Motions or muscles? Some behavioral factors underlying robotic assistance of motor recovery

Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development

Volumn 43, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 605-618

  Hogan, Neville ^a,b   Krebs, Hermano I ^a,c   Rohrer, Brandon ^a   Palazzolo, Jerome J ^a   Dipietro, Laura ^a   Fasoli, Susan E ^a   Stein, Joel ^d   Hughes, Richard ^d   Frontera, Walter R ^d   Lynch, Daniel ^e   Volpe, Bruce T ^c,e  

^a Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge   (United States)

^b MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^c WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

^d and Red Sox Foundation and Massachusetts General Hospital Home Base Program   (United States)

^e BURKE MEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Active assistance therapy; Adaptation; Cerebrovascular accident; Hemiparesis; Motor learning; Passive resistance therapy; Rehabilitation; Robotic therapy; Submovements; Upper limb

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; INTELLIGENT ROBOTS; MEDICAL PROBLEMS; MOTION ESTIMATION; MOTORS; MUSCLE; PATIENT REHABILITATION;

ACTIVE ASSISTANCE THERAPY; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENTS; HEMIPARESIS; MOTOR LEARNING; PASSIVE RESISTANCE THERAPY; REHABILITATION THERAPY; ROBOTIC THERAPY; SUBMOVEMENTS; UPPER LIMBS;

BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING;

ALGORITHM; ARM MUSCLE; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONSTRAINT INDUCED THERAPY; HUMAN; KINEMATICS; LEARNING; LOCOMOTION; MOTOR DYSFUNCTION; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; MUSCLE WEAKNESS; NEUROMUSCULAR DISEASE; PASSIVE MOVEMENT; PERFORMANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANGE OF MOTION; REHABILITATION CARE; REVIEW; ROBOTICS; SENSORIMOTOR FUNCTION; STROKE; TRAINING;

BEHAVIOR; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; EXERCISE THERAPY; HUMANS; MOVEMENT; MUSCLE WEAKNESS; ROBOTICS;

EID: 33751025608     PISSN: 07487711     EISSN: 07487711     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1682/JRRD.2005.06.0103     Document Type: Review

References (62)

