Robotic neurorehabilitation: A computational motor learning perspective

Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2009, Pages

  Huang, Vincent S ^a   Krakauer, John W ^a  

^a Columbia University ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ARM; COMPUTER; CONVALESCENCE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; LEARNING; METHODOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REVIEW; ROBOTICS; STROKE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; ARM; COMPUTERS; HUMANS; LEARNING; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; ROBOTICS; STROKE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 62149105060     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17430003     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1743-0003-6-5     Document Type: Review

References (121)

1. Heart disease and stroke statistics - 2008 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. W Rosamond K Flegal K Furie A Go K Greenlund N Haase SM Hailpern M Ho V Howard B Kissela S Kittner D Lloyd-Jones M McDermott J Meigs C Moy G Nichol C O'Donnell V Roger P Sorlie J Steinberger T Thom M Wilson Y Hong, Circulation 2008 117 e25 146 18086926
2. Impact of time on improvement of outcome after stroke. G Kwakkel B Kollen J Twisk, Stroke 2006 37 2348 2353 16931787
3. Compensatory strategies for reaching in stroke. MC Cirstea MF Levin, Brain 2000 123 Pt 5 940 953 10775539
4. A Quantitative Test Of Upper Extremity Function. D Carroll, J Chronic Dis 1965 18 479 491 14293031
5. A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and research. RC Lyle, Int J Rehabil Res 1981 4 483 492 7333761
6. An objective and standardized test of hand function. RH Jebsen N Taylor RB Trieschmann MJ Trotter LA Howard, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1969 50 311 319 5788487
7. Forced use of hemiplegic upper extremities to reverse the effect of learned nonuse among chronic stroke and head-injured patients. SL Wolf DE Lecraw LA Barton BB Jann, Exp Neurol 1989 104 125 132 2707361
8. Adult norms for the Box and Block Test of manual dexterity. V Mathiowetz G Volland N Kashman K Weber, Am J Occup Ther 1985 39 386 391 3160243
9. Rehabilitation Outcomes: Analysis and Measurement. B Hamilton M Fuhrer (Eds), Baltimore: Brooks 1987
10. Interrater reliability of the 7-level functional independence measure (FIM). BB Hamilton JA Laughlin RC Fiedler CV Granger, Scand J Rehabil Med 1994 26 115 119 7801060
11. Functional Evaluation: The Barthel Index. FI Mahoney DW Barthel, Md State Med J 1965 14 61 65 14258950
12. The Barthel ADL Index: a reliability study. C Collin DT Wade S Davies V Horne, Int Disabil Stud 1988 10 61 63 3403500
13. Health accounting - functional assessment of the long-term patient. C Granger, Krusen's handbook of physical medicine and rehabilitation Philadelphia: Saunders, Kottke F, Stillwell G, Lehmann J, 1982
14. Motor learning: its relevance to stroke recovery and neurorehabilitation. JW Krakauer, Curr Opin Neurol 2006 19 84 90 16415682
15. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. AR Fugl-Meyer L Jaasko I Leyman S Olsson S Steglind, Scand J Rehabil Med 1975 7 13 31 1135616
16. The fugl-meyer assessment of motor recovery after stroke: a critical review of its measurement properties. DJ Gladstone CJ Danells SE Black, Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2002 16 232 240 12234086
17. Assessing Wolf motor function test as outcome measure for research in patients after stroke. SL Wolf PA Catlin M Ellis AL Archer B Morgan A Piacentino, Stroke 2001 32 1635 1639 11441212
18. The responsiveness of the Action Research Arm test and the Fugl-Meyer Assessment scale in chronic stroke patients. JH van der Lee H Beckerman GJ Lankhorst LM Bouter, J Rehabil Med 2001 33 110 113 11482350
