Matched-pairs tests of homogeneity with applications to homologous nucleotide sequences

Bioinformatics

Volumn 22, Issue 10, 2006, Pages 1225-1231

  Ababneh, Faisal ^a   Jermiin, Lars S ^a,b   Ma, Chunsheng ^c   Robinson, John ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b INSTITUT PASTEUR   (France)

^c WICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NUCLEOTIDE; SMALL SUBUNIT RIBOSOMAL RNA;

ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL STRAIN; CONTINGENCY TABLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; GENETIC CONSERVATION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHYLOGENY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; SIMULATION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STRUCTURAL PROTEOMICS;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS);

EID: 33646892649     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 13674811     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl064     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Ababneh,F. et al. (2006) Generation of the exact distribution and simulation of matched nucleotide sequences on a phylogenetic tree. J. Math. Model. Algor., (in press).
2. Agresti,A. (1990) Categorical Data Analysis, Wiley Series in Probability and Mathematical Statistics, New York.
3. Barry,D. and Hartigan,J.A. (1987) Statistical analysis of hominoid molecular evolution. Stat. Sci., 2, 191-210.
4. Bhapkar,V.P. (1966) A note on the equivalence of two test criteria for hypotheses in categorical data. J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 61, 228-235.
5. Bollback,J.P. (2002) Bayesian model adequacy and choice in phylogenetics. Mol. Biol. Evol., 19, 1171-1180.
6. Bowker,A.H. (1948) A test for symmetry in contingency tables. J. Am. Stat. Assoc, 43, 572-574.
7. Felsenstein,J. (2004) Inferring Phylogenies. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland.
8. Foster,P.G. (2004) Modeling compositional heterogeneity. Syst. Biol., 53, 485-495.
9. Galtier,N. and Gouy,M. (1995) Inferring phylogenies from DNA sequences of unequal base compositions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 92, 11317-11321.
10. Gelman,A. et al. (1996) Posterior predictive assessment of model fitness via realized discrepancies. Stat. Sinica, 6, 733-807.
11. Ho,S.Y.W. and Jermiin,L.S. (2004) Tracing the decay of the historical signal in biological sequence data. Syst. Biol., 53, 623-637.
12. Huelsenbeck,J.P. et al. (2001) Bayesian inference of phylogeny and its impact on evolutionary biology. Science, 294, 2310-2314.
13. Ireland,C. et al. (1969) Symmetry and marginal homogeneity of an r × r contingency table. J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 64, 1323-1341.
14. Jayaswal,V. et al. (2005) Estimation of phylogeny using a general Markov model. Evol. Bioinf. Online, 1, 62-80.
15. Jermiin,L.S. et al. (2004) The biasing effect of compositional heterogeneity on phylogenetic estimates may be underestimated. Syst. Biol., 53, 638-643.
16. Jukes,T.H. and Cantor,C.R. (1969) Evolution of protein molecules. In Munro (ed.), Mammalian Protein Metabolism. Academic Press, New York, pp. 21-132.
17. Lanave,C. et al. (1984) A new method for calculating evolutionary substitution rates. J. Mol. Evol., 20, 86-93.
18. Lanave,C. and Pesole,G. (1993) Stationary MARKOV processes in the evolution of biological macromolecules. Binary, 5, 191-195.
19. O'Neill,M.E. (1975) Problems in Dependence, PhD Thesis, University of Sydney.
20. Posada,D. and Crandall,K.A. (1998) MODELTEST: Testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics, 14, 817-818.
21. Rzhetsky,A. and Nei,M. (1995) Tests of applicability of several substitution models for DNA sequence data. Mol. Biol. Evol., 12, 131-151.
22. Stuart,A. (1955) A test for homogeneity of the marginal distributions in a two-way classification. Biometrika, 42, 412-416.
23. Swofford,D.L. (2001) PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (* and other methods). Version 4. Massachusetts, Sinauer Associates.
24. Tavaré,S. (1986) Some probabilistic and statistical problems on the analysis of DNA sequences. Lect. Math. Life Sci., 17, 57-86.
25. Waddell,P.J. and Steel,M.A. (1997) General time reversible distances with unequal rates across sites: Mixing Γ and inverse Gaussian distributions with invariant sites. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol., 8, 398-414.
26. Waddell,P.J. et al. (1999) Using novel phylogenetic methods to evaluate mammalian mtDNA, including amino acid-invariant sites-LogDet plus site stripping, to detect internal conflicts in the data, with special reference to the positions of hedgehog, armadillo, and elephant. Syst. Biol., 48, 31-53.
27. Yang,Z. and Roberts,D. (1995) On the use of nucleotide sequences to infer early branches in the tree of life. Mol. Biol. Evol., 12, 451-458.