Explaining and predicting individually experienced liking of berry fractions by the hTAS2R38 taste receptor genotype

Appetite

Volumn 61, Issue , 2013, Pages 85-96

  Laaksonen, Oskar ^a   Ahola, Johanna ^a   Sandell, Mari ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TURKU   (Finland)

Author keywords

Astringency; Berry fractions; Bitterness; Food choice motives; Health concern; HTAS2R38; Liking; Polyphenol extracts; Sourness

Indexed keywords

RECEPTOR; TAS2R38 RECEPTOR; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASTRINGENCY; BERRY; BITTER TASTE; CHEMICAL COMPOSITION; FEMALE; FRUIT JUICE; GENOTYPE; HOMOZYGOSITY; HUMAN; MALE; QUESTIONNAIRE; TASTE BUD; TASTE PREFERENCE;

ADULT; BEVERAGES; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; CROSS-OVER STUDIES; FEMALE; FOOD PREFERENCES; FRUIT; GENOTYPE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POLYPHENOLS; QUESTIONNAIRES; RECEPTORS, G-PROTEIN-COUPLED; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; TASTE; TASTE BUDS; TASTE PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84870859984     PISSN: 01956663     EISSN: 10958304     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2012.10.023     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Ares G., Barreiro C., Deliza R., Gambaro A. Alternatives to reduce the bitterness, astringency and characteristic flavour of antioxidant extracts. Food Research International 2009, 42:871-878.
2. Bajec M.R., Pickering G.J. Astringency. Mechanisms and perception. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 2008, 48:858-875.
3. Bartoshuk L.M., Duffy V.B., Fast K., Green B.G., Prutkin J., Snyder D.J. Labeled scales (e.g., category, Likert, VAS) and invalid across-group comparisons. What we have learned from genetic variation in taste. Food Quality and Preference 2003, 14:125-138.
4. Boots A.W., Haenen G.R.M.M., Bast A. Health effects of quercetin. From antioxidant to nutraceutical. European Journal of Pharmacology 2008, 585:325-337.
5. Brock A., Hofmann T. Identification of the key astringent compounds in spinach (Spinacia oleracea) by means of the taste dilution analysis. Chemosensory Perception 2008, 1:268-281.
6. Bufe B., Breslin P.A.S., Kuhn C., Reed D., Tharp C., Slack J., Kim U.-K., Drayna D., Meyerhof W. The molecular basis of individual differences in phenylthiocarbamide and propylthiouracil bitterness perception. Current Biology 2005, 15:322-327.
7. Dinehart M.E., Hayes J.E., Bartoshuk L.M., Lanier S.L., Duffy V.B. Bitter taste markers explain variability in vegetable sweetness, bitterness, and intake. Physiology & Behavior 2006, 87:304-313.
8. Dinnella C., Recchia A., Tuorila H., Monteleone E. Individual astringency responsiveness affects the acceptance of phenol-rich foods. Appetite 2011, 56:633-642.
9. Drewnovski A., Gomes-Carneros C. Bitter taste, phytonutrients, and the consumer. A review. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2000, 72:1424-1435.
10. Drewnovski A., Henderson S.A., Barratt-Fornell A. Genetic taste markers and food preferences. Drug Metabolism and Disposition 2001, 29:535-538.
11. Duffy V.B., Hayes J.E., Davidson A.C., Kidd J.R., Kidd K.K., Bartoshuk L.M. Vegetable intake in college-aged adults is explained by oral sensory phenotypes and TAS2R38 genotype. Chemosensory Perception 2010, 3:137-148.
12. Fox A.L. The relationship between chemical constitution and taste. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 1932, 18:115-120.
13. Galvano F., La Fauci L., Lazzarino G., Fogliano V., Ritieni A., Ciappelano S., Battistini N.C., Tavazzi B., Galvano G. Cyanidins. Metabolism and biological properties. Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry 2004, 15:2-11.
14. Garcia-Bailo B., Toguri C., Eny K.M., El-Sohemy A. Genetic variation in taste and its influence on food selection. Journal of Integrative Biology 2009, 13:69-80.
15. Hayes J.E., Bartoshuk L.M., Kidd J.R., Duffy V.R. Supertasting and PROP bitterness depends on more than the TAS2R38 gene. Chemical Senses 2008, 33:255-265.
