Analysis of Acorus calamus chloroplast genome and its phylogenetic implications

Molecular Biology and Evolution

Volumn 22, Issue 9, 2005, Pages 1813-1822

  Goremykin, Vadim V ^a   Holland, Barbara ^b   Hirsch Ernst, Karen I ^c   Hellwig, Frank H ^a  

^a FRIEDRICH SCHILLER UNIVERSITY JENA   (Germany)

^b MASSEY UNIVERSITY   (New Zealand)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Acorus calamus; Angiosperms; Chloroplast genomes; Gymnosperms; Molecular evolution; Systematic phylogenetic error

Indexed keywords

CONCATENATED DNA;

ACORUS CALAMUS; ANGIOSPERM; ARISTOLOCHIA; ARTICLE; CHLOROPLAST GENETICS; CLADISTICS; CONTROLLED STUDY; GENE LOCATION; GENE SEQUENCE; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC LINKAGE; GENOME; HYPOTHESIS; LONG BRANCH ATTRACTION; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD METHOD; NONHUMAN; NYMPHAEA; PARSIMONY ANALYSIS; PHYLOGENY; POACEAE; SIMULATION; TAXON; TAXONOMY;

ACORUS; BASE SEQUENCE; DNA, CHLOROPLAST; GENOME, PLANT; NUCLEIC ACID AMPLIFICATION TECHNIQUES; PHYLOGENY; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; VARIATION (GENETICS);

ACORUS CALAMUS; AMBORELLA; AUSTROBAILEYALES; GYMNOSPERMAE; MAGNOLIOPHYTA; NYMPHAEALES; PINUS (GENUS); PIPERALES; POACEAE; SPERMATOPHYTA;

