Incremental phonological encoding during unscripted sentence production

Frontiers in Psychology

Volumn 3, Issue NOV, 2012, Pages

  Jaeger, T Florian ^a,b   Furth, Katrina ^c   Hilliard, Caitlin ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER   (United States)

^b University of Rochester   (United States)

^c BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d University of Iowa   (United States)

Author keywords

Inhibition; Phonological encoding; Phonological overlap; Sentence production; Unscripted speech

Indexed keywords

EID: 84870860147     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16641078     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00481     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Abrams, L., and Rodriguez, E. L. (2005). Syntactic classinfluencesphonological priming of tip-of-the-tongue resolution. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 12, 1018.
2. Baayen, R. H. (2007). Analyzing Linguistic Data: A Practical Introduction to Statistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Baayen,R. H.,Davidson,D. J.,and Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. J. Mem. Lang. 59, 390-412.
4. Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., and Van Rijn, H. (1995). CELEX Lexical Database Release 2.5. Philadelphia: University of Philadelphia.
5. Barr,D.,Levy,R.,Scheepers,C.,and Tily, H. (2011). Random Effects Structure in Mixed-Effects Models: Keep it Maximal. Glasgow: University of Glasgow. [Unpublished manuscript].
6. Bates, D. M., Maechler, M., and Bolker, B. (2011). lme4: Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using S4 Classes Unpublished R Package Version 0.9975-9911.
7. Bell, A., Jurafsky, D., Fosler-Lussier, E., Girand, C., Gregory, M., and Gildea, D. (2003). Effects of disfluencies, predictability, and utterance position on word form variation in English conversation. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 113, 1001-1024.
8. Bock, J. K. (1986). Syntactic persistence in language production. Cogn. Psychol. 18, 355-387.
9. Bock, J. K. (1987). An effect of the accessibility of word forms on sentence structures. J. Mem. Lang. 26, 119-137.
10. Bock, J. K., and Levelt, W. J. M. (1994). "Language production: grammatical encoding," in Handbook of Psycholinguistics, ed. M. Gernsbacher (San Diego, CA: Academic Press), 945-984.
11. Branigan, H. P., Pickering, M. J., and Tanaka, M. (2008). Contributions of animacy to grammatical function assignment and word order during production. Lingua 118, 172-189.
12. Breslow, N. E., and Clayton, D. G. (1993). Approximate inference in generalized linear mixed models. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 88, 9-25.
13. Bresnan, J., Cueni, A., Nikitina, T., and Baayen, H. (2007). "Predicting the dative alternation," in Cognitive Foundations of Interpretation, eds G. Boume, I. Kraemer, and J. Zwarts (Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Science), 69-94.
14. Carbary, K., and Tanenhaus, M. (2011). "Conceptual pacts, syntactic priming, and referential form," in Proceedings of the CogSci Workshop on the Production of Referring Expressions: Bridging the Gap Between Computational, Empirical and Theoretical Approaches to Reference (PRECogSci 2011), eds K. van Deemter, A. Gatt, R. v. Gompel, and E. Krahmer (Boston: Cognitive Science Society).
15. Clark, H. H., and Fox Tree, J. E. (2002). Using uh and um in spontaneous speaking. Cognition 84, 73-111.
16. Clark, H. H., and Wasow, T. (1998). Repeating words in spontaneous speech. Cogn. Psychol. 37, 201-242.
17. Costa, A., and Caramazza, A. (2002). The production of noun phrases in English and Spanish: implications for the scope of phonological encoding in speech production. J. Mem. Lang. 46, 178-198.
18. Damian, M. F. (2003). Articulatory duration in single-word speech production. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 29, 416-431.
19. Damian,M. F.,and Martin,R. C. (1999). Semantic and phonological codes interact in single word production. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 25, 345-361.
20. Davies, M. (2010). The corpus of contemporary American English as the first reliable monitor corpus of English. Lit. Linguist. Comput. 25, 447.
21. Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreadingactivation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychol. Rev. 93, 283-321.
22. Dell, G. S., Oppenheim, G. M., and Kittredge, A. K. (2008). Saying the right word at the right time: syntagmatic and paradigmatic interference in sentence production. Lang. Cogn. Process. 23, 583-608.
23. Dell,G. S.,and Reich,P.A. (1981). Stages in sentence production: an analysis of speech error data. J. Verb. Learn. Verb. Behav. 20, 611-629.