16. Hayes J.E., Keast R.S.J. Two decades of supertasting. Where do we stand?. Physiology & Behavior 2011, 104:1072-1074.
17. Hayes J.E., Wallace M.R., Knopik V.S., Herbstman D.M., Bartokshuk L.M., Duffy V.B. Allelic variation in TAS2R bitter receptor genes associates with variation in sensations from and ingestive behaviors towards common bitter beverages in adults. Chemical Senses 2011, 36:311-319.
18. Hufnagel J.C., Hofmann T. Orosensory-directed identification of astringent mouthfeel and bitter-tasting compounds in red wine. Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry 2008, 56:1376-1386.
19. Jaeger S.R., Axten L.G., Wohlers M.W., Sun-Waterhouse D. Polyphenol-rich beverages. Insights from sensory and consumer science. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 2009, 89:2356-2363.
20. Kähkönen P., Tuorila H., Rita H. How information enhances acceptability of a low-fat spread. Food Quality & Preference 1996, 7:87-94.
21. Kallio H., Nieminen R., Tuomasjukka S., Hakala M. Cutin composition of five Finnish berries. Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry 2006, 54:457-462.
22. Keast R.S.J., Breslin P.A.S. An overview of binary taste-taste interactions. Food Quality and Preference 2003, 14:111-124.
23. Kildegaard H., Tønning E., Thybo A.K. Preference, liking and wanting for beverages in children aged 9-14years. Role of sourness perception, chemical composition and background variables. Food Quality and Preference 2011, 22:620-627.
24. Kim U.-K., Breslin P., Reed D., Drayna D. Genetics of human taste perception. Journal of Dental Research 2004, 83:448-453.
25. Kim U.-K., Drayna D. Genetics of individual differences in bitter taste perception. Lessons from the PTC gene. Clinical Genetics 2004, 67:275-280.
26. Kim U.-K., Jorgenson E., Coon H., Leppert M., Risch N., Drayna D. Positional cloning of the human quantitative trait locus underlying taste sensitivity to phenylthiocarbamide. Science 2003, 299:1221-1225.
27. Kobue-Lekalake R.I., Taylor J.R.N., de Kock H.N. Influence of PROP taster status on the consumer acceptability of food made from tannin sorghums. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 2009, 89:1809-1814.
28. Kühn B.F., Thybo A.K. The influence of sensory and physiochemical quality on Danish children's preferences for apples. Food Quality and Preference 2001, 12:543-550.
29. Laaksonen O., Sandell M., Järvinen R., Kallio H. Orosensory contributing compounds in crowberry (Empetrum nigrum) press-byproducts. Food Chemistry 2011, 124:1514-1524.
30. Laaksonen O., Sandell M., Kallio H. Chemical factors contributing to orosensory profiles of bilberry (Vaccinium myrtillus) fractions. European Food Research and Technology 2010, 231:271-285.
31. Laaksonen O., Sandell M., Nordlund E., Heiniö R.-J., Malinen H.-M., Jaakkola M., Kallio H. The effect of enzymatic treatment on blackcurrant (Ribes nigrum) juice flavour and its stability. Food Chemistry 2012, 130:31-41.
32. Lanier S.A., Hayes J.E., Duffy V.B. Sweet and bitter taste of alcoholic beverages mediate alcohol intake in of-age undergraduates. Physiology & Behavior 2005, 83:821-831.
33. Lawless H.T. Evidence for neural inhibition in bittersweet taste mixtures. Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology 1979, 93:538-547.
34. Lee C.B., Lawless H.T. Time-course of astringent sensations. Chemical Senses 1991, 16:225-238.
35. Lesschaeve I., Noble A.C. Polyphenols. Factors influencing their sensory properties and their effects on food and beverage preferences. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2005, 81(Suppl.):330S-335S.
36. Ley J.P. Masking bitter taste by molecules. Chemosensory Perception 2008, 1:58-77.
37. Mennella J., Beauchamp G. Understanding the origin of flavor preferences. Chemical Senses 2005, 30:242-243.
38. Mennella J., Pepino Y., Reed D. Genetic and environmental determinants of bitter perception and sweet preferences. Pediatrics 2005, 115:216-222.
39. National Institute for health and welfare of Finland (2010). Fineli® Finnish Food Composition Data Base.
