Stroke rehabilitation reaches a threshold

PLoS Computational Biology

Volumn 4, Issue 8, 2008, Pages

  Han, Cheol E ^a,b   Arbib, Michael A ^a,b   Schweighofer, Nicolas ^b  

^a University of Southern California ^*  (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; NEUROMUSCULAR REHABILITATION; PATIENT TREATMENT; RECOVERY; REINFORCEMENT;

COMPENSATORY STRATEGY; DAILY ACTIVITY; LEARN+; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; MOTOR TRAININGS; MOTOR-CORTEX; PERFORMANCE; STROKE RECOVERY; STROKE REHABILITATION; UPPER LIMBS;

REINFORCEMENT LEARNING;

ARTICLE; BOOTSTRAPPING; BRAIN NERVE CELL; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; LEARNING; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MOTOR CORTEX; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; REINFORCEMENT; STROKE; ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL; ARM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CONVALESCENCE; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DIFFERENTIAL THRESHOLD; HAND; HEMIPLEGIA; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; INNERVATION; METHODOLOGY; MOTIVATION; MOTOR ACTIVITY; MOVEMENT THERAPY; NERVE CELL NETWORK; NERVE CELL PLASTICITY; PATHOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ANIMALS; ARM; DECISION MAKING; DIFFERENTIAL THRESHOLD; FEEDBACK, PSYCHOLOGICAL; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HAND; HEMIPLEGIA; HUMANS; LEARNING; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; MOTION THERAPY, CONTINUOUS PASSIVE; MOTIVATION; MOTOR ACTIVITY; MOTOR SKILLS; NERVE NET; NEURONAL PLASTICITY; NONLINEAR DYNAMICS; PRACTICE (PSYCHOLOGY); RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; REINFORCEMENT (PSYCHOLOGY); STROKE;