24. Ferreira, V. S. (1996). Is it better to give than to donate? Syntactic flexibility in language production. J. Mem. Lang. 35, 724-755.
25. Ferreira, V. S., and Dell, G. S. (2000). Effect of ambiguity and lexical availability on syntactic and lexical production. Cogn. Psychol. 40, 296-340.
26. Ferreira, V. S., and Yoshita, H. (2003). Given-new ordering effects on the production of scrambled sentences in Japanese. J. Psycholinguist. Res. 32, 669-692.
27. Fox Tree, J. E., and Clark, H. H. (1997). Pronouncing "The" as "Thee" to signal problems in speaking. Cognition 62, 151-167.
28. Garrett, M. (1980). "Levels of processing in sentence production," in Language Production Vol. 1 (Speech and Talk), ed. B. Butterworth (London: Academic Press), 177-220.
29. Goldrick, M. (2006). Limited interaction in speech production: chronometric, speech error, and neuropsychological evidence. Lang. Cogn. Process. 21, 817-855.
30. Griffin, Z. M. (2003). A reversed word length effect in coordinating the preparation and articulation of words in speaking. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 10, 603-609.
31. Harrell, F. E. (2001). Regression Modeling Strategies: With Applications to Linear Models, Logistic Regression, and Survival Analysis. New York: Springer.
32. Hilliard, C., Furth, K., and Jaeger, T. F. (2011). Phonological encoding in sentence production. Paper presented at the The 33rd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci11), Boston, MA. July, 2011.
33. Jaeger, T. F. (2006). Redundancy and Syntactic Reduction in Spontaneous Speech. Stanford: Stanford University.
34. Jaeger, T. F. (2008). Categorical data analysis: away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. J. Mem. Lang. 59, 434-446.
35. Jaeger, T. F. (2011). "Corpus-based research on language production: information density and reducible subject relatives," in Language from a Cognitive Perspective: Grammar, Usage, and Processing, eds T. Wasow, E. M. Benders, and J. E. Arnold (Stanford: CSLI Publications), 161-197.
36. Jaeger,T. F.,Graff,P.,Croft,W.,and Pontillo, D. (2011). Mixed effect models for genetic and areal dependencies in linguistic typology. Linguist. Typol. 15, 281-319.
37. Jaeger, T. F., and Norcliffe, E. (2009). The cross-linguistic study of sentence production: state of the art and a call for action. Linguist. Lang. Compass 3, 866-887.
38. Jaeger, T. F., and Wasow, T. (2006). "Processing as a source of accessibility effects on variation," in Proceedings of the 31st Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society, eds R. T. Cover and Y. Kim (Ann Arbor: Sheridan Books), 169-180.
39. Jaeger, T. F., Furth, K., and Hilliard, C. (2012). Phonological overlap affects lexical selection during sentence production. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cognit. 38, 1439-1449.
40. Janssen, N., Alario, F.-X., and Caramazza,A. (2008). A word-order constraint on phonological activation. Psychol. Sci. 19, 216-220.
41. Janssen, N., and Caramazza, A. (2009). Grammatical and phonological influences on word order. Psychol. Sci. 20, 1262-1268.
42. Jescheniak, J. D., and Schriefers, H. (2001). Priming effects from phonologically related distractors in picture-word interference. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. A 54, 371-382.
43. Kempen, G., and Harbusch, K. (2004). "A corpus study into word order variation in German subordinate clauses: animacy effects linearization independently of grammatical function assignment," in Multidisciplinary Approaches to Language Production, eds T. Pechmann and C. Habel (Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter), 173-181.
44. Kuperman, V., and Bresnan, J. (2012). The effects of construction probability on word durations during spontaneous incremental sentence production. J. Mem. Lang. 66, 588-611.
45. Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From Intention toArticulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
46. Levelt,W. J. M., and Maassen, B. (1981). "Lexical search and order of mention in sentence production," in Crossing the Boundaries in Linguistics, eds W. Klein and W. Levelt (Dordrecht: Riedel), 221-252.
47. Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., and Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behav. Brain Sci. 22, 1-38.
48. Lindsley, J. R. (1975). Producing simple utterances: how far ahead do we plan? Cogn. Psychol. 7, 1-19.
49. Lindsley, J. R. (1976). Producing simple utterances: details of the planning process. J. Psycholinguist. Res. 5, 331-354.
50. Martin,N.,Weisberg,R.W.,and Saffran, E. M. (1989). Variables influencing the occurrence of naming errors: implications for models of lexical retrieval. J. Mem. Lang. 28, 462-485.