1. Muntner P, Garrett E, Klag MJ, Coresh J. Trends in stroke prevalence between 1973 and 1991 in the US population 25 to 74 years of age. Stroke. 2002;33(5):1209-13.
2. Broderick J, Brott T, Kothari R, Miller R, Khoury J, Pancioli A, Gebel J, Mills D, Minneci L, Shukla R. The Greater Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky Stroke Study: Preliminary first-ever and total incidence rates of stroke among blacks. Stroke. 1998;29(2):415-21.
3. Gresham GE, Alexander D, Bishop DS, Giuliani C, Goldberg G, Holland A, Kelly-Hayes M, Linn RT, Roth EJ, Stason WB, Trombly CA. American Heart Association Prevention Conference. IV. Prevention and rehabilitation of stroke. Rehabilitation. Stroke. 1997;28(7);1522-26.
4. Gowland C. Recovery of motor function following stroke: Profile and predictors. Physiotherapy Canada. 1982;34:77-84.
5. Kwakkel G , Kollen BJ, Wagenaar RC. Therapy impact on functional recovery in stroke rehabilitation: A critical review of the literature. Physiotherapy. 1999;85(7):377-91.
6. Dromerick AW, Edwards DF, Hahn M. Does the application of constraint-induced movement therapy during acute rehabilitation reduce arm impairment after ischemic stroke? Stroke. 2000;31(12):2984-88.
7. Kunkel A, Kopp B, Muller G , Villringer K, Villringer A, Taub E, Flor H. Constraint-induced movement therapy for motor recovery in chronic stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80(6):624-28.
8. Miltner WH, Bauder H, Sommer M, Dettmers C, Taub E. Effects of constraint-induced movement therapy on patients with chronic motor deficits after stroke: A replication. Stroke. 1999;30(3):586-92.
9. Taub E, Miller NE, Novack TA, Cook EW 3rd, Fleming WC, Nepomuceno CS, Connel JS, Crago JE. Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993;74(4):347-54.
10. Van der Lee JH, Wagenaar RC, Lankhorst GJ, Vogelaar TW, Deville WL, Bouter LM. Forced use of the upper extremity in chronic stroke patients: Results from a single-blind randomized clinical trial. Stroke. 1999;30(11):2369-75.
11. Aisen ML, Krebs HI, Hogan N, McDowell F, Volpe BT. The effect of robot-assisted therapy and rehabilitative training on motor recovery following stroke. Arch Neurol. 1997;54(4):443-46.
12. Volpe BT, Krebs HI, Hogan N, Edelsteinn L, Diels CM, Aisen ML. Robot training enhanced motor outcome in patients with stroke maintained over 3 years. Neurology. 1999;53(8):1874-76.
13. Volpe BT, Krebs HI, Hogan N, Edelstein L, Diels C, Aisen ML. A novel approach to stroke rehabilitation: Robot-aided sensorimotor stimulation. Neurology. 2000;54(10):1938-44.
14. Fasoli SE, Krebs HI, Stein J, Frontera WR, Hogan N. Effects of robotic therapy on motor impairment and recovery in chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84(4):477-82.
15. Fasoli SE, Krebs HI, Stein J, Frontera WR, Hughes R, Hogan N. Robotic therapy for chronic motor impairments after stroke: Follow-up results. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85(7):1106-11.
16. Lum PS, Burgar CG , Shor PC, Majmundar M, Van der Loos M. Robot-assisted movement training compared with conventional therapy techniques for the rehabilitation of upper-limb motor function after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83(7):952-59.
17. Weiss A, Suzuki T, Bean J, Fielding RA. High intensity strength training improves strength and functional performance after stroke. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;79(4):369-76.
18. Teixeira-Salmela LF, Olney SJ, Nadeau S, Brouwer B. Muscle strengthening and physical conditioning to reduce impairment and disability in chronic stroke survivors. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80(10):1211-18.
19. Trombly CA, Quintana LA. The effects of exercise on finger extension of CVA patients. Am J Occup Ther. 1983;37(3):195-202.
20. Trombly CA, Thayer Nason L, Bliss G , Girard CA, Lyrist LA, Brexa Hooson A. The effectiveness of therapy in improving finger extension in stroke patients. Am J Occup Ther. 1986;40(9):612-17.
21. Stein J, Krebs HI, Frontera WR, Fasoli SE, Hughes R, Hogan N. Comparison of two techniques of robot-aided upper limb exercise training after stroke. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;83(9):720-28.
22. Liebesman JL, Cafarelli E. Physiology of range of motion in human joints: A critical review. Crit Rev Phys Rehabil Med. 1994;6(2):131-60.
23. Lewis GN, Byblow WD. Modulations in corticomotor excitability during passive upper-limb movement: Is there a cortical influence? Brain Res. 2002;943(2):263-75.
24. Stinear JW, Byblow WD. Disinhibition in the human motor cortex is enhanced by synchronous upper limb movements. J Physiol. 2002;543(Pt 1):307-16.
25. Ziemann U, Muellbacher W, Hallett M, Cohen LG . Modulation of practice-dependent plasticity in human motor cortex. Brain. 2001;124(Pt 6):1171-81.
26. Volpe BT, Ferraro M, Lynch D, Christos P, Krol J, Trudell CM, Krebs HI, Hogan N. Robotics and other devices in the treatment of patients recovering from stroke. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2004;6(4):314-19.
27. Lynch D, Ferraro M, Krol J, Trudell CM, Christos P, Volpe BT. Continuous passive motion improves shoulder joint integrity following stroke. Clin Rehabil. 2005;19(6):594-99.
28. Marshall RS, Perera GM, Lazar RM, Krakauer JW, Constantine RC, DeLaPaz RL. Evolution of cortical activation during recovery from corticospinal tract infarction. Stroke. 2000;31(3):656-61.
29. Cramer SC, Nelles G , Benson RR, Kaplan JD, Parker RA, Kwong KK, Kennedy DN, Finklestein SP, Rosen BR. A functional MRI study of subjects recovered from hemiparetic stroke. Stroke. 1997;28(12):2518-27.
30. Cramer SC, Moore CI, Finklestein SP, Rosen BR. A pilot study of somatotopic mapping after cortical infarct. Stroke. 2000;31(3):668-71.
