The use of kinetics as a marker for manual dexterity after stroke and stroke recovery

Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 223-236

  Alberts, Jay L ^a,b,c   Wolf, Steven L ^d,e  

^a Department of Biomedical Engineering ^*  (United States)

^b LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c LOUIS STOKES CLEVELAND VA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d EMORY UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^e ATLANTA VA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Grip force; Kinetics; Manual dexterity; Recovery; Upper extremity rehabilitation

Indexed keywords

ARM MOVEMENT; BEHAVIOR THERAPY; BIOMECHANICS; CONVALESCENCE; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; GRIP STRENGTH; HAND FUNCTION; HEMIPARESIS; HUMAN; KINEMATICS; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; MOVEMENT THERAPY; PHYSICAL DISABILITY; REVIEW; RIGHT HANDEDNESS; STROKE; TASK PERFORMANCE;

FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HAND STRENGTH; HUMANS; MOTOR ACTIVITY; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; STROKE; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS;

EID: 70349213563     PISSN: 10749357     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1310/tsr1604-223     Document Type: Review

References (69)

1. Moberg E. Criticism and study of methods for examining sensibility in the hand. Neurology. 1962;12:8-19.
2. Napier J. Hands. New York: Pantheon Books; 1980.
3. Williams ME, Hadler NM, Earp JA. Manual ability as a marker of dependency in geriatric women. J Chronic Dis. 1982;35:115-122.
4. Falconer J, Hughes SL, Naughton BJ, Singer R, Chang RW, Sinacore JM. Self report and performance-based hand function tests as correlates of dependency in the elderly. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991;39:695-699.
5. Muntner P, Garrett E, Klag MJ, Coresh J. Trends in stroke prevalence between 1973 and 1991 in the US population 25 to 74 years of age. Stroke. 2002;33:1209-1213.
6. American Heart Association. Heart disease and stroke statistics: 2008 update. Circulation. 2008;117.
7. Duncan PW, Goldstein LB, Matchar D, Divine GW, Feussner J. Measurement of motor recovery after stroke. Outcome assessment and sample size requirements. Stroke. 1992;23:1084-1089.
8. Jorgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, Vive-Larsen J, Stoier M, Olsen TS. Outcome and time course of recovery in stroke. Part ii: Time course of recovery. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995;76:406-412.
9. Demain S, Wiles R, Roberts L, McPherson K. Recovery plateau following stroke: fact or fi ction? Disabil Rehabil. 2006;28:815-821.
10. Fang J, Alderman M. Trend of stroke hospitalization, United States, 1988-1997. Stroke. 2001;32: 2221-2226.
11. Dobkin BH. Clinical practice. Rehabilitation after stroke. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:1677-1684.
12. Wade DT, Langton Hewer RL, Wood VA, Skilbeck CE, Ismail HM. The hemiplegic arm and recovery. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1983;46:521.
13. Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, Van Der Grond J. Prevo AJH. Probability of regaining dexterity in the fl accid upper limb. Stroke. 2003:2181-2186.
14. Taub E. Somatosensory deafferenetation research with monkeys: implications for rehabilitation medicine. In: Ince LP, ed. Behavioral Psychology in Rehabilitation Medicine: Clinical Applications. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1980:371-401.
15. Kilbreath SL, Heard RC. Frequency of hand use in healthy older persons. Aust J Physiother. 2005;51: 119-122.
16. Johansson RS, Westling G. Roles of glabrous skin receptors and sensorimotor memory in automatic control of precision grip when lifting rougher or more slippery objects. Exp Brain Res. 1984;56:550-564.
17. Johansson RS, Westling G. Coordinated isometric muscle commands adequately and erroneously programmed for the weight during lifting task with precision grip. Exp Brain Res. 1988;71:59-71.
18. Johansson RS, Cole KJ. Grasp stability during manipulative actions. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 1994;72:511-524.
19. Gordon AM, Forssberg H, Johansson RS, Westling G. The integration of haptically acquired size information in the programming of precision grip. Exp Brain Res. 1991;83:483-488.
20. Gordon AM, Westling G, Cole KJ, Johansson RS. Memory representations underlying motor commands used during manipulation of common and novel objects. J Neurophysiol. 1993;69: 1789-1796.