51. Meyer, A. S. (1991). The time course of phonological encoding in language production: phonological encoding inside a syllable. J. Mem. Lang. 30, 69-89.
52. Meyer, A. S., and Schriefers, H. (1991). Phonological facilitation in picture-word interference experiments: effects of stimulus onset asynchrony and types of interfering stimuli. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 17, 1146-1160.
53. Oppermann, F., Jescheniak, J. D., and Schriefers, H. (2010). Phonological advance planning in sentence production. J. Mem. Lang. 63, 526-540.
54. O'Seaghdha, P. G., Dell, G. S., Peterson, R. R., and Juliano, C. (1992). "Models of form-related priming in comprehension and production," in Connectionist Approaches to Natural Language Processing, eds R. G. Reilly and N. E. Sharkey (Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates), 373-408.
55. O'Seaghdha, P. G., and Marin, J. W. (2000). Phonological competition and cooperation in form-related priming: sequential and nonsequential processes in word production. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 26, 57-73.
56. Pérez, E., Santiago, J., Palma, A., and O'Seaghdha,P. G. (2007). Perceptual bias in speech error data collection: insights from Spanish speech errors. J. Psycholinguist. Res. 36, 207-235.
57. Peterson, R. R., Dell, G. S., and O'Seaghdha, P. G. (1989). A connectionist model of form-related priming effects. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 11th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Hillsdale.
58. Peterson, R. R., and Savoy, P. (1998). Lexical selection and phonological encoding during language production: evidence for cascaded processing. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 24, 539-557.
59. Pickering, M. J., and Branigan, H. P. (1998). The representation of verbs: evidence from syntactic priming in language production. J. Mem. Lang. 39, 633-651.
60. Prat-Sala, M., and Branigan, H. P. (2000). Discourse constraints on syntactic processing in language production: a cross-linguistic study in English and Spanish. J. Mem. Lang. 42, 168-182.
61. R Development Core Team. (2011). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Development Core Team. [Unpublished manuscript].
62. Rapp, D. N., and Samuel, A. G. (2002). A reason to rhyme: phonological and semantic influences on lexical access. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 28, 564-571.
63. Schnur, T. T., Costa, A., and Caramazza, A. (2006). Planning at the phonological level during sentence production. J. Psycholinguist. Res. 35, 189-213.
64. Schriefers, H. (1999). Phonological facilitation in the production of twoword utterances. Eur. J. Cogn. Psychol. 11, 17-50.
65. Schriefers, H., Meyer, A. S., and Levelt, W. (1990). Exploring the time course of lexical access in language production: picture-word interference studies. J. Mem. Lang. 29, 86-102.
66. Sevald, C. A., and Dell, G. S. (1994). The sequential cuing effect in speech production. Cognition 53, 91-127.
67. Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. (1979). "Speech errors as evidence for a serialordering mechanism in sentence production," in Sentence Processing: Psycholinguistic Studies Presented to Merrill Garrett, eds W. E. Cooper and E. C. T. Walker (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum), 295-342.
68. Shriberg, E. (1996). Disfluencies in switchboard. Paper presented at the 4th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP96), Philadelphia, PA.
69. Shriberg, E., and Stolcke, A. (1996). Word predictability after hesitations: a corpus-based study. Paper Presented at the 4th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP96), Philadelphia, PA.
70. Smith, M., and Wheeldon, L. (2004). Horizontal information flow in spoken sentence production. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 30, 675-686.
71. Starreveld,P.A. (2000). On the interpretation of onsets of auditory context effects in word production. J. Mem. Lang. 42, 497-525.
72. Stemberger, J. P. (1985). An interactive activation model of language production. Prog. Psychol. Lang. 1, 143-186.
73. Stemberger, J. P. (1990). Wordshape errors in language production. Cognition 35, 123-157.
74. Sullivan, M. P., and Riffel, B. (1999). The nature of phonological encoding during spoken word retrieval. Lang. Cogn. Process. 14, 15-45.
75. Wheeldon, L. (2003). Inhibitory form priming of spoken word production. Lang. Cogn. Process. 18, 1-109.
76. Wheeldon, L., and Lahiri, A. (1997). Prosodic units in speech production. J. Mem. Lang. 37, 356-381.
77. Wickham, H. (2009). ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. New York: Springer.
78. Yang, J. C., and Yang, Y. F. (2008). Horizontal flow of semantic and phonological information in Chinese spoken sentence production. Lang. Speech 51, 267.