EID: 23944524609     PISSN: 07374038     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msi173     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Ané, C., J. G. Burleigh, M. M. McMahon, and M. J. Sanderson. 2005. Covarion structure in plastid genome evolution: a new statistical test. Mol. Biol. Evol. 22:914-924.
2. Asano, T., T. Tsudzuki, S. Takahashi, H. Shimada, and K. Kadowaki. 2004. Complete nucleotide sequence of the sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum) chloroplast genome: a comparative analysis of four monocot chloroplast genomes. DNA Res. 11:93-99.
3. Bharathan, G., and E. A. Zimmer. 1995. Early branching events in monocotyledons - partial 18s ribosomal DNA sequence analysis. Pp. 81-107 in P. J. Rudall, P. J. Cribb, D. F. Cutler, and C. J. Humphries, eds. Monocotyledons: systematics and evolution. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, United Kingdom.
4. Bogner, J., and S. J. Mayo. 1998. Acoraceae. Pp. 7-11 in K. Kubitzki, ed. The families and genera of vascular plants. Vol. 4. Springer Verlag, N. Y.
5. Chase, M. W., D. E. Soltis, P. S. Soltis et al. (13 co-authors). 2000. Higher-level systematics of the monocotyledons: an assessment of current knowledge and a new classification. Pp. 3-16 in K. L. Wilson and D. A. Morrison, eds. Monocots: systematics and evolution. CSIRO, Melbourne, Australia.
6. Duvall, M. R., and A. Bricker Ervin. 2004. 18S gene trees are positively misleading for monocot/dicot phylogenetics. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 30:97-106.
7. Duvall, M. R., G. H. Learn Jr, L. E. Eguiarte, and M. T. Clegg. 1993. Phylogenetic analysis of rbcL sequences identifies Acorus calamus as the primal extant monocotyledon. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90:4641-4644.
8. Ewing, B., L. Hillier, M. C. Wendl, and P. Green. 1998. Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. I. Accuracy assessment. Genome Res. 8:175-185.
9. Friis, E. M., K. R. Pedersen, and P. R. Crane. 2004. Araceae from the early cretaceous of Portugal: evidence on the emergence of monocotyledons. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101:16565-16570.
10. Goremykin, V., V. Bobrova, J. Pahnke, A. Troitsky, A. Antonov, and W. Martin. 1996. Noncoding sequences from the slowly evolving chloroplast inverted repeat in addition to rbcL data do not support gnetalean affinities of angiosperms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13:383-396.
11. Goremykin, V. V., K. I. Hirsch-Ernst, S. Wölfl, and F. H. Hellwig. 2003a. The chloroplast genome of the "basal" angiosperm Calycanthus fertilis - structural and phylogenetic analyses. Plant Syst. Evol. 242:19-135.
12. _. 2003b. Analysis of the Amborella trichopoda chloroplast genome sequence suggests that Amborella is not a basal angiosperm. Mol. Biol. Evol. 20:1499-1505.
13. Goremykin, V. V., K. I. Hirsch-Ernst, S. Wölfl, and F. H. Hellwig. 2004. The chloroplast genome of Nymphaea alba: whole-genome analyses and the problem of identifying the most basal angiosperm. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21:1445-1454.
14. Graham, S. W., and R. G. Olmstead. 2000. Utility of 17 chloroplast genes for inferring the phylogeny of the basal angiosperms. Am. J. Bot. 87:1712-1730.
15. Grayum, M. H. 1987. A summary of evidence and arguments supporting the removal of Acorus from the Araceae. Taxon 36:723-729.
16. Guindon, S., and O. Gascuel. 2003. A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst. Biol. 52:696-504.
17. Hiratsuka, J., H. Shimada, R. Whittier et al. (16 co-authors). 1989. The complete sequence of the rice (Oryza sativa) chloroplast genome: intermolecular recombination between distinct tRNA genes accounts for a major plastid DNA inversion during the evolution of the cereals. Mol. Gen. Genet. 217:185-194.
18. Huber, K. T., M. Langton, D. Penny, V. Moulton, and M. Hendy. 2002. Spectronet: a package for computing spectra and median networks. Appl. Bioinformatics 1:159-161.
19. Hupfer, H., M. Swiatek, S. Hornung, R. G. Hermann, R. M. Maier, W.-L. Chiu, and B. Sears. 2000. Complete nucleotide sequence of the Oenothera elata plastid chromosome, representing plastome I of the five distinguishable Euoenothera plastomes. Mol. Gen. Genet. 263:581-585.
20. Katayama, H., and Y. Ogihara. 1996. Phylogenetic affinities of the grasses to other monocots as revealed by molecular analysis of chloroplast DNA. Curr. Genet. 29:572-581.
21. Kato, T., T. Kaneko, S. Sato, Y. Nakamura, and S. Tabata. 2000. Complete structure of the chloroplast genome of a legume, Lotus japonicus. DNA Res. 7:323-330.
22. Kim, K.-J., and H.-L. Lee, 2004. Complete chloroplast genome sequence from Korea Ginseng (Panax schinseng Nees) and comparative analysis of sequence evolution among 17 vascular plants. DNA Res. 11:247-261.
23. Lockhart, P., and D. Penny. 2005. The place of Amborella within the radiation of angiosperms. Trends Plant Sci. 10:201-202.
24. Maier, R. M., K. Neckermann, G. L. Igloi, and H. Kossel. 1995. Complete sequence of the maize chloroplast genome: gene content, hotspots of divergence and fine tuning of genetic information by transcript editing. J. Mol. Biol. 251:614-628.
25. Martin, W., O. Deusch, N. Stawski, N. Grünheit, and V. Goremykin. 2005. Chloroplast genome phylogenetics: why we need independent approaches to plant molecular evolution. Trends Plant Sci. 10:203-209.
26. Murray, M. G., and W. F. Thompson. 1980. Rapid isolation of high molecular weight plant DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 19:4321-4325.
27. Ogihara, Y., K. Isono, T. Kojim et al. (19 co-authors). 2002. Structural features of a wheat plastome as revealed by complete sequencing of chloroplast DNA. Mol. Genet. Genomics 266:740-746.
28. Posada, D., and K. A. Crandall. 1998. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14:817-818.
29. Rambaut, A. E., and N. C. Grassly. 1997. Seq-gen: an application for the Monte Carlo simulation of DNA sequence evolution along phylogenetic trees. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 1:235-238.
30. Reeves, J. H. 1992. Heterogeneity in the substitution process of amino acid sites of proteins coded for by mitochondrial DNA. J. Mol. Evol. 35:17-31.
31. Sato, S., Y. Nakamura, T. Kaneko, E. Asamizu, and S. Tabata. 1999. Complete structure of the chloroplast genome of Arabidopsis thaliana. DNA Res. 6:283-290.
32. Savolainen, V., and M. W. Chase. 2003. A decade of progress in plant molecular phylogenetics. Trends Genet. 19:717-724.
33. Schmitz-Linneweber, C., R. M. Maier, J. P. Alcaraz, A. Cottet, R. G. Herrmann, and R. Mache. 2001. The plastid chromosome of spinach (Spinacia oleracea): complete nucleotide sequence and gene organization. Plant Mol. Biol. 45:307-315.
34. Shinozaki, K., M. Ohme, M. Tanaka et al. (23 co-authors). 1986. The complete nucleotide sequence of the tobacco chloroplast genome: its gene organisation and expression. EMBO J. 5: 2043-2049.
35. Soltis, D. E., V. A. Albert, V. Savolainen et al. (11 co-authors). 2004. Genome-scale data, angiosperm relationships, and "ending incongruence": a cautionary tale in phylogenetics. Trends Plant Sci. 9:477-483.
36. Staden, R., K. F. Beal, and J. K. Bonfield. 2000. The Staden package, 1998. Methods Mol. Biol. 132:115-130.
37. Stefanovic, S., D. W. Rice, and J. D. Palmer. 2004. Long branch attraction, taxon sampling, and the earliest angiosperms: Amborella or monocots? BMC Evol. Biol. 4:35.
38. Swofford, D. L. 2002. PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass.
39. Tamura, M. N., J. Yamashita, S. Fuse, and M. Haraguchi. 2004. Molecular phylogeny of monocotyledons inferred from combined analysis of plastid matK and rbcL gene sequences. J. Plant Res. 117:109-120.
40. Wakasugi, T., J. Tsudzuki, S. Ito, K. Nakashima, T. Tsudzuki, and M. Sugiura. 1994. Loss of all ndh genes as determined by sequencing the entire chloroplast genome of the black pine Pinus thunbergii. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:9794-9798.
41. Zanis, M. J., D. E. Soltis, P. S. Soltis, S. Mathews, and M. J. Donoghue. 2002. The root of the angiosperms revisited. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:6848-6853.