Horizontal information flow in spoken sentence production

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 675-686

  Smith, Mark ^a   Wheeldon, Linda ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; PHONETICS; SPEECH; SPEECH ANALYSIS;

HUMANS; PHONETICS; SPEECH; SPEECH PRODUCTION MEASUREMENT; VOCABULARY;

EID: 2442554916     PISSN: 02787393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.30.3.675     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Berg, T. (1987). The case against accommodation: Evidence from German speech error data. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 277-299.
2. Cohen, J. D., Dunbar, K., & McClelland, J. L. (1990). On the control of automatic processes: A parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect. Psychological Review, 97, 332-361.
3. Damian, M. F. (2000). Semantic negative priming in picture categorisation and naming. Cognition, 76, B45-B55.
4. Damian, M. F., & Martin, R. C. (1999). Semantic and phonological codes interact in single word production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 345-361.
5. Damian, M. F., Vigliocco, G., & Levelt, W. J. M. (2001). Effects of semantic context in the naming of pictures and words. Cognition, 81, B77-B86.
6. Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93, 283-291.
7. Dell, G. S. (1988). The retrieval of phonological forms in production: Tests of predictions from a connectionist model. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 124-142.
8. Dell, G. S. (1990). Effects of frequency and vocabulary type on phonological speech errors. Language and Cognitive Processes, 4, 313-349.
9. Dell, G. S., & Reich, P. A. (1981). Stages in sentence production: An analysis of speech error data. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 611-629.
10. Ferreira, F., & Swets, B. (2001). How incremental is language production? Evidence for the production of utterances requiring the computation of arithmetic sums. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 57-84.
11. Fox, E. (1994). Interference and negative priming from ignored distractors: The role of selection difficulty. Perception and Psychophysics, 56, 565-574.
12. Fox, E. (1996). Cross-language priming from ignored words: Evidence for a common representational system in bilinguals. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 353-370.
13. Garrett, M. F. (1980a). Levels of processing in sentence production. In B. Butterworth (Ed.), Language production: Vol. 1. Speech and talk (pp. 177-221). London: Academic Press.
14. Garrett, M. F. (1980b). The limits of accommodation: Arguments for independent processing levels in sentence production. In V.A. Fromkin (Ed.), Errors in linguistic performance: Slips of the tongue, ear, pen and hand (pp. 263-272). New York: Academic Press.
15. Glaser, W. R., & Dunglehoff, F. J. (1984). The time course of picture-word interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 640-654.
16. Golinkoff, R. M., & Rosinski, R. R. (1976). Decoding, semantic processing and reading comprehension skill. Child Development, 47, 252-258.
17. Griffin, Z. M. (2001). Gaze durations during speech reflect word selection and phonological encoding. Cognition, 82, B1-B14.
18. Griffin, Z. M., & Bock, K. (2000). What the eyes say about speaking. Psychological Science, 11, 274-279.
19. Hofland, K., & Johansson, S. (1982). Word frequencies in British and American English. Harlow, United Kingdom: Longman.
20. Jescheniak, J. D., & Schriefers, H. (2001). Priming effects from phonologically related distractors in picture-word interference. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 54A, 371-382.
21. Jescheniak, J. D., Schriefers, H., & Hantsch, A. (2001). Semantic and phonological activation in noun and pronoun production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 1058-1078.
22. Kučera, H., & Francis, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American-English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
23. Levelt, W. J. M. (1992). Accessing words in speech production: Stages, processes and representations. Cognition, 42, 1-22.
24. Levelt, W. J. M., & Maassen, B. (1981). Lexical search and order of mention in sentence production. In W. Klein & W. J. M. Levelt (Eds.), Crossing the boundaries in linguistics (pp. 221-252). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel.
25. Levelt, W. J. M., & Meyer, A. S. (2000). Word for word: Multiple lexical access in speech production. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 12, 433-452.
26. Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1-75.
27. Levelt, W. J. M., Schriefers, H., Vorberg, D., Meyer, A. S., Pechmann, T., & Havinga, J. (1991). The time course of lexical access in speech production: A study of picture naming. Psychological Review, 98, 122-142.
28. Lupker, S. J. (1979). The semantic nature of response competition in the picture-word interference task. Memory and Cognition, 7, 485-495.
29. Martin, R. C., Katz, M., & Freedman, M. (1998). Lexical semantic retention and language production. Brain and Language, 65, 99-101.