31. Cramer SC, Nelles G , Schaechter JD, Kaplan JD, Finklestein SP, Rosen BR. A functional MRI study of three motor tasks in the evaluation of stroke recovery. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2001;15(1):1-8.
32. Miyai I, Suzuki T, Mikami A, Kubota K, Volpe BT. Patients with capsular infarct and Wallerian degeneration show persistent regional premotor cortex activation on functional magnetic resonance imaging. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2002;10(5):210-16.
33. Nelles G , Jentzen W, Jueptner M, Muller S, Diener HC. Arm training induced brain plasticity in stroke studied with serial positron emission tomography. Neuroimage. 2001;13(6 Pt 1):1146-54.
34. Nudo RJ, Milliken GW, Jenkins WM, Merzenich MM. Use-dependent alterations of movement representations in primary motor cortex of adult squirrel monkeys. J Neurosci. 1996;16(2):785-807.
35. Nudo RJ, Wise BM, SiFuentes F, Milliken GW. Neural substrates for the effects of rehabilitative training on motor recovery after ischemic infarct. Science. 1996;272(5269):1791-94.
36. Volpe BT, Krebs HI, Hogan N. Is robot-aided sensorimotor training in stroke rehabilitation a realistic option? Curr Opin Neurol. 2001;14(6):745-52.
37. Roby-Brami A, Feydy A, Combeaud M, Bussel B, Levin MF. Motor compensation and recovery for reaching in stroke patients. Acta Neurol Scand. 2003;107(5):369-81.
38. Stefan K, Kunesch E, Choen LG , Benecke R, Classen J. Induction of plasticity in the human motor cortex by paired associative stimulation. Brain. 2000;(123 Pt 3):572-84.
39. Jones TA, Chu CJ, Grande LA, Gregory AD. Motor skills training enhances lesion-induced structural plasticity in the motor cortex of adult rats. J Neurosci. 1999;19(22):10153-63.
40. Neeper SA, Gomez-Pinilla F, Choi J, Cotman C. Exercise and brain neurotrophins. Nature. 1995;373(6510):109.
41. Kempermann G , Praag HV, Gage FH. Activity-dependent regulation of neuronal plasticity and self-repair. Prog Brain Res. 2000;127:35-48.
42. Gomez-Pinilla F, Ying Z, Roy RR, Molteni R, Edgerton VR. Voluntary exercise induces a BDNF-mediated mechanism that promotes neuroplasticity. J Neurophysiol. 2002;88(5):2187-95.
43. Ferraro M, Palazzolo JJ, Krol J, Krebs HI, Hogan N, Volpe BT. Robot-aided sensorimotor arm training improves outcome in patients with chronic stroke. Neurology. 2003;61(11):1604-7.
44. Flash T, Hogan N, Richardson MJE. Optimization principles in motor control. In: Arbib MA, editor. The handbook of brain theory and neural networks. 2nd ed. Cambrige (MA): MIT Press; 2002. p. 827-31.
45. Lackner JR, Dizio P. Rapid adaptation to Coriolis force perturbations of arm trajectory. J Neurophysiol. 1994;72(1):299-313.
46. Shadmehr R, Mussa-Ivaldi FA. Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task. J Neurosci. 1994;14(5 Pt 2):3208-24.
47. Wolpert DM, Ghahramani Z, Jordan M. Are arm trajectories planned in kinematic or dynamic coordinates? An adaptation study. Exp Brain Res. 1995;103(3):460-70.
48. Flanagan JR, Rao AK. Trajectory adaptation to a nonlinear visuomotor transformation: Evidence of motion planning in visually perceived space. J Neurophysiol. 1995;74(5):2174-78.
49. Krebs HI, Hogan N, Aisen ML, Volpe BT. Quantization of continuous arm movement in humans with brain injury. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96(8):4645-49.
50. Krebs HI, Volpe BT, Aisen ML, Hogan N. Increasing productivity and quality of care: Robot-aided neurorehabilitation. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2000;37(6):639-52.
51. Rohrer B, Fasoli SE, Krebs HI, Hughes R, Volpe BT, Frontera WR, Stein J, Hogan N. Movement smoothness changes during stroke recovery. J. Neurosci. 2002;22(18):8297-8304.
52. Rohrer B, Hogan N. Avoiding spurious submovement decompositions: A globally optimal algorithm. Biol Cybern. 2003;89(3):190-99.
53. Rohrer B. Evolution of movement smoothness and sub-movement patterns in persons with stroke [dissertation]. Cambridge (MA): Massachusetts Institute of Technology; 2002.
54. Rohrer B, Hogan N. Avoiding spurious submovement decompositions. II: A scattershot algorithm. Biol Cybern. 2006;94(5):409-14.
55. Rohrer B, Fasoli SE, Krebs HI, Volpe BT, Frontera WR, Stein J, Hogan N. Submovements grow larger, fewer, and more blended during stroke recovery. Motor Control. 2004;8(4):472-83.
56. Wolpert DM, Kawato M. Multiple paired forward and inverse models for motor control. Neural Netw. 1998;11(7-8):1317-29.
57. Bhushan N, Shadmehr R. Computational nature of human adaptive control during learning of reaching movements in force fields. Biol Cybern. 1999;81(1):39-60.
58. Rohrer B, Krebs HI, Volpe BT, Frontera WR, Stein J, Hogan N. Patterns in stroke patient's submovements support a paired adaptive forward/inverse learning model [abstract]. In: Computational Motor Control Symposium, Society for Neuroscience Annual Meeting; 2002 Nov 2-7; Orlando, FL.
59. Hogan N. Skeletal muscle impedance in the control of motor actions. J Mech Med Biol. 2002;2(3-4):359-73.
60. Burdet E, Osu R, Franklin DW, Milner TE, Kawato M. The central nervous system stabilizes unstable dynamics by learning optimal impedance. Nature. 2001;414(6862):446-49.
61. Krebs HI, Volpe BT, Lynch D, Hogan N. Stroke rehabilitation: An argument in favor of a robotic gym. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference of Rehabilitation Robotics; 2005 Jun 28-Jul 1; Chicago, IL. New York: IEEE; 2005. p. 219-22.
62. Charles SK, Krebs HI, Volpe BT, Lynch D, Hogan N. Wrist rehabilitation following stroke: Initial clinical results. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference of Rehabilitation Robotics; 2005 Jun 28-Jul 1; Chicago, IL. New York: IEEE; 2005. p. 13-16.