19. Reliability and validity of arm function assessment with standardized guidelines for the Fugl-Meyer Test, Action Research Arm Test and Box and Block Test: a multicentre study. T Platz C Pinkowski F van Wijck IH Kim P di Bella G Johnson, Clin Rehabil 2005 19 404 411 15929509
20. Comparison of the action research arm test and the Fugl-Meyer assessment as measures of upper-extremity motor weakness after stroke. MH Rabadi FM Rabadi, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006 87 962 966 16813784
21. Measurement of motor recovery after stroke. Outcome assessment and sample size requirements. PW Duncan LB Goldstein D Matchar GW Divine J Feussner, Stroke 1992 23 1084 1089 1636182
22. Arm function after stroke: measurement and recovery over the first three months. A Heller DT Wade VA Wood A Sunderland RL Hewer E Ward, J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1987 50 714 719 3612152
23. The hemiplegic arm after stroke: measurement and recovery. DT Wade R Langton-Hewer VA Wood CE Skilbeck HM Ismail, J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1983 46 521 524 6875585
24. Arm function after stroke. An evaluation of grip strength as a measure of recovery and a prognostic indicator. A Sunderland D Tinson L Bradley RL Hewer, J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1989 52 1267 1272 2592969
25. Probability of regaining dexterity in the flaccid upper limb: impact of severity of paresis and time since onset in acute stroke. G Kwakkel BJ Kollen J van der wGrond AJ Prevo, Stroke 2003 34 2181 2186 12907818
26. Understanding the pattern of functional recovery after stroke: facts and theories. G Kwakkel B Kollen E Lindeman, Restor Neurol Neurosci 2004 22 281 299 15502272
27. Intensity of leg and arm training after primary middle-cerebral-artery stroke: a randomised trial. G Kwakkel RC Wagenaar JW Twisk GJ Lankhorst JC Koetsier, Lancet 1999 354 191 196 10421300
28. Long term effects of intensity of upper and lower limb training after stroke: a randomised trial. G Kwakkel BJ Kollen RC Wagenaar, J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2002 72 473 479 11909906
29. The results of clinical trials in stroke rehabilitation research. KJ Ottenbacher S Jannell, Arch Neurol 1993 50 37 44 8418798
30. Inter-individual variability in the capacity for motor recovery after ischemic stroke. S Prabhakaran E Zarahn C Riley A Speizer JY Chong RM Lazar RS Marshall JW Krakauer, Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2008 22 64 71 17687024
31. Neuromuscular stimulation for upper extremity motor and functional recovery in acute hemiplegia. J Chae F Bethoux T Bohine L Dobos T Davis A Friedl, Stroke 1998 29 975 979 9596245
32. Functional electrical stimulation enhancement of upper extremity functional recovery during stroke rehabilitation: a pilot study. G Alon AF Levitt PA McCarthy, Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2007 21 207 215 17369518
33. Robot-aided sensorimotor arm training improves outcome in patients with chronic stroke. M Ferraro JJ Palazzolo J Krol HI Krebs N Hogan BT Volpe, Neurology 2003 61 1604 1607 14663051
34. Intensive sensorimotor arm training mediated by therapist or robot improves hemiparesis in patients with chronic stroke. BT Volpe D Lynch A Rykman-Berland M Ferraro M Galgano N Hogan HI Krebs, Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2008 22 305 310 18184932
35. Robotic upper-limb neurorehabilitation in chronic stroke patients. LR Macclellan DD Bradham J Whitall B Volpe PD Wilson J Ohlhoff C Meister N Hogan HI Krebs CT Bever Jr, J Rehabil Res Dev 2005 42 717 722 16680609
36. The impact of physical therapy on functional outcomes after stroke: what's the evidence? RP Van Peppen G Kwakkel S Wood-Dauphinee HJ Hendriks PJ Van der Wees J Dekker, Clin Rehabil 2004 18 833 862 15609840