21. Cole KJ, Beck CL. The stability of precision grip force in older adults. J Motor Behav. 1994: 171-177.
22. Winter DA, Eng P. Kinetics: our window into the goals and strategies of the central nervous system. Behav Brain Res. 1995;67:111-120.
23. Winter DA. Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement. New York: Wiley; 1990.
24. Murase T, Kinoshita H, Ikuta K, Kawai S, Asami T. Discrimination of grip force for preschool children aged 5 to 6 years. Percept Mot Skills. 1996;82: 255-263.
25. Gordon AM, Forssberg H, Johansson RS, Eliasson AC, Westling G. Development of human precision grip. III. Integration of visual size cues during the programming of isometric forces. Exp Brain Res. 1992;90:399-403.
26. Forssberg H, Kinoshita H, Eliasson AC, Johansson RS, Gordon AM. Development of human precision grip. II. Anticipatory control of isometric forces targeted for object's weight. Exp Brain Res. 1992;90: 393-398.
27. Johansson RS, Lemon RN, Westling G. Time-varying enhancement of human cortical excitability mediated by cutaneous inputs during precision grip. J Physiol Lond. 1994;481:761-775.
28. Johansson RS, Westling G. Signifi cance of cutaneous inputforprecisehandmovements.Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl. 1987;39:53-57.
29. Westling G, Johansson RS. Factors infl uencing the force control during precision grip. Exp Brain Res. 1984;53:277-284.
30. Johansson RS, Westling G. Programmed and triggered actions to rapid load changes during precision grip. Exp Brain Res. 1988;71:72-86.
31. Nowak DA. The impact of stroke on the performance of grasping: usefulness of kinetic and kinematic motion analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2008;32:1439-1450.
32. Nowak DA, Hermsdorfer J, Topka H. Deficits of predictive grip force control during object manipulation in acute stroke. J Neurol. 2003;250: 850-860. (Pubitemid 36898119)
33. McDonnell MN, Hillier SL, Ridding MC, Miles TS. Impairments in precision grip correlate with functional measures in adult hemiplegia. Clin Neurophysiol. 2006;117:1474-1480.
34. Raghavan P, Krakauer JW, Gordon AM. Impaired anticipatory control of fi ngertip forces in patients with a pure motor or sensorimotor lacunar syndrome. Brain. 2006;129:1415-1425.
35. Alberts JL, Butler AJ, Wolf SL. The effects of constraint-induced therapy on precision grip: a preliminary study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2004; 18:250-258.
36. Wolf SL, Winstein CJ, Miller JP, et al, Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: the EXCITE randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2006; 296(27):2095-2104.
37. Frick EM, Alberts JL. Combined use of repetitive task practice and an assistive robotic device in a patient with subacute stroke. Phys Ther. 2006;86: 1378-1386.
38. Rosenstein L, Ridgel AL, Thota A, Samame B, Alberts JL. Effects of combined robotic therapy and repetitive-task practice on upper extremity function in a patient with chronic stroke. Am J Occup Ther. 2008;62:28-35.
39. Quaney BM, Perera S, Maletsky R, Luchies CW, Nudo RJ. Impaired grip force modulation in the ipsilesional hand after unilateral middle cerebral artery stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2005;19:338-349.
40. Sunderland A, Bowers MP, Sluman SM, Wilcock DJ, Ardron ME. Impaired dexterity of the ipsilateral hand after stroke and the relationship to cognitive defi cit. Stroke. 1999;30:949-955.
41. Germano IM, Gracies JM, Weisz DJ, Tse W, Koller WC, Olanow CW. Unilateral stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus in Parkinson's disease: a double-blind 12-month evaluation study. J Neurosurg. 2004;101:36-42.
42. Yarosh CA, Hoffman DS, Strick PL. Deficits in movements of the wrist ipsilateral to a stroke in hemiparetic subjects. J Neurophysiol. 2004;92: 3276-3285.
43. Brinkman C, Porter R. Supplementary motor area in the monkey: activity of neurons during performance of a learned motor task. J Neurophysiol. 1979;42:681-709.
44. Brinkman C, Porter R. Supplementary motor area and premotor area of monkey cerebral cortex: functional organization and activities of single neurons during performance of a learned movement. In: Desmedt JE, ed. Motor Control Mechanisms in Health and Disease. New York: Raven Press; 1983:393-420.
