Individual astringency responsiveness affects the acceptance of phenol-rich foods

Appetite

Volumn 56, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 633-642

  Dinnella, Caterina ^a   Recchia, Annamaria ^a   Tuorila, Hely ^b   Monteleone, Erminio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORENCE   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

Food choice; Food familiarity; Food preference; Salivary characteristics; Sensory evaluation

Indexed keywords

ASTRINGENT AGENT; PHENOL; SUGAR; TANNIN;

ADULT; APPLE JUICE; ARTICLE; ASTRINGENCY; BEVERAGE; CACAO; CARROT; COFFEE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOOD; GRAPE; GRAPE JUICE; HUMAN; MALE; MASTICATION; MILK; SALIVARY GLAND EXAMINATION; SOMATOSENSORY SYSTEM; TASTE; TEA;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BEVERAGES; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; CONSUMER SATISFACTION; DAUCUS CAROTA; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; FOOD PREFERENCES; HUMANS; MALE; MALUS; PHENOLS; QUESTIONNAIRES; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SALIVA; TANNINS; TASTE; VITIS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79952986509     PISSN: 01956663     EISSN: 10958304     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2011.02.017     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Aldridge V., Dovey T.M., Halford J.C.G. The role of familiarity in dietary development. Development 2009, 29:32-44.
2. Arts I.C.W., Hollman P.C.H. Polyphenols and disease risk in epidemiological studies. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2005, 81(1):S317-325.
3. Ayaz F.A., Demir O., Torun H., Kolcuoglu Y., Colak A. Characterization of polyphenoloxidase (PPO) and total phenolic contents in medlar (Mespilus germanica L.) fruit during ripening and over ripening. Food Chemistry 2008, 106:291-298.
4. Bäckström A., Pirttilä-Backman A.M., Tuorila H. Willingness to try new foods as predicted by social representations and attitude and trait scales. Appetite 2004, 43:75-83.
5. Bai J., Wu P., Manthey J., Goodner K., Baldwin E. Effect of harvest maturity on quality of fresh-cut pear salad. Postharvest Biology and Technology 2009, 51:250-256.
6. Belitz H.D., Grosch W., Schieberle P. Fruit and fruit products. Food chemistry 2003, 806-960. Springer, Berlin.
7. Billy L., Mehinagic E., Royer G. Relationship between texture and pectin composition of two apple cultivars during storage. Postharvest Biology and Technology 2008, 47(3):315-324.
8. Bugaud C., Alter P., Daribo M.O., Brillouet J.M. Comparison of the physico-chemical characteristics of a new triploid banana hybrid, FLHORBAN 920, and the Cavendish variety. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 2009, 89:407-413.
9. Cascales A.I., Costell E., Romojaro F. Effects of the degree of maturity on the chemical composition, physical characteristics and sensory attributes of peach (Prunus persica) cv. Caterin. Food Science and Technology International 2005, 11(5):345-352.
10. Condelli N., Dinnella C., Cerone A., Monteleone E., Bertuccioli M. Prediction of perceived astringency induced by phenolic compounds. II. Criteria for panel selection and preliminary application on wine sample. Food Quality and Preference 2006, 17:96-107.
11. Cruz A., Green B.G. Thermal stimulation of taste. Nature 2000, 403:889-892.
12. de Wijk R.A., Prinz J.F. Mechanisms underlying the role of friction in oral texture. Journal of Texture Studies 2006, 37:413-427.
13. Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee Report of the dietary guidelines advisory committee on the dietary guidelines for Americans: 2005 2005, US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC.
14. Dinehart M.E., Hayes J.E., Bartoshuk L.M., Lanier S.L., Duffy V.B. Bitter taste markers explain variability in vegetable sweetness, bitterness, and intake. Physiology & Behavior 2006, 87:304-313.
