Rehabilitation robotics: Performance-based progressive robot-assisted therapy

Autonomous Robots

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 7-20

  Krebs, H I ^a,b   Palazzolo, J J ^a   Dipietro, L ^c   Ferraro, M ^d   Krol, J ^d   Rannekleiv, K ^d   Volpe, B T ^b   Hogan, N ^a  

^a Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge   (United States)

^b WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

^c SCUOLA SUPERIORE SANT ANNA   (Italy)

^d BURKE REHABILITATION HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Adaptive algorithm; Rehabilitation robotics; Robot aided neurorehabilitation; Stroke

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE ALGORITHMS; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; NEUROMUSCULAR REHABILITATION; ROBOT APPLICATIONS;

ROBOT THERAPY;

ROBOTICS;

EID: 0041841559     PISSN: 09295593     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1024494031121     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Aisen, M.L., Krebs, H.I., McDowell, F., Hogan, N., and Volpe, B.T. 1997. The effect of robot assisted therapy & rehabilitative training on motor recovery following a stroke. Archives of Neurology, 54:443-446.
2. Aizawa, H., Inase, M., Mushiake, H., Shima, K., and Tanji, J. 1994. Reorganization of supplementary motor areas after neocortical damage. Exp. Br. Res., 84:668-671.
3. Akazawa, K., Milner, T.E., and Stein, R.B. 1983. Modulation of reflex EMG and stiffness in response to stretch of human finger muscle. J. of Neurophysiology, 49:16-27.
4. Asanuma, C. 1991. Mapping movements within a moving motor map. Trends in Neuroscience, 14:217-218.
5. Brainin, M., Bornstein, N., Boysen, G., and Demarin, V. 2000, Acute neurological stroke care in Europe: Results of the European stroke care inventory. European Journal of Neurology, 7:5-10.
6. Buerger, S.P., Krebs, H.I., and Hogan, N. 2001. Characterization and control of a screw-driven robot for neurorehabilitation. IEEE - CCA/ISIC 2001.
7. Celestino, J., Krebs, H.I., and Hogan, N. in press. A robot for wrist rehabilitation: Characterization and initial results. ICORR-2003.
8. Classen, J., Liepert, J., Wise, S.P., Hallet, M., and Cohen, L.G. 1998. Rapid plasticity of human cortical representation induced by practice. Journal of Neurophysiology, 79(2): 1117-1123.
9. Cozens, J.A. 1999. Robotic assistance of an active upper limb exercise in neurologically impaired patients. IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering, 7(2).
10. Dewald, J.P.A., Pope, P.S., Given, J., Buchanan, T.S., and Rymer, W.Z. 1995. Abnormal muscle coactivation patterns during isometric torque generation at the elbow and shoulder in hemiparetic subjects. Brain, 118(2):495-510.
11. Diamond, M.C., Greer, E.R., York, A., Lewis, D., Barton, T., and Lin, J. 1987. Rat cortical morphology following crowded enriched living conditions. Exp. Neural, 87(2):309-317.
12. Diamond, M.C., Ingham, C.A., Johnson, R.E., Bennet, E.L., and Rozenzweig, M.R. 1976. Effects of environment on morphology of rat cerebral cortex and hippocampus. J. Neurobiol, 7(1):75-85.
13. Diamond, M.C., Johnson, R.E., Protti, A.M., Ott, C., and Kajisa, L. 1985. Plasticity in the 904-day-old male rat cerebral cortex. Exp. Neural, 87(2):309-317.
14. Diamond, M.C., Law, F., Rhodes, H., Lindner, B., Rosenzweig, M.R., Krech, D., and Bennet, E.L. 1966. Increases in cortical depth and glia numbers in rats subjected to enriched environment. J. Comp Neural, 128(1): 117-126.
15. Ferraro, M., Demaio, J.H., Krol, J., Trudell, C., Edelstein, L., Christos, P., England, J., Fasoli, S., Aisen, M.L., Krebs, H.I., Hogan, N., and Volpe, B.T. 2002. Assessing the motor status score: A scale for the evaluation of upper limb motor outcomes in patients after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 16(3):301-307.
16. Fasoli, S.E., Krebs, H.I., Stein, J., Frontera, W.R., and Hogan, N. 2003. Effects of robotic therapy on motor impairment and recovery in chronic stroke. Arch. Physical Medicine, 84:477-482.
17. Fisher, C.M. 1992. Concerning the mechanism of recovery in stroke hemiplegia. Can. J. Neural. Sci., 19:57-63.
18. Fukuda, O., Tsuji, T., and Kaneko, M. 1997. An EMG controlled manipulator using ANNs. IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Communication.
19. Fukuda, O., Tsuji, T., Ohtsuka, A., and Kaneko, M. 1998. EMG-based human-robot interface for rehabilitation aid. In Proc. 1998 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Leuven, Belgium.