37. Robot-aided rehabilitation of neural function in the upper extremities. R Riener, Acta Neurochir Suppl 2007 97 465 471 17691411
38. Dynamic biomechanical model for assessing and monitoring robot-assisted upper-limb therapy. HA Abdullah C Tarry R Datta GS Mittal M Abderrahim, J Rehabil Res Dev 2007 44 43 62 17551857
39. Combinations of muscle synergies in the construction of a natural motor behavior. A d'Avella P Saltiel E Bizzi, Nat Neurosci 2003 6 300 308 12563264
40. Neuromechanics of muscle synergies for posture and movement. LH Ting JL McKay, Curr Opin Neurobiol 2007 17 622 628 18304801
41. Changing motor synergies in chronic stroke. L Dipietro HI Krebs SE Fasoli BT Volpe J Stein C Bever N Hogan, J Neurophysiol 2007 98 757 768 17553941
42. Stochastic estimation of arm mechanical impedance during robotic stroke rehabilitation. JJ Palazzolo M Ferraro HI Krebs D Lynch BT Volpe N Hogan, IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2007 15 94 103 17436881
43. Midpoint perturbation response in haptically-guided movements. DI Fortunov F Hwang WS Harwin, Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2006 1 5571 5574 17946709
44. Unilateral ischemic sensorimotor cortical damage induces contralesional synaptogenesis and enhances skilled reaching with the ipsilateral forelimb in adult male rats. LM Luke RP Allred TA Jones, Synapse 2004 54 187 199 15472929
45. Sensitivity of cortical movement representations to motor experience: evidence that skill learning but not strength training induces cortical reorganization. MS Remple RM Bruneau PM VandenBerg C Goertzen JA Kleim, Behav Brain Res 2001 123 133 141 11399326
46. Systematic review of the effect of robot-aided therapy on recovery of the hemiparetic arm after stroke. GB Prange MJ Jannink CG Groothuis-Oudshoorn HJ Hermens MJ Ijzerman, J Rehabil Res Dev 2006 43 171 184 16847784
47. Effects of robot-assisted therapy on upper limb recovery after stroke: a systematic review. G Kwakkel BJ Kollen HI Krebs, Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2008 22 111 121 17876068
48. A comparison of functional and impairment-based robotic training in severe to moderate chronic stroke: a pilot study. HI Krebs S Mernoff SE Fasoli R Hughes J Stein N Hogan, NeuroRehabilitation 2008 23 81 87 18356591
49. Assessing the motor status score: a scale for the evaluation of upper limb motor outcomes in patients after stroke. M Ferraro JH Demaio J Krol C Trudell K Rannekleiv L Edelstein P Christos M Aisen J England S Fasoli HI Krebs N Hogan BT Volpe, Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2002 16 283 289 12234090
50. Robot-assisted movement training compared with conventional therapy techniques for the rehabilitation of upper-limb motor function after stroke. PS Lum CG Burgar PC Shor M Majmundar M Van der Loos, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002 83 952 959 12098155
51. R Shadmehr S Wise, The Computational Neurobiology of Reaching and Pointing - A Foundation for Motor Learning The MIT Press 2005
52. Repetitive task training for improving functional ability after stroke. B French LH Thomas MJ Leathley CJ Sutton J McAdam A Forster P Langhorne CI Price A Walker CL Watkins, Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007 CD006073 17943883
53. Effects of augmented exercise therapy time after stroke: a meta-analysis. G Kwakkel R van Peppen RC Wagenaar S Wood Dauphinee C Richards A Ashburn K Miller N Lincoln C Partridge I Wellwood P Langhorne, Stroke 2004 35 2529 2539 15472114
54. Robot-assisted reaching exercise promotes arm movement recovery in chronic hemiparetic stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study. LE Kahn ML Zygman WZ Rymer DJ Reinkensmeyer, J Neuroeng Rehabil 2006 3 12 16790067
55. Contribution of feedback and feedforward strategies to locomotor adaptations. T Lam M Anderschitz V Dietz, J Neurophysiol 2006 95 766 773 16424453
56. Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task. R Shadmehr FA Mussa-Ivaldi, J Neurosci 1994 14 3208 3224 8182467
57. Learning to move amid uncertainty. RA Scheidt JB Dingwell FA Mussa-Ivaldi, J Neurophysiol 2001 86 971 985 11495965
58. Learning of action through adaptive combination of motor primitives. KA Thoroughman R Shadmehr, Nature 2000 407 742 747 11048720
59. Reach adaptation and final position control amid environmental uncertainty after stroke. RA Scheidt T Stoeckmann, J Neurophysiol 2007 97 2824 2836 17267755
60. Evaluation of robotic training forces that either enhance or reduce error in chronic hemiparetic stroke survivors. JL Patton ME Stoykov M Kovic FA Mussa-Ivaldi, Exp Brain Res 2006 168 368 383 16249912
61. Robot-assisted adaptive training: custom force fields for teaching movement patterns. JL Patton FA Mussa-Ivaldi, IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2004 51 636 646 15072218
62. Locomotor adaptation on a split-belt treadmill can improve walking symmetry post-stroke. DS Reisman R Wityk K Silver AJ Bastian, Brain 2007 130 1861 1872 17405765
63. A pneumatic robot for re-training arm movement after stroke: rationale and mechanical design. RJ Sanchez Jr E Wolbrecht R Smith J Liu S Rao S Cramer T Rahman JE Bobrow DJ Reinkensmeyer, Rehabilitation Robotics, 2005 ICORR 2005 9th International Conference on 2005 500
64. RUPERT: a Device for Robotic Upper Extremity Repetitive Therapy. J He EJ Koeneman R Schultz D Herring J Wanberg H Huang T Sugar R Herman JB Koeneman, Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2005 7 6844 6847 17281846
65. Design and control of RUPERT: a device for robotic upper extremity repetitive therapy. TG Sugar J He EJ Koeneman JB Koeneman R Herman H Huang RS Schultz DE Herring J Wanberg S Balasubramanian P Swenson JA Ward, IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2007 15 336 346 17894266
66. A novel robot training system designed to supplement upper limb physiotherapy of patients with spastic hemiparesis. G Fazekas M Horvath A Toth, Int J Rehabil Res 2006 29 251 254 16900048
67. Robot-mediated upper limb physiotherapy for patients with spastic hemiparesis: a preliminary study. G Fazekas M Horvath T Troznai A Toth, J Rehabil Med 2007 39 580 582 17724559
68. Learning of visuomotor transformations for vectorial planning of reaching trajectories. JW Krakauer ZM Pine MF Ghilardi C Ghez, J Neurosci 2000 20 8916 8924 11102502
69. Adaptation to a visuomotor shift depends on the starting posture. P Baraduc DM Wolpert, J Neurophysiol 2002 88 973 981 12163546
70. Motor learning by field approximation. F Gandolfo FA Mussa-Ivaldi E Bizzi, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996 93 3843 3846 8632977
71. Mechanisms influencing acquisition and recall of motor memories. O Donchin L Sawaki G Madupu LG Cohen R Shadmehr, J Neurophysiol 2002 88 2114 2123 12364533
72. Limitations in interlimb transfer of visuomotor rotations. J Wang RL Sainburg, Exp Brain Res 2004 155 1 8 15064878
73. Interlimb transfer of novel inertial dynamics is asymmetrical. J Wang RL Sainburg, J Neurophysiol 2004 92 349 360 15028745
74. Mechanisms underlying interlimb transfer of visuomotor rotations. J Wang RL Sainburg, Exp Brain Res 2003 149 520 526 12677333
75. Interlimb transfer of visuomotor rotations: independence of direction and final position information. RL Sainburg J Wang, Exp Brain Res 2002 145 437 447 12172655
76. Learned dynamics of reaching movements generalize from dominant to nondominant arm. SE Criscimagna-Hemminger O Donchin MS Gazzaniga R Shadmehr, J Neurophysiol 2003 89 168 176 12522169
77. Generalization of motor learning depends on the history of prior action. JW Krakauer P Mazzoni A Ghazizadeh R Ravindran R Shadmehr, PLoS Biol 2006 4 e316 16968135