15. Dinnella C., Recchia A., Fia G., Bertuccioli M., Monteleone E. Saliva characteristics and individual sensitivity to phenolic astringent stimuli. Chemical Senses 2009, 34(4):295-304.
16. Dinnella C., Recchia A., Vincenzi S., Tuorila H., Monteleone E. Temporary modification of salivary protein profile and idividual responses to repeated phenolic astringent stimuli. Chemical Senses 2010, 35:75-85.
17. Drewnowski A., Gomez-Carneros C. Bitter taste, phytonutrients, and the consumer. A review. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2000, 72:1424-1435.
18. Duffy V.B. Variation in oral sensation. Implications for diet and health. Current Opinion in Gastroenterology 2007, 23:171-177.
19. Duffy V.B., Bartoshuk L.M. Food acceptance and genetic variation in taste. Journal of American Dietetic Association 2000, 100(6):647-655.
20. Faller A.L.K., Fioalho E. The antioxidant capacity and polyphenol content of organic and conventional retail vegetables after domestic cooking. Food Research International 2009, 42:210-215.
21. Fischer U., Boulton R.B., Noble A. Physiological factors contributing to the variability of sensory assessments. Relationship between salivary flow rate and temporal perception of gustatory stimuli. Food Quality and Preference 1994, 5:55-64.
22. Green B.G., George P. Thermal taste predicts higher responsiveness to chemical taste flavour. Chemical Senses 2004, 29:617-628.
23. Green B.G., Shaffer G.S., Gilmore M.M. A semantically-labeled magnitude scale of oral sensation with apparent ratio properties. Chemical Senses 1993, 18:683-702.
24. Halliwell B., Rafter J., Jenner A. Health promotion by flavonoids, tocopherols, tocotrienols, and other phenols. Direct or indirect effects? Antioxidant or not?. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2005, 81(1):268S-276S.
25. Horne J., Hayes J., Lawless H.T. Turbidity as a measure of salivary proteins reactions with astringent substances. Chemical Senses 2002, 27:653-659.
26. INRAN Linee guida per una sana alimentazione 2003, Istituto Nazionale di Ricerca per gli Alimenti e la Nutrizione, Roma.
27. Jaeger S.E., Axten L.G., Wohlers M.W. Sun-Waterhouse. Plyphenol-rich beverages. Insights from sensory and consumer science. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 2009, 89:2356-2363.
28. Kallithraka S., Bakker J., Clifford M.N., Vallis L. Correlations between saliva protein composition and some T-I parameters of astringency. Food Quality and Preference 2001, 12:145-152.
29. Kaminski L.C., Henderson S.A., Drewnowski A. Young women's food preferences and taste responsiveness to 6-n-propylthiouracil (PRP). Physiology & Behavior 2000, 68:691-697.
30. Keller K.L., Steinman L., Nurse R.J., Tepper B.J. Gentic taste sensitivity to 6-n-propyltiouracil influences food preference and reported intake in preschool children. Appetite 2002, 38:3-12.
31. Keskitalo K., Tuorila H., Spector T.D., Cherkas L.F., Knaapila A., Silventoinen K., et al. Same genetic components underlie different measures of sweet taste preference. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2007, 86:1663-1669.
32. Koponen J.M., Happonen A.M., Auriola S., Kontkanen H., Buchert J., Poutanen K.S., et al. Characterization and fate of black currant and bilberry flavonols in enzyme-aided processing. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 2008, 56:3136-3144.
33. Kuti J.O., Konuru H.B. Antioxidant capacity and phenolic content in leaf extracts of tree spinach (Cnidoscolus spp.). Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 2004, 52:117-121.
34. Lee C.B., Lawless H.T. Time-course of astringent materials. Chemical Senses 1991, 16:225-238.
35. Lesschaeve I., Noble A.C. Polyphenols. Factors influencing their sensory properties and their effects on food and beverage preference. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2005, 81(1):330-335.
36. Lockshin L., Jarvis W., d'Hauteville F., Perrouty J. Using simulations from discrete choice experiments to measure consumer sensitivity to brand, region, price and awards in wine choice. Food Quality and Preference 2006, 17:166-178.