EID: 50949096140     PISSN: 1553734X     EISSN: 15537358     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000133     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Dobkin B (2005) Clinical practice. Rehabilitation after stroke. N Engl J Med 352: 1677-1684.
2. Nakayama H, Jorgensen HS, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS (1994) Compensation in recovery of upper extremity function after stroke: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 75: 852-857.
3. Duncan PW, Wallace D, Lai SM, Johnson D, Embretson S, et al. (1999) The stroke impact scale version 2.0. Evaluation of reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. Stroke 30: 2131-2140.
4. Wolf SL, Winstein CJ, Miller JP, Taub E, Uswatte G, et al. (2006) Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: the EXCITE randomized clinical trial. JAMA 296: 2095-2104.
5. Winstein CJ, Rose DK, Tan SM, Lewthwaite R, Chui HC, et al. (2004) A randomized controlled comparison of upper-extremity rehabilitation strategies in acute stroke: a pilot study of immediate and long-term outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 85: 620-628.
6. Wolf SL, Winstein CJ, Miller JP, Thompson PA, Taub E, et al. (2008) Retention of upper limb function in stroke survivors who have received constraint-induced movement therapy: the EXCITE randomised trial. Lancet Neurol 7: 33-40.
7. Nudo RJ, Wise BM, SiFuentes F, Milliken GW (1996) Neural substrates for the effects of rehabilitative training on motor recovery after ischemic infarct. Science 272: 1791-1794.
8. Kleim JA, Barbay S, Nudo RJ (1998) Functional reorganization of the rat motor cortex following motor skill learning. J Neurophysiol 80: 3321-3325.
9. Conner JM, Culberson A, Packowski C, Chiba AA, Tuszynski MH (2003) Lesions of the basal forebrain cholinergic system impair task acquisition and abolish cortical plasticity associated with motor skill learning. Neuron 38: 819-829.
10. Rioult-Pedotti MS, Friedman D, Donoghue JP (2000) Learning-induced LTP in neocortex. Science 290: 533-536.
11. Sanes JN, Suner S, Lando JF, Donoghue JP (1988) Rapid reorganization of adult rat motor cortex somatic representation patterns after motor nerve injury. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 85: 2003-2007.
12. Sunderland A, Tuke A (2005) Neuroplasticity, learning and recovery after stroke: a critical evaluation of constraint-induced therapy. Neuropsychol Rehabil 15: 81-96.
13. Taub E, Uswatte G, Mark VW, Morris DM (2006) The learned nonuse phenomenon: implications for rehabilitation. Eura Medicophys 42: 241-256.
14. Taub E, Uswatte G (2003) Constraint-induced movement therapy: bridging from the primate laboratory to the stroke rehabilitation laboratory. J Rehabil Med 35(Suppl 41): 34-40.
15. Sterr A, Freivogel S, Schmalohr D (2002) Neurobehavioral aspects of recovery: assessment of the learned nonuse phenomenon in hemiparetic adolescents. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 83: 1726-1731.
16. Taub E, Uswatte G, Elbert T (2002) New treatments in neurorehabilitation founded on basic research. Nat Rev Neurosci 3: 228-236.
17. Luft AR, Hanley DF (2006) Stroke recovery - moving in an EXCITE-ing direction. JAMA 296: 2141-2143.
18. Taub E, Miller NE, Novack TA, Cook EW III, Fleming WC, et al. (1993) Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 74: 347-354.
19. Georgopoulos AP, Schwartz AB, Kettner RE (1986) Neuronal population coding of movement direction. Science 233: 1416-1419.
20. Lee D, Port NL, Kruse W, Georgopoulos AP (1998) Variability and correlated noise in the discharge of neurons in motor and parietal areas of the primate cortex. J Neurosci 18: 1161-1170.
21. Reinkensmeyer DJ, Iobbi MG, Kahn LE, Kamper DG, Takahashi CD (2003) Modeling reaching impairment after stroke using a population vector model of movement control that incorporates neural firing-rate variability. Neural Comput 15: 2619-2642.
22. Georgopoulos AP, Ashe J (2000) One motor cortex, two different views. Nat Neurosci 3: 963.
23. Moran DW, Schwartz AB (2000) One motor cortex, two different views. Nat Neurosci 3: 963.
24. Scott SH (2000) Reply to 'One motor cortex, two different views'. Nat Neurosci 3: 964-965.
25. Todorov E (2000) Reply to 'One motor cortex, two different views'. Nat Neurosci 3: 964.
26. Todorov E (2000) Direct cortical control of muscle activation in voluntary arm movements: a model. Nat Neurosci 3: 391-398.
27. Guigon E, Baraduc P, Desmurget M (2007) Coding of movement- and force-related information in primate primary motor cortex: a computational approach. Eur J Neurosci 26: 250-260.
28. Todorov E (2002) Cosine tuning minimizes motor errors. Neural Comput 14: 1233-1260.
29. Harris CM, Wolpert DM (1998) Signal-dependent noise determines motor planning. Nature 394: 780-784.
30. Jones KE, Hamilton AF, Wolpert DM (2002) Sources of signal-dependent noise during isometric force production. J Neurophysiol 88: 1533-1544.
31. Hertz J, Krogh A, Palmer RG (1991) Introduction to the Theory of Neural Computation. Redwood City (California): Addison-Wesley.
