Learning, retention, and slacking: A model of the dynamics of recovery in robot therapy

IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 286-296

  Casadio, Maura ^a   Sanguineti, Vittorio ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GENOA   (Italy)

^b ISTITUTO ITALIANO DI TECNOLOGIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Assistance; linear dynamical systems; robot therapy; state space model; stroke

Indexed keywords

ASSISTANCE; LINEAR DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS; ROBOT THERAPY; STATE SPACE MODEL; STROKE;

DYNAMICS; LINEAR CONTROL SYSTEMS; RECOVERY; STATE SPACE METHODS;

ROBOTS;

ADAPTATION; ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHM; ARM; ARTICLE; CONVALESCENCE; FEMALE; HUMAN; KINESIOTHERAPY; LEARNING; MALE; MEMORY; MIDDLE AGED; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; ROBOTICS; SIGNAL PROCESSING; STATISTICAL MODEL; STROKE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISION;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHMS; ARM; EXERCISE THERAPY; FEMALE; HUMANS; LEARNING; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; MEMORY; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MOVEMENT; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; ROBOTICS; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; STROKE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISION, OCULAR;

EID: 84861524623     PISSN: 15344320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TNSRE.2012.2190827     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. D. Lloyd-Jones et al., "Heart disease and stroke statistics-2009 update: A report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee," Circulation, vol. 119, no. 3, pp. 480-486, Jan. 27, 2009.
2. P. U. Heuschmann et al., "Incidence of stroke in Europe at the beginning of the 21st century," Stroke, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 1557-1563, May 2009.
3. R. J. Nudo, "Mechanisms for recovery of motor function following cortical damage," Curr. Opin. Neurobiol., vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 638-644, Dec. 2006. (Pubitemid 44791925)
4. G. Kwakkel, "Impact of intensity of practice after stroke: Issues for consideration," Disabil. Rehabil., vol. 28, no. 13-14, pp. 823-830, Jul. 2006.
5. G. Kwakkel, B. Kollen, and J. Twisk, "Impact of time on improvement of outcome after stroke," Stroke, vol. 37, no. 9, pp. 2348-2353, Sep. 2006. (Pubitemid 44337182)
6. B. French et al., "Repetitive task training for improving functional ability after stroke," Cochrane Database Syst. Rev., vol. 4, p. CD006073, 2007.
7. B. French et al., "Repetitive task training for improving functional ability after stroke," Stroke, pp. e98-e99, Feb. 2009.
8. E. J. Plautz, G. W. Milliken, and R. J. Nudo, "Effects of repetitive motor training on movement representations in adult squirrelmonkeys: Role of use versus learning," Neurobiol. Learn. Memory, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 27-55, Jul. 2000. (Pubitemid 30470907)
9. D. L. Adkins et al., "Motor training induces experience-specific patterns of plasticity across motor cortex and spinal cord," J. Appl. Physiol., vol. 101, no. 6, pp. 1776-1782, Dec. 2006. (Pubitemid 44904501)
10. J. A. Kleim, S. Barbay, and R. J. Nudo, "Functional reorganization of the rat motor cortex following motor skill learning," J. Neurophysiol., vol. 80, no. 6, pp. 3321-3325, Dec. 1998. (Pubitemid 29029253)
11. M. S. Remple et al., "Sensitivity of cortical movement representations to motor experience: Evidence that skill learning but not strength training induces cortical reorganization," Behav. Brain Res., vol. 123, no. 2, pp. 133-141, Sep. 2001. (Pubitemid 32496512)
12. J. A. Kleim et al., "Cortical synaptogenesis and motor map reorganization occur during late, but not early, phase of motor skill learning," J. Neurosci., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 628-633, Jan. 21, 2004. (Pubitemid 38166488)
13. G. B. Prange et al., "Systematic review of the effect of robot-Aided therapy on recovery of the hemiparetic arm after stroke," J. Rehabil. Res. Develop., vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 171-184, Mar.-Apr. 2006.
14. G. Kwakkel, B. J. Kollen, and H. I. Krebs, "Effects of robot-Assisted therapy on upper limb recovery after stroke: A systematic review," Neurorehabil. Neural Repair, pp. 1-17, Sep. 2007.
15. J. Mehrholz et al., "Electromechanical and robot-Assisted arm training for improving arm function and activities of daily living after stroke," Cochrane Database Syst. Rev., vol. 4, p. CD006876, 2008.
16. B. T. Volpe et al., "Robot training enhanced motor outcome in patients with stroke maintained over 3 years," Neurology, vol. 53, no. 8, pp. 1874-1876, Nov. 1999. (Pubitemid 29530373)
17. D. J. Reinkensmeyer, J. L. Emken, and S. C. Cramer, "Robotics, motor learning, and neurologic recovery," Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng., vol. 6, pp. 497-525, 2004. (Pubitemid 39209506)
18. L. Marchal-Crespo and D. J. Reinkensmeyer, "Review of control strategies for robotic movement training after neurologic injury," J. Neuroeng. Rehabil., vol. 6, pp. 1-15, 2009.