37. Looy H., Weingarten H.P. Effects of metabolic state on sweet taste reactivity in humans depend on underlying hedonic response profile. Chemical Senses 1991, 16:123-130.
38. Manganaris G.A., Vasilakakis M., Mignani I. Cell Wall Physicochemical properties as indicators of peach quality during fruit ripening after cold storage. Food Science and Technology International 2008, 14(4):385-391.
39. Mattes R.D. Orosensory considerations. Obesity 2006, 14S:164-167.
40. Mela D.J. Food choice and intake. The human factor. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 1999, 58:513-521. Cambridge University Press.
41. Monteleone E., Dinnella C. Italian meals. Meals in science and practice. Interdisciplinary research and business applications 2009, 359-375. Woodhead Publishing Limited, Cambridge. H.L. Meiselman (Ed.).
42. Monteleone E., Frewer L., Wakeling I., Mela D.J. Individual differences in starchy food consumption. The application of preference mapping. Food Quality and Preference 1998, 9(4):211-219.
43. Mueller-Harvey I. Unravelling the conundrum of tannins in animal nutrition and health. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 2006, 86(13):2010-2037.
44. Narain C., Paterson A., Piggott J.R., Dhawan M., Reid E. Whitening and sweetening influences on filter coffee preference. British Food Journal 2004, 106(6):465-478.
45. Nayak A., Carpenter G.H. A physiological model for tea induced astringency. Physiology & Behavior 2008, 95:290-294.
46. Ninfali P., Bacchiocca M. Polyphenols and antioxidant capacity of vegetables under fresh and frozen conditions. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 2003, 51:2222-2226.
47. Oszmianski J., Woidilo A., Kolniak J. Effect of enzymatic mash treatment and storage on phenolic composition, antioxidant activity, and turbidity of cloudy apple juice. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 2009, 57:7078-7085.
48. Pangborn R.M. Individual variation in affective responses to taste stimuli. Psychonomic Science 1970, 21:125-126.
49. Pangborn R.M. Individuality in responses to sensory stimuli. Criteria of food acceptance: How man chooses what he eats 1981, 177-219. Forster Verlag, Zurich. J. Solms, R.L. Hall (Eds.).
50. Peryam D.R., Pilgrim P.J. Hedonic scale method for measuring food preferences. Food Technology 1957, 11:9-14.
51. Reed D.R., Nanthakumar E., North M., Bell C., Bartoshuk L.M. Localization of a gene for bitter taste perception to human chromosome 5p15. American Journal of Human Genetics 1999, 64:1478-1480.
52. Reed D.R., Tanaka T., McDaniel A.H. Diverse tastes. Genetics of sweet and bitter perception. Physiology & Behavior 2006, 88:215-226.
53. Robichaud J.L., Noble A.C. Astringency and bitterness of selected phenolics in wine. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 1990, 53:343-353.
54. Shimada T. Salivary proteins as a defense against dietary tannins. Journal of Chemical Ecology 2006, 32(6):1149-1163.
55. Vinson J.A., Proch J., Zubik L. Phenol antioxidant quantity and quality in foods. Cocoa, dark chocolate, and milk chocolate rapid communications. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 1999, 47(12):4821-4824.
56. Waterhouse A.L. Wine phenolics. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 2002, 957:21-36.
57. Xu B., Chang S.C.K. Isoflavones flavan-3-ols, phenolic acids, total phenolic profiles, and antioxidant capacities of soy milk as affected by ultrahigh-temperature and traditional processing methods. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 2009, 57:4706-4717.
58. Yan Y., Hu J., Yao P. Effects of casein, ovalbumin, and dextran on the astringency of tea polyphenols determined by quartz crystal microbalance with dissipation. Langmuir 2009, 25(1):397-402.
59. Yeomans M.R., Prescott J., Gould N.J. Acquired hedonic and sensory characteristics of odours. Influence of sweet liker and propylthiouracil taster status. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2009, 62(8):1648-1664.