40. Pangborn R.M. Taste interrelationships. Journal of Food Science 1960, 25:245-256.
41. Pickering G.J., Robert G. Perception of mouthfeel sensations elicited by red wine is associated with sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP). Journal of Sensory Studies 2006, 21:249-265.
42. Pickering G.J., Simunkova K., DiBattista D. Intensity of taste and astringency sensations elicited by red wines is associated with sensitivity to PROP (6-n-propylthiouracil). Food Quality & Preference 2004, 15:147-154.
43. Pohjanheimo T., Paasovaara R., Luomala H., Sandell M. Food choice motives and bread liking of consumers embracing hedonistic and traditional values. Appetite 2010, 54:170-180.
44. Pohjanheimo T., Sandell M. Explaining the liking for drinking yoghurt. The role of sensory quality, food choice motives, health concern and product information. International Dairy Journal 2009, 19:459-466.
45. Pohjanheimo T., Sandell M. Headspace volatiles contributing to flavor and consumer liking of wellness beverages. Food Chemistry 2009, 115:843-851.
46. Sandell M., Breslin P. Variability in a taste-receptor gene determines whether we taste toxins in food. Current Biology 2006, 16:792-794.
47. Sandell M., Breslin P.A.S. hTAS2R38 receptor genotypes predict the bitterness of thiourea compounds in solution and in selected vegetables. Expression of multidisciplinary flavour science 2010, 13-15. Institut fur Chemie und Biologische Chemie. Blank, Wüst, Yeretzian (Eds.).
48. Sandell M., Laaksonen O., Järvinen R., Rostiala N., Pohjanheimo T., Tiitinen K., Kallio H. Orosensory profiles and chemical composition of black currant (Ribes nigrum) juice and fractions of press residue. Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry 2009, 57:3718-3728.
49. Sandell M., Laaksonen O., Lunden S. Flavour properties and chemistry of berries. Berries. Properties, consumption and nutrition (eBook) 2012, Nova Science Publishers, Inc., (pp. 105-126). C. Tuberoso (Ed.).
50. Scharbert S., Holzmann N., Hofmann T. Identification of astringent taste compounds in black tea infusions by combining instrumental analysis and human bioresponse. Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry 2004, 52:2498-2508.
51. Schwarz B., Hofmann T. Sensory-guided decomposition of red currant juice (Ribes rubrum) and structure determination of key astringent compounds. Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry 2007, 55:1394-1404.
52. Steptoe A., Pollard T.M., Wardle J. Development of a measure of the motives underlying the selection of food. The food choice questionnaire. Appetite 1995, 25:267-284.
53. Tang X., Kälviäinen N., Tuorila H. Sensory and hedonic characteristics of juice of sea buckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides L.) origins and hybrids. Lebensmittel-Wissenschaft Technologie 2001, 34:102-110.
54. Tepper B. Nutritional implications of genetic taste variation. The role of PROP sensitivity and other taste phenotypes. Annual Review of Nutrition 2008, 28:367-388.
55. Tepper B.J., White E.A., Koelliker Y., Lanzara C., d'Adamo P., Gasparini P. Genetic variation in taste sensitivity to 6-n-propylthiouracil and its relationship to taste perception and food selection. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 2009, 1170:126-139.
56. Tharp, C., Tharp, A., Alarcon, S., Reed, D., & Breslin, P. A. S (2005). PTC non-tasters find fruit of Antidesma bunius bitter, while PTC tasters find it sweet. In Proceeding Book of AChemS XXVII (pp. 28). The Association for Chemoreception Sciences.
57. Thybo A.K., Kühn B.F., Martens H. Explaining Danish children's preferences for apples using instrumental, sensory and demographic/behavioural data. Food Quality and Preference 2004, 15:53-63.
58. Tiitinen K.M., Hakala M.A., Kallio H.P. Quality components of sea buckthorn (Hippophaë rhamnoides) varieties. Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry 2005, 53:1692-1699.
59. Verbeke W. Functional foods. Consumer willingness to compromise on taste for health?. Food Quality & Preference 2006, 17:126-131.