20. Fukuda, O., Tsuji, T., Kane KO, M., Otsuka, A. 2003. A human-assisting manipulator teleperated by EMG signals and arm motions. IEEE Robotics and Automation, 19(2):210-222.
21. Glees, P. 1980. Functional reorganization following hemispherectomy in man and after small experimental lesions in primates. In Recovery of Function: Theoretical Considerations for Brain Injury Rehabilitation, Bach-y-Rita P. (Ed.), Baltimore, University Park Press.
22. Graupe, D., Kohn, K.H., Kralj, A., and Basseas, S. 1983. Patient controlled electrical stimulation via EMG signature discrimination for providing certain paraplegics with primitive walking functions. J. Biomed. Eng., 5:220-226.
23. Greer, E.R., Diamond, M.C., and Murphy, G.M. Jr. 1982. Increased branching of basal dendrites on pyramidal neurons in the occipital cortex of homozygous Brattleboro rats in standard and enriched environmental conditions: A Golgi study. Exp Neural, 76(2):254-262.
24. Gresham, G.E., Duncan, P.W., Stason W.B. et al. 1995. Post-Stroke Rehabilitation. Clinical Practice Guideline, No. 16. U.S. Dept. Health and Human Services. Public Health Service, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. AHCPR Publication No. 95-0662.
25. Hogan, N., Krebs, H.I., Sharon, A., and Charnnarong, J. 1995. Interactive robotic therapist. US Patent No. 5,466,213.
26. Hogan, N. 1976. A review of the methods of processing EMG for use as a proportional control signal. Biomed. Eng., 11:81-86.
27. Hogan, N. 1985. Impedance control: An approach to manipulation. ASME-Journal Dyn Syst Measure Control, 107:1-24.
28. Jacobs, K.M. and Konoghue, J.P. 1991. Reshaping the cortical motor map by unmasking latent intracortical connections. Science, 251:944-947.
29. Jenkins, W.M. and Merzenich, M.M. 1987. Reorganization of neocortical representations after brain injury. Progress in Brain Research, 71:249-266.
30. Jones, T.A. and Shallert, T. 1994. Used dependent growth after neocortical damage. J. Neuroscience, 14:2140-2152.
31. Jugenheimer, K.A., Hogan, N., and Krebs, H.I. 2001. A robot for hand rehabilitation: A continuation of the MIT-MANUS neurorehabilitation workstation. ASME 2001 IDETC/CIE.
32. Kaas, J.H., Krubitzer, L.A., Chino, Y.M. et al. 1990. Reorganization of retinotopic cortical maps in adult mammals after lesions of the retina. Science, 248:229-231.
33. Kato, I., Okazaki, E., Kikuchi, H., and Iwanami, K. 1967. Electropneumatically controlled hand prosthesis using pattern recognition of mio-electric signals. In Proc. 7th ICMBE.
34. Kazerooni, H. 1990. Human-robot interaction via the transfer of power and information signals. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 20(2):450-463.
35. Kearney, R.E. and Mirbagheri, M.M. 2001. Identification and simulation as tools for measurement of neuromuscular properties. IEEE - 23rd EMBS.
36. King, A.J. and Moore, D.R. 1991. Plasticity of auditory maps in the brain. Trends in Neuroscience, 14:21-27.
37. Krebs, H.I., Hogan, N., Aisen, M.L., and Volpe, B.T. 1998. Robot-aided neuro-rehabilitation. IEEE-Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering, 6(1):75-87.
38. Krebs, H.I., Hogan, N., Aisen, M.L., and Volpe, B.T. 1999. Quantization of continuous arm movements in humans with brain injury. Proc. National. Academy of Science, 96:4645-4649.
39. Krebs, H.I., Hogan, N., Hening, W., Adamovich, S., and Poizner, H. 2001. Procedural motor learning in parkinson's disease. Exp. Brain Res., 141:425-437.
40. Krebs, H.I., Volpe, B.T., Aisen, M.L., and Hogan, N. 2000. Increasing productivity and quality of care: Robot-aided neurorehabilitation. VA Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 37(6):639-652.
41. Krebs, H.I., Volpe, B.T., Ferraro, M., Fasoli, S., Palazzolo, J., Rohrer, B., Edelstein, L., and Hogan, N. 2002. Robot-aided neurorehabilitation: From evidence-based to science-based rehabilitation. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 8(4):54-70.
42. Krebs, H.I., Volpe, B.T., Palazzolo, J.J., Fasoli, S.E., Ferraro, M., Edelstein, L., and Hogan, N. 2001. Disturbances of higher level neural control - Robotic applications in stroke. IEEE - 23rd EMBS, Istanbul, Turkey.
43. Krebs, H.I., Volpe, B.T., Palazzolo, J., Rohrer, B., Ferraro, M., Fasoli, S., Edelstein, L., and Hogan, N. 2001. Robot-aided neuro-rehabilitation in stroke: Interim results on the follow-up of 76 patients and on movement performance indices. In Integration of Assistive Technology in the Information Age, Mounir Mokhtari (Ed.), IOS Press, Assistive Technology Research Series, Amsterdam, 2001.