45. Kazennikov O, Hyland B, Corboz M, Babalian A, Rouiller EM, Wiesendanger M. Neural activity of supplementary and primary motor areas in monkeys and its relation to bimanual and unimanual movement sequences. Neuroscience. 1999;89: 661-674.
46. Laplane D, Talairach J, Meininger V, Bancaud J, Bouchareine A. Motor consequences of motor area ablations in man. J Neurol Sci. 1977;31:29-49.
47. Dick JP, Benecke R, Rothwell JC, Day BL, Marsden CD. Simple and complex movements in a patient with infarction of the right supplementary motor area. Mov Disord. 1986;1:255-266.
48. Brinkman C. Lesions in supplementary motor area interfere with a monkey's performance of a bimanual coordination task. Neurosci Lett. 1981;27: 267-270.
49. Toyokura M, Muro I, Komiya T, Obara M. Relation of bimanual coordination to activation in the sensorimotor cortex and supplementary motor area: analysis using functional magnetic resonance imaging. Brain Res Bull. 1999;48:211-217.
50. Shibasaki H, Sadato N, Lyshkow H, et al. Both primary motor cortex and supplementary motor area play an important role in complex finger movement. Brain. 1993;116:1387-1398.
51. Alberts JL, Elder CM, Okun MS, Vitek JL. Comparison of pallidal and subthalamic stimulation on force control in patients with Parkinson's disease. Motor Control. 2004;8:484-499.
52. Alberts JL, Tresilian JR, Stelmach GE. The coordination and phasing of a bilateral prehension task. The infl uence of Parkinson's disease. Brain. 1998;121:725-742.
53. Ridgel AL, Vitek JL, Alberts JL. Forced, not voluntary, exercise improves motor function in Parkinson's disease patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009. Epub PMID 19131578.
54. Johnston JA, Winges SA, Santello M. Neural control of hand muscles during prehension. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2009;629:577-596.
55. Lukos J, Ansuini C, Santello M. Choice of contact points during multidigit grasping: effect of predictability of object center of mass location. J Neurosci. 2007;27:3894-3903.
56. McIsaac TL, Santello M, Johnston JA, Zhang W, Gordon AM. Task-specifi c modulation of multi-digit forces to object texture. Exp Brain Res. 2009;194:79-90.
57. Muratori LM, McIsaac TL, Gordon AM, Santello M. Impaired anticipatory control of force sharing patterns during whole-hand grasping in Parkinson's disease. Exp Brain Res. 2008;185:41-52.
58. Lewis SR, Duff SV, Gordon AM. Manual asymmetry during object release under varying task constraints. Am J Occup Ther. 2002;56:391-401.
59. Voelcker-Rehage C, Alberts JL. Age-related changes in grasping force modulation. Exp Brain Res. 2005;166:61-70.
60. Cole KJ, Rotella DL, Harper JG. Mechanisms for age-related changes of fingertip forces during precision gripping and lifting in adults. J Neurosci. 1999;19:3238-3247.
61. Cole KJ. Grasp force control in older adults. J Motor Behav. 1991;23:251-258.
62. Johansson RS, Westling G. Programmed and triggered action to rapid load changes during precision grip. Exp Brain Res. 1988;71:72-86.
63. Vaillancourt DE, Prodoehl J, Sturman MM, Bakay RA, Metman LV, Corcos DM. Effects of deep brain stimulation and medication on strength, bradykinesia, and electromyographic patterns of the ankle joint in Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord. 2006;21:50-58.
64. Alberts JL, Okun MS, Vitek JL. The persistent effects of unilateral pallidal and subthalamic deep brain stimulation on force control in advanced Parkinson's patients. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2008;14(6):461-468.
65. Alberts JL, Voelcker-Rehage C, Hallahan K, Vitek M, Bamzai R, Vitek JL. Bilateral subthalamic stimulation impairs cognitive-motor performance in Parkinson's disease patients. Brain. 2008;131:3348-3360.
66. Voelcker-Rehage C, Alberts JL. Effect of motor practice on dual-task performance in older adults. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2007;62:P141-148.
67. Kwakkel G, Kollen B. Predicting improvement in the upper paretic limb after stroke: a longitudinal prospective study. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2007; 25:453-460.
68. Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, Krebs HI. Effects of robot-assisted therapy on upper limb recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008;22:111-121.
69. Cheeran B, Cohen L, Dobkin B, et al. The future of restorative neurosciences in stroke: driving the translational research pipeline from basic science to rehabilitation of people after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009;23:97-107.