78. Adaptation to gradual as compared with sudden visuo-motor distortions. FA Kagerer JL Contreras-Vidal GE Stelmach, Exp Brain Res 1997 115 557 561 9262212
79. Enhancing visuomotor adaptation by reducing error signals: single-step (aware) versus multiple-step (unaware) exposure to wedge prisms. C Michel L Pisella C Prablanc G Rode Y Rossetti, J Cogn Neurosci 2007 19 341 350 17280521
80. Reach adaptation: what determines whether we learn an internal model of the tool or adapt the model of our arm? J Kluzik J Diedrichsen R Shadmehr AJ Bastian, J Neurophysiol 2008 100 1455 1464 18596187
81. Prism adaptation to a rightward optical deviation rehabilitates left hemispatial neglect. Y Rossetti G Rode L Pisella A Farne L Li D Boisson MT Perenin, Nature 1998 395 166 169 9744273
82. The dynamics of memory as a consequence of optimal adaptation to a changing body. KP Kording JB Tenenbaum R Shadmehr, Nat Neurosci 2007 10 779 786 17496891
83. Interacting Adaptive Processes with Different Timescales Underlie Short-Term Motor Learning. MA Smith A Ghazizadeh R Shadmehr, PLoS Biol 2006 4 e179 16700627
84. Bottom-up transfer of sensory-motor plasticity to recovery of spatial cognition: visuomotor adaptation and spatial neglect. G Rode L Pisella Y Rossetti A Farne D Boisson, Prog Brain Res 2003 142 273 287 12693267
85. Coding the location of the arm by sight. MS Graziano DF Cooke CS Taylor, Science 2000 290 1782 1786 11099420
86. Robot-based hand motor therapy after stroke. CD Takahashi L Der-Yeghiaian V Le RR Motiwala SC Cramer, Brain 2008 131 425 437 18156154
87. Multicenter randomized clinical trial evaluating the effectiveness of the lokomat in sub-acute stroke. J Hidler D Nichols M Pelliccio K Brady DD Campbell JH Kahn TG Hornby, Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009 23 1 5 13 19109447
88. Enhanced gait-related improvements after therapist-versus robotic-assisted locomotor training in subjects with chronic stroke: a randomized controlled study. TG Hornby DD Campbell JH Kahn T Demott JL Moore HR Roth, Stroke 2008 39 1786 1792 18467648
89. Cerebellar contributions to locomotor adaptations during splitbelt treadmill walking. SM Morton AJ Bastian, J Neurosci 2006 26 9107 9116 16957067
90. A computational neuroanatomy for motor control. R Shadmehr JW Krakauer, Exp Brain Res 2008 185 359 381 18251019
91. Composition of practice: influence on the retention of motor skills. CH Shea RM Kohl, Res Q Exerc Sport 1991 62 187 195 1925042
92. Acquisition of context-specific adaptation is enhanced with rest intervals between changes in context state, suggesting a new form of motor consolidation. A Aboukhalil M Shelhamer R Clendaniel, Neurosci Lett 2004 369 162 167 15450688
93. Hippocampal lesions enhance configural learning by reducing proactive interference. JS Han M Gallagher P Holland, Hippocampus 1998 8 138 146 9572720
94. Differential induction of long-term synaptic facilitation by spaced and massed applications of serotonin at sensory neuron synapses of Aplysia californica. J Mauelshagen CM Sherff TJ Carew, Learn Mem 1998 5 246 256 10454368
95. A meta-analytic review of the distribution of practice effect: Now you see it, now you don't. JJR Donovan J David, Journal of Applied Psychology 1999 84 795 805
96. Massed but not spaced training impairs spatial memory. S Commins L Cunningham D Harvey D Walsh, Behav Brain Res 2003 139 215 223 12642190
97. Drosophila long-term memory formation involves regulation of cathepsin activity. D Comas F Petit T Preat, Nature 2004 430 460 463 15269770
98. Evolution of motor memory during the seconds after observation of motor error. VS Huang R Shadmehr, J Neurophysiol 2007 97 3976 3985 17428900
99. Contextual interference effects on the acquisition, retention and transfer of a motor skill. JB Shea RL Morgan, J Exp Psychol (Hum Learn) 1979 3 179 187