44. Lum, P.S., Burgar, C.G., Shor, P., Majmundar, M., and Van der Loos, M. 2000. Robot-assisted movement training compared with convention therapy techniques for the rehabilitation of upper-pinto motor junc after stroke arch. Phys. Med. Rehab., 83:952-959.
45. Medical Research Council/Guarantors of Brain. 1986. Aids to the examination of the peripheral nervous system. London, Bailliere Tindall.
46. Merzenich, M.M., Jenkins, W.M., Johnston, P., Schreiner, C., Miller, S.L., and Tallal, P. 1996. Temporal processing deficits of language-learning impaired children ameliorated by training. Science, 271:77-81.
47. Merzenich, M.M., Nelson, R.J., Stryker, M.P., Cynader, M.S., Schoppmann, A., and Zook, J.M. 1984. Somatosensory cortical map changes following digit amputation in adult monkeys. J Comparative Neurology, 224:591-605.
48. Mirbagheri, M.M., Barbeau, H., Ladouceur, M., and Kearney, R.E. 2001. Intrinsic and reflex stiffness in normal and spastic, spinal cord injured subjects. Exp Brain Res, 141:446-459.
49. Mussa-Ivaldi, F.A., Hogan, N., and Bizzi, E. 1985. Neural, mechanical, and geometric factors subserving arm posture in humans. The Journal of Neuroscience, 5(10):2732-2743.
50. Nudo, R.J., Wise, B.M., SiFuentes, P., and Milliken, G.W. 1996. Neural substrates for the effects of rehabilitative training on motor recovery after ischemic infarct. Science, 272:1791-1794.
51. Nyberg-Hansen, R. and Rinvik, E. 1963. Some comments on the pyramidal tract, with special reference to its individual variations in man. Acta Neural. Scand., 39:1-30.
52. Patton, J. and Mussa-Ivaldi, F.A. 2001. Robotic teaching by exploiting the nervous system's adaptive mechanisms. In Integration of Assistive Technology in the Information Age, Mounir Mokhtari (Ed.), IOS Press, Assistive Technology Research Series, Amsterdam, 2001.
53. Peckham, P.H., Marsolais, E.B., and Mortimer, J.T. 1980. Restoration of key grip and release in C6 tetraplegic patient through functional electrical stimulation. J. Hand Surg., 5(5):462-469.
54. Philipson, L. 1985. Adaptable myoelectric prosthetic control with functional visual feedback using microprocessor techniques. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput., 23:8-14.
55. Pons, T.P., Garraghty, P.E., and Mishkin, M. 1988. Lesion-induced plasticity in the second somatosensory cortex of adult macaques. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 85:5279-5281.
56. Reinkensmeyer, D., Schmit, B.D., and Rymer, Z. 1999. Assessment of active and passive restraint during guided reaching after chronic brain injury. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 27:805-814.
57. Ridding, M.C., Sheean, G., Rothwell, J.C., Inzelberg, R., and Kujirai, T. 1995. Changes in the balance between motor cortical excitation and inhibition in focal, task specific dystonia. J Neural Neurosurg Psychiatry, 59:493-498.
58. Rosen, J., Brand, M., Fuchs, M.B., and Arcan, M. 2001. A myosignal based powered exoskeleton system. IEEE Transaction on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 31(3).
59. Sabatini, U., Toni, D., Pantano, P. et al. 1994. Motor recovery after early brain damage. Stroke, 25:514-517.
60. Stefan, K., Kunesch, E., Cohen, L.G., Benecke, R., and Classen, J. 2000. Induction of plasticity in the human motor cortex by paired associative stimulation. Brain, 123:572-584.
61. Triolo, R.J. and Moscowitz, G.D. 1985. A multi-channel time series myoprocessor for robust classification of limb functiona and estimation of muscle force. In IEEE Proc. 7th Annual Conf. Eng. Med. Biol. Soc..
62. Volpe, B.T., Krebs, H.I., Hogan, N., Edelstein, L., Diels, C.M., and Aisen, M.L. 1999. Robot training enhanced motor outcome in patients with stroke maintained over 3 years. Neurology, 53:1874-1876.
63. Volpe, B.T., Krebs, H.I., Hogan, N., Edelstein, L., Diels, C.M., and Aisen, M. 2000. A novel approach to stroke rehabilitation: Robot aided sensorymotor stimulation. Neurology, 54:1938-1944.
64. Volpe, B.T., Krebs, H.I., and Hogan, N. 2001. Is robot-aided sensorimotor training in stroke rehabilitation a realistic option? Current Opinion in Neurology, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
65. Williams, D.J., Krebs, H.I., Hogan, N. 2001. A Robot for wrist rehabilitation. IEEE-23rd EMBS.
66. Wu, C.-Y., Trombly, C.A., Lin, K.-C., and Tickle-Degnen, L. 1998. Effects of object affordances on movement performance: A meta-analysis. Scandinavian J. of Occupational Therapy, 5:83-92.