEE 2010; 98:450-61
71. Ganesh G, Burdet E, Haruno M, et al: Sparse linear regression for reconstructing muscle activity from human cortical fMRI. Neuroimage 2008;42:1463-72
72. Franklin DW, Burdet E, Tee KP, et al: CNS learns stable, accurate, and efficient movements using a simple algorithm. J Neurosci 2008;28:11165-73
73. Tee KP, Franklin DW, Kawato M, et al: Concurrent adaptation of force and impedance in the redundant muscle system. Biol Cybern 2010;102:31-44
74. Wenzelburger R, Kopper F, Frenzel A, et al: Hand coordination following capsular stroke. Brain 2005; 128:64-74
75. Kowalczewski J, Chong SL, Galea M, et al: In-home tele-rehabilitation improves tetraplegic hand function. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2011;25:412-22
76. Nowak DA: The impact of stroke on the performance of grasping: Usefulness of kinetic and kinematic motion analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2008;32:1439-50
77. Gassert R, Dovat L, Lambercy O, Burdet E:Motor skills training systems. UK Pending Patent PCT/GB2009/001449, 2008
78. Raghavan P, Krakauer JW, Gordon AM: Impaired anticipatory control of fingertip forces in patients with a pure motor or sensorimotor lacunar syndrome. Brain 2006;129:1415-25