32. Li CS, Padoa-Schioppa C, Bizzi E (2001) Neuronal correlates of motor performance and motor learning in the primary motor cortex of monkeys adapting to an external force field. Neuron 30: 593-607.
33. Paz R, Boraud T, Natan C, Bergman H, Vaadia E (2003) Preparatory activity in motor cortex reflects learning of local visuomotor skills. Nat Neurosci 6: 882-890.
34. Sutton RS, Barto AG (1998) Reinforcement Learning. Cambridge (Massachusetts): MIT Press.
35. Samejima K, Ueda Y, Doya K, Kimura M (2005) Representation of action-specific reward values in the striatum. Science 310: 1337-1340.
36. Kawato M, Samejima K (2007) Efficient reinforcement learning: computational theories, neuroscience and robotics. Curr Opin Neurobiol 17: 205-212.
37. Schweighofer N, Shishida K, Han CE, Okamoto Y, Tanaka SC, et al. (2006) Humans can adopt optimal discounting strategy under real-time constraints. PLoS Comput Biol 2: e152. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020152.
38. O'Doherty JP (2004) Reward representations and reward-related learning in the human brain: insights from neuroimaging. Curr Opin Neurobiol 14: 769-776.
39. Knutson B, Taylor J, Kaufman M, Peterson R, Glover G (2005) Distributed neural representation of expected value. J Neurosci 25: 4806-4812.
40. Dominey P, Arbib M, Joseph J (1995) A model of corticostriatal plasticity for learning oculomotor associations and sequences. J Cogn Neurosci 7: 311-336.
41. Reynolds JN, Wickens JR (2002) Dopamine-dependent plasticity of corticostriatal synapses. Neural Netw 15: 507-521.
42. Mink JW (2003) The basal ganglia and involuntary movements: impaired inhibition of competing motor patterns. Arch Neurol 60: 1365-1368.
43. Mamolo CM, Roy EA, Bryden PJ, Rohr LE (2005) The performance of left-handed participants on a preferential reaching test. Brain Cogn 57: 143-145.
44. Doya K (2000) Reinforcement learning in continuous time and space. Neural Comput 12: 219-245.
45. Beer RF, Dewald JP, Dawson ML, Rymer WZ (2004) Target-dependent differences between free and constrained arm movements in chronic hemiparesis. Exp Brain Res 156: 458-470.
46. Reinkensmeyer DJ, McKenna Cole A, Kahn LE, Kamper DG (2002) Directional control of reaching is preserved following mild/moderate stroke and stochastically constrained following severe stroke. Exp Brain Res 143: 525-530.
47. Evarts EV (1968) Relation of pyramidal tract activity to force exerted during voluntary movement. J Neurophysiol 31: 14-27.
48. Kalaska JF, Cohen DA, Hyde ML, Prud'homme M (1989) A comparison of movement direction-related versus load direction-related activity in primate motor cortex, using a two-dimensional reaching task. J Neurosci 9: 2080-2102.
49. Chae J, Yang G, Park BK, Labatia I (2002) Muscle weakness and cocontraction in upper limb hemiparesis: relationship to motor impairment and physical disability. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 16: 241-248.
50. Goodall S, Reggia JA, Chen Y, Ruppin E, Whitney C (1997) A computational model of acute focal cortical lesions. Stroke 28: 101-109.
51. Plautz E, Milliken GW, Nudo RJ (2000) Effects of repetitive motor training on movement representations in adult squirrel monkeys: role of use versus learning. Neurobiol Learn Mem 74: 27-55.
52. Schweighofer N, Arbib MA, Kawato M (1998) Role of the cerebellum in reaching movements in humans. I. Distributed inverse dynamics control. Eur J Neurosci 10: 86-94.
53. Kitazawa S, Kimura T, Yin PB (1998) Cerebellar complex spikes encode both destinations and errors in arm movements. Nature 392: 494-497.
54. Scheidt RA, Stoeckmann T (2007) Reach adaptation and final position control amid environmental uncertainty after stroke. J Neurophysiol 97: 2824-2836.
55. Bogacz R, Gurney K (2007) The basal ganglia and cortex implement optimal decision making between alternative actions. Neural Comput 19: 442-477.
56. Lo CC, Wang XJ (2006) Cortico-basal ganglia circuit mechanism for a decision threshold in reaction time tasks. Nat Neurosci 9: 956-963.
57. Cisek P (2006) Integrated neural processes for defining potential actions and deciding between them: a computational model. J Neurosci 26: 9761-9770.
58. Rokni U, Richardson AG, Bizzi E, Seung HS (2007) Motor learning with unstable neural representations. Neuron 54: 653-666.
59. Kakei S, Hoffman DS, Strick PL (1999) Muscle and movement representations in the primary motor cortex. Science 285: 2136-2139.
60. Herter TM, Kurtzer I, Cabel DW, Haunts KA, Scott SH (2007) Characterization of torque-related activity in primary motor cortex during a multijoint postural task. J Neurophysiol 97: 2887-2899.
61. Georgopoulos AP (1996) On the translation of directional motor cortical commands to activation of muscles via spinal interneuronal systems. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 3: 151-155.
62. Miyai I, Blau AD, Reding MJ, Volpe BT (1997) Patients with stroke confined to basal ganglia have diminished response to rehabilitation efforts. Neurology 48: 95-101.
63. Schmidt RA, Lee TD (2005) Motor Control and Learning: A Behavioral Emphasis. Champaign (Illinois): Human Kinetics.