30. Meyer, A. S. (1996). Lexical access in phrase and sentence production: Results from picture-word interference experiments. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 477-496.
31. Meyer, A. S., & Dobel, C. (2003). Application of eyetracking in speech production research. In J. Hyona, R. Radach, & H. Deubel (Eds.), The mind's eye: Cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research (pp. 239-251). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
32. Meyer, A. S., & Schriefers, H. (1991). Phonological facilitation in picture-word interference experiments: Effects of stimulus onset asynchrony and types of interfering stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 1146-1160.
33. Meyer, A. S., Sleiderink, A. M., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1998). Viewing and naming objects: Eye movements during noun phrase production. Cognition, 66, B25-B33.
34. Meyer, A. S., & van der Meulen, F. F. (2000). Phonological priming effects on speech onset latencies and viewing times in object naming. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 7, 314-319.
35. O'Seaghdha, P. G., & Marin, J. W. (2000). Phonological competition and cooperation in form-related priming: Sequential and nonsequential processes in word production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human perception and performance. 26, 57-73.
36. Phaf, R. H., Van der Heijden, A. H. C., & Hudson, P. T. W. (1990). SLAM: A connectionist model for attention in visual selection tasks. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 273-341.
37. Rapp, D. N., & Samuel, A. G. (2002). A reason to rhyme: Phonological and semantic influences on lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 564-571.
38. Roelofs, A. (1992). A spreading activation theory of lemma retrieval in speaking. Cognition, 42, 107-142.
39. Rosinski, R. R. (1977). Picture-word interference is semantically based. Child Development, 48, 643-647.
40. Schriefers, H. (1993). Syntactic processes in the production of noun phrases. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 841-850.
41. Schriefers, H., deRuiter, J. P., & Steigerwald, M. (1999). Parallelism in the production of noun phrases: Experiments and reaction time models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 702-720.
42. Schriefers, H., Meyer, A. S., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1990). Exploring the time course of lexical access in production: Picture-word interference studies. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 86-102.
43. Schriefers, H., & Teruel, E. (1999). The production of noun phrases: A cross-linguistic comparison of French and German. In M. Hahn & S. C. Stoness (Eds.), Proceedings of the twenty first annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 637-642). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
44. Schriefers, H., Teruel, E., & Meinshausen, R. M. (1999). Producing simple sentences: Results from picture-word interference experiments. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 1-24
45. Sevald, C. A., & Dell, G. S. (1994). The sequential cuing effect in speech production. Cognition, 53, 91-127.
46. Smith, M. C. (2000). Conceptual structures in language production. In L. Wheeldon (Ed.), Aspects of language production (pp. 331-374). Hove, England: Psychology Press.
47. Smith, M. C., & Wheeldon, L. R. (1999). High level processing scope in spoken sentence production. Cognition, 73, 205-246.
48. Smith, M. C., & Wheeldon, L. R. (2001). Syntactic priming in spoken sentence production: An online study. Cognition, 78, 123-164.
49. Snodgrass, J. G., & Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardised set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 174-215.
50. Starreveld, P. A., & LaHeij, W. (1996). Time-course analysis of semantic and orthographic context effects in picture naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37A, 571-590.
51. Stemberger, J. P. (1985). The lexicon in a model of language production. New York: Garland.
52. Van Turennout, M., Hagoort, P., & Brown, C. (1998, April 24). Brain activity during speaking: From syntax to phonology in 40 milliseconds. Science, 280, 572-574.
53. Wheeldon, L. R. (2003). Inhibitory form priming of spoken word production. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18, 81-109.
54. Wheeldon, L. R., & Lahiri, A. (1997). Prosodic units in speech production. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 356-381.
55. Wheeldon, L. R., Meyer, A. S., & Smith, M. C. (2003). Incremental language production. In L. Nadel (Ed.), The encyclopaedia of cognitive science: Vol. 2 (pp. 760-764). London: Macmillan.
56. Wheeldon, L. R., & Monsell, S. (1992). The locus of repetition priming of spoken word production. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44a, 723-761.
57. Yee, P. L. (1991). Semantic inhibition of ignored words during a figure classification task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43A, 127-153.