Strain development in 3-unit implant-supported CAD/CAM restorations

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 648-652

  Karl, Matthias ^a   Wichmann, Manfred G ^a   Heckmann, Siegfried M ^a   Krafft, Tim ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

^b NONE

Author keywords

CAD CAM; Implant supported restoration; Impression accuracy; Passive fit

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL CARE; DENTURE; METHODOLOGY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; DENTURE DESIGN; DENTURE, PARTIAL, FIXED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS;

EID: 50849108161     PISSN: 08822786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Assif D, Marshak B, Schmidt A. Accuracy of implant impression techniques. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:216-222.
2. Hellden LB, Derand T. Description and evaluation of a simplified method to achieve passive fit between cast titanium frameworks and implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13:190-196.
3. Goossens IC, Herbst D. Evaluation of a new method to achieve optimal passivity of implant-supported superstructures. SADJ 2003;58:279-285.
4. Hellden LB, Ericson G, Olsson CO. The Cresco Bridge and implant concept: Presentation of a technology for fabrication of abutment-free, passively fitting superstructures. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2005;25:89-94.
5. Longoni S, Sartori M, Davide R. A simplified method to reduce prosthetic misfit for a screw-retained, implant-supported complete denture using a luting technique and laser welding. J Prosthet Dent 2004;91:595-598.
6. Rubeling G. New techniques in spark erosion: The solution to an accurately fitting screw-retained implant restoration. Quintessence Int 1999;30:38-48.
7. Watanabe F, Uno I, Hata Y, Neuendorff G, Kirsch A. Analyses of stress distribution in a screw-retained implant prosthesis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:209-218.
8. Clelland NL, van Putten MC. Comparison of strains produced in a bone simulant between conventional cast and resin-luted implant frameworks. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997;12:793-799.
9. Sahin S, Cehreli MC.The significance of passive framework fit in implant prosthodontics: Current status. Implant Dent 2001;10:85-92.
10. Tan KB. The clinical significance of distortion in implant prosthodontics: Is there such a thing as passive fit? Ann Acad Med Singapore 1995;24:138-157.
11. Wee AG, Aquilino SA, Schneider RL. Strategies to achieve fit in implant prosthodontics: A review of the literature. Int J Prosthodont 1999;12:167-178.
12. Carr AB.Comparison of impression techniques for a five-implant mandibular model. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991;6:448-455.
13. Carr AB. Comparison of impression techniques for a two-implant 15-degree divergent model. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992;7:468-475.
14. Vigolo P, Majzoub Z, Cordioli G. In vitro comparison of master cast accuracy for single-tooth implant replacement. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:562-566.
15. Herbst D, Nel JC, Driessen CH, Becker PJ. Evaluation of impression accuracy for osseointegrated implant supported superstructures. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:555-561.
16. Hsu CC, Millstein PL, Stein RS. A comparative analysis of the accuracy of implant transfer techniques. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69:588-593.
17. Burawi G, Houston F, Byrne D, Claffey N. A comparison of the dimensional accuracy of the splinted and unsplinted impression techniques for the Bone-Lock implant system. J Prosthet Dent 1999;77:68-75.
18. Inturregui JA, Aquilino SA, Ryther JS, Lund PS. Evaluation of three impression techniques for osseointegrated oral implants. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69:503-509.
19. Assif D, Nissan J, Varsano I, Singer A. Accuracy of implant impression splinted techniques: Effect of splinting material. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:885-888.
20. Spector MR, Donovan TE, Nicholls JL. An evaluation of impression techniques for osseointegrated implants. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:444-447.
21. Ma T, Nicholls JI, Rubenstein JE. Tolerance measurements of various implant components. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997;12:371-375.
22. Keith SE, Miller BH, Woody RD, Higginbottom FL. Marginal discrepancy of screw-retained and cemented metal-ceramic crowns on implants abutments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:369-378.
23. Cheshire PD, Hobkirk JA. An in vivo quantitative analysis of the fit of Nobel Biocare implant superstructures. J Oral Rehabil 1996;23:782-789.
24. Carr AB, Gerard DA, Larsen PE. The response of bone in primates around unloaded dental implants supporting prostheses with different levels of fit. J Prosthet Dent 1996;76:500-509.
25. Heckmann SM, Karl M, Wichmann MG, Winter W, Graef F, Taylor TD. Cement fixation and screw retention: Parameters of passive fit - An in vitro study of three-unit implant-supported fixed partial dentures. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15:466-473.
26. Karl M, Winter W, Taylor TD, Heckmann SM. In vitro study on passive fit in implant-supported 5-unit fixed partial dentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:30-37.
27. McLaren EA, Terry DA. CAD/CAM systems, materials, and clinical guidelines for all-ceramic crowns and fixed partial dentures. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2002;23:637-641.
28. Raigrodski AJ. Contemporary all-ceramic fixed partial dentures: A review. Dent Clin North Am 2004;48:531-544.
29. Tinschert J, Natt G, Mautsch W, Spiekermann H, Anusavice KJ. Marginal fit of alumina-and zirconia-based fixed partial dentures produced by a CAD/CAM system. Oper Dent 2001;26:367-374.
30. Reich S, Wichmann M, Nkenke E, Proeschel P. Clinical fit of all-ceramic three-unit fixed partial dentures, generated with three different CAD/CAM systems. Eur J Oral Sci 2005;113:174-179.
31. Ortorp A, Jemt T, Back T, Jalevik T. Comparisons of precision of fit between cast and CMC-milled titanium implant frame-works for the edentulous mandible. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:194-200.