19. J. L. Emken et al., "Motor adaptation as a greedy optimization of error and effort," J. Neurophysiol., vol. 97, no. 6, pp. 3997-4006, Jun. 2007. (Pubitemid 47082400)
20. R. Colombo et al., "Measuring changes of movement dynamics during robot-Aided neurorehabilitation of stroke patients," IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 75-85, Feb. 2010.
21. E. Vergaro et al., "Self-Adaptive robot training of stroke survivors for continuous tracking movements," J. Neuroeng. Rehabil., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 3-12, Mar. 2010.
22. C. E. Han, M. A. Arbib, and N. Schweighofer, "Stroke rehabilitation reaches a threshold," PLoS Comput. Biol., vol. 4, no. 8, p. e1000133, 2008.
23. N. Schweighofer et al., "A functional threshold for long-term use of hand and arm function can be determined: Predictions from a computational model and supporting data from the Extremity Constraint-Induced Therapy Evaluation (EXCITE) Trial," Phys. Ther., vol. 89, no. 12, pp. 1327-1336, Dec. 2009.
24. J. L. Emken, R. Benitez, and D. J. Reinkensmeyer, "Human-robot cooperative movement training: Learning a novel sensory motor transformation during walking with robotic assistance-As-needed," J. Neuroeng. Rehabil., vol. 4, pp. 1-16, 2007.
25. S. Cheng and P. N. Sabes, "Modeling sensorimotor learning with linear dynamical systems," Neural Comput., vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 760-793, Apr. 2006. (Pubitemid 43543821)
26. O. Donchin, J. T. Francis, and R. Shadmehr, "Quantifying generalization from trial-by-trial behavior of adaptive systems that learn with basis functions: Theory and experiments in human motor control," J. Neurosci., vol. 23, no. 27, pp. 9032-9045, Oct. 8, 2003. (Pubitemid 37243804)
27. M. A. Smith, A. Ghazizadeh, and R. Shadmehr, "Interacting adaptive processes with different timescales underlie short-term motor learning," PLoS Biol., vol. 4, no. 6, p. e179, Jun. 2006.
28. S. K. Wainscott, O. Donchin, and R. Shadmehr, "Internal models and contextual cues: Encoding serial order and direction of movement," J. Neurophysiol., vol. 93, no. 2, pp. 786-800, Feb. 2005.
29. K. P. Kording, J. B. Tenenbaum, and R. Shadmehr, "The dynamics of memory as a consequence of optimal adaptation to a changing body," Nat. Neurosci., vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 779-786, Jun. 2007. (Pubitemid 46828507)
30. M. A. Smith andR. Shadmehr, "Intact ability to learn internalmodels of arm dynamics in huntington's disease but not cerebellar degeneration," J. Neurophysiol., vol. 93, no. 5, pp. 2809-2821, May 2005. (Pubitemid 40570859)
31. M. Casadio et al., "Abnormal sensorimotor control, but intact force field adaptation, in multiple sclerosis subjects with no clinical disability," Multiple Scler., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 330-342, Apr. 2008. (Pubitemid 351676428)
32. M. Casadio et al., "Minimally assistive robot training for proprioception enhancement," Exp. Brain Res., vol. 194, no. 2, pp. 219-231, Apr. 2009.
33. M. Casadio et al., "Braccio di Ferro: A new haptic workstation for neuromotor rehabilitation," Technol. Health Care, vol. 13, pp. 1-20, 2006.
34. R. Bohannon and M. Smith, "Interrater reliability of a modified ashworth scale of muscle spasticity," Phys. Ther., vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 206-207, 1987. (Pubitemid 17026064)
35. A. R. Fugl-Meyer et al., "The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. A method for evaluation of physical performance," Scand. J. Rehabil. Med., vol. 7, no. 1135616, pp. 13-31, 1975.
36. V. S. Huang and J. W. Krakauer, "Robotic neurorehabilitation: A computational motor learning perspective," J. Neuroeng. Rehabil., vol. 6, p. 5, 2009.
37. J. W. Krakauer, "Motor learning: Its relevance to stroke recovery and neurorehabilitation," Curr. Opin. Neurol., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 84-90, Feb. 2006. (Pubitemid 43172710)
38. L. Dipietro et al., "Learning, not adaptation, characterizes stroke motorrecovery: Evidence from kinematic changes induced by robot-Assisted therapyin trained and untrained task in the same workspace," IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 48-57, Jan. 2012.
39. C. J. Winstein, A. S. Merians, and K. J. Sullivan, "Motor learning after unilateral brain damage," Neuropsychologia, vol. 37, no. 8, pp. 975-987, Jul. 1999. (Pubitemid 29245993)
40. J. L. Patton et al., "Evaluation of robotic training forces that either enhance or reduce error in chronic hemiparetic stroke survivors," Exp. Brain Res., vol. 168, no. 3, pp. 368-383, Jan. 2006. (Pubitemid 41830946)
41. M. Ferraro et al., "Robot-Aided sensorimotor arm training improves outcome in patients with chronic stroke," Neurology, vol. 61, no. 11, pp. 1604-1607, Dec. 2003. (Pubitemid 37505588)
42. R. A. Scheidt et al., "Persistence of motor adaptation during constrained, multi-joint, arm movements," J. Neurophysiol., vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 853-862, Aug. 2000. (Pubitemid 30655608)
43. J. Y. Lee and N. Schweighofer, "Dual adaptation supports a parallel architecture of motor memory," J. Neurosci., vol. 29, no. 33, pp. 10396-10404, Aug. 19, 2009.