100. Long-term effects of type of practice on the learning and transfer of a complex motor skill. D Memmert, Percept Mot Skills 2006 103 912 916 17326522
101. Motor learning following unilateral stroke. RE Hanlon, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996 77 811 815 8702377
102. Stroke motor recovery: active neuromuscular stimulation and repetitive practice schedules. JH Cauraugh SB Kim, J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2003 74 1562 1566 14617717
103. Effects of robotic therapy on motor impairment and recovery in chronic stroke. SE Fasoli HI Krebs J Stein WR Frontera N Hogan, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003 84 477 482 12690583
104. Comparison of two techniques of robot-aided upper limb exercise training after stroke. J Stein HI Krebs WR Frontera SE Fasoli R Hughes N Hogan, Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2004 83 720 728 15314537
105. Human-robot cooperative movement training: learning a novel sensory motor transformation during walking with robotic assistance-as-needed. JL Emken R Benitez DJ Reinkensmeyer, J Neuroeng Rehabil 2007 4 8 17391527
106. A neuroeconomics approach to inferring utility functions in sensorimotor control. KP Kording I Fukunaga IS Howard JN Ingram DM Wolpert, PLoS Biol 2004 2 e330 15383835
107. A computational model of human-robot load sharing during robot-assisted arm movement training after stroke. DJ Reinkensmeyer E Wolbrecht J Bobrow, Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2007 2007 4019 4023 18002881
108. Trajectory adaptation to a nonlinear visuomotor transformation: evidence of motion planning in visually perceived space. JR Flanagan AK Rao, J Neurophysiol 1995 74 2174 2178 8592205
109. Hand and joint paths during reaching movements with and without vision. LE Sergio SH Scott, Exp Brain Res 1998 122 157 164 9776514
110. The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model. T Flash N Hogan, J Neurosci 1985 5 1688 1703 4020415
111. Rehabilitation Robotics: Performance-Based Progressive Robot-Assisted Therapy. HI Krebs JJ Palazzolo L Dipietro M Ferraro J Krol K Rannekleiv BT Volpe N Hogan, Autonomous Robots 2003 15 7
112. Understanding and treating arm movement impairment after chronic brain injury: progress with the ARM guide. DJ Reinkensmeyer LE Kahn M Averbuch A McKenna-Cole BD Schmit WZ Rymer, J Rehabil Res Dev 2000 37 653 662 11321001
113. Should object function matter during modeling of functional reach-to-grasp tasks in robot-assisted therapy? DE Nathan MJ Johnson, Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2006 1 5695 5698 17947163
114. Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination. E Todorov MI Jordan, Nat Neurosci 2002 5 1226 1235 12404008
115. Motor adaptation as a process of reoptimization. J Izawa T Rane O Donchin R Shadmehr, J Neurosci 2008 28 2883 2891 18337419
116. Design, implementation and clinical tests of a wire-based robot for neurorehabilitation. G Rosati P Gallina S Masiero, IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2007 15 560 569 18198714
117. Performance-based adaptive schedules enhance motor learning. Y Choi F Qi J Gordon N Schweighofer, J Mot Behav 2008 40 273 280 18628104
118. Active Learning with Statistical Models. DA Cohn Z Ghahramani MI Jordan, J Artificial Intelligence Research 1996 4 129 145
119. Active learning: learning a motor skill without a coach. VS Huang R Shadmehr J Diedrichsen, J Neurophysiol 2008 100 2 879 87 Epub 2008 May 28 18509079
120. Optimal unsupervised motor learning for dimensionality reduction of nonlinear control systems. TD Sanger, IEEE Trans Neural Netw 1994 5 965 973 18267871
121. Unsupervised learning of sensory-motor primitives. E Todorov Z Ghahramani, Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2003 Proceedings of the 25th Annual International Conference of the IEEE 2003 1750